1.
Comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xia, J, Yu, J, Xu, H, Zhou, Y, Li, H, Yin, S, Xu, D, Wang, Y, Xia, H, Liao, W, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;188:106647
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterised by sustained hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance, remains a severe driver of chronic metabolic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of glycaemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetic patients to inform clinical practice. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of one hundred and seventy articles with a total of 4223 adults with T2DM. Participants were randomised to either the placebo/no treatment group (n= 6345) or to the treatment group (n= 7878). Results show that: - chromium was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance. - vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing haemoglobin A1C and fasting insulin levels. - vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol reductions. - niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglycerides reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. - vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions. Authors conclude that micronutrient supplements especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more effective in the management of T2DM compared with other micronutrients.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Clinicians could consider the adjunctive effect of micronutrients supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements in a nutrition protocol to manage T2DM and slow or prevent its complications.
- The study authors state that the vitamin and mineral supplements under review had a statistically significant improvement, however they did not reach the study threshold for clinical significance. Therefore they advise caution in utilising micronutrient supplements in the management of glucose and lipid metabolism for T2DM.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Objectives
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methodology
This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA-2020 guidelines for network meta-analysis
The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk-of-bias tool was used to assess eligible randomised trials
8 prespecified markers identified and assessed in this study : 1) HbA1c (%), 2) fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), 3) total cholesterol (mmol/L), 4) triglycerides (mmol/L), 5) fasting insulin (μIU/mL), 6) HOMA-IR, 7) LDL-c (mmol/L), and 8) HDL-c (mmol/L).
Results
- 170 RCT trials of 14223 participants with T2DM treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment were included
- Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively)
- Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated haemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence
- Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%)
- Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipo-protein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively)
- Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%).
Conclusion
- Micronutrient supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be efficacious in managing T2DM
- It should be noted that the evidence certainty for all was low.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chromium plays an important role in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR reductions. More pronounced effects were seen for chromium than vitamin E, vitamin C, niacin, selenium, and magnesium supplements
- Vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing HbA1c and fasting insulin levels. The mechanism through which Vitamin K affects glucose metabolism is proposed as activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase/sirtuin 1, that in turn increases phosphocreatine 3-kinase and glucose transporter 2 to decrease insulin resistance and fasting glucose.
- Vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol (TC) reductions, where supplementation dosage should be carefully considered, as vanadium compounds can be moderately or highly toxic. Vanadium supplementation is only recommended in cases of vanadium deficiency or diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, where the intake of vanadium from food should be enhanced in preference to supplementation
- Niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglyceride (TG) reductions and increasing HDL cholesterol levels. The dose of niacin could not be determined
- Vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipo- protein (LDL) cholesterol reductions.
Considerations for future research:
- Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into the efficacy of micronutrient supplements in managing T2DM
- Selenium homeostasis, selenoprotein, insulin signaling/secretion, and carbohydrate/lipid metabolism are linked in multiple and complex ways but the authors could not explain why chromium supplementation would lower blood glucose more effectively than selenium supplementation, and suggest more research is needed to clarify this
- While vitamin K status could be an emerging treatment target in T2DM prevention and management, it remains to be determined whether vitamin K supplementation has an advantage over other nutrients in terms of hypoglycemic effect, and further research is necessary
- The beneficial effect of vitamin E and niacin supplements regarding lipid metabolism warrant investigation through more rigorous comparative studies.
Abstract
Medical nutrition treatment can manage diabetes and slow or prevent its complications. The comparative effects of micronutrient supplements, however, have not yet been well established. We aimed at evaluating the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to inform clinical practice. Electronic and hand searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed until June 1, 2022. We selected RCTs enrolling patients with T2DM who were treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment. Data were pooled via frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses. A total of 170 eligible trials and 14223 participants were included. Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively). Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence. Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%). Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively). Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%). Our analyses indicated that micronutrient supplements, especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more efficacious in managing T2DM than other micronutrients. Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into this issue.
2.
