1.
Diverging metabolic effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in nutrient quality: a 12-week randomized controlled trial in subjects with abdominal obesity.
Schutte, S, Esser, D, Siebelink, E, Michielsen, CJR, Daanje, M, Matualatupauw, JC, Boshuizen, HC, Mensink, M, Afman, LA
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;116(1):132-150
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Energy restriction (ER) diets are considered an effective strategy for managing obesity and preventing or reducing the risk of associated comorbidities. However, there are very few previous studies comparing the quality of energy restriction diets and their effect on maximising the health benefits. Therefore, this 12-week, parallel-designed, randomised controlled trial compared the effects of a 25% high-quality ER diet with a 25% low-quality ER diet and a habitual diet on cardiometabolic risk factors of 110 participants with abdominal obesity. Both ER diets were nutritionally balanced. The high-quality ER diet had added Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), Omega-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), fibre, and plant protein and had less fructose in it. The low-quality ER diet contained Saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and monosaccharides such as fructose. At the end of the 12-week trial, participants on the 25% high-quality diet showed more promising results in weight loss, reduction in cholesterol and triglycerides, and adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways compared to the 25% low-quality ER diet. Insulin-sensitive participants with abdominal obesity on a 25% high-quality diet lost more weight compared to the rest of the participants. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the findings due to the limitations of this study. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the beneficial effects of an ER diet when it is enriched with specific nutrients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the established relation between energy restriction (ER) and metabolic health, the most beneficial nutrient composition of a weight-loss diet is still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to examine the additional effects of nutrient quality on top of ER. METHODS A parallel-designed, 12-week 25% ER dietary intervention study was conducted (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02194504). Participants aged 40-70 years with abdominal obesity were randomized over 3 groups: a 25% ER high-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); a 25% ER low-nutrient-quality diet (n = 40); or a habitual diet (n = 30). Both ER diets were nutritionally adequate, and the high-nutrient-quality ER diet was enriched in MUFAs, n-3 PUFAs, fiber, and plant protein and reduced in fructose. Before and after the intervention, intrahepatic lipids, body fat distribution, fasting and postprandial responses to a mixed-meal shake challenge test of cardiometabolic risk factors, lipoproteins, vascular measurements, and adipose tissue transcriptome were assessed. RESULTS The high-nutrient-quality ER diet (-8.4 ± 3.2) induced 2.1 kg more weight loss (P = 0.007) than the low-nutrient-quality ER diet (-6.3 ± 3.9), reduced fasting serum total cholesterol (P = 0.014) and plasma triglycerides (P < 0.001), promoted an antiatherogenic lipoprotein profile, and induced a more pronounced decrease in adipose tissue gene expression of energy metabolism pathways than the low-quality ER diet. Explorative analyses showed that the difference in weight loss between the two ER diets was specifically present in insulin-sensitive subjects (HOMA-IR ≤ 2.5), in whom the high-nutrient-quality diet induced 3.9 kg more weight loss than the low-nutrient-quality diet. CONCLUSIONS A high-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet is more beneficial for cardiometabolic health than a low-nutrient-quality 25% ER diet. Overweight, insulin-sensitive subjects may benefit more from a high- than a low-nutrient-quality ER diet with respect to weight loss, due to potential attenuation of glucose-induced lipid synthesis in adipose tissue.
2.
Honey does not adversely impact blood lipids of adult men and women: a randomized cross-over trial.
Al-Tamimi, AM, Petrisko, M, Hong, MY, Rezende, L, Clayton, ZS, Kern, M
Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.). 2020;74:87-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Restriction of sugar intake is among the most commonly advocated public health strategies, as it is believed to prevent the development of chronic diseases. Unlike sugar, honey has been shown to have various positive health benefits from increasing antioxidant status to lowering postprandial [after a meal] glycaemia and insulinaemia in healthy subjects when compared to responses of more highly refined sugar mixtures. The aim of this study was to assess responses to both short-term (1 week) and relatively long-term (1 month) ingestion of clover honey consumption versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations in young to middle-aged adults. This study is a crossover design randomised controlled study for which 40 participants were recruited (male [n = 21] and female [n = 19]) with an age range between 25 and 57 years. Results indicate that consumption of clover honey (1.2 g of carbohydrate per kilogram body weight) for up to 1 month produced modestly positive dietary and triglyceride effects compared to sucrose. - there were no positive lipid effects within the clover honey trial. - compared to sucrose, clover honey consumption resulted in a significantly lower intake of energy, carbohydrate, sugars and fat as well as lower triglycerides concentrations at the end of 4 weeks. Authors conclude that honey produces limited, modest health benefits relative to sucrose. Future studies are needed to investigate the possible mechanisms by which honey influences triglyceride production and/or clearance and the metabolic and hormonal regulators of food intake.
