-
1.
Acute feeding with almonds compared to a carbohydrate-based snack improves appetite-regulating hormones with no effect on self-reported appetite sensations: a randomised controlled trial.
Carter, S, Hill, AM, Buckley, JD, Tan, SY, Rogers, GB, Coates, AM
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):857-866
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Long-term regulation of body weight is controlled by balancing energy intake with energy expenditure. Understanding the role of specific food items and their impact on energy intake may assist in promoting weight reduction and weight loss maintenance for people with obesity. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of eating almonds or a carbohydrate-based snack on appetite-regulating hormones, self-reported appetite ratings, and short-term energy intake. This study is based on data obtained from a parallel arm randomised controlled trial. Participants were males and females, aged between 25 and 65 years who were randomly assigned to either the almond or the snack bar treatment groups based on age, sex and body mass index. Results show that the consumption of almonds resulted in a smaller C-peptide response and a larger glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [pancreatic hormone], glucagon-like peptide 1 [peptide hormone] (timepoint comparisons only), glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide response compared to consuming an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar. Furthermore, although not significant, the almond group consumed 300 kJ less energy in the meal challenge, 270 kJ of which came from discretionary foods, which may be a clinically important benefit in weight management. Authors conclude that foods that promote satiety help to regulate energy balance and may assist with weight management. However, future studies should consider testing food dose and composition carefully as the volume of food, its sensory qualities, and the acceptance of the food respective of usual meal patterns, may be important in eliciting a feeling of fullness and satisfaction.
Abstract
PURPOSE Early satiety has been identified as one of the mechanisms that may explain the beneficial effects of nuts for reducing obesity. This study compared postprandial changes in appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite ratings after consuming almonds (AL, 15% of energy requirement) or an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar (SB). METHODS This is a sub-analysis of baseline assessments of a larger parallel-arm randomised controlled trial in overweight and obese (Body Mass Index 27.5-34.9 kg/m2) adults (25-65 years). After an overnight fast, 140 participants consumed a randomly allocated snack (AL [n = 68] or SB [n = 72]). Appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite sensations, measured using visual analogue scales, were assessed immediately before snack food consumption, and at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min following snack consumption. A sub-set of participants (AL, n = 49; SB, n = 48) then consumed a meal challenge buffet ad libitum to assess subsequent energy intake. An additional appetite rating assessment was administered post buffet at 150 min. RESULTS Postprandial C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) response was 47% smaller with AL compared to SB (p < 0.001). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide AUC responses were larger with AL compared to SB (18%, p = 0.005; 39% p < 0.001; 45% p < 0.001 respectively). Cholecystokinin, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin and polypeptide YY AUCs were not different between groups. Self-reported appetite ratings and energy intake following the buffet did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION More favourable appetite-regulating hormone responses to AL did not translate into better self-reported appetite or reduced short-term energy consumption. Future studies should investigate implications for longer term appetite regulation. ANZCTR REFERENCE NUMBER ACTRN12618001861246 2018.
-
2.
The efficacy of morning versus evening exercise for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial.
