-
1.
Blueberries Improve Abdominal Symptoms, Well-Being and Functioning in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.
Wilder-Smith, CH, Materna, A, Olesen, SS
Nutrients. 2023;15(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are the most common cause of recurring, chronic digestive upsets. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD), or persistent indigestion, are the most prevalent types of those disorders. Typical symptoms include pain or discomfort in the abdomen, changes in stool patterns or bloating and may also manifest in symptoms not directly relating to the digestive tract. It remains uncertain what the exact mechanisms of those disorders are. However, scientists identified various factors involved, including immune system activation, sensitisation of the nervous system, dysregulated permeability of the gut walls, and changes in the microbiota, their composition and metabolic activity. Polyphenols are natural compounds found abundantly in plants and are most known for their antioxidant qualities. One frequently studied and rich-source of phenols is Blueberries (Vaccinium spp). Blueberries have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties, and are known to reverse the permeability of the gut membrane. Hence their use in the management of FGID appeared promising. This double-blind, randomized, cross-over study assessed the benefit of blueberries in 43 people with IBS or FD, between 18–60 years of age. The candidates were given 30g freeze-dried blueberries, the equivalent of 180g of fresh blueberries, or a sugar-based placebo of similar calorific value for 6-weeks each. When receiving the blueberries, greater symptom relief was observed when compared to the placebo group. Blueberry intake also positively reflected in experienced improvement in quality of life. No notable differences were observed between groups in stool patterns and fructose digestion. Blueberries and their beneficial compounds such as polyphenols and fiber appear to have a wide range of benefits that can help manage some of the FGID-associated symptoms. Further studies are needed to understand why, despite some notable benefits, some of the other GI markers remained unaffected. As blueberries are generally well tolerated, they can be a simple and helpful food intervention to complement other FGID management strategies.
Abstract
Blueberries beneficially modulate physiologic mechanisms relevant to the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Forty-three patients with FGID received freeze-dried blueberries (equivalent to 180 g fresh blueberries) or sugar and energy-matched placebo in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. After 6 weeks of treatment, the differences in Gastrointestinal Clinical Rating Scale (GSRS) scores and abdominal symptom relief were compared as primary outcome measures. The quality of life and life functioning ratings (OQ45.2 questionnaire), Bristol stool scales, and fructose breath test results constituted secondary outcome measures. Blueberry treatment resulted in more patients with relevant abdominal symptom relief compared to placebo (53% vs. 30%, p = 0.03). Total and pain GSRS scores improved insignificantly (mean treatment differences [95% CI]: -3.4 [-7.4 to 0.6] (p = 0.09) and -1.0 [-2.2 to 0.1] (p = 0.08), respectively). OQ45.2 scores improved during blueberry treatment compared to placebo (treatment difference -3.2 [95% CI: -5.6 to -0], p = 0.01). Treatment effect differences for the further measures did not reach statistical significance. Blueberries relieved abdominal symptoms and improved general markers of well-being, quality of life, and life functioning more than placebo in patients with FGID. Consequently, the polyphenol and fiber components of blueberries exert broad beneficial effects separate from the sugars present in both treatments.
-
2.
Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity.