The Effect of Regular Consumption of Reformulated Breads on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Schadow, AM, Revheim, I, Spielau, U, Dierkes, J, Schwingshackl, L, Frank, J, Hodgson, JM, Moreira-Rosário, A, Seal, CJ, Buyken, AE, et al
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2023;14(1):30-43
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The metabolic effect of bread depends on several qualitative aspects ranging from the type of grain, the amount of carbohydrates, levels of other nutrients, as well as the chemical structure and processing. The aim of this study was to assess the certainty of the evidence and to investigate the overall effect of regular consumption of reformulated breads on glycaemic control in the following groups: a) healthy adults; b) those at risk of developing cardiometabolic disease (e.g., having hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hypercholesterolemia and/or overweight/obesity); and c) those with manifest type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies and 23 distinct study populations. All studies were randomised controlled trials, 12 of which had a crossover design and 10 had a parallel design. In total, 1037 participants were included. These provided 669 and 595 data points for intervention and control comparisons, respectively. Results show a beneficial effect of reformulated bread variants on fasting blood glucose concentrations. This benefit may be more pronounced among people with manifest T2DM (low certainty of evidence). Authors conclude that bread quality is relevant for metabolic health among adults and that future studies should address its relevance among people at risk of T2DM.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
This study’s findings suggest the effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fibre, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients may be more beneficial than regular breads on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults, primarily among those with T2DM. Reformulated breads however, did not lower fasting insulin concentrations, HOMA-IR and HbA1C when compared to regular bread.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Overview
This study evaluated the effect of regular consumption of “reformulated breads” on glycemic control among healthy adults, adults at cardiometabolic risk or with manifest T2DM in 22 RCTs with 1037 participants. Compared with “regular” or comparator bread, consumption of reformulated intervention breads yielded lower fasting blood glucose concentrations only among people with T2DM (low certainty of evidence), yet no differences in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, or postprandial glucose response were identified.
[*’reformulated bread’ as defined by the World Health Organisation of altering the processing or composition of a food to improve its nutritional profile, and contained whole-grains and dietary fibre]
Results
Sub group analysis revealed that the effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fibre, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients on lowering fasting blood glucose was confined to participants with T2DM, with no significant effect among participants without T2DM (0.68 mmol/L; 95% CI: 1.11, 0.36; I2 1⁄4 57% and 0.04 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.05; I2 1⁄4 25%, respectively; P < 0.001).
Subgroup analyses by continent revealed a more pronounced effect on fasting blood glucose concentrations in studies conducted in Asia and the Middle East compared with studies conducted in Europe, North America, and Oceania (MD: 0.84 mmol/L; 95% CI: 1.35, 0.33; I2 1⁄4 52% and MD: 0.04 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.03; I2 1⁄4 0%, respectively; P < 0.001)
Additional subgroup analyses found that the type of control bread, but not the type of intervention bread, affected the pooled effect estimate of fasting blood glucose concentration (P 1⁄4 0.03), with the largest difference reported in studies not describing the control bread used.
Limitations
Publication bias was considered negligible for the studies included in this meta-analysis, and the risk of bias assessment revealed that most of the studies had some concerns of risk of bias. One author is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium and another is a member of the GRADE working group.
Strengths
This systematic review and meta-analysis include the focus on high-quality intervention studies (i.e., RCTs using either crossover or parallel design) and the inclusion of longer-term studies (>2 wk) to address the effectiveness of regular bread replacement for glycemic control in everyday life.
Clinical practice applications:
- This data suggests that bread quality is relevant for metabolic health among adults at risk of T2DM. In particular, reformulated breads were found to have a more beneficial impact than regular breads on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults with TsDM. However, consumption of the reformulated bread (enriched with dietary fiber, whole grains, or functional ingredients) did not lower fasting insulin concentrations compared with the control breads (MD: 1.59 pmol/L; 95% CI: 5.78, 2.59; moderate certainty of evidence)
- Consumption of the reformulated bread did not lower HOMA-IR compared with the control breads (MD: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.22; moderate certainty of evidence)
- Consumption of the reformulated bread did not lower HbA1c concentrations compared with the control bread (0.14; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.10; P 1⁄4 0.195; very low certainty of evidence).
Considerations for future research:
- Longer intervention periods may be required to determine the beneficial effects on the HbA1c concentrations and to elicit changes in markers of insulin resistance
- Future studies should use the 2022 WHO standardised HbA1c diagnostic reference criterion for diabetes mellitus
- Improvements in specific outcomes may also be linked to defined groups within populations such as persons with manifest T2DM.