Brooker, PG, Gomersall, SR, King, NA, Leveritt, MD
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2023;31(1):83-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Despite considerable efforts to promote a healthy lifestyle, rates of overweight and obesity are continuing to rise worldwide, and obesity is now considered a pandemic. Although dietary intervention is the most effective lifestyle intervention for weight loss, exercise plays an important role in weight management. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a 12-week exercise programme, performed in either the morning or evening, on weight loss, cardiometabolic health risk factors, and components of energy balance in inactive adults with overweight and obesity. This study is a three-armed randomised controlled trial. Participants allocated to the two intervention conditions were prescribed 250 minutes per week of self-paced aerobic (treadmill-based) exercise for 12 weeks. Results show that there was no compelling evidence to support or encourage exercise exclusively at a particular time of day for weight loss. However, there were improvements in cardiometabolic health, such as weight reduction and increased cardiorespiratory fitness, increased levels of physical activity, and positive changes to dietary intake in both intervention groups. Following the intervention, both exercise groups continued to lose weight, and the improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness were sustained. Authors conclude that consistent reporting of time of day of exercise interventions among high-quality studies would significantly contribute to the literature and provide critical insight into the relative importance (or lack thereof) of prescribing exercise at a particular time of day.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of morning versus evening exercise on weight loss, cardiometabolic health, and components of energy balance. METHODS A total of 100 inactive adults with overweight or obesity were randomized to morning exercise (AMEx; 06:00-09:00), evening exercise (PMEx; 16:00-19:00), or wait-list control (CON). AMEx and PMEx were prescribed 250 min·wk-1 of self-paced aerobic exercise for 12 weeks. Anthropometry and body composition, physical activity, and dietary intake were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2 peak), resting metabolic rate, and blood markers were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. Body composition and V̇O2 peak were also measured at 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS AMEx and PMEx lost weight during the intervention (mean [SD], AMEx, -2.7 [2.5] kg, p < 0.001; PMEx, -3.1 [3.4] kg, p < 0.001). V̇O2 peak significantly increased in both intervention groups, and these changes were different from CON (AMEx, +4.7 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , p = 0.034; PMEx, +4.2 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , p = 0.045). There were no between-group differences for resting metabolic rate or physical activity. At 12 weeks, total energy intake was significantly reduced in both AMEx and PMEx versus CON (AMEx, -3974 kJ, p < 0.001; PMEx, -3165 kJ, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adults with overweight and obesity experience modest weight loss in response to an exercise program, but there does not appear to be an optimal time to exercise.
-
3.
Effects of a Dulaglutide plus Calorie-Restricted Diet versus a Calorie-Restricted Diet on Visceral Fat and Metabolic Profiles in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Zhang, Y, Qu, Z, Lu, T, Shao, X, Cai, M, Dilimulati, D, Gao, X, Mao, W, Hu, F, Su, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a unification of reproductive endocrine and metabolic disorders. Lifestyle and weight management, particularly dietary intake aimed at weight loss, are initial treatment strategies for PCOS. A calorie-restricted diet (CRD) seems to be the optimal dietary pattern for weight management in the PCOS population. The aim of this study was to evaluate modifications in fat distribution, the androgenic state, and metabolic profiles in the overweight and obese PCOS-affected population, who obtained modest and equivalent weight loss induced by a CRD regimen with or without Dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA). This study was a randomised controlled trial which enrolled 68 females diagnosed with PCOS. Participants were randomly assigned to receive to one of the two groups: a GLP-1 RA combined with CRD or CRD alone. Results showed that participants in the GLP-1 RA + CRD group took a shorter time to achieve a 7% weight loss goal than those in the CRD group. Furthermore, both interventions had similar positive effects in improving menstrual frequency and reducing levels of blood pressure, insulin, aminotransferases, lipids, total fat mass, total lean mass, and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue mass after equivalent weight loss. Authors conclude that their findings support the importance of dietary intervention as a first-line treatment in women with PCOS, and that GLP-1 RA therapy offers an effective and generally tolerable adjunct therapy to aid in achieving weight targets based on dietary therapy in overweight and obese women with PCOS.