Schutte, S, Esser, D, Siebelink, E, Michielsen, CJR, Daanje, M, Matualatupauw, JC, Boshuizen, HC, Mensink, M, Afman, LA
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;116(1):132-150
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Energy restriction (ER) diets are considered an effective strategy for managing obesity and preventing or reducing the risk of associated comorbidities. However, there are very few previous studies comparing the quality of energy restriction diets and their effect on maximising the health benefits. Therefore, this 12-week, parallel-designed, randomised controlled trial compared the effects of a 25% high-quality ER diet with a 25% low-quality ER diet and a habitual diet on cardiometabolic risk factors of 110 participants with abdominal obesity. Both ER diets were nutritionally balanced. The high-quality ER diet had added Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), Omega-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), fibre, and plant protein and had less fructose in it. The low-quality ER diet contained Saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and monosaccharides such as fructose. At the end of the 12-week trial, participants on the 25% high-quality diet showed more promising results in weight loss, reduction in cholesterol and triglycerides, and adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways compared to the 25% low-quality ER diet. Insulin-sensitive participants with abdominal obesity on a 25% high-quality diet lost more weight compared to the rest of the participants. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the findings due to the limitations of this study. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the beneficial effects of an ER diet when it is enriched with specific nutrients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the established relation between energy restriction (ER) and metabolic health, the most beneficial nutrient composition of a weight-loss diet is still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to examine the additional effects of nutrient quality on top of ER. METHODS A parallel-designed, 12-week 25% ER dietary intervention study was conducted (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02194504). Participants aged 40-70 years with abdominal obesity were randomized over 3 groups: a 25% ER high-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); a 25% ER low-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); or a habitual diet (n = 30). Both ER diets were nutritionally adequate, and the high-nutrient-quality ER diet was enriched in MUFAs, n-3 PUFAs, fiber, and plant protein and reduced in fructose. Before and after the intervention, intrahepatic lipids, body fat distribution, fasting and postprandial responses to a mixed-meal shake challenge test of cardiometabolic risk factors, lipoproteins, vascular measurements, and adipose tissue transcriptome were assessed. RESULTS The high-nutrient-quality ER diet (-8.4 ± 3.2) induced 2.1 kg more weight loss (P = 0.007) than the low-nutrient-quality ER diet (-6.3 ± 3.9), reduced fasting serum total cholesterol (P = 0.014) and plasma triglycerides (P < 0.001), promoted an antiatherogenic lipoprotein profile, and induced a more pronounced decrease in adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways than the low-quality ER diet. Explorative analyses showed that the difference in weight loss between the two ER diets was specifically present in insulin-sensitive subjects (HOMA-IR ≤ 2.5), in whom the high-nutrient-quality diet induced 3.9 kg more weight loss than the low-nutrient-quality diet. CONCLUSIONS A high-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet is more beneficial for cardiometabolic health than a low-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet. Overweight, insulin-sensitive subjects may benefit more from a high- than a low-nutrient-quality ER diet with respect to weight loss, due to potential attenuation of glucose-induced lipid synthesis in adipose tissue.
-
3.
Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Simons, N, Veeraiah, P, Simons, PIHG, Schaper, NC, Kooi, ME, Schrauwen-Hinderling, VB, Feskens, EJM, van der Ploeg, EMCL, Van den Eynde, MDG, Schalkwijk, CG, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2021;113(2):391-400
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The use of fructose in the food industry may have contributed to the increase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the general population. Consequently, obesity and associated comorbidities like type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, NAFLD, and cardiovascular disease have increased. Although glucose and fructose are both sugars, they are metabolised differently by the body. The overfeeding of fructose may contribute to steatosis or accumulation of fat in the liver than glucose. The aim of this randomised, double-blind trial was to measure intrahepatic lipid content in 44 overweight subjects with high fatty liver index following fructose restriction for six weeks. In this study, fructose restriction resulted in a small but significant reduction in intrahepatic lipid content with a small effect size of 0.7% point. Fructose restriction did not seem to affect glucose tolerance, serum lipid concentration or HOMA-IR, variables related to intrahepatic lipid content. As a supplement, fructose may have a different metabolic profile than when taken as a food component. The study found no effect on glucose tolerance or serum lipid levels. The results of this study may help healthcare professionals to comprehend the role of fructose in steatosis and NAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an ongoing debate on whether fructose plays a role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content in a double-blind randomized controlled trial using an isocaloric comparator. METHODS Between March 2017 and October 2019, 44 adult overweight individuals with a fatty liver index ≥ 60 consumed a 6-wk fructose-restricted diet (<7.5 g/meal and <10 g/d) and were randomly assigned to supplementation with sachets of glucose (= intervention group) or fructose (= control group) 3 times daily. Participants and assessors were blinded to the allocation. IHL content, assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, was the primary outcome and glucose tolerance and serum lipids were the secondary outcomes. All measurements were conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center. RESULTS Thirty-seven participants completed the study protocol. After 6 wk of fructose restriction, dietary fructose intake and urinary fructose excretion were significantly lower in the intervention group (difference: -57.0 g/d; 95% CI: -77.9, -39.5 g/d; and -38.8 μmol/d; 95% CI: -91.2, -10.7 μmol/d, respectively). Although IHL content decreased in both the intervention and control groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), the change in IHL content was more pronounced in the intervention group (difference: -0.7% point, 95% CI: -2.0, -0.03% point). The changes in glucose tolerance and serum lipids were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS Six weeks of fructose restriction per se led to a small, but statistically significant, decrease in IHL content in comparison with an isocaloric control group.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03067428.
