-
1.
Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Chen, B, Zhang, J, Dong, J, Ma, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, K, Lu, J
BMC psychiatry. 2023;23(1):477
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that impairs psychosocial function and quality of life. Recent studies show that prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics reveal a novel way to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in alleviating depressive symptoms. This study was a meta-analysis of thirteen studies with a total of 786 participants who were allocated to the intervention group (n=427) and the placebo group (n=359). Results showed that the overall effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on depressive symptoms were significantly superior to those of placebo. Additionally, biological sex was a vital factor that influenced patients’ responses to the treatment. Authors concluded that agents that manipulate gut microbiota might become a novel approach to treat patients with mild-to-moderate depression.
Abstract
Accumulating studies have shown the effects of gut microbiota management tools in improving depression. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on patients with depression. We searched six databases up to July 2022. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 786 participants were included. The overall results demonstrated that patients who received prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics had significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with those in the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis only confirmed the significant antidepressant effects of agents that contained probiotics. In addition, patients with mild or moderate depression could both benefit from the treatment. Studies with a lower proportion of females reported stronger effects for alleviating depressive symptoms. In conclusion, agents that manipulate gut microbiota might improve mild-to-moderate depression. It is necessary to further investigate the benefits of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic treatments relative to antidepressants and follow up with individuals over a longer time before these therapies are implemented in clinical practice.
-
2.
Acceptability, Tolerability, and Estimates of Putative Treatment Effects of Probiotics as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nikolova, VL, Cleare, AJ, Young, AH, Stone, JM
JAMA psychiatry. 2023;80(8):842-847
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
About 60% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not fully respond to anti-depressant treatments. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is thought to be involved in the development of MDD, making the microbiome a promising target for new treatments. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 50 adult patients with major depressive disorder, was to evaluate the tolerability, acceptability and efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 8 weeks as an adjunctive to antidepressant drugs. There were no serious adverse events; all reported non-serious events were of gastrointestinal nature and more common in the probiotic group (it was not reported whether the difference was statistically significant). A high adherence rate of 97.2% suggests a high level of acceptability. Depressive mood symptoms improved significantly more in the probiotic group. Greater improvements in anxiety in the probiotic were also seen in some, but not all anxiety scales. The authors concluded that a multi-strain probiotic supplement is a promising adjunct to anti-depressant treatment in patients with MDD, with high tolerability and acceptability.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The microbiota-gut-brain axis is a promising target for novel treatments for mood disorders, such as probiotics. However, few clinical trials have been conducted, and further safety and efficacy data are needed to support this treatment approach. OBJECTIVE To provide acceptability and tolerability data and estimates of intervention effect size for probiotics as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomized clinical trial, adults aged 18 to 55 years with MDD taking antidepressant medication but having an incomplete response were studied. A random sample was recruited from primary and secondary care services and general advertising in London, United Kingdom. Data were collected between September 2019 and May 2022 and analyzed between July and September 2022. INTERVENTION Multistrain probiotic (8 billion colony-forming units per day) or placebo daily for 8 weeks added to ongoing antidepressant medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The pilot outcomes of the trial were retention, acceptability, tolerability, and estimates of putative treatment effect on clinical symptoms (depression: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD-17] and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [IDS] scores; anxiety: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAMA] and General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] scores) to be used as indicators for a definitive trial. RESULTS Of 50 included participants, 49 received the intervention and were included in intent-to-treat analyses; of these, 39 (80%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (9.8) years. A total of 24 were randomized to probiotic and 25 to placebo. Attrition was 8% (1 in the probiotic group and 3 in the placebo group), adherence was 97.2%, and there were no serious adverse reactions. For the probiotic group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 11.00 (5.13) and 8.83 (4.28), respectively; IDS, 30.17 (11.98) and 25.04 (11.68); HAMA, 11.71 (5.86) and 8.17 (4.68); and GAD-7, 7.78 (4.12) and 7.63 (4.77). For the placebo group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 14.04 (3.70) and 11.09 (3.22), respectively; IDS, 33.82 (9.26) and 29.64 (9.31); HAMA, 14.70 (5.47) and 10.95 (4.48); and GAD-7, 10.91 (5.32) and 9.48 (5.18). Standardized effect sizes (SES) from linear mixed models demonstrated that the probiotic group attained greater improvements in depressive symptoms according to HAMD-17 scores (week 4: SES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.01-0.98) and IDS Self Report scores (week 8: SES, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87) as well as greater improvements in anxiety symptoms according to HAMA scores (week 4: SES, 0.67; 95% CI, 0-0.95; week 8: SES, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.06-1.05), but not GAD-7 scores (week 4: SES, 0.57; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.82; week 8: SES, 0.32; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.65), compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The acceptability, tolerability, and estimated effect sizes on key clinical outcomes are promising and encourage further investigation of probiotics as add-on treatment for people with MDD in a definitive efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03893162.