Abstract
The effects of dulaglutide and a calorie-restricted diet (CRD) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have not been extensively investigated. In this study, we investigated whether dulaglutide combined with CRD could further reduce VAT and promote clinical benefits as compared with a CRD regimen alone in overweight or obese PCOS-affected women. Between May 2021 and May 2022, this single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial was conducted. Overall, 243 participants with PCOS were screened, of which 68 overweight or obese individuals were randomly randomized to undergo dulaglutide combined with CRD treatment (n = 35) or CRD treatment alone (n = 33). The duration of intervention was set as the time taken to achieve a 7% weight loss goal from baseline body weight, which was restricted to 6 months. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change in VAT area reduction between the groups. The secondary endpoints contained changes in menstrual frequency, metabolic profiles, hormonal parameters, liver fat, and body composition. As compared with the CRD group, the dulaglutide + CRD group had a considerably shorter median time to achieve 7% weight loss. There was no significant between-group difference in area change of VAT reduction (-0.97 cm2, 95% confidence interval from -14.36 to 12.42, p = 0.884). As compared with CRD alone, dulaglutide + CRD had significant advantages in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c and postprandial plasma glucose levels. The results of the analyses showed different changes in menstruation frequency, additional metabolic profiles, hormonal markers, liver fat, and body composition between the two groups did not differ significantly. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, and loss of appetite were the main adverse events of dulaglutide. These results emphasize the value of dietary intervention as the first line of treatment for PCOS-affected women, while glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist therapy provides an efficient and typically well tolerated adjuvant therapy to aid in reaching weight targets based on dietary therapy in the population of overweight/obese PCOS-affected women.
-
4.
Is Extra Virgin Olive Oil the Critical Ingredient Driving the Health Benefits of a Mediterranean Diet? A Narrative Review.
Flynn, MM, Tierney, A, Itsiopoulos, C
Nutrients. 2023;15(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the largest contributor to deaths globally, followed by cancers, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes. It is estimated that 90% of deaths from CVD can be prevented with modifiable risk factors such as diet. The Mediterranean diet, which is rich in extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), is important in the prevention of chronic diseases. There is however very little focus on differentiating healthy fats such as EVOO from other fats and oils in dietary guidelines. This review of 34 studies aims to compare the effect of diets that include EVOO on cardiometabolic risk factors for heart disease, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. It looks at the effects on blood pressure (SBP), low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, (HDP-c and LDD-c) fasting blood glucose (FBG) and body weight. It also assesses from published studies the minimum daily amount of EVOO and the shortest time needed to see improvements in the risk factors. There is evidence to support EVOO in improving SBP in patients with high blood pressure, with studies suggesting that specific phenols in the oil may be important compared with a refined olive oil. Compared with other dietary fats or low-fat diets, EVOO can decrease LDL-c and increase HDL-c. Diets including daily EVOO are effective for weight loss. The effect of EVOO on FBG compared with other diets is not yet clear. The authors state that EVOO would be a far superior choice compared with other dietary fats, low-fat diets, or refined olive oil. The daily use of EVOO starting at approximately two tablespoons a day will improve a range of risk factors in as few as three weeks.
Abstract
Most chronic diseases are preventable with a healthy diet, although there is debate about the optimal dietary approach. Increasingly more countries are focusing on food-based guidelines rather than the traditional nutrient-based approach. Although there is good agreement on plant foods, controversy remains about the types and amounts of fats and oils. This narrative review aims to systematically summarize and evaluate the latest evidence on the protective effects of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) on disease risk factors. A systematic search of the relevant literature using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was conducted for the years 2000 through December 2022. A narrative synthesis was then undertaken. Of 281 retrieved articles, 34 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included. Compared with other dietary fats and low-fat diets, EVOO is superior in the management of clinical biomarkers including lowering blood pressure and LDL-c, increasing protective HDL-c, improving glycemic control, and weight management. The protective effects of EVOO are likely due to its polyphenol content rather than the monounsaturated fat content. It is therefore important to promote the regular use of EVOO in the context of healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet for maximal health benefit.
-
5.
A clinical trial about effects of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on weight loss, psychological profile and metabolic parameters in obese subjects.
