-
1.
White rice, brown rice and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu, J, Balaji, B, Tinajero, M, Jarvis, S, Khan, T, Vasudevan, S, Ranawana, V, Poobalan, A, Bhupathiraju, S, Sun, Q, et al
BMJ open. 2022;12(9):e065426
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has continued to increase worldwide, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. Since rice is a staple food in many cultures and is predominant in most Asian diets, it is hypothesised that improving diet quality by replacing white rice with brown rice could play an important role in the prevention of T2D. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between rice intake and the risk of T2D. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nineteen studies – 8 cohort studies and 11 randomised controlled trials. Results from the meta-analyses of the cohort studies show a positive association between intake of white rice and risk of T2D. The associations were stronger in women compared with men. Additionally, brown rice was inversely associated with risk of T2D however, the results are based on limited data. Furthermore, the randomised controlled trials showed that the between-group difference in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was statistically significant in favour of the brown rice group. Authors conclude that replacing white rice with brown rice or other whole grains has the potential to be a low-cost and feasible lifestyle strategy to improve diet quality and help reduce T2D risk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intake of white rice has been associated with elevated risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), while studies on brown rice are conflicting. To inform dietary guidance, we synthesised the evidence on white rice and brown rice with T2D risk. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched through November 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Prospective cohort studies of white and brown rice intake on T2D risk (≥1 year), and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing brown rice with white rice on cardiometabolic risk factors (≥2 weeks). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted by the primary reviewer and two additional reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for prospective cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. Strength of the meta-evidence was assessed using NutriGrade. RESULTS Nineteen articles were included: 8 cohort studies providing 18 estimates (white rice: 15 estimates, 25 956 cases, n=5 77 426; brown rice: 3 estimates, 10 507 cases, n=1 97 228) and 11 RCTs (n=1034). In cohort studies, white rice was associated with higher risk of T2D (pooled RR, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.32) comparing extreme categories. At intakes above ~300 g/day, a dose-response was observed (each 158 g/day serving was associated with 13% (11%-15%) higher risk of T2D). Intake of brown rice was associated with lower risk of T2D (pooled RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.97) comparing extreme categories. Each 50 g/day serving of brown rice was associated with 13% (6%-20%) lower risk of T2D. Cohort studies were considered to be of good or fair quality. RCTs showed an increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (0.06 mmol/L; 0.00 to 0.11 mmol/L) in the brown compared with white rice group. No other significant differences in risk factors were observed. The majority of RCTs were found to have some concern for risk of bias. Overall strength of the meta-evidence was moderate for cohort studies and moderate and low for RCTs. CONCLUSION Intake of white rice was associated with higher risk of T2D, while intake of brown rice was associated with lower risk. Findings from substitution trials on cardiometabolic risk factors were inconsistent. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020158466.
-
2.
A Vegan Diet Is Associated with a Significant Reduction in Dietary Acid Load: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Individuals.
Müller, A, Zimmermann-Klemd, AM, Lederer, AK, Hannibal, L, Kowarschik, S, Huber, R, Storz, MA
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diets high in meat and cheese, which are acidogenic and low in fruits and vegetables, which are alkalising, increase the dietary acid load (DAL) of the diet. Diets with a high DAL have been associated with poor health outcomes and the development of heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Plant-based diets have been associated with a lower DAL, however very little research exists on this. Individuals following a vegan diet have been shown in previous studies to have a reduced DAL, however it is unclear whether this was due to a reduced calorie intake or because of the diet composition. This post-hoc study aimed to investigate this and determine whether eating a vegan diet for 4-weeks reduced DAL and how this compares to 4-weeks of a diet rich in meat. The results showed that after 3-weeks, the vegan diet significantly reduced the DAL compared to the meat-rich diet, which increased the DAL. Interestingly all the participants in this study were put on the same balanced diet for 7 days prior to commencing the trial, reducing the chance that results would be affected by a prior diet. It was concluded that a vegan diet as opposed to a meat-rich diet may be of benefit to health outcomes through lowering DAL. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that a balanced vegan diet may be of benefit to those who have heart disease and/or type 2 diabetes. However as this trial did not measure indicators of type 2 diabetes or heart disease, these associations are speculative.
