0
selected
-
1.
Calorie restriction improves metabolic state independently of gut microbiome composition: a randomized dietary intervention trial.
Sowah, SA, Milanese, A, Schübel, R, Wirbel, J, Kartal, E, Johnson, TS, Hirche, F, Grafetstätter, M, Nonnenmacher, T, Kirsten, R, et al
Genome medicine. 2022;14(1):30
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is an important risk factor for chronic diseases. Aside from well-established mechanisms such as obesity-induced inflammation, alterations in sugar and lipid metabolism, and steroid hormone signalling, imbalances in the composition of the gut microbiome have also been linked to the progression of obesity and its cardio-metabolic sequelae. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) (operationalised as the 5:2 diet) or continuous calorie restriction (CCR) induced alterations in the gut microbiome, and to which extent these were associated with overall weight loss irrespective of the dietary intervention in overweight or obese adults. This study was conducted using data and samples of the HELENA trial which was a parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, i.e., an ICR (n = 49), a CCR (n = 49), or a control group (n = 52) over a 50-week period in a 1:1:1 ratio. Results showed that the type of calorie restriction or the amount of weight lost were not accompanied by substantial and consistent shifts in gut microbiome composition or the abundance of individual bacterial taxa. Authors conclude that moderate ICR or CCR interventions as well as an overall moderate weight loss induced by calorie restriction (irrespective of which form) may not be associated with significant changes in the gut microbiome of overweight and obese adults, notwithstanding observed metabolic improvements.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gut microbiota has been suggested to play a significant role in the development of overweight and obesity. However, the effects of calorie restriction on gut microbiota of overweight and obese adults, especially over longer durations, are largely unexplored. METHODS Here, we longitudinally analyzed the effects of intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) operationalized as the 5:2 diet versus continuous calorie restriction (CCR) on fecal microbiota of 147 overweight or obese adults in a 50-week parallel-arm randomized controlled trial, the HELENA Trial. The primary outcome of the trial was the differential effects of ICR versus CCR on gene expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Changes in the gut microbiome, which are the focus of this publication, were defined as exploratory endpoint of the trial. The trial comprised a 12-week intervention period, a 12-week maintenance period, and a final follow-up period of 26 weeks. RESULTS Both diets resulted in ~5% weight loss. However, except for Lactobacillales being enriched after ICR, post-intervention microbiome composition did not significantly differ between groups. Overall weight loss was associated with significant metabolic improvements, but not with changes in the gut microbiome. Nonetheless, the abundance of the Dorea genus at baseline was moderately predictive of subsequent weight loss (AUROC of 0.74 for distinguishing the highest versus lowest weight loss quartiles). Despite the lack of consistent intervention effects on microbiome composition, significant study group-independent co-variation between gut bacterial families and metabolic biomarkers, anthropometric measures, and dietary composition was detectable. Our analysis in particular revealed associations between insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR) and Akkermansiaceae, Christensenellaceae, and Tanerellaceae. It also suggests the possibility of a beneficial modulation of the latter two intestinal taxa by a diet high in vegetables and fiber, and low in processed meat. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our results suggest that the gut microbiome remains stable and highly individual-specific under dietary calorie restriction. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial, including the present microbiome component, was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02449148 on May 20, 2015.
-
2.
Gut microbiota plasticity is correlated with sustained weight loss on a low-carb or low-fat dietary intervention.
Grembi, JA, Nguyen, LH, Haggerty, TD, Gardner, CD, Holmes, SP, Parsonnet, J
Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1405
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is responsible for a substantial number of deaths and is associated with considerable economic costs. Dietary intervention can help with weight loss; however, success varies between individuals. Gut microbiota could influence weight loss as they have been shown in previous studies to affect feelings of hunger. This cohort study taken from an RCT of 161 obese adults aimed to determine if differing gut microbiota communities could be involved in determining weight loss success when on a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet over 12 months. The results showed that specific gut microbiota did not predict weight loss success. However, having a diverse gut microbiota prior to starting a low-fat diet, predicted higher weight loss. This was only observed in those on a low-carbohydrate diet after 10 weeks of dieting. Interestingly individuals that reported better dietary adherence weren’t necessarily more successful with weight loss. It was concluded that gut microbiota diversity is important in sustained weight loss, especially if on a low-fat diet. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that microbial diversity may determine the success of a diet regime and the importance of personalising recommendations.