-
3.
Effect of a dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean diet on the quality of life of patients recovered from depression: Analysis of the PREDIDEP randomized trial.
Cabrera-Suárez, BM, Lahortiga-Ramos, F, Sayon-Orea, C, Hernández-Fleta, JL, González-Pinto, A, Molero, P, Vega-Pérez, R, Sánchez-Villegas, A
Experimental gerontology. 2023;175:112149
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Unipolar depression is a prevalent and disabling condition that negatively influences quality of life. Patients with depression are more vulnerable to have a poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of 2-year intervention with Mediterranean Diet enriched with extra virgin olive oil on HRQoL. This study is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blind trial. The study included 52 men and 144 women aged between 18 and 86 years who had suffered at least one depression episode and who were in a stage of clinical remission. The participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Results show that a Mediterranean diet–based nutritional intervention enriched with extra virgin olive oil compared with usual care, resulted in a significantly greater increase in HRQoL in recovered depressed patients. This association was greater for the mental dimensions rather than the physical dimensions. Furthermore, this association was also observed for participants aged 60 or more. Authors conclude that since depression is an important condition for its high prevalence, economic cost and personal suffering, it is important to evaluate cost-effective, safe, and inexpensive interventions, such as Mediterranean Diet nutritional interventions.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is substantial evidence supporting that improving diet quality leads to improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our major aim was to assess the effectiveness of a Mediterranean diet-based nutritional intervention to improve HRQoL in the context of a secondary prevention trial of depression. Secondarily to assess its effectiveness among adults aged 60 or more years. METHODS The PREDIDEP study is a 2-year multicentre, randomized, single-blinded nutritional trial. At baseline and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, SF-36 health survey questionnaire was collected to evaluate participants' HRQoL (total and specific range for each of the 8 dimensions: 0 to 100 points). Mixed effect linear models were used to assess changes in HRQoL according to adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.govNCT03081065. RESULTS After 2 years of intervention, the Mediterranean Diet intervention group compared to control group (without nutritional intervention, only usual clinical care) showed an improvement in some dimensions of HRQoL such as Mental Health (7.22; 95 % CI = 2.22-12.22) (between-group difference: 6.79; 95 % CI -0.14-13.73, p = 0.055); Vitality (9.51; 95 % CI = 4.00-15.03) (between-group difference: 9.00; 95 % CI 1.75-16.25, p = 0.020); Mental Summary Component (2.83; 95 % CI = 0.55-5.11) (between-group difference: 1.17; 95 % CI = -1.96-4.30, p = 0.462); and General Health (10.70; 95 % CI = 5.58-15.81) (between-group difference: 6.20; 95 % CI = -0.89-13.28, p = 0.086). Similar results were observed for participants aged 60 or more years. CONCLUSION The intervention based on Mediterranean diet in patients with previous depression seems to be effective in improving HRQoL, especially the mental dimensions. This effect is also observed among participants aged 60 or more years.
-
4.
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on depression in older Australian adults.
