-
1.
Efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lou, J, Cui, S, Huang, N, Jin, G, Chen, C, Fan, Y, Zhang, C, Li, J
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2024;59:48-62
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The intestinal microbiota is a complex microbial community that plays an irreplaceable role in human life. Intestinal dysbiosis is very common in patients with critical illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics or synbiotics in preventing ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty-three trials (n=4 retrospective studies and n=29 randomised controlled studies). A total of 7886 patients were grouped into the probiotics or synbiotics group (n= 4065) and control group (n= 3821). Results showed that probiotics or synbiotics significantly reduced the incidence of VAP and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical support, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU morality. Authors concluded that probiotics or synbiotics supplementation plays a beneficial role in critically ill patients and presents a novel approach to the management of critical diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation in critically ill patients. METHODS Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and the Web of Science. The primary output measure was the incident of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the secondary outputs were diarrhea, Clostridium diffusion infection (CDI), incident of sepsis, incident of hospital acquired pneumonia, duration of mechanical exploitation, ICU mortality rate, length of ICU stay, in hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay. Data were pooled and expressed as Relative Risk(RR) and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS 33 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 4065 patients who received probiotics or synbiotics (treatment group) and 3821 patients who received standard care or placebo (control group). The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the treatment group has significantly reduced incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR = 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.67-0.96; p = 0.021, I2 = 52.5 %) and sepsis (RR = 0.97; 95 % CI: 0.66-1.42; p = 0.032, I2 = 54.4 %), As well as significantly increased duration of mechanical exploitation (SMD = -0.47; 95 % CI: -0.74-0.20, p = 0.012, I2 = 63.4 %), ICU mobility (RR = 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.71-1.27; p = 0.004, I2 = 62.8 %), length of ICU stay (SMD = -0.29; 95 % CI: -0.58-0.01; p = 0.000, I2 = 82.3 %) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.33; 95 % CI: -0.57-0.08, p = 0.000, I2 = 74.2 %) than the control group. There were no significant differences in diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis showed that probiotic and synbiotic supplements are beneficial for critically ill patients as they significantly reduce the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical exploitation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality. However, this intervention has minimal impact on diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality in critically ill patients.
-
2.
The synergistic effect of herbal medicine and probiotics in pediatric functional constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim, E, Chang, S, Nam, J, Park, N, Min, SY
Medicine. 2024;103(7):e36899
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Paediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder in children. The initial approach to managing PFC involves demystification, education, toilet training, and the use of laxatives. Using laxatives can lead to various adverse effects therefore, patients with functional constipation typically adopt a self-management approach and explore complementary and alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to analyse the synergistic effect of herbal medicine (HM) combined with probiotics in the treatment of PFC, by comparing it to the use of probiotics alone. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-two randomised controlled trials. Results showed that the combination of HM with probiotics may yield significantly greater benefits for total effective rate when compared to probiotics alone. Furthermore, HM combined with probiotics could potentially reduce the recurrence rate by 70% compared to probiotics alone. Authors concluded that HM could potentially offer advantages in enhancing the efficacy rate and Bristol faecal score, influencing gastrointestinal peptide hormones, decreasing inflammation indicators and lowering the recurrence rate among children with functional constipation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a prevalent and persistent gastrointestinal disorder, that requires various treatments, including alternative approaches. This review assessed the synergistic efficacy of herbal medicine (HM) and probiotics for PFC. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of 11 databases, including English, Chinese, and Korean databases, until June 29, 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the intervention of HM with probiotics to that of the same probiotics. Statistical analyses included calculation of the mean difference (MD), standardized MD, risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and assessment of risk of bias using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system was used to evaluate evidence quality. Potential publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Egger test, the fail-safe N test, and Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method. RESULTS A total of 22 RCTs involving 2228 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The HM and probiotics group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the probiotics alone group in various parameters: total effective rate (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.19-1.29, P < .001), Bristol fecal Score (MD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, P < .001), gastrointestinal peptide hormone (motilin) (MD: 35.37, 95% CI: 24.64-64.10, P < .001), inflammation indicator (nitrous oxide) (MD: -12.45, 95% CI: -15.12 to -9.77, P < .001), minimal sensitive volume of the rectum (MD: -8.7, 95% CI: -10.91 to -6.49, P < .001), and recurrence rate (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21-0.43, P < .001). CONCLUSION The combination of HM and probiotics may exhibit a synergistic effect on PFC. Nevertheless, it is imperative to undertake rigorously planned RCTs to comprehensively evaluate the synergistic efficacy of HM and probiotics.
