1.
Lipid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Is There a Link? A New Focus and Meta-Analysis.
Lodi, M, Kiehl, A, Qu, FL, Gabriele, V, Tomasetto, C, Mathelin, C
European journal of breast health. 2022;18(2):108-126
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Incidence of breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for 15.5% of all cancer-related deaths. However, there is a lack of complete understanding of the effects of different types of dietary lipids on breast cancer development, such as saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), dietary cholesterol, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and unsaturated trans fatty acids (TFA). An evaluation of the effect of lipid consumption on breast cancer and the impact it has on menopausal status was conducted in this meta-analysis, which included forty-four studies. Increased saturated fatty acid intake was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, breast cancer risk was not associated with increased consumption of total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and cholesterol in premenopausal women. The effects of estrogen and the release of proinflammatory cytokines by adipocytes should be evaluated, as well as other pathways that contribute to the development of breast cancer. There is a need for further robust studies to evaluate the effects of different types of lipid consumption on breast cancer. Although the association between SFA and breast cancer is weak, healthcare professionals can use this study's findings to better understand the detrimental effect of SFA, despite the fact that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in the current analysis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- Among lifestyle-related breast cancer risk factors, the role of diet in breast cancer remains uncertain.
- The authors highlight a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women.
- The authors found no association between total fat, saturated fatty-acids, mono and poly-unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol intake and breast cancer incidence in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
Objectives
- To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk.
Results
- Forty-four articles were included in the meta-analysis, consisting of 28 case-control studies and 16 cohort studies.
- In total, this meta-analysis involved 1,185,896 women, of whom 54,553 had breast cancer.
- There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women.
- In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03–1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85–1.19; p = 0.93).
Limitations
- Studies included in the meta-analysis were carried out on populations from five continents with significant cultural and dietary diversity, and well as different types of oils used in the diet
Conclusion
- At this stage, the authors state it is not possible to establish nutritional recommendations regarding the consumption of lipids to decrease breast cancer risk.
Clinical practice applications:
- The results of this meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant link between high consumption of total lipids, PUFA, MUFA and cholesterol and the occurrence of breast cancer.
- However, the results suggest that there is an association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, although this was only found in case-controlled studies and not cohort studies.
- While obesity is a known breast cancer risk factor after menopause, the link between the effect of diet and the effect of obesity on the breast may be through different mechanisms.
- The authors investigated if high lipid consumption acts on breast tissue by the same mechanisms as obesity, and found the association between SFA intake and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women must be through other biological explanations.
- The authors found that while high SFA consumption may increase breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women, biological mechanisms linking SFA and breast cancerogenesis are still unknown.
- The meta-analysis found high blood cholesterol levels appear to increase the risk of breast cancer. However, the authors could not confirm that high dietary cholesterol intake is a risk factor for breast cancer. The authors postulated this may be in part due to the low proportion of cholesterol (about 30%) in the diet, while the rest comes from the degradation of lipids and carbohydrates by the liver.
Considerations for future research:
- As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption
Abstract
Objective: To determine if there is an association between total lipid intake, saturated fatty acid (SFA), Poly- and Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acid (PUFA and MUFA) and cholesterol intake and breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all cohort and case-control studies published up to December 2020 with subgroup analysis according to menopausal status. Results: We included 44 articles for analysis. There was no association between total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA and cholesterol intake and breast cancer in the general population and in pre-menopausal women. In postmenopausal women, high SFA consumption was associated with increased breast cancer risk in case-control studies [relative risk (RR): 1.12; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.03-1.21; p = 0.006 but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.01; CI 95%: 0.85-1.19; p = 0.93). Conclusion: There was a weak association between high SFA consumption and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women, however there was high heterogeneity for this analysis. As lipids can have different actions in the same family, studies should rather focus on specific lipid consumption.
2.
Effectiveness of Exercise Training on Male Factor Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Hajizadeh Maleki, B, Tartibian, B, Chehrazi, M
Sports health. 2022;14(4):508-517
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Male factor infertility is characterised by the existence of suboptimal sperm parameters in the male partner of childbearing age and is presently defined as the inability to conceive a child with frequent and unprotected sexual intercourse in the fertile phase of the menstrual cycles for a year or longer. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 1 or more of the selected types of exercise interventions (moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), resistance training (RT), combined aerobic and resistance training (CET), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT)) in the prevention and treatment of male factor infertility. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials representing 18 groups (11 exercise, 7 non-intervention control [NON-EX]) and 2641 participants and/or patients (1429 exercise, 1212 NON-EX). Results show that in the setting of couples with male factor infertility, when compared with the NON-EX group, selected types of exercise interventions improved the relative risk of pregnancy rate in the following order: CET > MICT > RT > HICT > HIIT. The top-ranking interventions for live birth rate were for MICT, RT, HIIT, CET, and HICT. In addition, the interventions with the highest probability of being the best approach out of all available options in improving semen quality parameters were for CET, MICT, HICT, RT, and HIIT. Authors conclude that when clinicians are formulating clinical recommendations for preventing and treating male factor infertility, the findings of this study should be considered.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For couples with male factor infertility, this review recommends moderate intensity-aerobic exercise in combination with strength training to be the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach for reproductive health benefits.