Rahman, ST, Waterhouse, M, Romero, BD, Baxter, C, English, DR, Almeida, OP, Berk, M, Ebeling, PR, Armstrong, BK, McLeod, DSA, et al
International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2023;38(1):e5847
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Depression can considerably impair daily function. However, although medications and psychological therapy can be effective in treating depression, non‐compliance with and/or side effects of antidepressants are common. Thus, identifying alternative or adjunctive therapies to prevent or treat depression may help to overcome some limitations of current management strategies. The aim of this study was to examine whether supplementing older Australians with monthly doses of 60,000 IU of vitamin D3 for 5 years would reduce depressive symptoms or incidence of antidepressant use, as a surrogate for a formal diagnosis of depression. This study used data from the D‐Health Trial, a large population‐based randomised controlled trial. Authors randomly selected potential participants aged between 60 and 79 years from the Australian Commonwealth Electoral Roll. The participants who accepted the invitation were randomly allocated to either 60,000 IU of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Results show that there wasn’t an overall benefit of monthly supplementation with 60,000 IU of vitamin D for up to 5 years on measures of depression. However, pre‐specified subgroup analyses suggested a potential beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation in people taking antidepressants at baseline or with lower predicted baseline vitamin D3 concentration. However there was an unfavourable effect in participants with a body mass index <25 kg/m2 or those with higher predicted baseline vitamin D3 concentration. Authors conclude that routine supplementation with vitamin D in populations with a low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is unlikely to be of benefit for depression and may cause harm in people with low body mass index or normal vitamin D status.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether vitamin D supplementation reduces depressive symptoms and incidence of antidepressant use. METHODS We used data from the D-Health Trial (N = 21,315), a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of monthly vitamin D3 for the prevention of all-cause mortality. Participants were Australians aged 60-84 years. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 1, 2 and 5 years after randomization to measure depressive symptoms; national prescribing records were used to capture antidepressant use. We used mixed models and survival models. RESULTS Analyses of PHQ-9 scores included 20,487 participants (mean age 69·3 years, 46% women); the mean difference (MD) in PHQ-9 score (vitamin D vs. placebo) was 0·02 (95% CI -0·06, 0·11). There was negligible difference in the prevalence of clinically relevant depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10) (odds ratio 0·99; 95% CI 0·90, 1·08). We included 16,670 participants in the analyses of incident antidepressant use (mean age 69·4 years, 43% women). Incidence of antidepressant use was similar between the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1·04; 95% CI 0·96, 1·12). In subgroup analyses, vitamin D improved PHQ-9 scores in those taking antidepressants at baseline (MD -0·25; 95% CI -0·49, -0·01; p-interaction = 0·02). It decreased risk of antidepressant use in participants with predicted 25(OH)D concentration <50 nmol/L (HR 0·88; 95% CI 0·75, 1·02; p-interaction = 0·01) and increased risk in those with predicted 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/L (HR 1·10; 95% CI 1·01, 1·20). CONCLUSION Monthly supplementation with high-dose vitamin D3 was not of benefit for measures of depression overall, but there was some evidence of benefit in subgroup analyses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000743763. https://www.anzctr.org.au/.
-
5.
HOMEFOOD randomised trial - Six-month nutrition therapy improves quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in older adults after hospital discharge.