Ben Othman, R, Ben Amor, N, Mahjoub, F, Berriche, O, El Ghali, C, Gamoudi, A, Jamoussi, H
Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism. 2023;6(2):e402
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gut microbiota is defined by all the beneficial microorganisms that live and grow in the intestine. It is set up from birth and evolves according to different factors. Today, the microbiota is considered a therapeutic revolution, where researchers use its enrichment to prevent or treat certain diseases including obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a probiotic supplement containing Bifidobacteruim, Lactobacillus strains and a prebiotic supplement by carob on the changes in body composition and metabolic biomarkers in subjects with obesity. This study was a prospective interventional study. Forty-five patients were recruited on their first visit to the obesity unit and were randomly assigned to three groups. All participants were enrolled in the weight loss program at the beginning of the study and followed a low-carbohydrate, reduced-energy intake eating plan. Results showed that a low-carbohydrate, restricted-energy diet effectively showed positive results in terms of weight loss, metabolic parameters and obesity-related psychiatric disorders in obese individuals. Authors concluded that prebiotics and probiotics supplementation with lifestyle measures can be taken into consideration for the management of obesity.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of obesity is difficult with many failures of lifestyle measures, hence the need to broaden the range of treatments prescribed. The aim of our work was to study the influence of pre and probiotics on weight loss psychological profile and metabolic parameters in obese patients. METHODS It is a clinical trial involving 45 obese patients, recruited from the Obesity Unit of the National Institute of Nutrition between March and August 2022 divided into three groups: diet only (low-carbohydrate and reduced energy diet), prebiotics (30 g of carob/day) and probiotics (one tablet containing Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus/day). The three groups were matched for age, sex and BMI. Patients were seen after 1 month from the intervention. Anthropometric measures, biological parameters, dietary survey and psychological scores were performed. RESULTS The average age of our population was 48.73 ± 7.7 years, with a female predominance. All three groups showed a significant decrease in weight, BMI and waist circumference with p < .05. Only the prebiotic and probiotic group showed a significant decrease in fat mass (p = .001) and a significant increase in muscle strength with p = .008 and .004, but the differences were not significant between the three groups. Our results showed also a significant decrease in insulinemia and HOMA-IR in the prebiotic group compared to the diet-alone group (p = .03; p = .012) and the probiotic group showed a significant decrease in fasting blood glucose compared to the diet alone group (p = .02). A significant improvement in sleep quality was noted in the prebiotic group (p = .02), with a significant decrease in depression, anxiety and stress in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS The prescription of prebiotics and probiotics with the lifestyle measures seems interesting for the management of obesity especially if it is sarcopenic, in addition to the improvement of metabolic parameters and obesity-related psychiatric disorders.
-
6.
The effects of time-restricted eating and weight loss on bone metabolism and health: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.
Papageorgiou, M, Biver, E, Mareschal, J, Phillips, NE, Hemmer, A, Biolley, E, Schwab, N, Manoogian, ENC, Gonzalez Rodriguez, E, Aeberli, D, et al
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2023;31 Suppl 1:85-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) involves an alternation of abstinence and consumption of food and caloric beverages over a cycle of hours to days. Time-restricted feeding (in animals) or eating (TRE in humans) is a form of IF that entails restricting eating within a window of 4 to 12 hours per 24-hour cycle and prolonging the time spent in the fasted state to realign eating-fasting patterns with circadian rhythms. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of a 6-month randomised controlled trial of TRE versus standard dietary advice (SDA, active control arm) on bone metabolism and health in a population with at least one component of the metabolic syndrome. This study is a secondary analysis of an open-label 6-month randomised controlled trial in which participants who ate within a time interval > 14 hours per 24-hour cycle (n=54) were randomised to TRE or SDA (active control) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 42 participants (76% women) with available bone turnover markers and/or bone mass measurements were included in this study. Results show that there weren’t any detrimental effects on bone health outcomes i.e. bone metabolism or bone loss after 6 months of TRE. Additionally, weight loss following a period of TRE might be associated with small bone-sparing effects compared with SDA. Authors conclude that future studies of longer duration (>6 months) assessing multiple bone phenotypes are required in order to confirm the study’s findings and explore the effects of various TRE regimens particularly among individuals at risk for bone fragility such as postmenopausal women and the elderly.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored the impact of time-restricted eating (TRE) versus standard dietary advice (SDA) on bone health. METHODS Adults with ≥1 component of metabolic syndrome were randomized to TRE (ad libitum eating within 12 hours) or SDA (food pyramid brochure). Bone turnover markers and bone mineral content/density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed in the total population and by weight loss response. RESULTS In the total population (n = 42, 76% women, median age 47 years [IQR: 31-52]), there were no between-group differences (TRE vs. SDA) in any bone parameter. Among weight loss responders (≥0.6 kg weight loss), the bone resorption marker β-carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen tended to decrease after TRE but increase after SDA (between-group differences p = 0.041), whereas changes in the bone formation marker procollagen type I N-propeptide did not differ between groups. Total body bone mineral content decreased after SDA (p = 0.028) but remained unchanged after TRE (p = 0.31) in weight loss responders (between-group differences p = 0.028). Among nonresponders (<0.6 kg weight loss), there were no between-group differences in bone outcomes. CONCLUSIONS TRE had no detrimental impact on bone health, whereas, when weight loss occurred, it was associated with some bone-sparing effects compared with SDA.
