1.
Diets for weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses and systematic review of trials of diets for diabetes remission.
Churuangsuk, C, Hall, J, Reynolds, A, Griffin, SJ, Combet, E, Lean, MEJ
Diabetologia. 2022;65(1):14-36
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global epidemic. Although it is a complex disease, it is mainly driven by weight gain. The benefits of weight loss for T2D are well known, but patients and healthcare practitioners do not have clear guidance as to which dietary strategies may be effective to achieve and to maintain weight loss. The aim of this study is to review a number of studies of weight loss diets in T2D patients to see which ones are the most effective. Also, to see which dietary patterns support type 2 diabetes remission. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets including formula meal replacements. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets. High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal or no difference from control diets. Diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacements appear to be the most effective. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula ‘total diet replacement’ induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Further research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Authors highlight current evidence on diets for T2D remission is limited but believe remission can be achieved if sufficient weight loss is maintained. The main contributor to HbA1c reduction and remission appears to be weight loss, irrespective of diet type
- Nice Guidelines highlight the remission of diabetes occurs when a patient no longer satisfies the diagnostic criteria, without receiving glucose-lowering medication. By 2019 in one UK GP practice 27% of the practice population with T2D who followed a LCD for 23 months, lost weight and lowered their HbA1c to 48 mmol/mol (NICE target range) in conjunction with prescribed medication
- This review highlights an opportunity for Nutritional Therapy Practitioners to successfully work with LCD approaches to support weight loss and improved HbA1c.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- 19 meta-analyses (MA) on weight-loss diets, involving 23 primary trials were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies – of Interventions [ROBINS-I]) with GRADE applied
- Weight loss diets in the review included: Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI −3.3, −1.4) greater weight loss over 12–52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3– 2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate)
- Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets (VLED), (400–500 kcal). However, this study found that low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) (21–70g of carbohydrate daily from1000–1500 kcal) were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets
- Time period of diets / length of observation / intervention: (1) Formula meal replacements (>12–52 wk), (2) LCDs ranged between (>8 wk to 4 years), (3) Very low energy diets (>8–12 wk), (4) High- protein (>4->8 wks), Mediterranean (>4->8 wk), high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid (>2wk), vegetarian (≥3wk) and low-glycaemic-index diets (≥6mo)
- Authors highlight weight reduction is fundamental for T2D management and remission
- This MA found that VLED and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches for weight management with T2D by providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets
- Potential pathophysiological mechanisms highlighted by authors are HbA1c reduction and remission which appear to be from weight loss, with only small differences between diet types assessed over 3–12 months, irrespective of diet type
- Study limitations: Many meta-analyses were of ‘low’ and ‘critically low’ AMSTAR 2 quality, predominantly through ‘no protocol reported’ (despite clear and sound methods) and no assessment of publication bias
- Most studies included European participants, such that findings may not be equally applicable to other ethnic and/or deprived communities. Durations of interventions varied, where weight regain is frequent over a longer period. Authors highlight evidence from clinical practice is needed to identify safe and effective approaches to achieve and maintain weight loss
- Authors highlight primary studies should use an RCT design, with data analyses conducted ‘blind’. They should define the intervention clearly (e.g., diets, physical activity, and behavioural and psychological support), and address separately the induction (usually 3–6 months) and maintenance (≥12 months)
- This research received no funding
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this study found a variety of dietary compositions can be used effectively for weight management with T2D, VLED was successfully used to achieve remission for T2D
- Programmes with a ’total diet replacement’ induction phase were the most effective dietary approach for T2D remission (up to 61% of participants at 1 year).