- The type of reformulation of the bread may be an important factor but differ considerably around the world
Abstract
Bread is a major source of grain-derived carbohydrates worldwide. High intakes of refined grains, low in dietary fiber and high in glycemic index, are linked with increased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and other chronic diseases. Hence, improvements in the composition of bread could influence population health. This systematic review evaluated the effect of regular consumption of reformulated breads on glycemic control among healthy adults, adults at cardiometabolic risk or with manifest T2DM. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies employed a bread intervention (≥2 wk) in adults (healthy, at cardiometabolic risk or manifest T2DM) and reported glycemic outcomes (fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, and postprandial glucose responses). Data were pooled using generic inverse variance with random-effects model and presented as mean difference (MD) or standardized MD between treatments with 95% CIs. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 1037 participants). Compared with "regular" or comparator bread, consumption of reformulated intervention breads yielded lower fasting blood glucose concentrations (MD: -0.21 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.38, -0.03; I2 = 88%, moderate certainty of evidence), yet no differences in fasting insulin (MD: -1.59 pmol/L; 95% CI: -5.78, 2.59; I2 = 38%, moderate certainty of evidence), HOMA-IR (MD: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.35, 0.23; I2 = 60%, moderate certainty of evidence), HbA1c (MD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.39, 0.10; I2 = 56%, very low certainty of evidence), or postprandial glucose response (SMD: -0.46; 95% CI: -1.28, 0.36; I2 = 74%, low certainty of evidence). Subgroup analyses revealed a beneficial effect for fasting blood glucose only among people with T2DM (low certainty of evidence). Our findings suggest a beneficial effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fiber, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults, primarily among those with T2DM. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020205458.
3.
Comparative analysis of the efficacies of probiotic supplementation and glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang, T, Xie, X, Wu, L, Li, L, Yang, L, Gao, H, Deng, Z, Zhang, X, Chen, X, Zhang, J, et al
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:825897
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a serious medical condition often requiring antidiabetic drug management. Although commonly used antidiabetic drugs effectively control glucose levels, their tolerability profiles differ, causing various side effects. Probiotics can be used as single or multi strains to reduce glycaemic and lipid indicators and avoid the negative effects of antidiabetic medications. The study included twenty-five randomised controlled trials, of which fourteen studies assessed the effectiveness of probiotics (single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements), and eleven studies included different antidiabetic drugs such as Thiazolidinedione (TZD), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-4i), and Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of probiotic and antidiabetic drugs on glycaemia, lipid profile and blood pressure in T2D patients. Probiotics were less effective than specific antidiabetic drugs in reducing fasting blood sugar levels (FBS), HbA1c levels, and triglycerides. Different probiotic formulations were effective in reducing the HOMA-IR index, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and systolic and diastolic pressure (SBP and DBP). A subgroup analysis showed a greater reduction in FBS, HbA1c, TC, TG, and SBP in obese and elderly participants, those who participated for a longer duration, and those from Eastern origins. Considering the high heterogeneity in baseline study characteristics among the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, further studies are required to evaluate the effects of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs. However, healthcare professionals can use the study to understand the effect of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs in reducing glycaemic, lipid and hypertension profiles.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Glucose-lowering drugs, except for DPP-4i, reduced FBS and HbA1c more than probiotics; and SGLT-2i induced the greatest decrease in HbA1c
- A BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 showed a significant decrease in FBS and the HOMA-IR index compared with those with lower BMI
- Weight loss induced by glucose-lowering drugs and probiotic supplementation plays an important role in glycaemic control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis compared the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) on various outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library between January 2015 - April 2021.
Results
25 randomised controlled trials (RCT) were included (2843 participants). 14 RCTs (842 participants) involved the administration of single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements, and 11 RCTs (2001 participants) involved TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP-4i. Participants in 7 of the studies had T2D, aged ≤ 55 years old. 8 RCTs included participants with a mean BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, and 11 RCTs participants had a mean BMI < 30 kg/m2.
Effects of probiotics:
- Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS): A reduction (−1.42, −0.32 mg/dL, p=0.000)
- Glycated hemaglobin (HbA1c): No reduction (p = 0.000)
- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR): A decrease (−0.64, −0.31; p = 0.780), regardless of probiotic strain or with a co-supplement
- Insulin: Not significant (p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis: no reduction
- Total Cholesterol (TC): No difference (p = 0.941). Subgroup analysis: reduction from multi-species probiotics (−0.36, −0.01 mg/dL, p = 0.871)
- Triglycerides: Difference (−0.25 mg/dL, p = 0.958)
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.189)
- HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.014)
- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): A decrease (−6.44, −0.08 mmHg, p = 0.044)
- Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): A reduction (−4.53, −0.80 mmHg, p = 0.206).