Abstract
The composition of diet strongly affects acid-base homeostasis. Western diets abundant in acidogenic foods (meat and cheese) and deficient in alkalizing foods (fruits and vegetables) increase dietary acid load (DAL). A high DAL has been associated with numerous health repercussions, including cardiovascular disease and type-2-diabetes. Plant-based diets have been associated with a lower DAL; however, the number of trials exploring this association is limited. This randomized-controlled trial sought to examine whether an isocaloric vegan diet lowers DAL as compared to a meat-rich diet. Forty-five omnivorous individuals were randomly assigned to a vegan diet (n = 23) or a meat-rich diet (n = 22) for 4 weeks. DAL was determined using potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) scores at baseline and after 3 and 4 weeks, respectively. After 3 weeks, median PRAL (-23.57 (23.87)) and mean NEAPR (12.85 ± 19.71) scores were significantly lower in the vegan group than in the meat-rich group (PRAL: 18.78 (21.04) and NEAPR 60.93 ± 15.51, respectively). Effects were mediated by a lower phosphorus and protein intake in the vegan group. Our study suggests that a vegan diet is a potential means to reduce DAL, whereas a meat-rich diet substantially increases the DAL burden.
-
3.
Digital messaging to support control for type 2 diabetes (StAR2D): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Farmer, A, Bobrow, K, Leon, N, Williams, N, Phiri, E, Namadingo, H, Cooper, S, Prince, J, Crampin, A, Besada, D, et al
BMC public health. 2021;21(1):1907
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Many individuals with type 2 diabetes find it challenging to adhere to treatments possibly due to lack of support. Text messaging has been shown to be effective for treatment adherence in various parts of the world, yet it is unclear on its effect in Malawi and sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this randomised control trial of 1186 individuals was to determine the effect of motivational and educational text messages three to four times per week for 12 months on treatment success. The results showed that SMS text messages resulted in improved blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals, yet no effect on blood sugar control. It was concluded that text messaging without other support from health care professionals may be inadequate for the self-management of type 2 diabetes. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that there are additional support strategies for individuals with type 2 diabetes, yet these should be secondary to the input from professionals.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to take medicines for diabetes as prescribed contributes to poor outcomes from the condition. Mobile phones are ubiquitous and short message service (SMS) texts have shown promise as a low-cost intervention. We tested the effectiveness of SMS-text messaging in improving outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS StAR2D was a 12-month two-arm randomised trial of SMS-text messaging and usual care in Cape Town, South Africa and Lilongwe, Malawi. Messages used behaviour change theory and were developed with patients and staff. The intervention group received four messages each week. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who collected > 80% medication and changes in systolic blood pressure, lipids, cardiovascular risk, and the proportion of the participants reaching treatment goals. RESULTS The trial took place between 1 October, 2016 and 1 October 2018, 1186 participants were randomised to intervention (593) and control (593) groups. 91% of participants completed follow-up. There was a reduction in HbA1c (DCCT) in both groups but not in mean change (95% CI) between groups (- 0.08% (- 0.31 to 0.16) (IFCC - 0.82 mmol/mol (- 3.44 to 1.79). There was a small but not significant increase in the proportions of participants likely to have collected 80% or more of medication (Relative risk 1.11 (0.84 to 1.47; P = 0.47). There was a significant difference between groups in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline of 3.46 mmHg (1.48 to 5.44, P = 0.001) in favour of the intervention group. The between group difference in change in 10-year risk of coronary heart disease was - 0.71% (- 1.46 to 0.04, P = 0.064). The proportion of participants meeting treatment goals in the intervention group was 36.0% and in the control group 26.8% (Relative risk 1.36 (1.13 to 1.63, P = 0.001). Participants reported many challenges to adherence despite finding messages acceptable and useful. CONCLUSIONS Whilst SMS text messages do not lead to improved glycaemia in these low-resource settings there appeared to be an impact on blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals but the mechanisms for this are unclear. Text messages alone, may be unsuccessful unless accompanied by health system strengthening and other forms of self-management support for type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN70768808. Registered 1 July 2015, http://www.isrctn.com/I ISRCTN70768808.
-
4.
Dissecting the interaction between COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus.