-
4.
Acute responses of hepatic fat content to consuming fat, glucose and fructose alone and in combination in non-obese non-diabetic individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Kovar, J, Dusilova, T, Sedivy, P, Bruha, R, Gottfriedova, H, Pavlikova, P, Pitha, J, Smid, V, Drobny, M, Dezortova, M, et al
Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society. 2021;72(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is often associated with obesity or conditions related to obesity, such as type 2 diabetes. Steatosis is one of the four stages of NAFLD, where there is a small layer of fat build-up on the liver. Currently, one in three people in the UK has simple fatty liver or steatosis. A fascinating aspect of this study is exploring the long-term cumulative effects of daily fat intake when consumed with glucose or fructose and in the pathogenesis of steatosis. In this randomised controlled study, the researchers examined the immediate impact of high-fat loads on hepatic fat content (HFC) when administered with glucose or fructose in eight healthy overweight males with NFALD. The experiments lasted only eight hours. HFC was only transiently elevated by co-administration of glucose and high-fat loading. However, fructose co-administration with multiple high-fat loads promoted HFC. Small sample size and short duration are the limitations of this study. Long-term robust studies are needed to confirm the findings. Yet, healthcare professionals can use this study to distinguish between the immediate effects of fructose or glucose when combined with multiple doses of high fat on HFC in healthy and NAFLD subjects.
Abstract
We have recently demonstrated that a high-fat load can induce immediate increase in hepatic fat content (HFC) and that such an effect can be modified differently by co-administration of fructose or glucose in healthy subjects. Therefore, we addressed the question how consumption of these nutrients affects changes in HFC in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Eight male non-obese non-diabetic patients with NAFLD underwent 6 experiments each lasting 8 hours: 1. fasting, 2. high-fat load (150 g of fat (dairy cream) at time 0), 3. glucose (three doses of 50 g at 0, 2, and 4 hours), 4. high-fat load with three doses of 50 g of glucose, 5. fructose (three doses of 50 g at 0, 2, and 4 hours), 6. high-fat load with three doses of 50 g of fructose. HFC was measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy prior to meal administration and 3 and 6 hours later. Plasma triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, glucose and insulin were monitored throughout each experiment. HFC increased by 10.4 ± 6.9% six hours after a high-fat load and by 15.2 ± 12.5% after high-fat load with fructose. When co-administering glucose with fat, HFC rose only transiently to return to baseline at 6 hours. Importantly, NAFLD subjects accumulated almost five times more fat in their livers than healthy subjects with normal HFC. Consumption of a high-fat load results in fat accumulation in the liver of NAFLD patients. Fat accumulation after a fat load is diminished by glucose but not fructose co-administration.
-
5.
Association of Major Food Sources of Fructose-Containing Sugars With Incident Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Semnani-Azad, Z, Khan, TA, Blanco Mejia, S, de Souza, RJ, Leiter, LA, Kendall, CWC, Hanley, AJ, Sievenpiper, JL
JAMA network open. 2020;3(7):e209993
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fructose is a type of sugar that has been implicated as a contributor to the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is a condition where large waist circumference, high blood pressure and elevated blood lipid levels may all coexist. However, it remains unclear as to the role of fructose containing foods in the development of MetS. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 prospective cohort studies aimed to determine the association of several fructose containing foods and drinks with MetS. The results showed that sugary drinks containing fructose increased the risk of MetS, whereas no associations were found with mixed fruit juice, 100% fruit juice, honey, ice cream or confectionary. Interestingly fruit and yoghurt containing fructose decreased the risk of developing MetS. It was concluded that fructose containing food and drinks are not all equal in their biological effects. Sugary drinks increased the risk of developing MetS but yoghurt and fruit had a protective effect against development. Reasons for this could be due to a generally unhealthier lifestyle in those who consume sugary drinks or may be due to the increased protective effects associated with the vitamins and minerals in fruit and yoghurt. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a diet eliminating sugary drinks and containing regular fruit and yoghurt intake.