Abstract
While low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets can both lead to weight-loss, a substantial variability in achieved long-term outcomes exists among obese but otherwise healthy adults. We examined the hypothesis that structural differences in the gut microbiota explain a portion of variability in weight-loss using two cohorts of obese adults enrolled in the Diet Intervention Examining The Factors Interacting with Treatment Success (DIETFITS) study. A total of 161 pre-diet fecal samples were sequenced from a discovery cohort (n = 66) and 106 from a validation cohort (n = 56). An additional 157 fecal samples were sequenced from the discovery cohort after 10 weeks of dietary intervention. We found no specific bacterial signatures associated with weight loss that were consistent across both cohorts. However, the gut microbiota plasticity (i.e. variability), was correlated with long-term (12-month) weight loss in a diet-dependent manner; on the low-fat diet subjects with higher pre-diet daily plasticity had higher sustained weight loss, whereas on the low-carbohydrate diet those with higher plasticity over 10 weeks of dieting had higher 12-month weight loss. Our findings suggest the potential importance of gut microbiota plasticity for sustained weight-loss. We highlight the advantages of evaluating kinetic trends and assessing reproducibility in studies of the gut microbiota.
-
3.
A structured weight loss program increases gut microbiota phylogenetic diversity and reduces levels of Collinsella in obese type 2 diabetics: A pilot study.
Frost, F, Storck, LJ, Kacprowski, T, Gärtner, S, Rühlemann, M, Bang, C, Franke, A, Völker, U, Aghdassi, AA, Steveling, A, et al
PloS one. 2019;14(7):e0219489
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The global obesity epidemic is a major cause of the increase in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and ensuing cardiovascular disease. The causes of obesity are complex ,and it has been shown that changes in the microbiome are associated with obesity. The microbiome can be altered through dietary intervention and weight loss. The aim of this open label pilot study was to investigate the microbiome of obese patients with T2DM during a weight loss programme. During the first six weeks the diet consisted of formula drink providing 800kcal per day, followed by nine weeks during which a regular diet of 1,200-1,500kcal per day was reintroduced, depending on the individuals’ needs. All participants lost weight continuously over the 15 weeks, from an average BMI of 39.6 at the start to 33.1 at the end of the programme. This was accompanied with an improvement in glucose metabolism, total and LDL cholesterol and uric acid levels, but not HDL cholesterol or triglycerides. All participants experienced changes in their microbiome towards greater diversity after the first six weeks of the low-calorie formula diet but these changes were partially reversed at the end of the study period at 15 weeks. A particular type of bacteria, Collinsella, which has been associated with poor metabolic health, was the only type found to remain reduced at the end of the 15 weeks, an 8.4-fold decrease. The authors hypothesise that this reduction in Collinsella may be associated with the improvement of metabolic factor in these patients at the end of the study.
Abstract
The global obesity epidemic constitutes a major cause of morbidity and mortality challenging public health care systems worldwide. Thus, a better understanding of its pathophysiology and the development of novel therapeutic options are urgently needed. Recently, alterations of the intestinal microbiome in the obese have been discussed as a promoting factor in the pathophysiology of obesity and as a contributing factor to related diseases such as type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. The present pilot study investigated the effect of a structured weight loss program on fecal microbiota in obese type 2 diabetics. Twelve study subjects received a low-calorie formula diet for six weeks, followed by a nine week food reintroduction and stabilization period. Fecal microbiota were determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples at baseline, after six weeks and at the end of the study after fifteen weeks. All study subjects lost weight continuously throughout the program. Changes in fecal microbiota were most pronounced after six weeks of low-calorie formula diet, but reverted partially until the end of the study. However, the gut microbiota phylogenetic diversity increased persistently. The abundance of Collinsella, which has previously been associated with atherosclerosis, decreased significantly during the weight loss program. This study underlines the impact of dietary changes on the intestinal microbiome and further demonstrates the beneficial effects of weight loss on gut microbiota. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02970838.
-
4.
Gut Microbial Carbohydrate Metabolism Hinders Weight Loss in Overweight Adults Undergoing Lifestyle Intervention With a Volumetric Diet.
Muñiz Pedrogo, DA, Jensen, MD, Van Dyke, CT, Murray, JA, Woods, JA, Chen, J, Kashyap, PC, Nehra, V
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2018;93(8):1104-1110
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Recent research suggests that the human gut microbiome has a role to play in the development and maintenance of obesity, by influencing metabolism, fat deposition, brain-hormone signalling and insulin sensitivity. This pilot study of 26 participants, aimed to assess whether the composition and functional aspects of the gut microbiome influence outcomes of a comprehensive weight loss programme in overweight and obese individuals in America. A success criteria of 5% weight loss over a 3 month period was established. Comparisons in the gut microbiome using fecal samples at baseline and at 3 months were made between those successfully achieving the weight loss with those that did not. Achieving the weight loss success criteria was positively associated with the presence of Phascolarctobacterium. In contrast, an increased abundance of Dialister and of genes encoding gut microbial carbohydrate-active enzymes was positively associated with a failure to lose 5% of baseline body weight after 3 months. Interestingly, Phascolarctobacterium and Dialister both belong to the same bacterial family, which suggests that a compositional shift in this family may be responsible for host carbohydrate metabolism and obesity outcomes. This study highlights the potential of influencing the gut microbiome as part of an individualised obesity management programme. However the findings need to be confirmed in a larger, cohort study over a longer duration.