Blondal, BS, Geirsdottir, OG, Halldorsson, TI, Beck, AM, Jonsson, PV, Ramel, A
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2022;48:74-81
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is well known that older people are at a higher risk for nutritional inadequacy which is accompanied by depression, impaired cognitive function, and poor overall health. In this secondary analysis of a randomised controlled assessor-blinded dietary intervention trial, the authors examined the effects of six months of nutritional therapy on quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in elderly patients aged 65 years and over. The participants in the intervention group received nutritional therapy (HOMEFOOD) education to overcome malnutrition, which included dietary recommendations to ensure an adequate nutritional intake of energy and protein through diet and additional supplemental protein and energy-rich foods. After six months of nutritional therapy, the intervention group showed improvement in cognitive function, self-rated health, depression score, and quality of life scores, as well as improvements in measures related to weight gain. Further studies need to be conducted in order to determine if nutritional therapy provides additional benefits to older people. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to better understand how nutritional therapy can improve the quality of life and health of older people in comparison to standard care, so they can better advise their patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Malnutrition is common among older adults and is related to quality of life, cognitive function, and depression. To what extent nutrition interventions can improve these outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nutrition therapy on health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in community dwelling older adults recently discharged from hospital. METHODS Participants (>65 years) were randomised into an intervention (n = 53) and a control group (n = 53). The intervention group received individualised nutrition therapy based on the nutrition care process including 5 home visits and 3 phone calls, in combination with freely delivered energy- and protein-rich foods and oral nutrition supplements for six months after hospital discharge. EQ-5D, self-rated health, Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE), and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression - IOWA (CES-D) scale were measured at baseline and at endpoint. RESULTS Two subjects dropped out, one from each arm. The control group experienced an increase in depressive symptoms and a decrease in self-rated health during the study period, while the intervention group experienced increases in cognitive function, self-rated health, and EQ-5D resulting in significant endpoint differences between the groups: EQ-5D (0.102, P = 0.001); self-rated health: 15.876 (P < 0.001); MMSE 1.701 (P < 0.001); depressive symptoms: - 3.072 (P < 0.001); all in favour of the intervention group. Improvements during the intervention in MMSE, self-rated health, and CES-D were significantly related to body weight gain in a linear way. CONCLUSION Cognitive function and mental well-being worsen or stagnate in older adults who receive standard care after hospital discharge. However, a six-month nutrition therapy improves these outcomes leading to statistically and clinically significant endpoint differences between the groups. As improvements were related to body weight gain after hospital discharge, we conclude that the increase in dietary intake, with focus on energy and protein density, and changes in body weight might have contributed to better cognitive function and mental well-being in older adults after the intervention.
-
6.
Effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on premenstrual syndrome.
Borji-Navan, S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S, Esmaeilpour, K, Mirghafourvand, M
BMC research notes. 2022;15(1):324
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
About 20% of women of reproductive age suffer from premenstrual syndrome (PMS). The syndrome leads to various consequences, including physical, psychological, behavioural, and social complications. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on symptom severity of women with PMS and their quality of life during the perimenstrual and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. This study is based on data that was gathered for a randomised controlled trial with two-parallel arms carried out on 92 female university students aged 18–35 years. Authors conclude that the results cannot be generalised to all women suffering from PMS since the study recruited only medical students. Furthermore, the long-term effectiveness of the intervention is unknown because the participants were only followed for two menstrual cycles after the end of the intervention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on symptom severity of women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and their quality of life during the perimenstrual and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. Moreover, the PMS-related disability and attitude toward menstruation were investigated as secondary outcomes. DATA DESCRIPTION We provide data generated in a randomized controlled trial with two-parallel arms carried out on 92 female university students aged 18-35 years who had moderate to severe PMS, residing at halls of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. PMS severity was assessed during two menstrual cycles before intervention (baseline) and during two cycles just after ending the two-month intervention using Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) and the quality of life using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) on days 1-2 and 11-13 of the menstrual cycle at the baseline and post-intervention. Also, the PMS-related disability was assessed using Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and attitude toward menstruation using Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire (MAQ) at the baseline and post-intervention. Participant satisfaction and views on intervention effectiveness were also assessed using a single Likert question.
-
7.
A Systematic Review of the Impact of the First Year of COVID-19 on Obesity Risk Factors: A Pandemic Fueling a Pandemic?