Abstract
Importance: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, the role of other important food sources of fructose-containing sugars in the development of MetS remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association of major food sources of fructose-containing sugars with incident MetS. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to March 24, 2020, in addition to manual searches of reference lists from included studies using the following search terms: sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit drink, yogurt, metabolic syndrome, and prospective study. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria included prospective cohort studies of 1 year or longer that investigated the association of important food sources of fructose-containing sugars with incident MetS in participants free of MetS at the start of the study. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Extreme quantile risk estimates for each food source with MetS incidence were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). Dose-response analyses were performed using a 1-stage linear mixed-effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results were reported according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled risk ratio (RR) of incident MetS (pairwise and dose response). Results: Thirteen prospective cohort studies (49 591 participants [median age, 51 years; range, 6-90 years]; 14 205 with MetS) that assessed 8 fructose-containing foods and MetS were included. An adverse linear dose-response association for SSBs (RR for 355 mL/d, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23) and an L-shaped protective dose-response association for yogurt (RR for 85 g/d, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76) and fruit (RR for 80 g/d, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.86) was found. Fruit juices (mixed and 100%) had a U-shaped dose-response association with protection at moderate doses (mixed fruit juice: RR for 125 mL/d, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79; 100% fruit juice: RR for 125 mL/d, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97). Honey, ice cream, and confectionary had no association with MetS incidence. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for SSBs, yogurt, fruit, mixed fruit juice, and 100% fruit juice and very low for all other food sources. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the adverse association of SSBs with MetS does not extend to other food sources of fructose-containing sugars, with a protective association for yogurt and fruit throughout the dose range and for 100% fruit juice and mixed fruit juices at moderate doses. Therefore, current policies and guidelines on the need to limit sources of free sugars may need to be reexamined.
-
6.
Honey does not adversely impact blood lipids of adult men and women: a randomized cross-over trial.
Al-Tamimi, AM, Petrisko, M, Hong, MY, Rezende, L, Clayton, ZS, Kern, M
Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.). 2020;74:87-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Restriction of sugar intake is among the most commonly advocated public health strategies, as it is believed to prevent the development of chronic diseases. Unlike sugar, honey has been shown to have various positive health benefits from increasing antioxidant status to lowering postprandial [after a meal] glycaemia and insulinaemia in healthy subjects when compared to responses of more highly refined sugar mixtures. The aim of this study was to assess responses to both short-term (1 week) and relatively long-term (1 month) ingestion of clover honey consumption versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations in young to middle-aged adults. This study is a crossover design randomised controlled study for which 40 participants were recruited (male [n = 21] and female [n = 19]) with an age range between 25 and 57 years. Results indicate that consumption of clover honey (1.2 g of carbohydrate per kilogram body weight) for up to 1 month produced modestly positive dietary and triglyceride effects compared to sucrose. - there were no positive lipid effects within the clover honey trial. - compared to sucrose, clover honey consumption resulted in a significantly lower intake of energy, carbohydrate, sugars and fat as well as lower triglycerides concentrations at the end of 4 weeks. Authors conclude that honey produces limited, modest health benefits relative to sucrose. Future studies are needed to investigate the possible mechanisms by which honey influences triglyceride production and/or clearance and the metabolic and hormonal regulators of food intake.
Abstract
Consumption of added sugars in the US is estimated to be approximately 1.5 times recommended levels and has been linked to increased risk for developing chronic diseases. We hypothesized that relative to sugar, honey would reduce energy intake and improve serum lipid profiles. To test this, we assessed the short-term (1-week) and relatively long-term (1-month) effects of honey versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations. Thirty-seven apparently healthy subjects (21 males; 16 females) aged 24-57 years (BMI = 17.6-37.2 kg/m2) completed two 4-week trials in a randomized, cross-over design separated by ≥4-week washout. During each trial, subjects consumed either clover honey or sucrose providing 1.2 g/kg/day of carbohydrate under free-living conditions with instructions to avoid changing their habitual food intake. Serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations were elevated (P < .05) after 1 week for both trials but only remained elevated (P < .05) at the 4-week time-point during sucrose consumption. The elevation after 1 week during the honey trial was concurrent with a transient increase (P < .05) in body weight. No effects on serum concentrations of insulin, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, or high density lipoprotein-cholesterol were detected for either trial. Subjects consumed significantly less energy (P < .05), carbohydrate (P < .005), sugars (P < .05), and saturated fat (P < .05) during the honey trial. These data suggest that honey may serve as a favorable substitute for sucrose with regard to reduced energy intake, carbohydrate and sugars, without negatively influencing serum lipid concentrations.
-
7.
Postexercise Glucose-Fructose Coingestion Augments Cycling Capacity During Short-Term and Overnight Recovery From Exhaustive Exercise, Compared With Isocaloric Glucose.
