-
1.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
2.
Role of whole grains versus fruits and vegetables in reducing subclinical inflammation and promoting gastrointestinal health in individuals affected by overweight and obesity: a randomized controlled trial.
Kopf, JC, Suhr, MJ, Clarke, J, Eyun, SI, Riethoven, JM, Ramer-Tait, AE, Rose, DJ
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):72
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor diet is the leading risk factor for premature death and disability in the United States. Poor diets lead to metabolic syndrome and its associated diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of increasing intake of wholegrains or fruit and vegetables against a typical Western diet on inflammatory makers and gut microbiota composition. The study was a randomized, parallel arm feeding trial which enrolled fifty-two participants. The subjects were randomized into three groups (control, wholegrains, and fruit and vegetables). Results indicate that the wholegrain and fruit and vegetable diets had significant positive impacts on inflammatory markers. Interestingly, while both treatment groups decreased inflammatory markers, each decreased a different biomarker. The treatments induced individualised changes in microbiota composition such that treatment group differences were not identified. Authors conclude that wholegrain and fruit and vegetable diets have a positive impact on metabolic health in individuals affected by overweight or obesity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole grains (WG) and fruits and vegetables (FV) have been shown to reduce the risk of metabolic disease, possibly via modulation of the gut microbiota. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of increasing intake of either WG or FV on inflammatory markers and gut microbiota composition. METHODS A randomized parallel arm feeding trial was completed on forty-nine subjects with overweight or obesity and low intakes of FV and WG. Individuals were randomized into three groups (3 servings/d provided): WG, FV, and a control (refined grains). Stool and blood samples were collected at the beginning of the study and after 6 weeks. Inflammatory markers [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] were measured. Stool sample analysis included short/branched chain fatty acids (S/BCFA) and microbiota composition. RESULTS There was a significant decrease in LBP for participants on the WG (- 0.2 μg/mL, p = 0.02) and FV (- 0.2 μg/mL, p = 0.005) diets, with no change in those on the control diet (0.1 μg/mL, p = 0.08). The FV diet induced a significant change in IL-6 (- 1.5 pg/mL, p = 0.006), but no significant change was observed for the other treatments (control, - 0.009 pg/mL, p = 0.99; WG, - 0.29, p = 0.68). The WG diet resulted in a significant decrease in TNF-α (- 3.7 pg/mL; p < 0.001), whereas no significant effects were found for those on the other diets (control, - 0.6 pg/mL, p = 0.6; FV, - 1.4 pg/mL, p = 0.2). The treatments induced individualized changes in microbiota composition such that treatment group differences were not identified, except for a significant increase in α-diversity in the FV group. The proportions of Clostridiales (Firmicutes phylum) at baseline were correlated with the magnitude of change in LBP during the study. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that WG and FV intake can have positive effects on metabolic health; however, different markers of inflammation were reduced on each diet suggesting that the anti-inflammatory effects were facilitated via different mechanisms. The anti-inflammatory effects were not related to changes in gut microbiota composition during the intervention, but were correlated with microbiota composition at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02602496 , Nov 4, 2017.
-
3.
Almond Consumption and Processing Affects the Composition of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Healthy Adult Men and Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Holscher, HD, Taylor, AM, Swanson, KS, Novotny, JA, Baer, DJ
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor diet is recognised as a contributing factor to the development of common diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity. Increasingly, links are being made between the health and diversity of the human intestinal microbiome (the bacteria resident in our gut) and these chronic metabolic disorders. The microbiome is constantly changing, depending on a number of factors, including dietary intake. This small cross-over study of 18 participants, included five three-week diet periods of almonds in varying forms, with a one week break (wash out) between diets. The diets were 1. No almonds; 2. 42g whole almonds daily; 3. 42g whole roasted almonds daily; 4. 42g roasted, chopped almonds daily and 5. 42g of almond nut butter. Using stool samples at the end of each diet period, the results showed that chopped almond consumption increased the relative abundance of 3 bacteria strains (Lachnospira, Roseburia and Oscillospira) compared to the no almonds control group, while whole almonds increased the Dialister bacteria strain compared to control. There were no differences between the almond nut butter and control. The authors conclude that consumption of almonds affects the intestinal bacteria profile, which differs with the form of almonds eaten. Whilst this is a small study, Nutrition Practitioners should be aware of the ability to manipulate the gut microbiome with targeted dietary changes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almond processing has been shown to differentially impact metabolizable energy; however, the effect of food form on the gastrointestinal microbiota is under-investigated. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the interrelationship of almond consumption and processing on the gastrointestinal microbiota. DESIGN A controlled-feeding, randomized, five-period, crossover study with washouts between diet periods was conducted in healthy adults (n = 18). Treatments included: (1) zero servings/day of almonds (control); (2) 1.5 servings (42 g)/day of whole almonds; (3) 1.5 servings/day of whole, roasted almonds; (4) 1.5 servings/day of roasted, chopped almonds; and (5) 1.5 servings/day of almond butter. Fecal samples were collected at the end of each three-week diet period. RESULTS Almond consumption increased the relative abundances of Lachnospira, Roseburia, and Dialister (p ≤ 0.05). Comparisons between control and the four almond treatments revealed that chopped almonds increased Lachnospira, Roseburia, and Oscillospira compared to control (p < 0.05), while whole almonds increased Dialister compared to control (p = 0.007). There were no differences between almond butter and control. CONCLUSIONS These results reveal that almond consumption induced changes in the microbial community composition of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. Furthermore, the degree of almond processing (e.g., roasting, chopping, and grinding into butter) differentially impacted the relative abundances of bacterial genera.
