0
selected
-
1.
The Efficacy of Self-Management Strategies for Females with Endometriosis: a Systematic Review.
Mardon, AK, Leake, HB, Hayles, C, Henry, ML, Neumann, PB, Moseley, GL, Chalmers, KJ
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.). 2023;30(2):390-407
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Endometriosis is a gynaecological condition with symptoms of pelvic pain, fatigue, and stress. Decreased quality of life, impaired fertility and hinderances to carry out day to day tasks are all associated with endometriosis. Treatment options involve medications and surgery; however, both are associated with poorer outcomes than the initial disease itself. Self-management strategies that the individual can perform themselves, such as lifestyle changes, meditation, and rest have all been used to improve the quality of life of individuals with endometriosis, however their effectiveness has not been determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for the management of endometriosis. The study showed that many self-management strategies were no more effective than placebo or hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis. It was concluded that many self-management strategies were no more effective than hormonal treatment at reducing endometriosis symptoms and the studies that did show a benefit were insufficient to base recommendations on due to poor design. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that currently the research on self-management strategies of endometriosis is poor and whilst some may be of benefit to individuals who cannot or do not want to take hormone therapy, more research is warranted.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
It is not possible to generalise the findings of this systematic review for the self-management of endometriosis due to the poor quality of evidence. Further studies of higher quality are needed.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition where endometrial-like tissue is found outside of the uterus. Diagnosis of endometriosis is made in around 6-10% of females of reproductive age. Endometriosis can adversely affect fertility, psychological well being and quality of life (QoL). Conventional interventions can have side effects and limited effectiveness. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the efficacy of self-management interventions for pain-related symptoms and QoL.
Methods
Fifteen experimental studies were included in this SR. Ten evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) medication, and one evaluated exercise. Outcome measures were self-reported for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, overall pain, non-menstrual pelvic pain, use of medications and QoL.
Results
- Most dietary supplements were no more effective than placebo or frequently recommended medical interventions, at reducing pain-related outcomes.
- Melatonin (one RCT n=30) performed better than placebo for managing dysmenorrhoea and overall pain but not for non-menstrual pelvic pain. PEA-transploydatin (one RCT n=20) performed better than placebo for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain but not better than medical intervention.
- Resveratrol (one RCT n=22 & one intervention study n=12) plus the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) was more effective than the OCP alone for managing dysmenorrhoea.
- In one observational study, 75% of participants (n=295) reported a reduction in ‘high’ intensity pain scores following a 12-month gluten-free diet (p- value =<0.005). Similarly, a full dietary modification (one non randomised controlled trial , n=30) found less participants reporting pain at ‘high intensity’ (18%) compared to linseed and calcium oil supplements (41%) and placebo (62%).
- A metal trace element supplement was more effective than placebo for managing overall pain (one RCT p- value<0.001).
- Naproxen (one cross over trial, n=11) performed better than placebo at managing dysmenorrhoea (83% vs 41%, p- value 0.008).
- Hatha yoga (one RCT n=12) was found to be effective at reducing overall pain and improving QoL compared to no yoga (p-value <0.05).
Conclusion
Due to limited, low-quality evidence, high risk of bias and high levels of heterogeneity between studies, it was not possible to generalise the findings of the studies included in this systematic review. Further research of high-quality is needed in order to make self-management recommendations for females with endometriosis.
Notes: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Evidence-based self-management interventions are considered critical for the management of endometriosis. However, the quality of evidence in this SR was considered of poor quality. Further high-quality research is needed in order to be able to make recommendations. Strategies that showed potential benefits included:
- Dietary modifications and a gluten-free diet may be effective for reducing the intensity of pain associated with endometriosis.
- Hatha yoga may be effective at reducing overall pain and supporting psychological wellbeing and QoL.
Considerations for future research:
High quality studies are needed as well as a ‘gold standard’ definition for self-management criteria. Understanding potential barriers to self-management interventions may also be beneficial.
Abstract
Self-management is critical for the care of endometriosis. Females with endometriosis frequently use self-management strategies to manage associated symptoms; however, the efficacy of such strategies is unknown. The aim of this review was to systematically appraise the evidence concerning efficacy of self-management strategies for endometriosis symptoms. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to March 2021. We included peer-reviewed experimental studies published in English evaluating the efficacy of self-management strategies in human females laparoscopically diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies underwent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal (randomised studies: Risk of Bias 2 tool; non-randomised studies: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool). Of the fifteen studies included, 10 evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter medication, and one evaluated exercise. Most studies had a high-critical risk of bias. Many self-management strategies were not more effective at reducing endometriosis symptoms compared to placebo or hormonal therapies. Where studies suggest efficacy for self-management strategies, no recommendations can be made due to the poor quality and heterogeneity of evidence. High-quality empirical evidence is required to investigate the efficacy of self-management strategies for females with endometriosis.