Gray, EA, Green, TA, Betts, JA, Gonzalez, JT
International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism. 2020;30(1):54-61
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Carbohydrate is the dominant energy source during moderate-to-high-intensity exercise. During prolonged exercise, low glycogen availability is inevitable which is associated with the onset of fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion versus glucose alone on subsequent cycling capacity. This study consists of two randomized, cross-over experiments. Experiment one (double-blind) employed a 4-h recovery (SHORT-EXPERIMENT), whereas, experiment two (single-blind) used a 15-h overnight recovery (OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT). Eight trained male cyclists participated in SHORT-EXPERIMENT whereas three female and five male trained cyclists participated in OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT. Results demonstrate that post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion, compared to isocaloric glucose alone, augments cycling capacity following short (4-h) and overnight (15-h) recovery periods in trained cyclists. Authors conclude that endurance athletes competing in multi-stage events where recovery time is limited may benefit from consuming fructose alongside glucose in their post-exercise nutritional strategies.
Abstract
During short-term recovery, postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion can accelerate total glycogen repletion and augment recovery of running capacity. It is unknown if this advantage translates to cycling, or to a longer (e.g., overnight) recovery. Using two experiments, the present research investigated if postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion augments exercise capacity following 4-hr (short experiment; n = 8) and 15-hr (overnight experiment; n = 8) recoveries from exhaustive exercise in trained cyclists, compared with isocaloric glucose alone. In each experiment, a glycogen depleting exercise protocol was followed by a 4-hr recovery, with ingestion of 1.5 or 1.2 g·kg-1·hr-1 carbohydrate in the short experiment (double blind) and the overnight experiment (single blind), respectively. Treatments were provided in a randomized order using a crossover design. Four or fifteen hours after the glycogen depletion protocol, participants cycled to exhaustion at 70% Wmax or 65% Wmax in the short experiment and the overnight experiment, respectively. In both experiments there was no difference in substrate oxidation or blood glucose and lactate concentrations between treatments during the exercise capacity test (trial effect, p > .05). Nevertheless, cycling capacity was greater in glucose + fructose versus glucose only in the short experiment (28.0 ± 8.4 vs. 22.8 ± 7.3 min, d = 0.65, p = .039) and the overnight experiment (35.9 ± 10.7 vs. 30.6 ± 9.2 min, d = 0.53, p = .026). This is the first study to demonstrate that postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion enhances cycling capacity following short-term (4 hr) and overnight (15 hr) recovery durations. Therefore, if multistage endurance athletes are ingesting glucose for rapid postexercise recovery then fructose containing carbohydrates may be advisable.
-
8.
Dietary Fructose and the Metabolic Syndrome.
Taskinen, MR, Packard, CJ, Borén, J
Nutrients. 2019;11(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructose is a naturally occurring sugar in carbohydrate foods and is often used as an ingredient in foods and sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) such as sport and energy drinks. The consumption of these drinks accounts for up to 15-17% of calorie intake in the modern western diet. Excessive sugar consumption is becoming a major public health issue with high sugar intake linked to Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Fructose is largely absorbed in the small intestines however the liver is considered the major organ for fructose metabolism. Too much fructose in the diet appears to stimulate the liver to produce more sugars and triglyceride fats which can raise cholesterol levels and promote insulin resistance. This partially explains the role of fructose in promoting a build-up of fat around the liver leading to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and central obesity. Too much fructose is also linked to unfavourable changes in gut bacteria which may contribute to obesity and MetS. Overall the study concludes that too much fructose contributes to an unhealthy lifestyle and is a risk factor for metabolic disturbances.
Abstract
Abstract: Consumption of fructose, the sweetest of all naturally occurring carbohydrates, has increased dramatically in the last 40 years and is today commonly used commercially in soft drinks, juice, and baked goods. These products comprise a large proportion of the modern diet, in particular in children, adolescents, and young adults. A large body of evidence associate consumption of fructose and other sugar-sweetened beverages with insulin resistance, intrahepatic lipid accumulation, and hypertriglyceridemia. In the long term, these risk factors may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Fructose is absorbed in the small intestine and metabolized in the liver where it stimulates fructolysis, glycolysis, lipogenesis, and glucose production. This may result in hypertriglyceridemia and fatty liver. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying intestinal and hepatic fructose metabolism is important. Here we review recent evidence linking excessive fructose consumption to health risk markers and development of components of the Metabolic Syndrome.