-
4.
Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults.
Vanegas, SM, Meydani, M, Barnett, JB, Goldin, B, Kane, A, Rasmussen, H, Brown, C, Vangay, P, Knights, D, Jonnalagadda, S, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;105(3):635-650
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Increased whole grain consumption has been associated with reduced levels of inflammation. This randomised, controlled trial aimed to assess the effects of a whole grain diet in comparison with a refined grain diet on the immune system, levels of inflammation and gut bacteria. 81 men and women aged between 40 and 60 were randomly assigned to either a whole grain or a refined grain diet for a period of 6 weeks. All other dietary components were kept the same and calorie levels were controlled to maintain weight levels. The study findings showed a positive effect on stool frequency and stool weight with the whole grain diet in comparison to the refined grain diet. The whole grain diet also showed modest positive effects on gut bacteria profiles and aspects of immunity. The whole grain diet showed no effects on markers of inflammation.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies suggest an inverse association between whole-grain (WG) consumption and inflammation. However, evidence from interventional studies is limited, and few studies have included measurements of cell-mediated immunity.Objective: We assessed the effects of diets rich in WGs compared with refined grains (RGs) on immune and inflammatory responses, gut microbiota, and microbial products in healthy adults while maintaining subject body weights.Design: After a 2-wk provided-food run-in period of consuming a Western-style diet, 49 men and 32 postmenopausal women [age range: 40-65 y, body mass index (in kg/m2) <35] were assigned to consume 1 of 2 provided-food weight-maintenance diets for 6 wk.Results: Compared with the RG group, the WG group had increased plasma total alkyresorcinols (a measure of WG intake) (P < 0.0001), stool weight (P < 0.0001), stool frequency (P = 0.02), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producer Lachnospira [false-discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P = 0.25] but decreased pro-inflammatory Enterobacteriaceae (FDR-corrected P = 0.25). Changes in stool acetate (P = 0.02) and total SCFAs (P = 0.05) were higher in the WG group than in the RG group. A positive association was shown between Lachnospira and acetate (FDR-corrected P = 0.002) or butyrate (FDR-corrected P = 0.005). We also showed that there was a higher percentage of terminal effector memory T cells (P = 0.03) and LPS-stimulated ex vivo production of tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.04) in the WG group than in the RG group, which were positively associated with plasma alkylresorcinol concentrations.Conclusion: The short-term consumption of WGs in a weight-maintenance diet increases stool weight and frequency and has modest positive effects on gut microbiota, SCFAs, effector memory T cells, and the acute innate immune response and no effect on other markers of cell-mediated immunity or systemic and gut inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01902394.
-
5.
Ketogenic diet poses a significant effect on imbalanced gut microbiota in infants with refractory epilepsy.
