1.
Clinical significance of nutritional risk screening for older adult patients with COVID-19.
Liu, G, Zhang, S, Mao, Z, Wang, W, Hu, H
European journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;74(6):876-883
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Literature shows that nutritional deficiency is common and serious in the elderly, with studies reporting malnourishment in 35–65% of elderly hospitalized patients and 25–60% of institutionalized older adults. The aim of this study to explore the relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcome in patients older than 65 years with COVID-19. A secondary outcome was to investigate the ability of the (nutritional risk screening) NRS tools to predict worse-than-average clinical outcomes. The study is a retrospective cohort analysis which enrolled 141 patients (females n = 73). Patients were classified into either a normal group or a nutritional risk group according to the criterion of each NRS tool. Results indicate that patients with COVID-19 who classified as having a nutritional risk had significantly poorer clinical outcomes than those classified as normal following assessments by Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Mini Nutrition Assessment Shortcut (MNA-sf), and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI). Authors conclude that the NRS 2002, MNAsf, and NRI are useful and practical tools for identifying older adult patients with COVID-19 who are at nutritional risk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional risks among older patients with COVID-19 and their associated clinical outcomes using four nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools: Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutrition Assessment Shortcut (MNA-sf), and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with COVID-19 older than 65 years who were treated in our hospital from January 28, 2020 to March 5, 2020, and explored the relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 141 patients with COVID-19 (46 common COVID-19, 73 severe COVID-19, and 22 extremely severe COVID-19) were enrolled in the study. NRS 2002 identified 85.8% of patients as having risk, with being identified 41.1% by MUST, 77.3% by MNA-sf, and 71.6% by NRI. The agreement strength was moderate between NRS 2002 and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MUST and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MNA-sf and NRI, poor between NRS 2002 and MUST (P < 0.01). After adjustment for confounding factors in multivariate regression analysis, patients in the risk group had significantly longer LOS, higher hospital expenses (except MNA-sf), poor appetite, heavier disease severity, and more weight change(kg) than normal patients by using NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI are useful and practical tools with respect to screening for patients with COVID-19 who are at nutritional risk, as well as in need of additional nutritional intervention.
2.
People with Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Were More Likely Depressed and Had Lower Health-Related Quality of Life: The Potential Benefit of Health Literacy.
Nguyen, HC, Nguyen, MH, Do, BN, Tran, CQ, Nguyen, TTP, Pham, KM, Pham, LV, Tran, KV, Duong, TT, Tran, TV, et al
Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
COVID-19 has been spreading to a growing number of countries and is recognized as a global health concern that has set global public health institutions on high alert. Improving health literacy is a strategic approach to preventing and controlling diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID-19-S) with depression and health related quality of life (HRQoL), and the effect modification of health literacy on the associations among people who visited outpatient departments. This is a cross-sectional study which recruited participants (aged between 18 and 85 years) from outpatient departments of six hospitals and three health centers across Vietnam. Results indicate that participants with S-COVID-19-S had a higher likelihood of depression and lower HRQoL. Whereas, those participants having S-COVID-19-S and with higher health literacy had a low occurrence of depression and better HRQoL compared to those people with lower health literacy. Authors conclude that health literacy can help to protect the mental health and HRQoL of people with S-COVID-19-S during the pandemic.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic affects people's health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), especially in those who have suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID-19-S). We examined the effect of modifications of health literacy (HL) on depression and HRQoL. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 14 February to 2 March 2020. 3947 participants were recruited from outpatient departments of nine hospitals and health centers across Vietnam. The interviews were conducted using printed questionnaires including participants' characteristics, clinical parameters, health behaviors, HL, depression, and HRQoL. People with S-COVID-19-S had a higher depression likelihood (OR, 2.88; p < 0.001), lower HRQoL-score (B, -7.92; p < 0.001). In comparison to people without S-COVID-19-S and low HL, those with S-COVID-19-S and low HL had 9.70 times higher depression likelihood (p < 0.001), 20.62 lower HRQoL-score (p < 0.001), for the people without S-COVID-19-S, 1 score increment of HL resulted in 5% lower depression likelihood (p < 0.001) and 0.45 higher HRQoL-score (p < 0.001), while for those people with S-COVID-19-S, 1 score increment of HL resulted in a 4% lower depression likelihood (p = 0.004) and 0.43 higher HRQoL-score (p < 0.001). People with S-COVID-19-S had a higher depression likelihood and lower HRQoL than those without. HL shows a protective effect on depression and HRQoL during the epidemic.