-
2.
Effect of Chamomile on the Complications of Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Maleki, M, Mardani, A, Manouchehri, M, Ashghali Farahani, M, Vaismoradi, M, Glarcher, M
Integrative cancer therapies. 2023;22:15347354231164600
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a wide range of complications such as mucositis, nausea/vomiting and dermatitis as well as implication for mental health, such as anxiety and depression, which can reduce quality of life (QOL) of patients. Chamomile is a commonly used medicinal herbal that is used in various forms orally and topically. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of chamomile, in its various forms of administration, for complications of cancer (any type) and its treatments. 18 controlled intervention studies including 1099 patients were included in the review. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a meta-analysis was not possible. Benefits were reported for locally applied forms of chamomile for prevention of mucositis (7 of 8 studies), topical application for prevention of dermatitis or phlebitis (4/5), aromatherapy massage for anxiety (2) and QOL (2), tea for depression but not anxiety (1). No effect was seen of syrup for QOL (1). No side effects were reported in the included studies. The authors conclude that chamomile is a safe method to help mitigate the suffering from cancer complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Oral use of chamomile infusion may be helpful for people receiving treatment for cancer.
- Studies of this intervention report no safety concerns.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review examined the use of chamomile in the support of people receiving treatment for cancer. Studies of a variety of chamomile preparations were considered.
Methods
- The authors retrieved 2240 studies from 5 on-line databases, from which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
- Fifteen of these studies were randomised control trials (RCT), three were non-randomised studies. German (Matricaria recutita) and Roman (Chamaemelum nobile) chamomile varieties were included. Studies using blends with other herbs were excluded.
- A narrative review was produced due to heterogeneous patient groups, preparations and trial protocols.
Results
- 1099 patients were included in the analysis, 57% female.
- Risk of bias assessment of 15 RCTs identified 2 RCTs with high risk of bias in blinding or in reporting outcome data.
- Studies in several cancer types were included, four in head and neck cancer (HNC), four in leukaemia, three in breast cancer, one in digestive system cancers, remaining in mixed cancer types.
- Eight studies reported the impact on oral mucositis of chamomile infusions used as mouthwash, or ice chips, or applied as an oral gel. Patients were receiving chemotherapy orstem cell transplantation, with interventions for up to 21 days after chemotherapy. Seven studies reported reduced severity and/or duration of mucositis and associated pain. One study of 14 days’ use after 5-fluorouracil treatment for colorectal cancer showed no impact on oral mucositis.
- One of three studies of psychological impact of cancer treatment used chamomile tea and reported no impact on anxiety but decreased depression. In comparison, two studies of weekly aromatherapy massage using chamomile oil reported reduced anxiety.
- One RCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reported increased neutrophil count with 125mg chamomile in syrup versus placebo (p=0.019, 955 CI 15.076-171.324)
- One RCT in breast cancer randomised 45 women receiving usual antiemetics to additional chamomile capsules (500mg) or ginger (500mg) capsules, twice daily for 5 days before and after chemotherapy, or control group of no additional botanicals. Both botanical interventions reduced frequency of vomiting compared with the control group. Frequency of nausea was also reduced by ginger but not by chamomile.
- Five studies evaluated external treatments of chamomile on skin complications of radiotherapy. Reduction in radiation dermatitis in HNC patients with compresses soaked in chamomile infusion was reported.
- No side effects of using chamomile preparations were reported by the studies included in the systematic review.