Xie, G, Zhou, Q, Qiu, CZ, Dai, WK, Wang, HP, Li, YH, Liao, JX, Lu, XG, Lin, SF, Ye, JH, et al
World journal of gastroenterology. 2017;23(33):6164-6171
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A ketogenic diet is a high fat diet recommended as an alternative therapy for infants with refractory (uncontrolled) epilepsy. Research has demonstrated that gut microbiota is affected by diet, particularly diets high in fat. According to various studies on gut brain axis, the gut microbiota may also effect children’s neurodevelopment. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the gut microbiota of infants who have refractory epilepsy with healthy infants, and the effect of ketogenic diet on the gut microbiota. 14 subjects with refractory epilepsy, as well as 15 healthy male and 15 healthy female infants under 3 years were recruited for this study. On analysis the gut microbiota of healthy infants had greater microbial diversity in comparison to epileptic infants. The intervention of a ketogenic diet showed significant improvement in reducing the pathogenic bacteria and increasing beneficial Bacterioidetes, though the authors concluded that a ketogenic diet as an alternative treatment for epileptic seizures needs further research.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate whether patients with refractory epilepsy and healthy infants differ in gut microbiota (GM), and how ketogenic diet (KD) alters GM. METHODS A total of 14 epileptic and 30 healthy infants were recruited and seizure frequencies were recorded. Stool samples were collected for 16S rDNA sequencing using the Illumina Miseq platform. The composition of GM in each sample was analyzed with MOTHUR, and inter-group comparison was conducted by R software. RESULTS After being on KD treatment for a week, 64% of epileptic infants showed an obvious improvement, with a 50% decrease in seizure frequency. GM structure in epileptic infants (P1 group) differed dramatically from that in healthy infants (Health group). Proteobacteria, which had accumulated significantly in the P1 group, decreased dramatically after KD treatment (P2 group). Cronobacter predominated in the P1 group and remained at a low level both in the Health and P2 groups. Bacteroides increased significantly in the P2 group, in which Prevotella and Bifidobacterium also grew in numbers and kept increasing. CONCLUSION GM pattern in healthy infants differed dramatically from that of the epileptic group. KD could significantly modify symptoms of epilepsy and reshape the GM of epileptic infants.
-
6.
Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior of people with self-reported intolerance to traditional cows' milk.
Jianqin, S, Leiming, X, Lu, X, Yelland, GW, Ni, J, Clarke, AJ
Nutrition journal. 2016;15:35
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cows’ milk contains two types of beta-casein, A1 and A2, and the A1 type is thought to cause the adverse gastrointestinal side effects related to lactose intolerance. The aim of this crossover study was to compare the effects of milk consumption with differing beta-casein types in subjects with self-reported lactose intolerance. Forty-five participants were randomised to receive milk containing either both types of casein or only the A2 type, and inflammatory markers, symptoms of digestive discomfort and cognitive processing were assessed. This study demonstrated that consumption of milk containing A1 beta-casein was associated with increased inflammation, worsening of digestive discomfort, delayed transit and decreased cognitive functioning. The findings of this study suggest that some symptoms of lactose intolerance may be attenuated by consuming milk containing only the A2 type of beta-casein.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cows' milk generally contains two types of β-casein, A1 and A2 types. Digestion of A1 type can yield the peptide β-casomorphin-7, which is implicated in adverse gastrointestinal effects of milk consumption, some of which resemble those in lactose intolerance. This study aimed to compare the effects of milk containing A1 β-casein with those of milk containing only A2 β-casein on inflammation, symptoms of post-dairy digestive discomfort (PD3), and cognitive processing in subjects with self-reported lactose intolerance. METHODS Forty-five Han Chinese subjects participated in this double-blind, randomized, 2 × 2 crossover trial and consumed milk containing both β-casein types or milk containing only A2 β-casein. Each treatment period was 14 days with a 14-day washout period at baseline and between treatment periods. Outcomes included PD3, gastrointestinal function (measured by smart pill), Subtle Cognitive Impairment Test (SCIT), serum/fecal laboratory biomarkers, and adverse events. RESULTS Compared with milk containing only A2 β-casein, the consumption of milk containing both β-casein types was associated with significantly greater PD3 symptoms; higher concentrations of inflammation-related biomarkers and β-casomorphin-7; longer gastrointestinal transit times and lower levels of short-chain fatty acids; and increased response time and error rate on the SCIT. Consumption of milk containing both β-casein types was associated with worsening of PD3 symptoms relative to baseline in lactose tolerant and lactose intolerant subjects. Consumption of milk containing only A2 β-casein did not aggravate PD3 symptoms relative to baseline (i.e., after washout of dairy products) in lactose tolerant and intolerant subjects. CONCLUSIONS Consumption of milk containing A1 β-casein was associated with increased gastrointestinal inflammation, worsening of PD3 symptoms, delayed transit, and decreased cognitive processing speed and accuracy. Because elimination of A1 β-casein attenuated these effects, some symptoms of lactose intolerance may stem from inflammation it triggers, and can be avoided by consuming milk containing only the A2 type of beta casein. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02406469.
-
7.
Synbiotic therapy decreases microbial translocation and inflammation and improves immunological status in HIV-infected patients: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial.