Chee, YJ, Tan, SK, Yeoh, E
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;11(5):1104-1114
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several countries have reported higher death rates and more severe cases of covid-19 amongst individuals with chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. This review of 100 papers aimed to investigate the interconnecting factors which may contribute to poorer prognosis in individuals with covid-19 and type 2 diabetes. Although the evidence suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes have poorer outcomes after contracting covid-19, they are not more susceptible to infection. The paper reported that mechanisms which may increase severity in type 2 diabetics are abnormal immune function, increased susceptibility to inflammation, the increased adherence of the virus to target cells and reduced ability to fight infection. It is important to manage blood sugars when suffering from covid-19. The paper reviewed the use of several medications such as metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4), glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and insulin in the context of individuals suffering from covid-19, with insulin being the treatment of choice in the acutely ill patient. Current treatments of covid-19 were also reviewed such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir-ritonavir, IL-6 receptor agonists, type 1 interferon and remdesivir. It was concluded that clinicians should be aware of the risks in patients with type 2 diabetes and covid-19. However as new data is made available, the chronic and long-term implications will become clearer. This study could be used by health care professionals to ensure that patients with type 2 diabetes do everything they can to avoid covid-19 infection and that if contracted these patients are closely monitored for severe disease.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that is caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Data from several countries have shown higher morbidity and mortality among individuals with chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus. In this review, we explore the contributing factors for poorer prognosis in these individuals. As a significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 also have diabetes mellitus, this adds another layer of complexity to their management. We explore potential interactions between antidiabetic medications and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors with COVID-19. Suggested recommendations for the use of antidiabetic medications for COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus are provided. We also review pertinent clinical considerations in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis in COVID-19 patients. In addition, we aim to increase clinicians' awareness of the metabolic effects of promising drug therapies for COVID-19. Finally, we highlight the importance of timely vaccinations for patients with diabetes mellitus.
-
5.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Altered Immune System Leading to Susceptibility to Pathogens, Especially Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Ferlita, S, Yegiazaryan, A, Noori, N, Lal, G, Nguyen, T, To, K, Venketaraman, V
Journal of clinical medicine. 2019;8(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes can alter the immune system and increase the risk of infections such as Mycobaterium tuberculosis (M. tb). Understanding how this can occur and the possible strategies to enhance the immune system is critical to prevent co-infections. This review of 69 papers aimed to discuss how concurrent infections can be prevented. The paper starts by discussing the ways that type 2 diabetes can alter the immune response, such as persistent high blood sugar levels leading to the production of harmful chemicals when protein or fat combine with sugar in the bloodstream and increased inflammation. Complex pathways are triggered by these two events resulting in an altered immune response. In particular glutathione, an antioxidant is decreased, which is important in the immune response when controlling M. tb. It was concluded that high blood sugar can increase inflammation and decrease glutathione resulting in immune suppression. This paper could be used by health care professionals to understand the complex mechanisms whereby type 2 diabetes can suppress the immune system resulting in a high risk of infections.
Abstract
There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) worldwide. Uncontrolled T2DM can lead to alterations in the immune system, increasing the risk of susceptibility to infections such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb). Altered immune responses could be attributed to factors such as the elevated glucose concentration, leading to the production of Advanced Glycation End products (AGE) and the constant inflammation, associated with T2DM. This production of AGE leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the use of the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) via the Polyol pathway, and overall diminished levels of glutathione (GSH) and GSH-producing enzymes in T2DM patients, which alters the cytokine profile and changes the immune responses within these patients. Thus, an understanding of the intricate pathways responsible for the pathogenesis and complications in T2DM, and the development of strategies to enhance the immune system, are both urgently needed to prevent co-infections and co-morbidities in individuals with T2DM.
-
6.
Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnoses in the UK: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health Improvement Network Primary Care Database.
Pham, TM, Carpenter, JR, Morris, TP, Sharma, M, Petersen, I
Clinical epidemiology. 2019;11:1081-1088
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with substantial disease burden, including increased mortality risk and significant long-term morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses based on primary care electronic health records. This study is a cross-sectional analysis of health records data from The Health Improvement Network primary care database. The sample comprised 51% women; most of the individuals in the sample (approximately 80%) were below 60 years of age. Results show that compared with those of White ethnicity, the likelihood of having a type 2 diabetes diagnosis was more than double among Asian people, 65% more likely among Black people, and 17% more likely among people of Mixed/Other ethnicity. Authors conclude that accurate estimates of ethnic prevalence of type 2 diabetes are important for ensuring that public health resources are allocated appropriately for diabetes screening and lifestyle interventions.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with high levels of disease burden, including increased mortality risk and significant long-term morbidity. The prevalence of diabetes differs substantially among ethnic groups. We examined the prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses in the UK primary care setting. METHODS We analysed data from 404,318 individuals in The Health Improvement Network database, aged 0-99 years and permanently registered with general practices in London. The association between ethnicity and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses in 2013 was estimated using a logistic regression model, adjusting for effect of age group, sex, and social deprivation. A multiple imputation approach utilising population-level information about ethnicity from the UK census was used for imputing missing data. RESULTS Compared with those of White ethnicity (5.04%, 95% CI 4.95 to 5.13), the crude percentage prevalence of type 2 diabetes was higher in the Asian (7.69%, 95% CI 7.46 to 7.92) and Black (5.58%, 95% CI 5.35 to 5.81) ethnic groups, while lower in the Mixed/Other group (3.42%, 95% CI 3.19 to 3.66). After adjusting for differences in age group, sex, and social deprivation, all minority ethnic groups were more likely to have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes compared with the White group (OR Asian versus White 2.36, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.47; OR Black versus White 1.65, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.73; OR Mixed/Other versus White 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27). CONCLUSION The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was higher in the Asian and Black ethnic groups, compared with the White group. Accurate estimates of ethnic prevalence of type 2 diabetes based on large datasets are important for facilitating appropriate allocation of public health resources, and for allowing population-level research to be undertaken examining disease trajectories among minority ethnic groups, that might help reduce inequalities.