Effects of glucose-lowering drugs:
- FBS: A decrease (−4.22 mg/dL, −1.24 mg/dL, p = 0.000)
- HbA1c: A decrease (−2.51%, −0.52%, p = 0.000) with TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP- 4i; a reduction with SGLT-2i (p = 0.003)
- TC: No difference (p = 0.000). Subgroup: no decrease with single species probiotics and probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i)
- TG: No difference (p = 0.000)
- . HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.000). Subgroup: a decrease with TZDs (−2.37, −0.72 mg/dL). No difference with probiotic strains, or probiotics with co-supplements, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.000), Subgroups: no difference with probiotic strains, probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i).
Limitations
Limited number of studies for TZD and SGLT-2i, making results potentially unreliable.
Conclusions
Multi species probiotics are worth considering as an adjunct to glucose-lowering drugs, and for improving lipid profiles and hypertension.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic supplementation reduced the HOMA-IR index
- Multi-species probiotics were associated with reduction in TC and TG levels
- DPP-4i only decreased TG levels
- TZD was associated with decrease in HDL-C, whereas probiotic supplementation was associated with higher decrease in SBP and DBP and that GLP-1 RA increases the risk of hypoglycaemia.
Considerations for future research:
- Semaglutide was associated with an increased risk for hypoglycaemia compared with a placebo, indicating that the safety of semaglutide needs further study
- Dietary and physical activity should be considered in future studies
- Heterogeneity in some indicators may be due to differences in study baseline characteristics,Larger trials needed to support the results of this meta-analysis.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs (thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) in patients with type 2 diabetes from randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on the treatment effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs on glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure metabolism published between Jan 2015 and April 2021. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 25 RCTs (2,843 participants). Overall, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and TZD significantly reduce fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas GLP-1 RA increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. Multispecies probiotics decrease FBS, total cholesterol (TC), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Moreover, subgroup analyses indicated that participants aged >55 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, longer duration of intervention, and subjects from Eastern countries, showed significantly higher reduction in FBS and HbA1c, TC, TG and SBP. This meta-analysis revealed that including multiple probiotic rather than glucose-lowering drugs might be more beneficial regarding T2D prevention who suffering from simultaneously hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.
4.
Gut microbiome-related effects of berberine and probiotics on type 2 diabetes (the PREMOTE study).
Zhang, Y, Gu, Y, Ren, H, Wang, S, Zhong, H, Zhao, X, Ma, J, Gu, X, Xue, Y, Huang, S, et al
Nature communications. 2020;11(1):5015
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Berberine, which is a naturally occurring alkaloid found in plants, has been traditionally used as a remedy to protect against Type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. It is important to study how berberine affects the human gut microbiome, specifically in regard to its impact on short-chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolism, due to its low oral bioavailability. The PREMOTE study investigated the glycaemic lowering effects of individual and combination of berberine and probiotics in newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes patients. This randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial included four hundred and nine Type 2 diabetic patients and randomly assigned them (1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive berberine alone, berberine combined with probiotics, probiotics alone or a placebo for twelve weeks. A combination of berberine plus probiotics and berberine alone significantly improved glycated haemoglobin levels compared to the placebo and probiotics alone treatment. The antidiabetic effects of berberine could be due to the Ruminococcus bromii abundance followed by the berberine treatment and its ability to inhibit deoxycholic acid biotransformation. Further robust studies are required to consider the therapeutic application of berberine and probiotics in a general population due to the limitations of the present study. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this trial to understand the mechanism behind the anti-diabetic effects of berberine and probiotics.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The use of berberine, as a specific antimicrobial agent, along with high strength probiotics may be beneficial for managing blood glucose and potentially other metabolic health markers alongside diet and lifestyle modifications
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Dysbiosis of the human gut microbiome has been associated with the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research has found that, in part, mechanisms of action for the antidiabetic medications, Metformin and Acarbose, include alterations in the gut microbiome as well as the inhibition of bile acid (BA) metabolism and signalling. Remedies targeting the gut microbiota for treatment of T2D and other metabolic diseases have therefore been investigated.
