0
selected
-
1.
Fermented Foods: Definitions and Characteristics, Impact on the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Gastrointestinal Health and Disease.
Dimidi, E, Cox, SR, Rossi, M, Whelan, K
Nutrients. 2019;11(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fermented foods have grown in popularity due to their proposed health benefits but there is limited clinical evidence for the effectiveness of most fermented foods in gastrointestinal health. This review paper looks at non-dairy fermented foods which have been studied in at least one RCT: kefir, sauerkraut, natto, and sourdough bread. The health benefits are attributed to the high ratio of probiotic microorganisms, metabolites, or ability to convert compounds into active metabolites, as well as prebiotics and vitamins contained in these foods. Kimchi has the greatest evidence from epidemiological and case control studies investigating risk of gastric cancers. Different food composition of kimchi is shown to both increase and decrease risks, whilst it had no impact on H. pylori levels. There were no studies on kefir in functional bowel disorders however, it was shown to help lactose malabsorption and reduce H. pylori levels. A small RCT on Sauerkraut showed it reduced IBS severity in patients and increased in vitro activity of key liver and kidney detoxifying enzymes. There are small pockets of data that show that tempeh may influence gut microbiota in humans, and that natto may increase bifidobacterial and short-chain fatty acids in healthy volunteers. There are numerous limited cohort studies on miso and cancer risk but no studies on gastrointestinal conditions. Finally, sourdough was shown to reduce FODMAPS and be better tolerated in IBS patients, reducing bloating, nausea and discomfort. Overall, all the studies provide insufficient evidence on fermented foods and gastrointestinal health.
Abstract
Fermented foods are defined as foods or beverages produced through controlled microbial growth, and the conversion of food components through enzymatic action. In recent years, fermented foods have undergone a surge in popularity, mainly due to their proposed health benefits. The aim of this review is to define and characterise common fermented foods (kefir, kombucha, sauerkraut, tempeh, natto, miso, kimchi, sourdough bread), their mechanisms of action (including impact on the microbiota), and the evidence for effects on gastrointestinal health and disease in humans. Putative mechanisms for the impact of fermented foods on health include the potential probiotic effect of their constituent microorganisms, the fermentation-derived production of bioactive peptides, biogenic amines, and conversion of phenolic compounds to biologically active compounds, as well as the reduction of anti-nutrients. Fermented foods that have been tested in at least one randomised controlled trial (RCT) for their gastrointestinal effects were kefir, sauerkraut, natto, and sourdough bread. Despite extensive in vitro studies, there are no RCTs investigating the impact of kombucha, miso, kimchi or tempeh in gastrointestinal health. The most widely investigated fermented food is kefir, with evidence from at least one RCT suggesting beneficial effects in both lactose malabsorption and Helicobacter pylori eradication. In summary, there is very limited clinical evidence for the effectiveness of most fermented foods in gastrointestinal health and disease. Given the convincing in vitro findings, clinical high-quality trials investigating the health benefits of fermented foods are warranted.
-
2.
Brain fogginess, gas and bloating: a link between SIBO, probiotics and metabolic acidosis.
Rao, SSC, Rehman, A, Yu, S, Andino, NM
Clinical and translational gastroenterology. 2018;9(6):162
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
D-lactic acid is produced by intestinal bacteria and a rise in levels can lead to D-lactic acidosis, causing neurological changes such as slurred speech and gait disturbances. This is frequently observed in short bowel syndrome. This small, observational study aimed to determine if brain fogginess (mental confusion, impaired judgement, poor short-term memory and difficulty concentrating) and intestinal gas and bloating is associated with D-lactic acidosis and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). 38 patients presenting with gas and bloating in the absence of short bowel syndrome, and with or without brain fog were assessed. All patients with brain fog were consuming probiotics, with a higher proportion of them diagnosed with SIBO and D-lactic acidosis, when compared to the non-brain fog group. The researchers stopped probiotics in all patients and administered antibiotics, observing a significant reduction in brain fog and gastrointestinal symptoms. Whilst this is a small, observational study, nutrition practitioners may wish to assess the likelihood of SIBO and D-lactic acidosis before recommending probiotics, especially in the presence of brain fog.
Abstract
BACKGROUND D-lactic acidosis is characterized by brain fogginess (BF) and elevated D-lactate and occurs in short bowel syndrome. Whether it occurs in patients with an intact gut and unexplained gas and bloating is unknown. We aimed to determine if BF, gas and bloating is associated with D-lactic acidosis and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). METHODS Patients with gas, bloating, BF, intact gut, and negative endoscopic and radiological tests, and those without BF were evaluated. SIBO was assessed with glucose breath test (GBT) and duodenal aspiration/culture. Metabolic assessments included urinary D-lactic acid and blood L-lactic acid, and ammonia levels. Bowel symptoms, and gastrointestinal transit were assessed. RESULTS Thirty patients with BF and 8 without BF were evaluated. Abdominal bloating, pain, distension and gas were the most severe symptoms and their prevalence was similar between groups. In BF group, all consumed probiotics. SIBO was more prevalent in BF than non-BF group (68 vs. 28%, p = 0.05). D-lactic acidosis was more prevalent in BF compared to non-BF group (77 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). BF was reproduced in 20/30 (66%) patients. Gastrointestinal transit was slow in 10/30 (33%) patients with BF and 2/8 (25%) without. Other metabolic tests were unremarkable. After discontinuation of probiotics and a course of antibiotics, BF resolved and gastrointestinal symptoms improved significantly (p = 0.005) in 23/30 (77%). CONCLUSIONS We describe a syndrome of BF, gas and bloating, possibly related to probiotic use, SIBO, and D-lactic acidosis in a cohort without short bowel. Patients with BF exhibited higher prevalence of SIBO and D-lactic acidosis. Symptoms improved with antibiotics and stopping probiotics. Clinicians should recognize and treat this condition.
-
3.
Elevated methane levels in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth suggests delayed small bowel and colonic transit.
Suri, J, Kataria, R, Malik, Z, Parkman, HP, Schey, R
Medicine. 2018;97(21):e10554
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Whilst the most conclusive way to diagnose SIBO is to use an invasive procedure (endoscopy) to take samples from the middle section of the small intestine (jejunum), lactulose breath testing of methane and hydrogen gasses has become the most commonly used test to rule SIBO in or out. This cohort study used historic data (retrospective) of 78 individuals to compare intestinal transit time in patients with a positive lactulose breath test to those with a negative result, as well as compare patients with hydrogen-positive results with those with methane-positive results. All patients experienced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of nausea, bloating, constipation, diarrhea and gas to varying degrees. No significant difference in GI symptom severity was found between those with a positive lactulose breath test and those with a negative result. However, those with a hydrogen-gas positive result had a significantly higher level of reported nausea compared to the methane-gas positive patients. A positive SIBO result on the breath test also did not affect GI transit time in comparison to a negative result. However, those with a methane-gas peak on their positive lactulose breath test had a statistically significant slower GI transit time when compared to those with a hydrogen-positive result.
Abstract
Limited research exists regarding the relationship between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), small bowel transit (SBT), and colonic transit (CT). Furthermore, symptom analysis is limited between the subtypes of SIBO hydrogen producing (H-SIBO) and methane producing (M-SIBO). The primary aims of this study are to: compare the SBT and CT in patients with a positive lactulose breath test (LBT) to those with a normal study; compare the SBT and CT among patients with H-SIBO or M-SIBO; compare the severity of symptoms in patients with a positive LBT to those with a normal study; compare the severity of symptoms among patients with H-SIBO or M-SIBO.A retrospective review was performed for 89 patients who underwent a LBT and whole gut transit scintigraphy (WGTS) between 2014 and 2016. Seventy-eight patients were included. WGTS evaluated gastric emptying, SBT (normal ≥40% radiotracer bolus accumulated at the ileocecal valve at 6 hours), and CT (normal geometric center of colonic activity = 1.6-7.0 at 24 hours, 4.0-7.0 at 48 hours, 6.2-7.0 at 72 hours; elevated geometric center indicates increased transit). We also had patients complete a pretest symptom survey to evaluate nausea, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, belching, and flatulence.A total of 78 patients (69 females, 9 males, mean age of 48 years, mean BMI of 25.9) were evaluated. Forty-seven patients had a positive LBT (H-SIBO 66%, M-SIBO 34%). Comparison of SBT among patients with a positive LBT to normal LBT revealed no significant difference (62.1% vs 58.6%, P = .63). The mean accumulated radiotracer was higher for H-SIBO compared to M-SIBO (71.5% vs 44.1%; P < .05). For CT, all SIBO patients had no significant difference in geometric centers of colonic activity at 24, 48, and 72 hours when compared to the normal group. When subtyping, H-SIBO had significantly higher geometric centers compared to the M-SIBO group at 24 hours (4.4 vs 3.1, P < .001), 48 hours (5.2 vs 3.8, P = .002), and at 72 hours (5.6 vs 4.3, P = .006). The symptom severity scores did not differ between the positive and normal LBT groups. A higher level of nausea was present in the H-SIBO group when compared to the M-SIBO group.Overall, the presence of SIBO does not affect SBT or CT at 24, 48, and 72 hours. However, when analyzing the subtypes, M-SIBO has significantly more delayed SBT and CT when compared to H-SIBO. These results suggest the presence of delayed motility in patients with high methane levels on LBT.
-
4.
Probiotic monotherapy and Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review with pooled-data analysis.
Losurdo, G, Cubisino, R, Barone, M, Principi, M, Leandro, G, Ierardi, E, Di Leo, A
World journal of gastroenterology. 2018;24(1):139-149
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Helicobacter pylori (H-pylori) is a parasite that resides in the human stomach and is associated with the development of stomach ulcers, amongst other conditions. Conventional treatment relies on a combination of antibiotics and stomach acid suppressants, however failure rates for standard treatments have been rising and alternatives are required. Probiotics (live bacteria that provide health benefits to their host) have been used alongside antibiotic treatment for H-pylori in some cases to reduce medication side effects. This systematic review of 11 studies including 517 H-pylori infected patients, aimed to assess the effects of probiotic therapy alone on H-pylori status. The study found that the eradication rate of H-pylori with a variety of probiotic strains was 12-16%, compared to a 0% success rate in the placebo groups. Clinically, this rate is low, however the authors conclude that probiotics may have a role to play in a multi-therapy approach for the eradication of H-pylori.
Abstract
AIM: To define probiotic monotherapy effect on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status by performing a systematic review. METHODS Methods of analysis and inclusion criteria were based on PRISMA recommendations. Relevant publications were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct, and EMBASE. The end-point was to estimate eradication rate and urea breath test delta value before and after probiotic monotherapy across all studies and, overall, with a pooled data analysis. Adverse events of probiotic therapy were evaluated. The data were expressed as proportions/percentages, and 95%CIs were calculated. For continuous variables, we evaluated the weighted mean difference. Odd ratios (ORs) were calculated according to the Peto method for the comparison of eradication rates between probiotics and placebo. RESULTS Eleven studies were selected. Probiotics eradicated H. pylori in 50 out of 403 cases. The mean weighted eradication rate was 14% (95%CI: 2%-25%, P = 0.02). Lactobacilli eradicated the bacterium in 30 out of 235 patients, with a mean weighted rate of 16% (95%CI: 1%-31%). Saccharomyces boulardii achieved eradication in 6 out of 63 patients, with a pooled eradication rate of 12% (95%CI: 0%-29%). Multistrain combinations were effective in 14 out of 105 patients, with a pooled eradication rate of 14% (95%CI: 0%-43%). In the comparison of probiotics vs placebo, we found an OR of 7.91 in favor of probiotics (95%CI: 2.97-21.05, P < 0.001). Probiotics induced a mean reduction in delta values higher than placebo (8.61% with a 95%CI: 5.88-11.34, vs 0.19% for placebo, P < 0.001). Finally, no significant difference in adverse events was found between probiotics and placebo (OR = 1, 95%CI: 0.06-18.08). CONCLUSION Probiotics alone show a minimal effect on H. pylori clearance, thus suggesting a likely direct role.