1.
Effect of the probiotic strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9, on chronic constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ma, T, Yang, N, Xie, Y, Li, Y, Xiao, Q, Li, Q, Jin, H, Zheng, L, Sun, Z, Zuo, K, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;191:106755
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastroenterological problem encountered in clinical practice, and it negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. Growing evidence indicates that the occurrence of CC is closely linked to gut dysbiosis. Several main probiotics have been used to relieve constipation. The main aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 (P9) administration on alleviating CC and impact on the host gut microbiota and its metabolites. This study was a 42-day longitudinal double-blind randomised controlled trial which enrolled a total of 181 patients with CC. Subjects were randomly assigned to the probiotic or placebo group. Subjects in P9 group received one sachet of P9 powder per day after meal. Results show that P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency. In fact, P9 administration effectively alleviated constipation, and the symptom relief effects were linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes. Authors conclude that administering P9 could effectively relieve chronic constipation in adults and improve some aspects of their quality of life.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study suggested that P9-associated constipation symptom relief was not attributed to macroscopic changes in the host gut bacteriome and phageome
- However, results supported that taking P9 could alleviate constipation, with the symptom relief effects linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes, including the gut commensal bacteria (L. plantarum, Ruminococcus_B gnavus, Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp.) and the bacteriophage family, Herelleviridae.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study investigated the effect of a specific probiotic strain in alleviating Chronic Constipation (CC).
Methods
- The study employed a 42-day randomised control trial (RTC) double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with 163 patients, (mean age =22.68 ±5.66 years for the probiotic group and 21.59 ±4.59 years for the placebo group), diagnosed with CC (Rome IV criteria)
- The male to female ratio was 15–63 and 17–68 in probiotic and placebo groups respectively
- Groups were standardised with no differences observed in baseline age, gender ratio, drug treatment, high-fibre diet and smoking between the two groups (P >0.18)
- Participants were randomly assigned to the probiotic Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 (n=78; 2 g per sachet, 1 ×1011 CFU/day) or the placebo (n =85; maltodextrin powder) groups.
Results
Primary outcomes: weekly mean complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs):
- At 28-days CSBM was 28% higher in the P9 group (P=0.039) compared with the placebo group
- At 42-days CSBM remained significantly higher in the P9 group (P=0.026) compared with the placebo group, and increased 2-fold compared with baseline (P <0.05)
- Authors noted that the CSBM benefits were maintained even after 14 days of not taking the supplement.
Secondary outcomes: The effects of P9 supplementation on constipation-related parameters, including the weekly mean frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) demonstrated:
- After 28-days of P9 supplementation, SBMs were 12% higher than the placebo group (P=0.039)
- No differences were observed in the weekly mean stool consistency and straining scores between groups (P>0.05).
Patients’ quality of life and psychological state, using a PAC-QOL questionnaire related to: worries and concerns (WO), physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, and satisfaction and found:
- At day 14 WO in the P9 group was 1.22-fold lower than those in the placebo group (P <0.05)
- No differences in the other 3 items between P9 and placebo groups (P >0.05) were observed
- Supplementation resulted in a significant change in relative abundance of the P9 genome (≥0.01%)
- However, no differences were observed in alpha diversity after P9 consumption compared with placebo.
Conclusion
- The results indicated that P9 administration alleviated patients’ constipation symptoms and improved their quality of life but did not impact on gut bacteria or phageome
- Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 supplementation impacted several beneficial bacteria species (e.g. (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), and reduced levels of other bacteria and phage taxa (e.g. Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae) which may be implicated in constipation relief mechanisms.
Clinical practice applications:
- In this study, the use of P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency which could have beneficial implications for patients suffering from chronic constipation
- Probiotic effects are known to be strain- and host-specific, and based on this study P9 administration for relief of constipation needs to be taken for at least two weeks to improve aspects of patients’ quality of life and 4 weeks for improvements in constipation.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials should include factors that impact gut motility and constipation symptoms, such as: a detailed daily diet (dietary composition, fibre content, and water intake) and physical activity scale (intensity and duration), and longer term use of P9 or comparison across strains
- The relatively small study size and short duration of this study, as well as the younger age groups included may be pertinent when considering future research.