Conclusion
Chamomile has been studied in a variety of preparations for people receiving treatment for cancer. Several RCTs reported significant amelioration of common side effects of cancer treatments, with reduced severity and/or duration of oral mucositis and associated pain.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chamomile infusion used in the mouth, as mouthwash or ice chips, may be useful for oral mucositis, a common side effect of cancer treatment
- Chamomile infusion may also be considered for mental wellbeing
- Several protocols for using chamomile preparations are described in the review and practitioners may refer to the individual studies cited
- This use of chamomile in the described applications appears to be safe
- (Reviewer’s note: allergy to ragwort would be a contraindication for use of chamomile preparations)
Considerations for future research:
- More detailed comparisons of chamomile preparations would be useful, for use in oral mucositis
- Topical applications may be studied further by researchers in aromatherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, many people across the world still suffer from this chronic disease and its complications. Chamomile as an herbal medicine has gained an increasing attention for relieving cancer complications. This study aimed to integrate and synthesize current international evidence regarding the effect of chamomile on cancer complications. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken. Five online databases including Web of Science, PubMed [including MEDLINE], Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched and articles published from inception to January 2023 were retrieved. All clinical trials and similar interventional studies on human subjects examining the effects of chamomile on cancer complications were included in the review and research synthesis. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies after quality appraisals using proper methodological tools. The review results were presented narratively given that meta-analysis was impossible. RESULTS A total of 2240 studies were retrieved during the search process, but 18 articles were selected. The total sample size was 1099 patients with cancer of which 622 participants were female. Fifteen studies used an RCT design. Various forms of chamomile were used such as mouthwash, topical material, tea, capsule, syrup and aromatherapy massage. Chamomile effectively reduced oral mucositis, skin complications, depression, and vomiting and also improved appetite and quality of life among cancer patients. CONCLUSION The use of chamomile as a non-pharmacologic and safe method can be helpful for mitigating cancer complications in patients with cancer. Therefore, it can be incorporated into routine care along with other therapeutic measures to reduce patients' suffering related to cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42022307887.
-
3.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
4.
The anxiolytic effect of probiotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and preclinical literature.
Reis, DJ, Ilardi, SS, Punt, SEW
PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0199041
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The microbiome-gut-brain axis in general and the possibility of altering the microbiome through administration of probiotics to support physical and mental health has received much attention in recent years. Here, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to evaluate the clinical and preclinical evidence for the use of probiotics in anxiety. 22 preclinical (rodent) studies were included in the meta-analysis and showed an overall significant anxiolytic effect of probiotics in diseased, but not healthy, animals. Studies were heterogenous with regards to species and strains of probiotic used. Subgroup analysis showed that only Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced anxiety-like behaviour. 14 human studies were included in the meta-analysis and overall no anxiolytic effect was observed. Only three out of the 14 studies showed a positive effect (vs 12 out of the 22 animal studies), one of which used L. rhamnosus. Due to the small number of trials no subgroup analysis could be performed. Apart from the small number and heterogeneity of human studies, the authors discuss further possible reasons for the discrepancy between animal and human studies: • Dose: Dosages were typically 100 times higher (per kg) in animals than in humans. • Diseased vs healthy subjects: In animal studies, only those which investigated animals displaying anxiety related behaviour improved with probiotic administration. None of the human studies specifically recruited anxious individuals, eight of the studies included healthy subjects, the other six selected participants for other disorders, including four for irritable bowel syndrome. The authors conclude that more research into an anxiolytic effect of probiotics in humans is warranted, especially using L. rhamnosus, studying patients with anxiety, and using higher dosages and longer study duration.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- While preclinical animal studies suggest that probiotics may help reduce anxiety, such findings have not yet translated to clinical research in humans.
- Further investigation of probiotic treatment for clinically relevant anxiety is warranted, particularly with respect to the probiotic species L. rhamnosus.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This review highlights how important it is for future studies to focus on clinically anxious patients and also to consider exploring the effects of differing doses of probiotics in this population.
Clinical practice applications:
Anxiety disorders affect as many as 3 in 10 people at some point during their lifetime. On that basis, it would be great to have a viable non-pharmaceutical option to help with some of the symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
If the results from the pre-clinical studies can be corroborated in human populations, this could have widespread clinical implications.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have generated intensive research interest in recent years as a novel mode of treatment for physical and mental illness. Nevertheless, the anxiolytic potential of probiotics remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical and preclinical (animal model) evidence regarding the effect of probiotic administration on anxiety. METHODS The PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were reviewed for preclinical and clinical studies that met the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effects of probiotics on anxiety-like behavior and symptoms of anxiety were analyzed by meta-analyses. Separate subgroup analyses were conducted on diseased versus healthy animals, specific preclinical probiotic species, and clinical versus healthy human samples. RESULTS Data were extracted from 22 preclinical studies (743 animals) and 14 clinical studies (1527 individuals). Overall, probiotics reduced anxiety-like behavior in animals (Hedges' g = -0.47, 95% CI -0.77 --0.16, p = 0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction only among diseased animals. Probiotic species-level analyses identified only Lactobacillus (L.) rhamnosus as an anxiolytic species, but these analyses were broadly under-powered. Probiotics did not significantly reduce symptoms of anxiety in humans (Hedges' g = -0.12, 95% CI -0.29-0.05, p = 0.151), and did not differentially affect clinical and healthy human samples. CONCLUSIONS While preclinical (animal) studies suggest that probiotics may help reduce anxiety, such findings have not yet translated to clinical research in humans, perhaps due to the dearth of extant research with clinically anxious populations. Further investigation of probiotic treatment for clinically relevant anxiety is warranted, particularly with respect to the probiotic species L. rhamnosus.