Berberine (BBR) has been used in Indian Ayurvedic and Traditional Chinese Medicine to treat metabolic conditions for hundreds of years. Probiotics have also been extensively researched for their potential metabolic benefits. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate whether BBR and probiotics may be effective in managing T2D.
Methods
A total of 409 participants aged 42-61 years were recruited from 20 medical centres in China. All patients were newly diagnosed (<12 months) with T2D and had no previous antidiabetic medication history. Participants were randomised into 4 groups; Probiotics and BBR, BBR only, probiotics only or a placebo for 12 weeks. Subgroup analysis was also completed for those aged >50 and >54.
Dosage of BBR was 0.6 g prior to a meal, twice daily. 4 g of powdered multi-strain probiotics including 9 strains of lactic acid bacteria were taken at bedtime. All participants were given a 7-day broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment immediately prior to baseline. 391 people completed the trial. The primary outcome measurement was glycaemic haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary evaluations of additional metabolic markers included fasting and post-load plasma glucose (FPG, PPG), homeostasis assessment model index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and serum triglycerides (TG).
Results
Results showed a reduction in glycaemic haemoglobin (HbA1c) for both the BBR plus probiotics group (least squares mean [95% CI] -1.04 [-1-19, -0.89]% ) and the BBR only group (-.99 [-1.16, 0.83]%). The results for these groups were significantly greater than the probiotics alone (-0.53 {-068, -0.37]%) and the placebo groups (0.59 [-0.75, -0.44]%).
Secondary metabolic evaluations for FPG and PPG, TC, LDL -c and TGs also showed similar improvements in the BBR and BBR plus probiotic groups only. Additionally, in the >50 and >54 subgroups BBR and probiotics marginally improved the HOMA-IR.
Metagenomic and metabolomic analysis of the gut microbiome was also undertaken after a one-week pre-treatment with antibiotics immediately prior to the trial and at week 13. These results showed that the blood glucose lowering effects of BBR may be due to decreased deoxycholic acid species (DCA) biotransformation by ruminococcus bromii.
Higher levels of adverse gastrointestinal side effects were reported in the BBR treatment groups, however, the authors reported that this did not affect glycemic control outcomes.
Conclusion
This study found that BBR had an antidiabetic effect through microbial alterations in the human gut microbiome
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- 600mg of BBR twice daily prior to a meal plus a multi-strain (lactic acid) probiotic of >50 billion colony forming units (CFU) for 12 weeks may be effective in lowering HbA1c in T2D clients diagnosed within the previous 12 months
- Further research is needed for clients with longer term T2D diagnosis
- Insulin resistance may be marginally improved in clients >50
- Practitioners should be aware that in this study, adverse gastrointestinal side effects were more likely to be be experienced with the use of BBR
Considerations for future research:
The authors reported several limitations to this study:
- A population of Chinese people living in China may not be generalisable to other ethnic/racial populations
- The study was over a short duration. Longer studies are needed to confirm the results
- Participants had newly diagnosed T2D and had not received any previous medications. Future studies should include patients with a longer diagnosis time
- Records should be kept of any additional lifestyle changes made by the participants
- Adverse reactions were experienced in the BBR groups, in this study. It was reported that the gut microbiome and anti-diabetic effects were not affected, however, this may be something to be considered in longer trials.
Abstract
Human gut microbiome is a promising target for managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Measures altering gut microbiota like oral intake of probiotics or berberine (BBR), a bacteriostatic agent, merit metabolic homoeostasis. We hence conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with newly diagnosed T2D patients from 20 centres in China. Four-hundred-nine eligible participants were enroled, randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) and completed a 12-week treatment of either BBR-alone, probiotics+BBR, probiotics-alone, or placebo, after a one-week run-in of gentamycin pretreatment. The changes in glycated haemoglobin, as the primary outcome, in the probiotics+BBR (least-squares mean [95% CI], -1.04[-1.19, -0.89]%) and BBR-alone group (-0.99[-1.16, -0.83]%) were significantly greater than that in the placebo and probiotics-alone groups (-0.59[-0.75, -0.44]%, -0.53[-0.68, -0.37]%, P < 0.001). BBR treatment induced more gastrointestinal side effects. Further metagenomics and metabolomic studies found that the hypoglycaemic effect of BBR is mediated by the inhibition of DCA biotransformation by Ruminococcus bromii. Therefore, our study reports a human microbial related mechanism underlying the antidiabetic effect of BBR on T2D. (Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT02861261).