Abstract
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastrointestinal condition associated with intestinal inflammation, and the condition considerably impairs patients' quality of life. We conducted a large-scale 42-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of probiotics in alleviating CC. 163 patients diagnosed with CC (following Rome IV criteria) were randomly divided into probiotic (n = 78; received Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 [P9]; 1 ×1011 CFU/day) and placebo (n = 85; received placebo material) groups. Ingesting P9 significantly improved the weekly mean frequency of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), while significantly reducing the level of worries and concerns (WO; P < 0.05). Comparing with the placebo group, P9 group was significantly enriched in potentially beneficial bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), while depriving of several bacterial and phage taxa (Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae; P < 0.05). Interesting significant correlations were also observed between some clinical parameters and subjects' gut microbiome, including: negative correlation between Oscillospiraceae sp. and SBMs; positive correlation between WO and Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp. Additionally, P9 group had significantly (P < 0.05) more predicted gut microbial bioactive potential involved in the metabolism of amino acids (L-asparagine, L-pipecolinic acid), short-/medium-chain fatty acids (valeric acid and caprylic acid). Furthermore, several metabolites (p-cresol, methylamine, trimethylamine) related to the intestinal barrier and transit decreased significantly after P9 administration (P < 0.05). In short, the constipation relief effect of P9 intervention was accompanied by desirable changes in the fecal metagenome and metabolome. Our findings support the notion of applying probiotics in managing CC.
2.
Predictors of Symptom-Specific Treatment Response to Dietary Interventions in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Colomier, E, Van Oudenhove, L, Tack, J, Böhn, L, Bennet, S, Nybacka, S, Störsrud, S, Öhman, L, Törnblom, H, Simrén, M
Nutrients. 2022;14(2)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction, formerly known as a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder. Apart from abdominal pain, altered stool frequency, diarrhoea, and constipation, a large proportion of patients with IBS also experience other GI symptoms such as abdominal distention, bloating and flatulence. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of treatment response to the low FODMAP (short-chain carbohydrates, i.e., fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) and the traditional IBS diet while focusing on the four core IBS symptoms (bloating, constipation, diarrhoea, and pain). This study was a post-hoc analysis of a previously published randomised controlled trial. In total, 33 patients on low FODMAP diet and 34 patients on the traditional IBS diet were included in the analysis. Results showed that patterns of psychological, dietary, and microbial factors can predict IBS symptom response to two dietary advice systems—the traditional IBS and the low FODMAP diet. A clinical profile with less severe IBS features appears to predict a better symptom-specific response to both dietary interventions. Authors conclude that larger prospective randomised controlled trials which include different treatment approaches are required as they may help to optimize personalized treatment algorithms in IBS.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Dietary intervention for IBS related symptoms was efficacious for up to 75% of patients in this study
- Recommendation for a traditional IBS dietary intervention should supersede the low-FODMAP diet, with the latter only implemented when symptoms persist.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study of 67 individuals fulfilling the Rome III criteria for IBS drew comparisons between the efficacy of the traditional IBS diet - as directed by the British Dietetic Association and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) - and the low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) diet on specific IBS-related symptoms (pain, constipation, diarrhoea, and bloating).
Methods
A 10-day screening period included faecal sample analysis, 4-day food diary (pre-randomisation and last week of intervention), and daily stool diary (Bristol Stool Form scale). After 10 days, patients compiled several GI and non-GI related questionnaires, inclusive of IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS). Patients who scored ≥175 for the IBS-SSS were randomly allocated to follow either a low-FODMAP or traditional IBS diet for a period of 4-weeks. Thorough explanations were provided by trained Dietitians. During intervention, patients compiled symptom questionnaires (Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale-IBS) on a weekly basis.