González-Hernández, LA, Jave-Suarez, LF, Fafutis-Morris, M, Montes-Salcedo, KE, Valle-Gutierrez, LG, Campos-Loza, AE, Enciso-Gómez, LF, Andrade-Villanueva, JF
Nutrition journal. 2012;11:90
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
HIV causes gastrointestinal dysfunction and microbial translocation that can provoke local and systemic inflammation that may lead to disease progression. Inflammation and intestinal permeability increase and the reduction in immune defences creates the opportunity for microbial overgrowth and raised lipopolysaccharides levels, which may lead to disease progression. HIV-infected patients also tend to have low levels of beneficial bacteria. Probiotics have the potential to stimulate the immune system through IgA secretion and reduce inflammation. Prebiotics selectively stimulate the growth of some bacteria, altering the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. This randomized, prospective, double-blind controlled pilot study evaluates use of probiotics and prebiotic to expand beneficial microbiota that help decrease bacterial translocation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, thereby improving immune functions in HIV-infected subjects. 20 HIV-infected adult patients were divided into four groups (n=5 per group) to receive probiotics, synbiotic, a prebiotic, or placebo once daily for 16 weeks. Probiotics used were Lactobacillus rhamnosus plus Bifidobacterium lactis. From baseline to week 16, the synbiotic group showed a reduction in bacterial DNA concentrations in plasma. The probiotic and synbiotic groups demonstrated a decrease in total bacterial load in feces. The probiotic group showed a significant increase in beneficial bacteria load (such as Bifidobacterium and a decrease in harmful bacteria load (such as Clostridium). The synbiotic group had greater increases in CD4+ T-cell count and cytokine levels (IL-6) decreased significantly. Serious adverse effects previously reported with the use of probiotics in immunocompromised patients were not reported in this study. The authors found no decrease in HIV-1 plasma viral load so the use of a synbiotic for maintaining an undetectable viral load as part of the primary prevention of HIV transmission is not justified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV-infection results in damage and dysfunction of the gastrointestinal system. HIV enteropathy includes pronounced CD4+ T-cell loss, increased intestinal permeability, and microbial translocation that promotes systemic immune activation, which is implicated in disease progression. A synbiotic is the combination of probiotics and prebiotics that could improve gut barrier function. Our study goal was to determine whether the use of a synbiotic, probiotics or a prebiotic can recover immunological parameters in HIV-infected subjects through of a reduction of microbial translocation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. METHODS A randomized, double-blind controlled study was performed; twenty Antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-infected subjects were subgrouped and assigned to receive a synbiotic, probiotics, a prebiotic, or a placebo throughout 16 weeks. RESULTS We had no reports of serious adverse-events. From baseline to week 16, the synbiotic group showed a reduction in bacterial DNA concentrations in plasma (p = 0.048). Moreover, the probiotic and synbiotic groups demonstrated a decrease in total bacterial load in feces (p = 0.05). The probiotic group exhibited a significant increment of beneficial bacteria load (such as Bifidobacterium; p = 0.05) and a decrease in harmful bacteria load (such as Clostridium; p = 0.063). In the synbiotic group, the CD4+ T-cells count increased (median: +102 cells/μL; p = 0.05) and the level of Interleukin 6 cytokine decreased significantly (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a significant increase in CD4+ T lymphocyte levels in the synbiotic group, which could delay the initiation of antiretroviral therapy and decrease costs in countries with limited resources.
-
8.
Clinical relevance of IgG antibodies against food antigens in Crohn's disease: a double-blind cross-over diet intervention study.