Considerations for future research:
- Authors state future research should provide implementation with optimal support in real-life settings for weight loss, prevention of weight regain and remissions, rather than seek subtle differences from macronutrient compositions
- Future studies should report sufficient detail about macronutrient or micronutrient contents, or prescribed and reported energy intakes, including energy intake of nutrient-restricted diets.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Weight reduction is fundamental for type 2 diabetes management and remission, but uncertainty exists over which diet type is best to achieve and maintain weight loss. We evaluated dietary approaches for weight loss, and remission, in people with type 2 diabetes to inform practice and clinical guidelines. METHODS First, we conducted a systematic review of published meta-analyses of RCTs of weight-loss diets. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, up to 7 May 2021. We synthesised weight loss findings stratified by diet types and assessed meta-analyses quality with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. We assessed certainty of pooled results of each meta-analysis using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) (PROSPERO CRD42020169258). Second, we conducted a systematic review of any intervention studies reporting type 2 diabetes remission with weight-loss diets, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to 10 May 2021. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions [ROBINS-I]), with GRADE applied (PROSPERO CRD42020208878). RESULTS We identified 19 meta-analyses of weight-loss diets, involving 2-23 primary trials (n = 100-1587), published 2013-2021. Twelve were 'critically low' or 'low' AMSTAR 2 quality, with seven 'high' quality. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets, 1.7-2.1 MJ/day (400-500 kcal) for 8-12 weeks (high-quality meta-analysis, GRADE low), achieving 6.6 kg (95% CI -9.5, -3.7) greater weight loss than low-energy diets (4.2-6.3 MJ/day [1000-1500 kcal]). Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI -3.3, -1.4) greater weight loss over 12-52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3-2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate). For type 2 diabetes remission, of 373 records, 16 met inclusion criteria. Remissions at 1 year were reported for a median 54% of participants in RCTs including initial low-energy total diet replacement (low-risk-of-bias study, GRADE high), and 11% and 15% for meal replacements and Mediterranean diets, respectively (some concerns for risk of bias in studies, GRADE moderate/low). For ketogenic/very low-carbohydrate and very low-energy food-based diets, the evidence for remission (20% and 22%, respectively) has serious and critical risk of bias, and GRADE certainty is very low. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Published meta-analyses of hypocaloric diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches, generally providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula 'total diet replacement' induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Most of the evidence is restricted to 1 year or less. Well-conducted research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.
2.
Low-carbohydrate diets and men's cortisol and testosterone: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Whittaker, J, Harris, M
Nutrition and health. 2022;28(4):543-554
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Testosterone is the primary male sex hormone, and vital for reproductive development and function. Moreover, low endogenous testosterone is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on mens' testosterone and cortisol. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-seven studies with a total of 309 participants. Twelve of these studies were randomised trials whilst the rest were non-randomised. Results show an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term low-carbohydrate diets (<3 weeks). In fact, resting cortisol levels return to baseline after <3 weeks on a LC diet, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. Furthermore, high-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone. Authors conclude that further research is required in order to warrant their findings.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Short-term LC-diets diets cause a moderate increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol however this effect is not seen in LC-diets followed for great than 3 weeks
- HP-LC diets caused a statistically significant decrease in resting TT, suggesting caution in relation to endocrine effects of LC diets
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction:
A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted on the effects of low-carbohydrate (LC) versus high-carbohydrate (HC) diets on men’s testosterone and cortisol.
The review was registered with PROSPERO and reported using PRISMA 2020 checklists.
Methods:
A comprehensive search strategy was used to find intervention studies looking at healthy adult males and LC diets of <35% carbohydrate. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Sub-group analyses was conducted for diet duration, protein intake and exercise duration.
Results:
The literature search resulted in 27 studies with a total of 309 healthy adult male participants, age: 27.3 ± 4.7 (to minimise variation in steroid hormone metabolism), body mass: 78.6± 7.1kg and BMI: 24.8 ±1.6. 12 randomised and 15 non-randomised controlled trials were analysed. 21 studies were considered low risk bias, 5 medium and 1 high risk.
- Short-term (<3 weeks) LC diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01) when compared to HC diets.
- Long-term (≥3 weeks) LC diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol
- LC diets resulted in higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01).
- The overall results for resting total testosterone (TT) showed a significant decrease on LC versus HC diets (SMD = −0.48, p = 0.01. However, subgroup analyses revealed this effect to be limited to high-protein (HP) LC diets, which yielded a very large decrease in TT (SMD = −1.08, p < 0.01; ∼5.23 nmol/L), albeit in a small sample (n = 26).
- Moderate protein (MP) (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (−1.08 [−1.67, −0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (−1.01 [−2, −0.01] p = 0.05).
- There was no overall effect of LC versus HC diets on 0 h post-exercise TT (SMD = −0.03, p = 0.95). However, subgroup analysis showed 0 h post-exercise was non-significantly higher on long-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = 0.44, p = 0.18), and much lower on short-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = −1.01, p = 0.05)
Conclusion:
This systematic review and metanalysis found an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term LC diets. Cortisol does return to baseline in the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet. The same response is, however, not seen in post-exercise cortisol, which remains elevated. In addition, the review showed that compared to moderate-protein diets, HP diets were found to cause a large decrease in resting and post-exercise TT (∼5.23 nmol/L).
Clinical practice applications:
The results of this review suggest that exercising whilst following a LC diet can increase cortisol in the short term, but not long-term. This suggests a period of diet adaptation. The effects of long-term LC diets on cardiovascular disease risk is uncertain and healthcare practitioners should monitor client responses and keep up-to-date with new research in this area
Since HP-LC diets were found to significantly decrease resting testosterone it highlights the need to ensure that protein intake does not exceed the urea cycle’s capacity due to potential adverse endocrine effects.
