1.
Association of Retinol and Carotenoids Content in Diet and Serum With Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Han, X, Zhao, R, Zhang, G, Jiao, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, D, Cai, H
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:918777
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The incident rate of malignant tumours has been increasing, and so has colo-rectal cancer (CRC), which is now the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. CRC development is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Diet, diabetes, obesity, lack of physical activity, age, family history and history of benign adenomatous polyps and inflammatory bowel disease are all known risk factors. Modulating diet is one way to modify cancer risk. Vitamin A (retinol) and carotenoids, which are precursors to Vitamin A, are indispensable in the human body and widely occur in a range of vegetables, fruits and animal-derived foods. In some studies high dietary intake of retinol and carotenoids had been linked to a decreased risk of CRC, however, this was not consistent in all findings. To get a better understanding of this matter, the authors of this meta-analysis analysed 22 clinical studies from the last 20 years. The authors found an inverse association with carotenoids in blood serum, so higher blood serum of carotenoids seemed to decrease CRC risk. In regards to dietary intake, total carotenoid intake did not increase CRC risk and in fact the carotenoids carotenes, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin reduced risk, which was particularly noticeable in men. In women, high dietary intake of retinol also showed to reduce CRC risk, but it appeared to increase the risk in men. This raised the idea of gender-specific differences. Of clinical relevance are that carotenoids can be an important dietary contributors in reducing CRC risk. However the protective role of retinol appears to be gender-specific and only seems to benefit women, with the opposite effect in men.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The results of this study were mixed:
- Total dietary intake of carotenoids was not associated with CRC risk.
- Case control studies found that high serum carotenoids may increase CRC risk.
- There were differences in findings between males and females.
- Larger, well-controlled studies over long time frames are needed to further explore the relationship between dietary intake and serum concentrations of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. These studies should include results by sex, race and dose response.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and second in terms of mortality. Diet and environmental factors may have a strong influence and causative effect. Research has linked dietary consumption and serum levels of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. However, results have been mixed.
The aim of this meta analysis was to identify a potential association between CRC and carotenoid and retinol intake. A total of 22 cohort and case control studies published between 2000-2019 from across Europe, North America and Asia were included. The number of CRC cases totalled 19,293 from a sample of more than 450,000 people.
Eligible studies reported data in either relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In the meta analysis, data were combined and expressed as OR with 95% CI.
Cases and control groups were based on high or low carotenoid intake as defined by the included studies and based on dietary intake or serum concentration. Sub-group analysis was undertaken by study type, sex and tumour type. A sensitivity analysis tested the robustness of the results.
Due to the heterogeneity between studies, adjustments were made for potential covariates and confounding factors including age, gender, a family history of CRC, smoking, alcohol consumption and levels of physical activity.
The quality of the studies was assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
The nutrients studied included; beta-carotene, alpha-carotene, lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin, beta-cryptoxanthin and retinol. These were assessed through dietary intake or serum concentrations.
Key Findings
- High dietary intake of beta-carotene was not associated with an increased risk of CRC in females (OR = 0.97; 95%CI 0.79-1.19), however, it may lower CRC risk in males (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99).
- High dietary intake of retinol was not associated with CRC risk (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.89-1.10). However, the findings suggested that it may reduce CRC risk in females but increase CRC risk in males.
- There was a tendency towards a slightly decreased risk of CRC with high dietary intakes of alpha-carotene), lycopene, and beta-cryptoxanthin. The results were more pronounced in males.
- No association was found between high consumption of high lutein/zeaxanthin, retinol or total carotenoids and the risk of CRC
- Case control studies found a negative association between serum carotenoids and CRC risk. This relationship was not found in cohort studies and therefore remains uncertain.
Conclusions
This was a well-conducted meta-analysis that was not subject to any conflicts of interest. Larger, well controlled prospective studies adjusting for sex and with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of carotenoids and CRC.
Notes: The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Clinical practice applications:
- Healthcare practitioners working with people with a family history of CRC or those who may be at increased risk may like to consider increasing carotenoid intake modestly.
- A modest increase in dietary intake of beta-carotene for males may be beneficial.
- A modest increase in dietary retinol may be beneficial for females.