-
7.
The Effect of Omega-3 Enriched Oral Nutrition Supplement on Nutritional Indices and Quality of Life in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sim, E, Kim, JM, Lee, SM, Chung, MJ, Song, SY, Kim, ES, Chun, HJ, Sung, MK
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2022;23(2):485-494
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial condition that reveals impairments in energy and protein balance leading to weight loss through the loss of skeletal muscle and body fat. Nutritional status of cancer patients affects therapeutic efficacy, and the disease survival is influenced by the degree of anorexia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids fortified nutrition supplement intervention on nutritional status, quality of life (QOL) and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations of cancer patients. This study was a randomised controlled study. Participants (n = 58) included in the study were patients who were in stages between II to IV receiving one or more cancer therapies without taking any nutritional supplements. Both control and experimental groups received regular nutrition counselling and education, while only the experimental group was asked to take oral nutrition supplements (ONS) twice a day (400 ml, 400 kcal). Results show that ONS intervention: - alleviated symptoms of gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting and constipation; - exerted improvements in many of QOL indices; and - did not improve (statistically significant) biochemical markers of nutritional status and concentration level of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Authors conclude that nutritional supplements can improve some of the QOL components which need evidence-based explanation in mechanistic aspects.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients often experience severe malnutrition during cancer therapies due to gastrointestinal dysfunctions including poor digestion and absorption as well as tumor-associated anorexia. In this study, we performed a randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy of oral nutrition supplement (ONS) enriched with omega-3 fatty acids on nutritional status, quality of life (QOL), and pro-inflammatory indices. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GI cancers were recruited and screened for eligibility. A total of 58 patients were randomly allocated to either the control group (n=27) or the experimental group (n=31). The intervention group received 200 ml ONS twice a day while the control group received routine care. Anthropometrics, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score, QOL score and nutrient intake data were collected at baseline, week 4 and week 8. Blood was drawn for biochemical assessments. Nine patients from each group dropped out of the study Forty patients (18 control patients and 22 intervention patients) completed the study. RESULTS This study showed that ONS intervention improved PG-SGA scores in the intervention group (p<0.01). Scores of physical functioning score and role functioning were declined only in the control group and the difference between week 8 and baseline for role functioning was significant (p<0.001). Fatigue score was steadily decreased in the experiment group, and the differences between week 8 and baseline was significant between two groups (p<0.02). However, no statistically significant improvement in biochemical markers of nutritional status and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations were found. These results suggests that ONS intervention for 8 weeks improves PG-SGA scores and QOL scores in patients undergoing cancer therapy.
-
8.
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase IIa Study: Evaluating the Effect of Curcumin for Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome in Solid Cancer Patients.