For clients where there is a desire to increase strength, power and hypertrophy, a MP-LC diet could be of benefit, as it showed potential to signal an increased anabolic state post exercise..
NB: Since the review only included a low number of studies and saw within these some heterogeneity that could not be explained, more research is needed before the paper’s findings can be conclusive. The above potential practice applications should therefore be seen as something to be mindful of when working with clients where cortisol and testosterone levels are relevant to their protocol.
Considerations for future research:
Future research should consider:
- Since LC diets have been shown to have a positive effect on health – decreased triglycerides, increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol and weight loss - future studies would benefit from including these markers so any positive and negative impacts can be monitored directly.
- Despite extensive analysis including sensitivity analysis to reduce bias and heterogeneity of the results, the paper highlights a need for further research to ensure consistency in key parameters e.g., exercise duration and intensity, carbohydrate supplements inclusion and period of dietary intervention. Since it was identified that HP-LP diets impact post exercise and resting TT, follow up studies would benefit from consistency in participants diets. This would help to reduce any potential confounding results.
Abstract
Background: Low-carbohydrate diets may have endocrine effects, although individual studies are conflicting. Therefore, a review was conducted on the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on men's testosterone and cortisol. Methods: The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021255957). The inclusion criteria were: intervention study, healthy adult males, and low-carbohydrate diet: ≤35% carbohydrate. Eight databases were searched from conception to May 2021. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Random-effects, meta-analyses using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, were performed with Review Manager. Subgroup analyses were conducted for diet duration, protein intake, and exercise duration. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included, with a total of 309 participants. Short-term (<3 weeks), low- versus high-carbohydrate diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01). Whereas, long-term (≥3 weeks), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol. Low- versus high-carbohydrate diets resulted in much higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01). Moderate-protein (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (-1.08 [-1.67, -0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (-1.01 [-2, -0.01] p = 0.05). Conclusions: Resting and post-exercise cortisol increase during the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate diet. Afterwards, resting cortisol appears to return to baseline, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. High-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L).
3.
Efficacy and safety of low and very low carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trial data.
Goldenberg, JZ, Day, A, Brinkworth, GD, Sato, J, Yamada, S, Jönsson, T, Beardsley, J, Johnson, JA, Thabane, L, Johnston, BC
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;372:m4743
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diet modification has long been recognised as a component for the treatment of diabetes. Diets low in carbohydrates have been extensively researched, as a diet for those with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of low carbohydrate diets on T2D. The systematic review found 23 studies, including 1357 individuals, investigating the role of low carbohydrate diets on T2D outcomes. Low carbohydrate diet was defined as less than 130g of carbohydrate (less than 26% of calories from carbohydrate) for at least 12 weeks. Results reported at 6 months, found low carbohydrate diets were more effective than a normal diet at achieving diabetes remission. However, this effect diminished at 12 months, although longer term improvements were seen in blood lipids, weight loss and measures of prediabetes. It was concluded that individuals with T2D, eating a low carbohydrate diet for 6 months may reverse the disease. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a short-term low carbohydrate diet to individuals with T2D, to improve their chance of going into remission.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Type 2 diabetes remains a significant and worsening problem worldwide, despite many pharmaceutical developments and a global emphasis on glycemic control.
- This review highlights structured LCDs as a worthwhile option for the management and treatment of diabetes, providing an opportunity for Nutritional Therapy Practitioners to support clients in adopting evidence-informed, modifiable dietary and lifestyle changes for Type Two Diabetes.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes, accounting for 90-95% of cases.
- Previous randomised trials assessed low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) (<26-45% of daily calories from carbohydrate) as encouraging to improve blood glucose control and outcomes of type 2 diabetes but did not systematically assessed remission of diabetes using low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) and very low carbohydrate diets (VLCDs) for people with type 2 diabetes.
- Systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses represent the most valuable, reliable, and objective tool to summarise evidence from primary studies.
- This SR assessed 23 randomised controlled trials comparing LCDs with mostly low fat control diets in individuals / subjects / participants with type 2 diabetes. LCDs were defined as diets with less than 130 g/day or less than 26% of calories from carbohydrates, based on 2000 kcal/day. The authors used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (RoB 2) to assess methodological quality of evidence, GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence
- On the basis of assessment of moderate to low certainty evidence, individuals / subjects / participants adhering to a LCD for six months may experience remission of type 2 diabetes without adverse consequences.