Abstract
The rising incidence of obesity requires the reevaluation of our current therapeutic strategies to optimize patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether compositional and functional characteristics of the gut microbiota in adults predict responses to a comprehensive lifestyle intervention program in overweight and obese adults. We recruited 26 participants from the Mayo Clinic Obesity Treatment Research Program between August 6, 2013, and September 12, 2013, to participate in a lifestyle intervention program for weight loss. Adults aged 18 to 65 years with a body mass index of 27 to 39.9 kg/m2 and able to provide informed consent were included in the study. Fecal stool samples were obtained at baseline and after 3 months. Loss of at least 5% of baseline weight after 3 months was defined as success. Clinical characteristics and gut microbial composition and function were compared between those who achieved at least 5% and those who achieved less than 5% weight loss. After 3 months, 9 of 26 participants lost at least 5% of their weight. The mean weight loss was 7.89 kg (95% CI, 6.46-9.32 kg) in the success group and 1.51 kg (95% CI, 0.52-2.49 kg) in the less than 5% weight loss group. An increased abundance of Phascolarctobacterium was associated with success. In contrast, an increased abundance of Dialister and of genes encoding gut microbial carbohydrate-active enzymes was associated with failure to lose 5% body weight. A gut microbiota with increased capability for carbohydrate metabolism appears to be associated with decreased weight loss in overweight and obese patients undergoing a lifestyle intervention program.
-
5.
Reduction of dietary fat absorption by the novel gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor cetilistat in healthy volunteers.
Bryson, A, de la Motte, S, Dunk, C
British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2009;67(3):309-15
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is epidemic and many obese patients seek drug treatment. Orlistat (a lipase inhibitor) is effective, but associated with gastrointestinal side effects. This study aimed to demonstrate that Cetilistat inhibits gastrointestinal lipase and is well tolerated in comparison to Orlistat. Results from three Phase I clinical studies (all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in healthy male volunteers (age 18-45y, BMI ≤30 kg m−2, minimum weight of 60 kg) (total n=99) resident in a clinical unit) are reported. Subjects receives placebo (n=24), one of a range of Cetilistat doses (n=66) or 120mg Orlistat x3/daily (n=9) for 5 days, whilst maintained on a strict diet. 30% of calories were derived from fat. Each dose of Cetilistat in the 3 studies increased mean faecal fat excretion relative to both baseline and placebo. Increased faecal fat excretion was significant compared with placebo at 150 mg t.i.d. (study 1). Faecal fat excretion was significantly higher in both the Cetilistat 120 and 240 mg t.i.d. groups (study 3). Overall, fecal fat excretion for Orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. was similar to Cetilistat. Gastroinetstinal side effects were most common (51%) for Cetilistat. Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the Orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any Cetilistat dose group. Most side-effects (98%) were mild or moderate. 3 subjects taking Cetilistat were withdrawn from the study after developing maculopapular rash, but no reaction was observed (pin-prick). The chemical structure of Orlistat and Cetistat are different which may affect how they interact with fat micelles in the intestines. The author speculates that Cetilistat may act more like a detergent, whereas Orlistat may promote the coalescence of micelles, leading to oils and increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Cetilistat is an effective inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, increasing faecal fat excretion in at all doses studied. Cetilistat is well tolerated across a range of doses, and comparison with Orlistat suggests improved tolerability.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a range of doses of cetilistat, a novel inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, in healthy volunteers. METHODS Three Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted. Enrolled subjects in the three studies (n = 99) received a controlled calorie diet (total intake 2160 calories daily, 30% from fat). Twenty-four subjects were randomized to placebo and 66 were randomized to the following cetilistat doses: 50 mg three times daily [t.i.d. (n = 7)], 60 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 100 mg t.i.d. (n = 7), 120 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 150 mg t.i.d. (n = 16), 240 mg t.i.d. (n = 9) and 300 mg t.i.d. (n = 9). Nine subjects received the approved orlistat dose (120 mg t.i.d.). Treatment was for 5 days, with a 2-day run-in period and 1-day post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome measure was daily faecal fat excretion. Secondary outcomes included plasma lipid levels, tolerability [gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)] and safety. RESULTS Cetilistat increased faecal fat excretion relative to baseline at all doses. Cetilistat was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal AEs the most common (51%). Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any cetilistat dose group (0.14-1.81 events per subject). Most AEs (98%) were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS Cetilistat increased dietary fat excretion in healthy volunteers receiving a controlled calorie diet. Cetilistat was well tolerated at all doses examined and tolerability appeared to be improved relative to orlistat. Faecal fat excretion in the cetilistat groups was at least comparable to the orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. group.