Chaiworramukkul, A, Seetalarom, K, Saichamchan, S, Prasongsook, N
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2022;23(7):2333-2340
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS) is usually found in advanced cancer patients. CACS is a multifactorial process which comprises skeletal muscle and adipose tissue loss which may be compounded by anorexia and a dysregulated metabolic state. The hypothesis of this study was that curcumin will increase body compositions and body weight in patients with solid malignancy and CACS when compared to placebo after adjusting by age, gender, primary site of cancer, stage of cancer, performance status, and supplementary nutrition support. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised phase lla study. A total of 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 33 underwent 1:1 block of four randomisations. Seventeen patients were randomly assigned to receive curcumin at dose of 800 mg twice daily orally and sixteen patients were randomly assigned to received placebo. Results show that curcumin supplementation: (1) did not statistically significantly improve body compositions and body weight when compared to placebo; (2) may cause clinical benefit in term of hand grip muscle strength and slow progress of CACS by decreasing in basal metabolic rate and preventing the decline in serum albumin; and (3) administered orally for two months at a dose of up to 2 grams daily appeared safe and no serious adverse events were reported. Authors conclude that curcumin inhibited process of CACS via reduction of basal metabolic rate and slowed down the progression of hand-grip muscle strength loss. Furthermore, nuclear factor kappa B [regulator of gene expression] levels merit further exploration as potentially suitable predictive biomarker for CACS treatment with curcumin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to investigate the effect of curcumin on preventing cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) via through mechanism of inhibition on NF-kB signal pathway. Outcome measurement for primary end point was improvement of body tissue composition, and the secondary end points were body weight and body mass index, hand grip muscle strengthening, and safety. METHODS This is randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase ll a study, 33 patients with CACS in solid malignancy were enrolled and randomized in 1:1 to receive oral curcumin (at a dose of 800 mg twice daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. RESULTS All parameters of body compositions were not statistically significant different between two groups, which were consist body fat mass [-1.25(SEM 0.87) vs. +0.63(SEM 0.55); p=0.119], skeletal muscle mass [-0.35(SEM 0.60) vs.+0.33(SEM 0.42); p=0.408] and percent body fat [-0.47(SEM 0.95) vs. -0.29(SEM 0.82); p=0.893] including with basal metabolic rate [-13.47(SEM 21.94) vs. +15.30(13.76); p=0.336]. The average of weight loss was also not statistically significant different between two groups. [-1.4 kg(SEM 0.89) in curcumin vs-1.12 kg(SEM 0.73), p=0.810]. Notably, patient with curcumin had less reduction of hand-grip muscle strength on both hands [Rt. handed: -2.47 in curcumin vs. -5.36 in placebo; p=0.318] [Lt. handed: -1.98 vs. -5.43; p=0.317], and basal metabolic rate than placebo group. Most adverse events were grade 1 on both groups similarly. CONCLUSION Curcumin was not shown to be superior to placebo with regard to increasing the body composition in cancer patients with CACS. However, curcumin might show some clinical benefits, including slow progression of hand-grip muscle strength loss, and basal metabolic rate. Further investigations should be explored.
-
9.
Timing of daily calorie loading affects appetite and hunger responses without changes in energy metabolism in healthy subjects with obesity.
Ruddick-Collins, LC, Morgan, PJ, Fyfe, CL, Filipe, JAN, Horgan, GW, Westerterp, KR, Johnston, JD, Johnstone, AM
Cell metabolism. 2022;34(10):1472-1485.e6
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Recent research has shown that the time of the day when a larger meal is consumed may influence energy utilisation, positively affecting weight loss. This randomised, crossover, isocaloric and eucaloric controlled feeding trial compared morning-loaded calorie intake with evening-loaded calorie intake to assess its effects on weight and metabolism. Thirty healthy, overweight, or obese individuals participated in this study for four weeks and assessed their energy intake and energy expenditure. Based on the findings of this study, there were no discernible variations in either resting metabolic rate or total energy expenditure based on the timing of energy intake. Morning loaded diet can significantly lower hunger and improve satiety compared to the evening-loaded diet. Because of these effects, a morning-loaded diet may aid weight loss through behavioural adaptations. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of morning-loaded calorie intake in terms of hunger suppression and increased satiety which may promote weight loss through behavioural change. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the metabolic outcomes and energy metabolism followed by morning-loaded energy intake and evening-loaded energy intake.