Results
- Both diets reduced symptoms of pain, diarrhoea and bloating (all p<0.0001), but not constipation (p=0.15)
- There was no difference between following the traditional IBS diet and low-FODMAP diet in terms of pain (p=0.80), constipation (p=0.63), diarrhoea (p=0.96) and bloating (p=0.35)
- Less severe gut dysbiosis was weakly associated with better dietary response and improvement of constipation (p=0.05)
- Higher energy intake at baseline predicted better pain improvement with both dietary types compared to lower energy intake (p=0.03)
- More severe psychological distress predicted worse intervention response for bloating (p=0.03)
- Higher baseline oligosaccharide intake predicted a worse response to the low FODMAP diet (p=0.01) but not the traditional IBS diet (p=0.16).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that based on 4 distinct IBS-related symptomatology, better treatment response to 2 different dietary strategies was noted in patients with less severe clinical characteristics. Higher energy intake at baseline and gut dysbiosis scores that were similar to healthy controls were associated with better improvements following dietary interventions. Thus patients who already follow a calorie restricted diet and who have more significant gut dysbiosis profiles might need more bespoke intervention. Severe psychological distress patients responded worse to both diets.
Clinical practice applications:
- Even a short 4-week specific dietary intervention (low FODMAP or traditional IBS diet) can result in IBS-related symptomatic improvement for pain, bloating, and diarrhoea, but not constipation
- The preferred starting point for dietary intervention should be the traditional IBS diet given its relative ease to follow
- The more restrictive low FODMAP protocol could be considered if symptoms persist
- More bespoke interventions are required for patients who suffer with severe psychological stress, have tested and found gut dysbiosis, and individuals who already follow a restrictive diet.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include not only larger but more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the efficacy of IBS symptom-related dietary interventions
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm dietary intervention efficacy.
Abstract
(1) Background: Predictors of dietary treatment response in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain understudied. We aimed to investigate predictors of symptom improvement during the low FODMAP and the traditional IBS diet for four weeks. (2) Methods: Baseline measures included faecal Dysbiosis Index, food diaries with daily energy and FODMAP intake, non-gastrointestinal (GI) somatic symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, and psychological distress. Outcomes were bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and pain symptom scores treated as continuous variables in linear mixed models. (3) Results: We included 33 and 34 patients on the low FODMAP and traditional IBS diet, respectively. Less severe dysbiosis and higher energy intake predicted better pain response to both diets. Less severe dysbiosis also predicted better constipation response to both diets. More severe psychological distress predicted worse bloating response to both diets. For the different outcomes, several differential predictors were identified, indicating that baseline factors could predict better improvement in one treatment arm, but worse improvement in the other treatment arm. (4) Conclusions: Psychological, nutritional, and microbial factors predict symptom improvement when following the low FODMAP and traditional IBS diet. Findings may help individualize dietary treatment in IBS.
3.
Low FODMAP diet reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome and clinical response could be predicted by symptom severity: A randomized crossover trial.
Algera, JP, Demir, D, Törnblom, H, Nybacka, S, Simrén, M, Störsrud, S
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(12):2792-2800
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction, characterised by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Currently, many patients follow an exclusion diet where specific food components are eliminated. One of these exclusion diets is a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs). The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in IBS. This study was a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover study which enrolled 31 participants who were randomly assigned to the diet periods. Results showed that the severity of GI symptoms was reduced, and bowel habits were affected in the direction of less frequent and firmer stool by the low FODMAP diet, but not by a diet with moderate amounts of FODMAPs. Authors conclude that assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FODMAP diet as a treatment option.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
A low (4 g/day) FODMAP diet could provide clinical benefits in the context of an acute strategy for IBS clients with frequent loose stools (IBS-Diarrhoea and/or IBS-Mixed) compared to those with hard and less frequent stools (IBS-Constipation) to improve the severity of GI symptoms, including lower abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits, daily life interference, and psychological distress.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).