-
7.
Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.
Lean, ME, Leslie, WS, Barnes, AC, Brosnahan, N, Thom, G, McCombie, L, Peters, C, Zhyzhneuskaya, S, Al-Mrabeh, A, Hollingsworth, KG, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10120):541-551
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Most individuals with type 2 diabetes are obese with accumulation of fat around the liver and pancreas. Many studies have demonstrated that dietary induced weight loss can improve type 2 diabetes, however none have assessed whether dietary weight loss can sustain type 2 diabetes remission. This 12-month randomised trial of 306 individuals with type 2 diabetes aimed to determine whether weight management led by doctors would achieve long-term remission of type 2 diabetes. The results showed that weight loss of 15kg or more resulted in significantly higher rates of type 2 diabetes remission after 12 months, with 48% of the weight loss group achieving remission compared to 4% of the individuals who were not assigned a weight loss regimen. It was concluded that nearly half of the participants who were on a dietary weight loss programme achieved type 2 diabetes remission and were able to stop their medications. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that type 2 diabetes remission is a possibility with a supervised dietary weight loss programme.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disorder that requires lifelong treatment. We aimed to assess whether intensive weight management within routine primary care would achieve remission of type 2 diabetes. METHODS We did this open-label, cluster-randomised trial (DiRECT) at 49 primary care practices in Scotland and the Tyneside region of England. Practices were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated list, to provide either a weight management programme (intervention) or best-practice care by guidelines (control), with stratification for study site (Tyneside or Scotland) and practice list size (>5700 or ≤5700). Participants, carers, and research assistants who collected outcome data were aware of group allocation; however, allocation was concealed from the study statistician. We recruited individuals aged 20-65 years who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the past 6 years, had a body-mass index of 27-45 kg/m2, and were not receiving insulin. The intervention comprised withdrawal of antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs, total diet replacement (825-853 kcal/day formula diet for 3-5 months), stepped food reintroduction (2-8 weeks), and structured support for long-term weight loss maintenance. Co-primary outcomes were weight loss of 15 kg or more, and remission of diabetes, defined as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of less than 6·5% (<48 mmol/mol) after at least 2 months off all antidiabetic medications, from baseline to 12 months. These outcomes were analysed hierarchically. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 03267836. FINDINGS Between July 25, 2014, and Aug 5, 2017, we recruited 306 individuals from 49 intervention (n=23) and control (n=26) general practices; 149 participants per group comprised the intention-to-treat population. At 12 months, we recorded weight loss of 15 kg or more in 36 (24%) participants in the intervention group and no participants in the control group (p<0·0001). Diabetes remission was achieved in 68 (46%) participants in the intervention group and six (4%) participants in the control group (odds ratio 19·7, 95% CI 7·8-49·8; p<0·0001). Remission varied with weight loss in the whole study population, with achievement in none of 76 participants who gained weight, six (7%) of 89 participants who maintained 0-5 kg weight loss, 19 (34%) of 56 participants with 5-10 kg loss, 16 (57%) of 28 participants with 10-15 kg loss, and 31 (86%) of 36 participants who lost 15 kg or more. Mean bodyweight fell by 10·0 kg (SD 8·0) in the intervention group and 1·0 kg (3·7) in the control group (adjusted difference -8·8 kg, 95% CI -10·3 to -7·3; p<0·0001). Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimensions visual analogue scale, improved by 7·2 points (SD 21·3) in the intervention group, and decreased by 2·9 points (15·5) in the control group (adjusted difference 6·4 points, 95% CI 2·5-10·3; p=0·0012). Nine serious adverse events were reported by seven (4%) of 157 participants in the intervention group and two were reported by two (1%) participants in the control group. Two serious adverse events (biliary colic and abdominal pain), occurring in the same participant, were deemed potentially related to the intervention. No serious adverse events led to withdrawal from the study. INTERPRETATION Our findings show that, at 12 months, almost half of participants achieved remission to a non-diabetic state and off antidiabetic drugs. Remission of type 2 diabetes is a practical target for primary care. FUNDING Diabetes UK.