Abstract
Morning loaded calorie intake in humans has been advocated as a dietary strategy to improve weight loss. This is also supported by animal studies suggesting time of eating can prevent weight gain. However, the underlying mechanisms through which timing of eating could promote weight loss in humans are unclear. In a randomized crossover trial (NCT03305237), 30 subjects with obesity/overweight underwent two 4-week calorie-restricted but isoenergetic weight loss diets, with morning loaded or evening loaded calories (45%:35%:20% versus 20%:35%:45% calories at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, respectively). We demonstrate no differences in total daily energy expenditure or resting metabolic rate related to the timing of calorie distribution, and no difference in weight loss. Participants consuming the morning loaded diet reported significantly lower hunger. Thus, morning loaded intake (big breakfast) may assist with compliance to weight loss regime through a greater suppression of appetite.
-
10.
A double-blinded, randomized, parallel intervention to evaluate biomarker-based nutrition plans for weight loss: The PREVENTOMICS study.
Aldubayan, MA, Pigsborg, K, Gormsen, SMO, Serra, F, Palou, M, Galmés, S, Palou-March, A, Favari, C, Wetzels, M, Calleja, A, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(8):1834-1844
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity, and particularly abdominal adiposity, is associated with various metabolic abnormalities. Diet has a vital role in preventing and managing obesity, but evidence from clinical studies demonstrates there is a great interindividual variability in response to the same dietary intervention, which likely indicates that no one diet is superior to another. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the PREVENTOMICS (empowering consumers to PREVENT diet-related diseases through OMICS sciences) platform, incorporated in an e-commerce digital tool, for producing more favourable health outcomes over dietary plans based on general diet recommendations, in subjects with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. This study is a 10-week randomised single-centre, parallel-group, double-blinded intervention study. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by cluster to either the intervention group (personalised plan) or the control group (generic recommendations). Results show that there isn’t any additional benefit of personalising dietary plans, over a generic approach, on the change in fat mass and body weight in individuals with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. Accordingly, personalisation of the diet did not significantly improve health parameters beyond the changes induced by the control diet. Participants in both groups lost approximately 3 kg of body weight. Authors conclude that based on their findings evidence to translate personalised nutrition approaches into clinical practice is insufficient.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Growing evidence suggests that biomarker-guided dietary interventions can optimize response to treatment. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the PREVENTOMCIS platform-which uses metabolomic and genetic information to classify individuals into different 'metabolic clusters' and create personalized dietary plans-for improving health outcomes in subjects with overweight or obesity. METHODS A 10-week parallel, double-blinded, randomized intervention was conducted in 100 adults (82 completers) aged 18-65 years, with body mass index ≥27 but <40 kg/m2, who were allocated into either a personalized diet group (n = 49) or a control diet group (n = 51). About 60% of all food was provided free-of-charge. No specific instruction to restrict energy intake was given. The primary outcome was change in fat mass from baseline, evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Other endpoints included body weight, waist circumference, lipid profile, glucose homeostasis markers, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, physical activity, stress and eating behavior. RESULTS There were significant main effects of time (P < 0.01), but no group main effects, or time-by-group interactions, for the change in fat mass (personalized: -2.1 [95% CI -2.9, -1.4] kg; control: -2.0 [95% CI -2.7, -1.3] kg) and body weight (personalized: -3.1 [95% CI -4.1, -2.1] kg; control: -3.3 [95% CI -4.2, -2.4] kg). The difference between groups in fat mass change was -0.1 kg (95% CI -1.2, 0.9 kg, P = 0.77). Both diets resulted in significant improvements in insulin resistance and lipid profile, but there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION Personalized dietary plans did not result in greater benefits over a generic, but generally healthy diet, in this 10-week clinical trial. Further studies are required to establish the soundness of different precision nutrition approaches, and translate this science into clinically relevant dietary advice to reduce the burden of obesity and its comorbidities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04590989).