Daniels, NF, Burrin, C, Chan, T, Fusco, F
Current developments in nutrition. 2022;6(4):nzac011
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the most serious infectious disease outbreaks in recent history. Among the factors that can increase the risk of obesity, some seem to play a more prominent role than others such as depression, emotional eating, sedentary lifestyle and the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. This study is a systematic review of 87 studies with over 350,000 participants. Results show that: - overall, there was a general trend of weight gain during the pandemic. - there were differences in dietary changes, with some studies showing an improvement in diet. - some beneficial effects were observed in the dieting domain, such as higher consumption of home-cooked meals and healthy food (e.g., vegetables). However, there was an increasing trend in the overall food and alcohol consumption. - financial hardship and job loss were unavoidable consequences of the pandemic lockdown. However, although the impact of the countermeasures used to curb the COVID-19 pandemic was evident on obesity risk factors, none of the studies included in the research explored the direct impact of the risk factors on obesity itself. Authors conclude by pointing out the need for future research that aims at strengthening the link between stressful circumstances and a rise in risk factors for obesity and weight gain.
Abstract
Obesity is increasingly prevalent worldwide. Associated risk factors, including depression, socioeconomic stress, poor diet, and lack of physical activity, have all been impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This systematic review aims to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 to identify relevant studies pertaining to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (PROSPERO; CRD42020219433). All English-language studies on weight change and key obesity risk factors (psychosocial and socioeconomic health) during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for inclusion. Of 805 full-text articles that were reviewed, 87 were included for analysis. The included studies observed increased food and alcohol consumption, increased sedentary time, worsening depressive symptoms, and increased financial stress. Overall, these results suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the current risk factors for obesity and is likely to worsen obesity rates in the near future. Future studies, and policy makers, will need to carefully consider their interdependency to develop effective interventions able to mitigate the obesity pandemic.
-
8.
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Lane, MM, Gamage, E, Travica, N, Dissanayaka, T, Ashtree, DN, Gauci, S, Lotfaliany, M, O'Neil, A, Jacka, FN, Marx, W
Nutrients. 2022;14(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor dietary quality is well established as a potentially modifiable risk factor for mental disorders. The NOVA food classification system was recently developed to enable the categorisation of food items based on distinctive levels of processing. The aim of this study was to synthesise and provide quantitative analyses of the most up-to-date evidence assessing associations between consumption of ultra-processed food, as defined by the NOVA food classification system, and mental disorders. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies with a total of 385,541 participants. The studies were 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospectively designed studies. Results show that ultra-processed food consumption is bidirectionally associated with adverse mental health. In fact, greater intake of ultra-processed food was associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together as well as separately. Authors conclude that further prospective and experimental studies are required to better determine directionality and causality and ensure that global preventative and treatment strategies are efficacious and appropriate.
Abstract
Since previous meta-analyses, which were limited only to depression and by a small number of studies available for inclusion at the time of publication, several additional studies have been published assessing the link between ultra-processed food consumption and depression as well as other mental disorders. We aimed to build on previously conducted reviews to synthesise and meta-analyse the contemporary evidence base and clarify the associations between the consumption of ultra-processed food and mental disorders. A total of 17 observational studies were included (n = 385,541); 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospective. Greater ultra-processed food consumption was cross-sectionally associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together (common mental disorder symptoms odds ratio: 1.53, 95%CI 1.43 to 1.63) as well as separately (depressive symptoms odds ratio: 1.44, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.82; and, anxiety symptoms odds ratio: 1.48, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.59). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies demonstrated that greater ultra-processed food intake was associated with increased risk of subsequent depression (hazard ratio: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.28). While we found evidence for associations between ultra-processed food consumption and adverse mental health, further rigorously designed prospective and experimental studies are needed to better understand causal pathways.
-
9.
The Dose-Response Associations of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake with the Risk of Stroke, Depression, Cancer, and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
Wang, Y, Zhao, R, Wang, B, Zhao, C, Zhu, B, Tian, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is high in today's society, which may lead to weight gain, inflammation, and a number of obesity-associated diseases. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the associations and causal links between the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer, stroke, depression, and cause-specific mortality. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages significantly increased the risk of cancer, strokes, depression, and cause-specific mortality when compared with the consumption of low or no-sugar-sweetened beverages. As little as a 250ml increment of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increase in risk. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% compared to those who consume less or no sugar-sweetened beverages. These findings can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the clinical significance of intervention strategies that reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. It is imperative to conduct additional robust studies as there is an insufficient amount of evidence at present to establish a causal connection between the consumption of sugary beverages and the risk of depression, stroke, cancer, and cause-specific mortality.