Considerations for future research:
- Further research is needed to explore the differences between sexes for dietary intake of carotenoids and retinol and CRC risk
- Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between serum carotenoids and CRC
- Analysis of results by race and continent may be beneficial
- Further research is needed to define dose response
- Due to heterogeneity between studies, large, well controlled studies over long time frames are needed
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is linked to serum and dietary retinol and carotenoids, according to clinical and epidemiological research. However, the findings are not consistent. As a result, we did this meta-analysis to determine the link between them. Methods: From 2000 through 2022, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, as well as pertinent article references, were searched and filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and literature quality ratings. High and low intake were used as controls, and OR (odds ratio) or RR (relative risk) and 95% confidence interval were extracted. The extracted data were plotted and analyzed using Stata12.0 software. Results: A total of 22 relevant studies were included, including 18 studies related to diet and 4 studies related to serum. For high and low intake or concentration controls, the pooled OR was as follows: β-carotene (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), α-carotene (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-1.03), lycopene (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07), lutein/zeaxanthin (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.07), β-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.01), total carotenoids (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81-1.15), retinol (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10), serum carotenoids (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93), serum retinol (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.26-1.49). Subgroup analysis was performed according to tumor type, study type and sex. Conclusion: Total carotenoid intake and Lutein/Zeaxanthin intake were not associated with CRC risk. High β-carotene, α-carotene, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin all tended to reduce CRC risk. Serum carotenoid concentrations were significantly inversely associated with CRC risk.
2.
Lipid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Is There a Link? A New Focus and Meta-Analysis.
Lodi, M, Kiehl, A, Qu, FL, Gabriele, V, Tomasetto, C, Mathelin, C
European journal of breast health. 2022;18(2):108-126
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Incidence of breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for 15.5% of all cancer-related deaths. However, there is a lack of complete understanding of the effects of different types of dietary lipids on breast cancer development, such as saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), dietary cholesterol, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and unsaturated trans fatty acids (TFA). An evaluation of the effect of lipid consumption on breast cancer and the impact it has on menopausal status was conducted in this meta-analysis, which included forty-four studies. Increased saturated fatty acid intake was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, breast cancer risk was not associated with increased consumption of total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and cholesterol in premenopausal women. The effects of estrogen and the release of proinflammatory cytokines by adipocytes should be evaluated, as well as other pathways that contribute to the development of breast cancer. There is a need for further robust studies to evaluate the effects of different types of lipid consumption on breast cancer. Although the association between SFA and breast cancer is weak, healthcare professionals can use this study's findings to better understand the detrimental effect of SFA, despite the fact that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in the current analysis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- Among lifestyle-related breast cancer risk factors, the role of diet in breast cancer remains uncertain.
- The authors highlight a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women.
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Objectives
- To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk.
Results
- Forty-four articles were included in the meta-analysis, consisting of 28 case-control studies and 16 cohort studies.
- In total, this meta-analysis involved 1,185,896 women, of whom 54,553 had breast cancer.
- There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
- In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03–1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85–1.19; p = 0.93).
Limitations
- Studies included in the meta-analysis were carried out on populations from five continents with significant cultural and dietary diversity, and well as different types of oils used in the diet
Conclusion
- At this stage, the authors state it is not possible to establish nutritional recommendations regarding the consumption of lipids to decrease breast cancer risk.
Clinical practice applications:
- The results of this meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant link between high consumption of total lipids, PUFA, MUFA and cholesterol and the occurrence of breast cancer.
- However, the results suggest that there is an association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, although this was only found in case-controlled studies and not cohort studies.
- While obesity is a known breast cancer risk factor after menopause, the link between the effect of diet and the effect of obesity on the breast may be through different mechanisms.
- The authors investigated if high lipid consumption acts on breast tissue by the same mechanisms as obesity, and found the association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women must be through other biological explanations.
- The authors found that while high SFA consumption may increase breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women, biological mechanisms linking SFA and breast cancerogenesis are still unknown.
- The meta-analysis found high blood cholesterol levels appear to increase the risk of breast cancer. However, the authors could not confirm that high dietary cholesterol intake is a risk factor for breast cancer. The authors postulated this may be in part due to the low proportion of cholesterol (about 30%) in the diet, while the rest comes from the degradation of lipids and carbohydrates by the liver.
Considerations for future research:
- As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption
Abstract
Objective: To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all cohort and case-control studies published up to December 2020 with subgroup analysis according to menopausal status. Results: We included 44 articles for analysis. There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women. In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03-1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85-1.19; p = 0.93). Conclusion: There was a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women, however there was high heterogeneity for this analysis. As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption.