1.
New Insights about How to Make an Intervention in Children and Adolescents with Metabolic Syndrome: Diet, Exercise vs. Changes in Body Composition. A Systematic Review of RCT.
Albert Pérez, E, Mateu Olivares, V, Martínez-Espinosa, RM, Molina Vila, MD, Reig García-Galbis, M
Nutrients. 2018;10(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic Syndrome is the term used to group a cluster of health concerns including overweight, obesity, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, blood glucose intolerance and insulin resistance which together can contribute to the development of Type II Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Diagnosis is usually given if a patient has three or more of these conditions however the diagnosis in children and adolescents is often inconsistent, and so guidelines for therapeutic strategies for metabolic syndrome also vary greatly. This review looked at 9 studies of children aged up to 19 years old, all diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, and given dietary, physical, psychological, and pharmacological interventions, to try and understand what the best clinical approach might be. It was found that a balanced diet combined with aerobic and resistance exercise helped to significantly reduce body mass, more so than the trials which included treatment with Metformin. A balance diet included calorie restriction and carbohydrate reduction, carefully planned around the daily exercise program of 2-3 resistance sessions each week and frequent cardio sessions of differing intensity and duration. They concluded that a minimum of 6 months was needed to reach optimal weight loss and body fat loss. Overall, the findings of this study support diet and physical exercise as beneficial clinical interventions, whilst the use of medication is still unclear.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To record which interventions produce the greatest variations in body composition in patients ≤19 years old with metabolic syndrome (MS). METHOD search dates between 2005 and 2017 in peer reviewed journals, following the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). The selection criteria were: diagnostic for MS or at least a criterion for diagnosis; randomized clinical trials, ≤19 years of age; intervention programs that use diet and/or exercise as a tool (interventions showing an interest in body composition). RESULTS 1781 clinical trials were identified under these criteria but only 0.51% were included. The most frequent characteristics of the selected clinical trials were that they used multidisciplinary interventions and were carried out in America. The most utilized parameters were BMI (body mass index) in kg/m² and BW (body weight) in kg. CONCLUSIONS Most of the clinical trials included had been diagnosed through at least 2 diagnostic criteria for MS. Multidisciplinary interventions obtained greater changes in body composition in patients with MS. This change was especially prevalent in the combinations of dietary interventions and physical exercise. It is proposed to follow the guidelines proposed for patients who are overweight, obese, or have diabetes type 2, and extrapolate these strategies as recommendations for future clinical trials designed for patients with MS.
2.
Calories, carbohydrates, and cancer therapy with radiation: exploiting the five R's through dietary manipulation.
Klement, RJ, Champ, CE
Cancer metastasis reviews. 2014;33(1):217-29
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Radiation therapy is standard care for cancer patients alongside surgery and chemotherapy. However, there are still some cancers which seem to withstand this treatment. This study looks at whether calorie reduction (CR) and carbohydrate restriction can have any impact on treatment outcomes. The reason for exploring this idea comes from data showing a high level of ‘glycolysis’ (a need for sugar) in cancer cells. Calorie reduction is defined as 30-50% less calories per day achieved either by intermittent fasting or a fixed calorie regime. Carbohydrate restriction is defined as a ketogenic diet (KD); a diet which removes carbohydrate foods and sugars and focuses on high fat foods and limited protein. Both nutritional protocols have been shown to have similar metabolic effects of reducing blood sugar levels and insulin activity, and thus reducing the ability of cancer cells to communicate. The 5R principle of radiotherapy tries to exploit the differences between cancer cells and healthy tissue. The 5Rs are Repair to DNA damage, Repopulation of the tumour, Redistribution of cells, Reoxygenation of the tumour area and Radio resistance in cells which do not respond to treatment. The concern with restricting calories and carbohydrates is triggering detrimental weight loss in cancer patients, although some fat loss may be beneficial in overweight patients with hormonal cancers. Intermittent fasting seems to fit well with typical radiation treatment schedules over 2-3-month periods. Trials of ketogenic diets on healthy volunteers have shown it encourages muscle mass which is a strong predictor of survival in cancer patients. Of the two, a carbohydrate-restricted, ketogenic diet appears the most viable adjunct to radiation therapy.
Abstract
Aggressive tumors typically demonstrate a high glycolytic rate, which results in resistance to radiation therapy and cancer progression via several molecular and physiologic mechanisms. Intriguingly, many of these mechanisms utilize the same molecular pathways that are altered through calorie and/or carbohydrate restriction. Furthermore, poorer prognosis in cancer patients who display a glycolytic phenotype characterized by metabolic alterations, such as obesity and diabetes, is now well established, providing another link between metabolic pathways and cancer progression. We review the possible roles for calorie restriction (CR) and very low carbohydrate ketogenic diets (KDs) in modulating the five R's of radiotherapy to improve the therapeutic window between tumor control and normal tissue complication probability. Important mechanisms we discuss include (1) improved DNA repair in normal, but not tumor cells; (2) inhibition of tumor cell repopulation through modulation of the PI3K-Akt-mTORC1 pathway downstream of insulin and IGF1; (3) redistribution of normal cells into more radioresistant phases of the cell cycle; (4) normalization of the tumor vasculature by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1α downstream of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway; (5) increasing the intrinsic radioresistance of normal cells through ketone bodies but decreasing that of tumor cells by targeting glycolysis. These mechanisms are discussed in the framework of animal and human studies, taking into account the commonalities and differences between CR and KDs. We conclude that CR and KDs may act synergistically with radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer patients and provide some guidelines for implementing these dietary interventions into clinical practice.