-
3.
Oral compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life for patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy: A randomized placebo-controlled study.
Wei, H, Yue, Z, Han, J, Chen, P, Xie, K, Sun, Y, Zhu, J
Thoracic cancer. 2024;15(2):182-191
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy occupies an important role in the management of lung cancer; however, there are treatment-associated side effects. These symptoms may deteriorate the quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy, and even necessitate dose reduction or discontinuation. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral compound probiotic supplements can reduce chemotherapy-related adverse effects and improve lung cancer patients' quality of life during chemotherapy. This study was a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study. A total of 100 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy where enrolled for the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intervention (probiotics) vs placebo. Results showed that the participants receiving probiotic supplements were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhoea relative to the placebo group. Authors concluded that compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve platinum-based doublet chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal adverse reactions for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is an important approach for lung cancer patients. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the compound probiotic supplements in improving the quality of life for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients with lung cancer who were scheduled to receive platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. All eligible patients were randomly administered (1:1) compound probiotic supplements (group BP-1) or placebo (group C) for two chemotherapy cycles. The EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire scores were evaluated before the first, second, and third cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in the EROTC QLQ C30 questionnaire score between the two groups after two cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 110 patients were recruited from March 2021 to January 2022. After undergoing two cycles of chemotherapy, group BP-1 were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea relative to group C (76.90 ± 18.31 vs. 58.89 ± 17.17; 93.33 ± 11.58 vs. 85.93 ± 15.06; 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 27.04 ± 29.15; 6.67 ± 13.53 vs. 22.22 ± 18.80; 0.95 ± 5.63 vs. 28.15 ± 22.42; 2.86 ± 9.47 vs. 15.56 ± 16.82; p < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea in group BP-1 was significantly lower than in group C (0% vs. 71.43%, 16.67% vs. 57.14%, 2.38% vs. 63.27%, and 7.14% vs. 42.86%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal side effects for lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800019269).
-
4.
Outcome-Specific Efficacy of Different Probiotic Strains and Mixtures in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Xie, P, Luo, M, Deng, X, Fan, J, Xiong, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(17)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional bowel disease that is induced by disorders of gut–brain interactions. Typical symptoms of IBS include recurrent abdominal pain associated with changes in stool form or frequency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different probiotic strains and mixtures based on global conditions, mental health levels, and specific gastrointestinal symptoms. This study was a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of eighty-one randomised controlled trials. Results showed that only some probiotic strains and combinations were more effective than the placebo for each specific outcome of IBS. Authors concluded that probiotics should be selected according to the specific symptoms of IBS patients.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disease. The efficacy of different probiotics in treating IBS remains controversial. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare and rank the outcome-specific efficacy of different probiotic strains or combinations in adults with IBS. We searched the literature up to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of probiotics in IBS were included. A frequentist framework was used to perform this study. In total, 9253 participants from 81 RCTs were included in the study. Four probiotic strains and five mixtures were significantly superior to placebo in improving IBS Symptom Severity Scale, among which Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 ranked first (surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA, 92.9%). A mixture containing five probiotics (SUCRA, 100%) ranked first in improving the IBS-Quality of life. Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA, 96.9%) and Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 (SUCRA, 92.6%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving abdominal pain. Three probiotic strains and two mixtures were effective in alleviating abdominal bloating. Four probiotic strains and a mixture were significantly superior to placebo in reducing the bowel movement frequency in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA, 99.6%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 (SUCRA, 89.7%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving the Bristol stool form scale of IBS-D. Only some probiotics are effective for particular outcomes in IBS patients. This study provided the first ranking of outcome-specific efficacy of different probiotic strains and combinations in IBS. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
-
5.