- Primary outcomes of interest were remission of type 2 diabetes (dichotomously defined as HbA1c <6.5% or fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/L), with or without the use of diabetes medication.
- Eight studies reported on remission of diabetes at six months. Pooled analysis showed that when remission was defined by an HbA1c level below 6.5% independent of medication use, LCDs increased remissions by an additional 32 per 100 patients followed (risk difference 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.47; 8 studies, n=264; GRADE=moderate)
- When remission was defined by an HbA1c level below 6.5% and the absence of diabetes medication, LCDs increased remissions at a lower rate (risk difference 0.05, –0.05 to 0.14; 5 studies, n=199; GRADE=low)
- Additional primary outcomes were weight loss, HbA1c:
- 18 studies reported on Weight loss results (mean difference –3.46, 95% confidence interval –5.25 to –1.67; n=882 (note that positive results not sustained at 12 mo)
- Seventeen studies reported on HbA1c levels at six months, LCDs achieved greater reductions in HbA1c than did control diets (mean difference –0.47%, –0.60 to –0.34; n=747
- Limitations of study: 1) the definition of remission of diabetes, 2) Self-reported dietary intake data are prone to measurement error, particularly in dietary trials in which participants are not blinded
- This SR was funded in part by Texas A&M University.
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
The Authors highlight LCD diets incorporating carbohydrate of less than 130 g/day or less than 26% of calories (based on 2000 kcal/day) may be a safe strategy to help individuals with type 2 diabetes achieve weight loss and better blood glucose control over a six-month period. Results may not be sustained at 12 months.
Considerations for future research:
- The definition of diabetes remission needs clarification, especially with regard to threshold concentrations of Hb1Ac or fasting glucose and the use of diabetes medication.
- Safety concerns have been raised with LCDs. Although no significant or clinically important increase in total or serious adverse events was identified in this SR, these outcomes should be reported in future trials to confirm the certainty of evidence for safety.
- The Authors suggest long term, well designed, calorie controlled randomised trials are needed to determine the effects of LCD on sustained weight loss and remission of diabetes.
- Larger treatment effects for LCDs in shorter term trials (3 to <6 months), may be trialed as an effect modifier
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) and very low carbohydrate diets (VLCDs) for people with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Searches of CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CAB, and grey literature sources from inception to 25 August 2020. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials evaluating LCDs (<130 g/day or <26% of a 2000 kcal/day diet) and VLCDs (<10% calories from carbohydrates) for at least 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION Primary outcomes were remission of diabetes (HbA1c <6.5% or fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/L, with or without the use of diabetes medication), weight loss, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included health related quality of life and biochemical laboratory data. All articles and outcomes were independently screened, extracted, and assessed for risk of bias and GRADE certainty of evidence at six and 12 month follow-up. Risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Outcomes were assessed according to a priori determined minimal important differences to determine clinical importance, and heterogeneity was investigated on the basis of risk of bias and seven a priori subgroups. Any subgroup effects with a statistically significant test of interaction were subjected to a five point credibility checklist. RESULTS Searches identified 14 759 citations yielding 23 trials (1357 participants), and 40.6% of outcomes were judged to be at low risk of bias. At six months, compared with control diets, LCDs achieved higher rates of diabetes remission (defined as HbA1c <6.5%) (76/133 (57%) v 41/131 (31%); risk difference 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.47; 8 studies, n=264, I2=58%). Conversely, smaller, non-significant effect sizes occurred when a remission definition of HbA1c <6.5% without medication was used. Subgroup assessments determined as meeting credibility criteria indicated that remission with LCDs markedly decreased in studies that included patients using insulin. At 12 months, data on remission were sparse, ranging from a small effect to a trivial increased risk of diabetes. Large clinically important improvements were seen in weight loss, triglycerides, and insulin sensitivity at six months, which diminished at 12 months. On the basis of subgroup assessments deemed credible, VLCDs were less effective than less restrictive LCDs for weight loss at six months. However, this effect was explained by diet adherence. That is, among highly adherent patients on VLCDs, a clinically important reduction in weight was seen compared with studies with less adherent patients on VLCDs. Participants experienced no significant difference in quality of life at six months but did experience clinically important, but not statistically significant, worsening of quality of life and low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 months. Otherwise, no significant or clinically important between group differences were found in terms of adverse events or blood lipids at six and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of moderate to low certainty evidence, patients adhering to an LCD for six months may experience remission of diabetes without adverse consequences. Limitations include continued debate around what constitutes remission of diabetes, as well as the efficacy, safety, and dietary satisfaction of longer term LCDs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020161795.