-
5.
Orthorexia nervosa: A behavioral complex or a psychological condition?
Strahler, J, Hermann, A, Walter, B, Stark, R
Journal of behavioral addictions. 2018;7(4):1143-1156
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a condition characterised by an obsession for 'healthy eating' and avoidance of 'unhealthy food' with the violation of these rigid dietary rules being associated with shame, anxiety and distress. Whilst numerous studies have evidenced its existence, there is debate as to whether it is a behavioural phenomenon or a mental health condition like other eating disorders. Anecdotally, there are reports of physiological impacts (such as weight loss), psychological impacts (such as emotional instability) and social impacts (such as social isolation), which are similar to clinical eating disorders. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore whether ON is of clinical relevance, and if it can be distinguished from other mental health conditions. An online survey including orthorexic behaviours was completed by 713 subjects (80% female) aged 18-75 years. 4% showed significant orthorexic eating alongside lower levels of life satisfaction, wellbeing and higher levels of stress. Depression and obsessive compulsive tendencies were also found in 48% and 30% of those with ON respectively. The authors conclude that there are strong overlaps between ON, mental health conditions and disturbed eating behaviours, questioning whether it should be a mental health condition in its own right.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Orthorexia nervosa has been associated with other mental health conditions, including depression and obsessive compulsive disorder.
- Given this association, and the desire for individuals with the condition to seek validation of their orthorexic eating, healthcare practitioners should make appropriate referral to ensure the safety and wellbeing of these individuals.
- Debate continues on whether orthorexia nervosa should be viewed as a mental health condition and eating disorder or a behavioural phenomenon.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is gaining increasing interest in research and clinical practice. Whilst research has evidenced its existence, there is still an active debate of whether it should be viewed as a mental health condition and eating disorder in its own right. Diagnoses may be useful for some individuals to make sense of the symptoms they are experiencing, reduce their feelings of isolation and to help them take steps to get the right support needed to improve their health. In a similar way to other eating disorders, orthorexia nervosa has been associated with other mental health conditions including depression and obsessive compulsive disorder.
Clinical practice applications:
Whether defined as an eating disorder in its own right or not, orthorexia nervosa nevertheless is likely to have an impact on wellbeing, life satisfaction and stress. It is an important condition or behavioural phenomenon for practitioners to be aware of, particularly in nutrition fields that may attract those individuals looking for more information or endorsement of their desired orthorexic eating. Given its association with other mental health conditions, safety and appropriate referral should be made to ensure the wellbeing of these individuals.
Considerations for future research:
Research on orthorexia nervosa is considerably smaller compared to other eating disorder conditions and behaviours. Further empirical evidence is needed to support the debate as to whether it is an eating disorder in its own right, or a behavioural phenomenon, and further insight needed to establish its full impact on physical and psychological health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Numerous studies have provided evidence for orthorexia nervosa (ON), an eating pattern characterized by an almost manic obsession for and fixation on healthy eating, to be of epidemiological relevance. However, there is scientific debate on whether it is merely a behavioral or lifestyle phenomenon as compared to a mental disorder. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore whether ON is of epidemiological and clinical relevance, and whether ON can be distinguished from other mental health disorders and healthy lifestyle features. METHODS An online survey including a measure of orthorexic behaviors [Duesseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS)], well-being and distress, eating behaviors, pathological eating, anxiety and depression, addictive behaviors, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, personality, and health behaviors was completed by 713 subjects (79.8% women, 18-75 years, median age: 25 years). RESULTS Twenty-seven subjects (3.8%, 21 women) showed significant orthorexic eating (DOS ≥ 30). ON cases reported lower well-being, lower satisfaction with life, and higher current stress levels than non-ON cases. The highest percentage of variation in ON was explained by pathological eating (R2 = .380), followed by eating style, Mediterranean diet, compulsive symptoms, and subjective social status. Importantly, ON provided hardly any additional predictive value for well-being when also considering pathological eating. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our data confirmed the epidemiological and clinical relevance of orthorexic behaviors, but the strong conceptual overlap with other mental health problems and pathological eating raise initial doubts as to whether ON is a distinct mental health disorder category. This co-occurrence, unique symptoms, and underlying processes need further exploration by comparing ON cases with patients with other mental disorders.