- A conservative interpretation of the findings is required because they were based on single studies.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The World Health Organisation estimates that infertility affects 10% to 15% of couples in industrialised countries. Approximately 50% of all infertility cases are attributed to male-related factors, in particular, poor semen quality (called male factor infertility). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation.
Methods
This is the first study to undertake a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 7 RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness of 1 or more types of exercise interventions on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation, as well as to provide clinicians with a ranking of treatments to inform them of the treatment effects of exercise training and physical activity.
The forms of exercise include: moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), resistance training (RT), combined aerobic and resistance training (CET), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
7 RCTs representing 18 groups (11 exercise (supervised, not home-based), 7 non-intervention control [NON-EX]) and 2641 participants and/or patients (1429 exercise, 1212 NON-EX). All the RCTs were conducted in Iran involving healthy adult participants and/or infertile patients (with doctor-diagnosed male factor infertility). The intervention period was ≥10 weeks with a follow-up period.
None of the studies reported changes in either patients’ dietary intakes or normal daily physical activities and lifestyles during the intervention period.
Results
Compared with a non-intervention control group, the top ranking interventions:
For pregnancy rate:
Combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) (p= 0.89 relative risk [RR] = 27.81), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (p=0.87, RR = 26.67), resistance training (RT) (p=0.61,RR = 12.54), high intensity continuous training (HICT) (p=0.34, RR = 5.55), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (p=0.28, RR = 4.63).
For live birth rate:
MICT (p=0.82, RR = 10.05), RT (p=0.70, RR = 4.92), HIIT (p=0.66, RR = 4.38)), CET (p=0.45, RR = 2.20), and HICT (p=0.30, RR = 1.55)
The following parameters/markers rank the 5 exercise strategies in order of effectiveness:
- Semen quality parameters were significantly improved after the following types of exercise interventions as compared with the non-intervention group [NON-EX]: CET > MICT > HICT > RT > HIIT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving seminal markers of oxidative stress: CET > MICT > HIIT > HICT > RT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving seminal markers of inflammation: CET > MICT > HIIT > RT > HICT
- The following training strategies were significantly better at improving measures of body composition and VO2 max: CET > HICT > MICT > HIIT > RT
- There was insufficient evidence of a difference for the selected types of exercise interventions versus NON-EX group for pregnancy and live birth rates in healthy participants.
Conclusion
Combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) was found to be the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach for improving the male factor infertility.
Clinical practice applications:
- In light of these findings, it is reasonable to propose that infertile men and at-risk populations take part in the top-ranking interventions identified in this analysis.
- For substantial reproductive health benefits, one should consider doing all of the selected types of exercise interventions (CET, MICT, RT, HICT, and HIIT); however, moderate intensity-aerobic exercise and strength training in combination would generally be more favourable to lend clinically significant improvements.
- To add to this, exercise can offer a myriad of other health benefits, is a possibly safe activity and a cost-effective treatment strategy for male factor infertility.
Considerations for future research:
- There was only a small number of relevant trials available for comparison suggesting the need for additional study in this field.
- Further trials are needed to analyse the dose-response impacts of exercise modalities on male reproductive function.
- The results propose several domains for development in the reporting of RCTs addressing the impacts of interventional exercise studies on male reproductive function.
- Heterogeneity of some findings and discrepancy across the included studies was significant. For example, variations in the characteristics of training programs. Future analyses should aim to continue to address this.
- There is a concern that this study may not relate to already active patients with male factor infertility which future studies should address.
Abstract
CONTEXT Mounting evidence from the literature suggests that different types of training interventions can be successful at improving several aspects of male reproductive function in both fertile and infertile populations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training on male factor infertility and seminal markers of inflammation. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed, CISCOM, Springer, Elsevier Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, PEDro, Ovid (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO), Sport Discus, Orbis, CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the impacts of selected types of exercise interventions on markers of male reproductive function and reproductive performance. STUDY SELECTION A total of 336 records were identified, of which we included 7 trials reporting on 2641 fertile and infertile men in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1 (because this is a systematic review of RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION The data included the study design, participant characteristics, inclusion and exclusion, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, and the main results of the study. RESULTS The results of network meta-analysis showed that, compared with a nonintervention control group, the top-ranking interventions for pregnancy rate were for combined aerobic and resistance training (CET) (relative risk [RR] = 27.81), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (RR = 26.67), resistance training (RT) (RR = 12.54), high-intensity continuous training (HICT) (RR = 5.55), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (RR = 4.63). While the top-ranking interventions for live birth rate were for MICT (RR = 10.05), RT (RR = 4.92), HIIT (RR = 4.38), CET (RR = 2.20), and HICT (RR = 1.55). Also, with the following order of effectiveness, 5 training strategies were significantly better at improving semen quality parameters (CET > MICT > HICT > RT > HIIT), seminal markers of oxidative stress (CET > MICT > HIIT > HICT > RT), seminal markers of inflammation (CET > MICT > HIIT > RT > HICT), as well as measures of body composition and VO2max (CET > HICT > MICT > HIIT > RT). CONCLUSION The review recommends that the intervention with the highest probability of being the best approach out of all available options for improving the male factor infertility was for CET.