Abstract
The associations between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and cause-specific mortality have not been determined, and the quantitative aspects of this link remain unclear. This meta-analysis therefore conducted a systematic review and dose-response analysis to determine their causal links. The database searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science up to 10 November 2021. The intervention effects were evaluated by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidences (CI). Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Higher levels of SSB consumption significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23), depression (1.25, 1.11-1.41), cancer (1.10, 1.03-1.17), and all-cause mortality (1.08, 1.05-1.11) compared with none or lower SSB intake. The associations were dose-dependent, with per 250 mL increment of SSB intake daily increasing the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and all-cause mortality by RR 1.09 (1.03-1.15), 1.08 (1.06-1.10), 1.17 (1.04-1.32), and 1.07 (1.03-1.11), respectively. The link was curved for depression and cancer risk (pnon-linear < 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that higher SSB intake increased ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% than none or lower SSB consumption. It is suggested that SSB accounts for a leading risk factor of stroke, depression, cancer, and mortality, and that the risk rises in parallel with the increment of SSB intake (and is affected by participant characteristics).
-
10.
Effects of a multicomponent resistance-based exercise program with protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with ADT: secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial.
Mundell, NL, Owen, PJ, Dalla Via, J, Macpherson, H, Daly, RM, Livingston, PM, Rantalainen, T, Foulkes, S, Millar, J, Murphy, DG, et al
BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e060189
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for local and advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is effective at reducing androgens, and thus inhibiting tumour progression. However, testosterone reduces the production of a highly neurotoxic protein (amyloid beta peptide 40), which is linked with the development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a multi-component resistance-based exercise programme with daily protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognitive function compared with usual care in PCa survivors treated with ADT. This study is a secondary analysis of a 12-month single-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial. Participants (n = 70) were randomised (1:1 ratio) to either: (a) multi-component exercise intervention including progressive resistance training, body-weight impact and balance exercises, as well as a daily nutritional supplement containing whey protein, calcium and vitamin D, or (b) usual care control receiving 1000 IU vitamin D only. Results show that a multicomponent exercise training and nutritional supplementation intervention did not improve cognitive function in men treated with ADT for PCa compared with usual care. Authors conclude that cognitive decline associated with ADT may mechanistically differ to that of general age-related cognitive declines, thus it is important that future studies also examine other intervention modalities.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this preplanned secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial was to investigate the effects of a multicomponent exercise programme combined with daily whey protein, calcium and vitamin D supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). DESIGN 12-month, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. SETTING University clinical exercise centre. PARTICIPANTS 70 ADT-treated men were randomised to exercise-training plus supplementation (Ex+ Suppl, n=34) or usual care (control, n=36). INTERVENTION Men allocated to Ex + Suppl undertook thrice weekly resistance training with weight-bearing exercise training plus daily whey protein (25 g), calcium (1200 mg) and vitamin D (2000 IU) supplementation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Cognition was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months via a computerised battery (CogState), Trail-making test, Rey auditory-verbal learning test and Digit span. Data were analysed with linear mixed models and an intention-to-treat and prespecified per-protocol approach (exercise-training: ≥66%, nutritional supplement: ≥80%). RESULTS Sixty (86%) men completed the trial (Ex + Suppl, n=31; control, n=29). Five (7.1%) men were classified as having mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Median (IQR) adherence to the exercise and supplement was 56% (37%-82%) and 91% (66%-97%), respectively. Ex + Suppl had no effect on cognition at any time. CONCLUSIONS A 12-month multicomponent exercise training and supplementation intervention had no significant effect on cognition in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer compared with usual care. Exercise training adherence below recommended guidelines does not support cognitive health in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12614000317695, registered 25/03/2014) and acknowledged under the Therapeutic Goods Administration Clinical Trial Notification Scheme (CT-2015-CTN-03372-1 v1).