Bentz, S, Hausmann, M, Piberger, H, Kellermeier, S, Paul, S, Held, L, Falk, W, Obermeier, F, Fried, M, Schölmerich, J, et al
Digestion. 2010;81(4):252-64
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Environmental factors are thought to play a part in the development of or exacerbation of symptoms in Crohn's disease (CD), and patients often implicate food as a contributing factor. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) food reactions can be rare in IBD and immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing can be controversial, this study set out to compare IgG antibody reactions in 79 CD patients and 20 healthy individuals. The pilot study measured IgG levels against 271 foods in the blood. It then went on to measure stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being following a 6 week specific elimination diet (based on foods identified by the IgG testing) or a 6 week sham diet. 23 participants were included in the follow on 12 week, cross-over double blinded study. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in stool was also measured to evaluate disease activity. The pilot study showed a significantly higher IgG reaction in the CD patients. In the follow-up study there was a decrease in stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being during the specific diet compared to the sham diet. EDN was found to decrease in both the specific and sham diet. It was concluded that IgG antibodies may contribute to CD but the mechanism is still not clear.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental factors are thought to play an important role in the development of Crohn's disease (CD). Immune responses against auto-antigens or food antigens may be a reason for the perpetuation of inflammation. METHODS In a pilot study, 79 CD patients and 20 healthy controls were examined for food immunoglobulin G (IgG). Thereafter, the clinical relevance of these food IgG antibodies was assessed in a double-blind cross-over study with 40 patients. Based on the IgG antibodies, a nutritional intervention was planned. The interferon (IFN)gamma secretion of T cells was measured. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin was quantified in stool. RESULTS The pilot study resulted in a significant difference of IgG antibodies in serum between CD patients and healthy controls. In 84 and 83% of the patients, respectively, IgG antibodies against processed cheese and yeast were detected. The daily stool frequency significantly decreased by 11% during a specific diet compared with a sham diet. Abdominal pain reduced and general well-being improved. IFNgamma secretion of T cells increased. No difference for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in stool was detected. CONCLUSION A nutritional intervention based on circulating IgG antibodies against food antigens showed effects with respect to stool frequency. The mechanisms by which IgG antibodies might contribute to disease activity remain to be elucidated.
-
9.
Reduction of dietary fat absorption by the novel gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor cetilistat in healthy volunteers.
Bryson, A, de la Motte, S, Dunk, C
British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2009;67(3):309-15
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is epidemic and many obese patients seek drug treatment. Orlistat (a lipase inhibitor) is effective, but associated with gastrointestinal side effects. This study aimed to demonstrate that Cetilistat inhibits gastrointestinal lipase and is well tolerated in comparison to Orlistat. Results from three Phase I clinical studies (all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in healthy male volunteers (age 18-45y, BMI ≤30 kg m−2, minimum weight of 60 kg) (total n=99) resident in a clinical unit) are reported. Subjects receives placebo (n=24), one of a range of Cetilistat doses (n=66) or 120mg Orlistat x3/daily (n=9) for 5 days, whilst maintained on a strict diet. 30% of calories were derived from fat. Each dose of Cetilistat in the 3 studies increased mean faecal fat excretion relative to both baseline and placebo. Increased faecal fat excretion was significant compared with placebo at 150 mg t.i.d. (study 1). Faecal fat excretion was significantly higher in both the Cetilistat 120 and 240 mg t.i.d. groups (study 3). Overall, fecal fat excretion for Orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. was similar to Cetilistat. Gastroinetstinal side effects were most common (51%) for Cetilistat. Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the Orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any Cetilistat dose group. Most side-effects (98%) were mild or moderate. 3 subjects taking Cetilistat were withdrawn from the study after developing maculopapular rash, but no reaction was observed (pin-prick). The chemical structure of Orlistat and Cetistat are different which may affect how they interact with fat micelles in the intestines. The author speculates that Cetilistat may act more like a detergent, whereas Orlistat may promote the coalescence of micelles, leading to oils and increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Cetilistat is an effective inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, increasing faecal fat excretion in at all doses studied. Cetilistat is well tolerated across a range of doses, and comparison with Orlistat suggests improved tolerability.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a range of doses of cetilistat, a novel inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, in healthy volunteers. METHODS Three Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted. Enrolled subjects in the three studies (n = 99) received a controlled calorie diet (total intake 2160 calories daily, 30% from fat). Twenty-four subjects were randomized to placebo and 66 were randomized to the following cetilistat doses: 50 mg three times daily [t.i.d. (n = 7)], 60 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 100 mg t.i.d. (n = 7), 120 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 150 mg t.i.d. (n = 16), 240 mg t.i.d. (n = 9) and 300 mg t.i.d. (n = 9). Nine subjects received the approved orlistat dose (120 mg t.i.d.). Treatment was for 5 days, with a 2-day run-in period and 1-day post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome measure was daily faecal fat excretion. Secondary outcomes included plasma lipid levels, tolerability [gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)] and safety. RESULTS Cetilistat increased faecal fat excretion relative to baseline at all doses. Cetilistat was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal AEs the most common (51%). Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any cetilistat dose group (0.14-1.81 events per subject). Most AEs (98%) were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS Cetilistat increased dietary fat excretion in healthy volunteers receiving a controlled calorie diet. Cetilistat was well tolerated at all doses examined and tolerability appeared to be improved relative to orlistat. Faecal fat excretion in the cetilistat groups was at least comparable to the orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. group.