Probiotics for the management of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.
Chen, M, Yuan, L, Xie, CR, Wang, XY, Feng, SJ, Xiao, XY, Zheng, H
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2023;109(11):3631-3647
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of the brain–gut axis characterised by frequent abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, and change of bowel habits – constipation or diarrhoea. This study's aim was to assess the overall effect of probiotics on improving IBS symptoms and find out the important effect moderators. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventy-two articles with 8581 participants. Results showed general medium effect size of probiotics on the improvement of IBS symptoms compared with placebo, and a large effect size of probiotics on the abdominal pain and the scores of quality-of-life assessments. Furthermore, the treatment duration and study duration were the most important moderators of effect, and a longer study duration or treatment duration was associated with a smaller effect size. Authors concluded that their study suggested a short-term effect of probiotics on the improvement of global IBS symptoms and abdominal pain. Furthermore, treatment duration, study regions, the types of outcomes, and the types of probiotics might be major effect moderators.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous systematic reviews demonstrated a potentially beneficial effect of probiotics on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, these studies are either affected by the inclusion of insufficient trials or by the problem of dependent data across multiple outcomes, and an overall effect size has not been provided. We aimed to determine the effect of probiotics on IBS through a three-level meta-analysis and clarify potential effect moderators. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, screening for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine the effect of probiotics on IBS. The primary outcome was the improvement in the severity of global IBS symptoms at the end of treatment. The secondary outcomes were the improvement in abdominal pain and the quality of life. The effect sizes of the probiotics were measured by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and pooled by a three-level meta-analysis model. RESULTS We included 72 RCTs in the analysis. The meta-analysis showed significantly better overall effect of probiotics than placebo on the global IBS symptoms (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.34, P <0.001), abdominal pain (SMD -0.89, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.5, P <0.001) and quality of life (SMD 0.99, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.54, P <0.001), respectively. Moderator analysis found that a treatment duration shorter than 4 weeks was associated with a larger effect size in all the outcomes, and Bacillus probiotics had better improvement on the abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics had a short-term effect and a medium effect size on the global IBS symptoms. Treatment duration and types of probiotics affected the effect size of probiotics, and shorter durations and Bacillus probiotics were associated with better treatment effects. REGISTRATION Open Science Framework.
-
6.
Effects of Probiotics on Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
He, X, Liu, W, Tang, F, Chen, X, Song, G
Nutrients. 2023;15(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disability caused by differences in the brain and is characterized by a series of neurodevelopmental disorders, including language and social disorders, restricted interests, and repetitive stereotyped activities. The aim of this study was to explore whether probiotics could improve the overall severity of ASD symptoms in children. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven studies. Results showed that probiotic supplementation did not improve the associated behavioural symptoms in children with ASD. However, multiple-strain probiotic blend intervention exhibited a positive therapeutic effect on children with ASD and was more effective than single-strain probiotics in subgroup analyses. Authors concluded that to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on children with ASD, randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled studies following strict trial guidelines are needed.
Abstract
Many studies have explored the efficacy of probiotics on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children, but there is no consensus on the curative effect. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively investigate whether probiotics could improve behavioral symptoms in children with ASD. A systematic database search was conducted and a total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found a nonsignificant overall effect size of probiotics on behavioral symptoms in children with ASD (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.60 to 0.11, p = 0.18). However, a significant overall effect size was found in the subgroup of the probiotic blend (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.02, p = 0.04). Additionally, these studies provided limited evidence for the efficacy of probiotics due to their small sample sizes, a shorter intervention duration, different probiotics used, different scales used, and poor research quality. Thus, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled studies following strict trial guidelines are needed to precisely demonstrate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on ASD in children.
-
7.
The effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Li, G, Feng, H, Mao, XL, Deng, YJ, Wang, XB, Zhang, Q, Guo, Y, Xiao, SM
Journal of translational medicine. 2023;21(1):442
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), an endocrine and metabolic disease, is influenced by host physiology and environmental factors. Recent studies have shown that the gut microbiota plays a key role in the maintenance of host homeostasis and pathogenesis of T2DM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a probiotic intervention on glycaemic control in T2DM patients and to evaluate the variations in these effects due to participant characteristics and intervention characteristics. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty randomised-controlled studies including a total of 1,827 individuals. Results showed that probiotic supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. Bifdobacterium and food-type probiotics had greater glucose-lowering effects than other probiotic genera and types of vehicles used to deliver the probiotics. Authors concluded that the administration of probiotics may be a promising adjuvant therapy for glycaemic control in T2DM patients.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on the data from the randomised clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception to October 2022, and RCTs about probiotics and T2DM were collected. The standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control related parameters, e.g. fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). RESULTS Thirty RCTs including 1,827 T2MD patients were identified. Compared with the placebo group, the probiotics supplementation group had a significant decrease in the parameters of glycaemic control, including FBG (SMD = - 0.331, 95% CI - 0.424 to - 0.238, Peffect < 0.001), insulin (SMD = - 0.185, 95% CI - 0.313 to - 0.056, Peffect = 0.005), HbA1c (SMD = - 0.421, 95% CI - 0.584 to - 0.258, Peffect < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (SMD = - 0.224, 95% CI - 0.342 to - 0.105, Peffect < 0.001). Further subgroup analyses showed that the effect was larger in the subgroups of Caucasians, high baseline body mass index (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2), Bifidobacterium and food-type probiotics (Psubgroup < 0.050). CONCLUSION This study supported that probiotics supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. It may be a promising adjuvant therapy for patients with T2DM.
-
8.
Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Chen, B, Zhang, J, Dong, J, Ma, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, K, Lu, J
BMC psychiatry. 2023;23(1):477
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that impairs psychosocial function and quality of life. Recent studies show that prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics reveal a novel way to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in alleviating depressive symptoms. This study was a meta-analysis of thirteen studies with a total of 786 participants who were allocated to the intervention group (n=427) and the placebo group (n=359). Results showed that the overall effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on depressive symptoms were significantly superior to those of placebo. Additionally, biological sex was a vital factor that influenced patients’ responses to the treatment. Authors concluded that agents that manipulate gut microbiota might become a novel approach to treat patients with mild-to-moderate depression.
Abstract
Accumulating studies have shown the effects of gut microbiota management tools in improving depression. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on patients with depression. We searched six databases up to July 2022. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 786 participants were included. The overall results demonstrated that patients who received prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics had significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with those in the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis only confirmed the significant antidepressant effects of agents that contained probiotics. In addition, patients with mild or moderate depression could both benefit from the treatment. Studies with a lower proportion of females reported stronger effects for alleviating depressive symptoms. In conclusion, agents that manipulate gut microbiota might improve mild-to-moderate depression. It is necessary to further investigate the benefits of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic treatments relative to antidepressants and follow up with individuals over a longer time before these therapies are implemented in clinical practice.
-
9.
Treating asthma patients with probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xie, Q, Yuan, J, Wang, Y
Nutricion hospitalaria. 2023;40(4):829-838
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory respiratory disease, with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the efficacy of probiotics in allergic diseases has received special attention. Experiments have shown that probiotics have a clear effect on allergic diseases. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of asthma and evaluate it, so as to provide a reference for the selection of treatment options for asthma patients. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics can improve symptoms and airway inflammation in patients with asthma, reduce acute exacerbation of asthma, and have no significant improvement in lung function. Authors concluded that the use of probiotics in patients with asthma can improve lung inflammation and asthma symptoms, as well as reduce the number of asthma attacks.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of asthma patients by meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases were searched by computer, and the relevant literature on the treatment of asthma by probiotics that met the inclusion criteria was screened by manual retrieval. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software and the combined effect was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Results: a total of ten references were included, all of which were randomized controlled studies, and a total of 1,101 people were investigated. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (MD = -7.17, 95 % CI: -12.81, -1.54), asthma symptom severity (MD = -0.07, 95 % CI: -0.10, -0.04), Childhood Asthma Control Test (CACT) (MD = 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.14, 3.39), and the number of acute episodes of asthma (OR = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.19, 0.47) in the probiotics group were better than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (MD = 0.11, 95 % CI: -0.05, 0.26) and FEV1/FVC (%) (MD = 0.32, 95 % CI: -1.48, 2.12). Conclusion: the use of probiotics in patients with asthma can improve lung inflammation and asthma symptoms, reduce the number of asthma attacks, and have no effect on lung function. Objetivo: evaluar el papel de los probióticos en el tratamiento de pacientes con asma mediante metaanálisis. Métodos: se realizaron búsquedas informáticas en PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science y otras bases de datos, y se examinó la literatura relevante sobre el tratamiento del asma con probióticos que cumplía con los criterios de inclusión mediante recuperación manual. El metaanálisis se realizó con el software Revman 5.4 y el efecto combinado se evaluó mediante la razón de probabilidades (OR) o diferencia media (MD) y el intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95 %. Resultados: se incluyó un total de diez referencias, todas ellas estudios controlados aleatorios, y se investigó un total de 1.101 personas. El óxido nítrico exhalado (FeNO) (MD = -7,17, IC 95 %: -12,81, -1,54), la gravedad de los síntomas del asma (MD = -0,07, IC 95 %: -0,10, -0,04), la Prueba de Control del Asma (CACT-ACT) (MD = 2,26, IC 95 %: 1,14, 3,39) y el número de episodios agudos de asma (OR = 0,30, IC 95 %: 0,19, 0,47) en el grupo de probióticos fueron mejores que en el grupo de control. No hubo diferencia significativa en volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo (FEV1) (DM = 0,11, IC 95 %: -0,05, 0,26) y FEV1/FVC (%) (DM = 0,32, IC 95 %: -1,48, 2,12). Conclusión: el uso de probióticos en pacientes con asma puede mejorar la inflamación pulmonar y los síntomas del asma, reducir el número de ataques de asma y no tener efecto sobre la función pulmonar.
-
10.
Effects of probiotics administration on lactose intolerance in adulthood: A meta-analysis.
Ahn, SI, Kim, MS, Park, DG, Han, BK, Kim, YJ
Journal of dairy science. 2023;106(7):4489-4501
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Milk and dairy products are good sources of protein, calcium and other nutrients. However, many people experience lactose intolerance due to their digestive tract's inability to digest lactose, resulting in symptoms such as flatulence, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. Oral administration of certain friendly live microorganisms or probiotics can help digest lactose more efficiently as they have greater β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity. β-galactosidase is an enzyme responsible for the digestion of lactose in the dairy products. A total of twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results of this meta-analysis showed an improvement in the symptoms of lactose intolerance in adult patients, following probiotic administration. Probiotic administration was also found to enhance the digestion of lactose and calcium absorption in adult patients. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the potential benefits of oral supplementation of probiotics for adult lactose intolerance patients. However, further studies are needed to understand the relationship between calcium absorption and lactose digestion after probiotic administration.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of probiotic administration on adults with lactose intolerance. Twelve studies were identified from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effect size was estimated using the standardized mean difference (SMD), and Cochrane's Q test was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity of the effect size. Moderator analysis, including meta-ANOVA and meta-regression, were performed to determine the cause of heterogeneity in the effect size using a mixed-effect model. Egger's linear regression test was conducted to evaluate publication bias. The results showed that probiotic administration alleviated the symptoms of lactose intolerance, including abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence. Among them, the area under the curve (AUC) showed the greatest decrease following probiotic administration (SMD, -4.96; 95% confidence interval, -6.92 to -3.00). In the meta-ANOVA test, abdominal pain and total symptoms decreased with monostrain probiotic administration. This combination was also effective for flatulence. The dosage of probiotics or lactose was significantly associated with a reduction in the total symptom score, and the linear regression models between the dosage and SMD were found to be Y = 2.3342 × dosage - 25.0400 (R2 = 79.68%) and Y = 0.2345 × dosage - 7.6618 (R2 = 34.03%), respectively. Publication bias was detected for most items. However, even after effect size correction, the probiotic administration effect for all items remained valid. The administration of probiotics was effective at improving adult lactose intolerance, and it is expected that the results of this study could help improve the nutritional status of adults by increasing their consumption of milk and dairy products in the future.