Methods
- This study involved a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover trial of 29 participants (18-75 years), mostly female, diagnosed with IBS (Rome IV)
- The primary outcome was to assess the effects of a low (4 g/day) vs. moderate (23 g/day) FODMAP diet on GI symptoms over a 7-day period
- Secondary outcomes involved assessing the effects of low vs. moderate FODMAP diets on i) somatic symptoms, ii) psychological distress, iii) predictors of clinical and IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) sensitivity to FODMAP
- Breakfast was standardised, with prescribed low FODMAP list deviations recorded
- Main dishes and snacks were also provided
- Participants were requested to limit alcohol, caffeine, fatty- and spicy foods, ate regularly, chewed thoroughly and drank enough water
- GI symptoms and bowel habits were recorded during the 7-day screening period, then participants undertook a Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT)
- The first 7-day diet started one day after the LNCT
- A 14-day wash-out period allowed participants to eat and drink as usual, thereafter following the second 7-day diet period as part of the cross over design.
Results
A low FODMAP intervention (compared to a moderate FODMAP diet); resulted in:
- Reduced overall IBS rating (10 ± 72 vs. 57 ± 108, P=0.04)
- Improved abdominal pain frequency (10 ± 32 vs. 18 ± 29 (P=0.02)
- Improved stool consistency (0.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 1.2, P= 0.01) and frequency (0.1 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7, P= 0.01)
- Overall, 34% of participants positively responded to the low FODMAP diet, which could be predicted based on higher baseline IBS-SSS scores (P=0.02)
- Participants sensitive to FODMAPs had increased pre- and postprandial ratings of gas, abdominal pain and bloating and higher exhaled methane concentrations compared to non-sensitive participants to FODMAPs
- Authors highlighted a non-significant association between FODMAP sensitivity and GI symptoms during the LNCT, with higher visceral hypersensitivity (45 ± 20, P=0.73) after ingestion of poorly absorbed and fermentable carbohydrates, with no independent predictors identified.
Conclusions
This study showed that a diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and positively impacts bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this was a short term study, a low FODMAP diet reduced GI symptoms and affected bowel habits (more firm and less frequent stools) in IBS, compared with a diet containing moderate amounts of FODMAPs
- Knowing the above, an assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians working with younger females in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FOD-MAP diet as a treatment option.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials could target a larger sample size with a more representative population, as well as assessing low FODMAP interventions over longer timeframes
- . Additionally, the assessment of biological measures such as microbiota diversity and stability, as well as metabolites (such as short chain fatty acids) could be important to understand mechanistic attributes of low FODMAP diets in IBS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) can provoke symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in IBS. METHODS Adult participants with IBS (Rome IV criteria, n = 29) were included and adhered to two 7-day diet periods, with either low (4 g/day) or moderate (23 g/day) amounts of FODMAPs, in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The periods were separated by a wash-out period (≥14 days). IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and a stool diary (Bristol Stool Form) were completed before and after the diet periods. At baseline, severity of GI symptoms and gut microbial fermentation were assessed (every 15 min, 4 h) during the Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT). Clinical response and FODMAP sensitivity were defined by reduction after low FODMAP period, and increase after moderate FODMAP period in IBS-SSS (≥50 points), respectively. RESULTS Severity of GI symptoms (P = 0.04), stool consistency (P = 0.01), and stool frequency (P = 0.01) differed between the interventions, with reduced overall GI symptom severity, abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits dissatisfaction, and daily life interference (P < 0.05 for all), as well as more firm (P = 0.03) and less frequent (P < 0.01) stools after low FODMAP intervention, but not after moderate FODMAP intervention. A third (34%) responded clinically to the low FODMAP diet, and the response could be predicted by higher IBS-SSS at baseline (P = 0.02). Although modest associations between FODMAP sensitivity (22%) and GI symptoms during LNCT were observed, no independent predictors could be identified. CONCLUSIONS A diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and affects bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet. Assessment of IBS severity before the intervention may be used to predict clinical response to a low FODMAP diet. Trial registry (http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov): Registered under Clinical Trial number NCT05182593.