Abstract
Consumption of added sugars in the US is estimated to be approximately 1.5 times recommended levels and has been linked to increased risk for developing chronic diseases. We hypothesized that relative to sugar, honey would reduce energy intake and improve serum lipid profiles. To test this, we assessed the short-term (1-week) and relatively long-term (1-month) effects of honey versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations. Thirty-seven apparently healthy subjects (21 males; 16 females) aged 24-57 years (BMI = 17.6-37.2 kg/m2) completed two 4-week trials in a randomized, cross-over design separated by ≥4-week washout. During each trial, subjects consumed either clover honey or sucrose providing 1.2 g/kg/day of carbohydrate under free-living conditions with instructions to avoid changing their habitual food intake. Serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations were elevated (P < .05) after 1 week for both trials but only remained elevated (P < .05) at the 4-week time-point during sucrose consumption. The elevation after 1 week during the honey trial was concurrent with a transient increase (P < .05) in body weight. No effects on serum concentrations of insulin, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, or high density lipoprotein-cholesterol were detected for either trial. Subjects consumed significantly less energy (P < .05), carbohydrate (P < .005), sugars (P < .05), and saturated fat (P < .05) during the honey trial. These data suggest that honey may serve as a favorable substitute for sucrose with regard to reduced energy intake, carbohydrate and sugars, without negatively influencing serum lipid concentrations.
3.
Postexercise Glucose-Fructose Coingestion Augments Cycling Capacity During Short-Term and Overnight Recovery From Exhaustive Exercise, Compared With Isocaloric Glucose.
Gray, EA, Green, TA, Betts, JA, Gonzalez, JT
International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism. 2020;30(1):54-61
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Carbohydrate is the dominant energy source during moderate-to-high-intensity exercise. During prolonged exercise, low glycogen availability is inevitable which is associated with the onset of fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion versus glucose alone on subsequent cycling capacity. This study consists of two randomized, cross-over experiments. Experiment one (double-blind) employed a 4-h recovery (SHORT-EXPERIMENT), whereas, experiment two (single-blind) used a 15-h overnight recovery (OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT). Eight trained male cyclists participated in SHORT-EXPERIMENT whereas three female and five male trained cyclists participated in OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT. Results demonstrate that post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion, compared to isocaloric glucose alone, augments cycling capacity following short (4-h) and overnight (15-h) recovery periods in trained cyclists. Authors conclude that endurance athletes competing in multi-stage events where recovery time is limited may benefit from consuming fructose alongside glucose in their post-exercise nutritional strategies.
Abstract
During short-term recovery, postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion can accelerate total glycogen repletion and augment recovery of running capacity. It is unknown if this advantage translates to cycling, or to a longer (e.g., overnight) recovery. Using two experiments, the present research investigated if postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion augments exercise capacity following 4-hr (short experiment; n = 8) and 15-hr (overnight experiment; n = 8) recoveries from exhaustive exercise in trained cyclists, compared with isocaloric glucose alone. In each experiment, a glycogen depleting exercise protocol was followed by a 4-hr recovery, with ingestion of 1.5 or 1.2 g·kg-1·hr-1 carbohydrate in the short experiment (double blind) and the overnight experiment (single blind), respectively. Treatments were provided in a randomized order using a crossover design. Four or fifteen hours after the glycogen depletion protocol, participants cycled to exhaustion at 70% Wmax or 65% Wmax in the short experiment and the overnight experiment, respectively. In both experiments there was no difference in substrate oxidation or blood glucose and lactate concentrations between treatments during the exercise capacity test (trial effect, p > .05). Nevertheless, cycling capacity was greater in glucose + fructose versus glucose only in the short experiment (28.0 ± 8.4 vs. 22.8 ± 7.3 min, d = 0.65, p = .039) and the overnight experiment (35.9 ± 10.7 vs. 30.6 ± 9.2 min, d = 0.53, p = .026). This is the first study to demonstrate that postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion enhances cycling capacity following short-term (4 hr) and overnight (15 hr) recovery durations. Therefore, if multistage endurance athletes are ingesting glucose for rapid postexercise recovery then fructose containing carbohydrates may be advisable.