-
9.
Relation of Total Sugars, Sucrose, Fructose, and Added Sugars With the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Khan, TA, Tayyiba, M, Agarwal, A, Mejia, SB, de Souza, RJ, Wolever, TMS, Leiter, LA, Kendall, CWC, Jenkins, DJA, Sievenpiper, JL
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019;94(12):2399-2414
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sugar-sweetened beverages have been associated with a risk for poor health outcomes, however risk for poor health outcomes with the fructose sugar they contain remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies aimed to determine the role of total added fructose in the development of heart disease. Total sugars, sucrose and fructose were not associated with the incidence of heart disease, however total sugars and fructose increased the risk of death due to heart disease, the extent of which was dependent upon the amount consumed. Interestingly sucrose had a protective effect against death due to heart disease. It was concluded that consumption of fructose, total sugars and added sugars is associated with death due to heart disease, whereas sucrose is not. Although not all food stuffs containing fructose and added sugars were analysed, it is still indicative that healthcare professionals could recommend a low sugar and fructose diet to lower the risk of death due to heart disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the association of total and added fructose-containing sugars on cardiovascular (CVD) incidence and mortality. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2018. Prospective cohort studies assessing the association of reported intakes of total, sucrose, fructose and added sugars with CVD incidence and mortality in individuals free from disease at baseline were included. Risk estimates were pooled using the inverse variance method, and dose-response analysis was modeled. RESULTS Eligibility criteria were met by 24 prospective cohort comparisons (624,128 unique individuals; 11,856 CVD incidence cases and 12,224 CVD mortality cases). Total sugars, sucrose, and fructose were not associated with CVD incidence. Total sugars (risk ratio, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.17]) and fructose (1.08 [1.01 to 1.15]) showed a harmful association for CVD mortality, there was no association for added sugars and a beneficial association for sucrose (0.94 [0.89 to 0.99]). Dose-response analyses showed a beneficial linear dose-response gradient for sucrose and nonlinear dose-response thresholds for harm for total sugars (133 grams, 26% energy), fructose (58 grams, 11% energy) and added sugars (65 grams, 13% energy) in relation to CVD mortality (P<.05). The certainty of the evidence using GRADE was very low for CVD incidence and low for CVD mortality for all sugar types. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports a threshold of harm for intakes of total sugars, added sugars, and fructose at higher exposures and lack of harm for sucrose independent of food form for CVD mortality. Further research of different food sources of sugars is needed to define better the relationship between sugars and CVD. REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01608620.
-
10.
Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Tsilas, CS, de Souza, RJ, Mejia, SB, Mirrahimi, A, Cozma, AI, Jayalath, VH, Ha, V, Tawfik, R, Di Buono, M, Jenkins, AL, et al
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(20):E711-E720
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sugars, particularly fructose-containing sugars, have been implicated as an important driver in the rise in incidence of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine the role of fructose-containing sugars independent of food form in the development of type 2 diabetes. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. The study included 15 cohorts from 9 studies. Results indicate that intakes of total sugars and fructose were not associated with type 2 diabetes, whereas intake of sucrose was associated with an 11% decrease in type 2 diabetes. Authors conclude that in the absence of a clear signal for harm, sugars alone do not appear to explain the relation between sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sugar-sweetened beverages are associated with type 2 diabetes. To assess whether this association holds for the fructose-containing sugars they contain, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library (through June 2016). We included prospective cohort studies that assessed the relation of fructose-containing sugars with incident type 2 diabetes. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analyses. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS Fiffeen prospective cohort studies (251 261 unique participants, 16 416 cases) met the eligibility criteria, comparing the highest intake (median 137, 35.2 and 78 g/d) with the lowest intake (median 65, 9.7 and 25.8 g/d) of total sugars, fructose and sucrose, respectively. Although there was no association of total sugars (RR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.09) or fructose (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84-1.29) with type 2 diabetes, sucrose was associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98). Our confidence in the estimates was limited by evidence of serious inconsistency between studies for total sugars and fructose, and serious imprecision in the pooled estimates for all 3 sugar categories. INTERPRETATION Current evidence does not allow us to conclude that fructose-containing sugars independent of food form are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Further research is likely to affect our estimates. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01608620.