1.
Effect of a Preparation of Four Probiotics on Symptoms of Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Association with Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.
Leventogiannis, K, Gkolfakis, P, Spithakis, G, Tsatali, A, Pistiki, A, Sioulas, A, Giamarellos-Bourboulis, EJ, Triantafyllou, K
Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins. 2019;11(2):627-634
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gut disorder with symptoms primarily of bloating and diarrhea. Recently these symptoms have been associated with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), which occurs when bacteria from the colon resides in the small intestine. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of probiotics in improvement of symptoms of IBS patients with SIBO. In this prospective trial, five patients with IBS and SIBO and 21 patients with IBS without SIBO were given probiotic capsules twice a day for 30 days. Participants completed an IBS severity questionnaire at three visits throughout the trial. At the end of the trial, a 71.3% decrease of the total IBS score was detected in patients with IBS and SIBO, compared with those without SIBO. This study found there are clinical benefits from probiotic supplementation in IBS patients with SIBO. Based on these findings, the authors conclude larger, randomised studies be undertaken based on this prospective design.
Abstract
The effect of probiotics on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has never been studied so far. In this prospective trial, five patients with IBS and SIBO and 21 patients with IBS without SIBO were administered an oral capsule containing Saccharomyces boulardii, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus plantarum (Lactolevure®) every 12 h for 30 days. SIBO was defined by quantitative culture of the third part of the duodenum; IBS was defined by the Rome III criteria. Severity of symptoms was graded by the IBS severity scoring system (SSS). The primary study endpoint was the efficacy of probiotics in improvement of symptoms of IBS in patients with SIBO. Thirty days after the end of treatment, a 71.3% decrease of the total IBS score was detected in patients with IBS and SIBO compared to 10.6% in those without SIBO (p 0.017). A similar decrease was achieved among patients with constipation-predominant IBS without SIBO. Post-treatment satisfaction from bowel function was greater in patients with SIBO. Similar satisfaction improvement was found among patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS irrespective from SIBO; pain intensity score decreased in patients with constipation-predominant IBS irrespective from SIBO. The benefit of probiotics was greater among patients with a pro-inflammatory cytokine pattern in the duodenal fluid. This is the first study that prospectively demonstrated superior clinical efficacy of probiotics in patients with IBS with SIBO. Analysis also showed considerable benefit from probiotic intake regarding certain symptoms of patients with diarrhea-predominant and constipation-predominant IBS.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02204891.
2.
Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous FMT.
Suez, J, Zmora, N, Zilberman-Schapira, G, Mor, U, Dori-Bachash, M, Bashiardes, S, Zur, M, Regev-Lehavi, D, Ben-Zeev Brik, R, Federici, S, et al
Cell. 2018;174(6):1406-1423.e16
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics are commonly used to reduce the risk of antibiotic associated diarrhoea (AAD). This study, in both mice and humans, investigated the effects of an 11 strain probiotic supplement and autologous faecal microbiome transplantation (aFMT) after antibiotic treatment. (Autologous meaning the person’s own, pre-antibiotic stool was transplanted.) Gut mucosa samples along the digestive tract and stool samples were investigated for microbiome composition and activity (transcriptome). The investigators found that without antibiotics the probiotics did not colonise very well, suggesting that our native microbiome offers resistance. After antibiotics, which would kill off much of our gut bacteria,the probiotics colonise the gut mucosa much better. However, the probiotics appear to then prevent the microbiome to return to its native, pre-antibiotic state. Whilst in those with the aFMT and in those who did nothing (“watchful waiting”) the microbiome returned to pre-antibiotic state fairly quickly, in the probiotic group even after 5 months the microbiome had not returned to its native composition. In vitro experiments suggest that the delay in the probiotic group is due to substances secreted by the probiotic bacteria, in particular Lactobacilli. The authors conclude that the potential benefits in terms of reducing the risk of AAD with probiotics may be offset with a delay in reconstitution of the native microbiome, and call for more research into aFMT and a more personalised approach to probiotic therapy.
Abstract
Probiotics are widely prescribed for prevention of antibiotics-associated dysbiosis and related adverse effects. However, probiotic impact on post-antibiotic reconstitution of the gut mucosal host-microbiome niche remains elusive. We invasively examined the effects of multi-strain probiotics or autologous fecal microbiome transplantation (aFMT) on post-antibiotic reconstitution of the murine and human mucosal microbiome niche. Contrary to homeostasis, antibiotic perturbation enhanced probiotics colonization in the human mucosa but only mildly improved colonization in mice. Compared to spontaneous post-antibiotic recovery, probiotics induced a markedly delayed and persistently incomplete indigenous stool/mucosal microbiome reconstitution and host transcriptome recovery toward homeostatic configuration, while aFMT induced a rapid and near-complete recovery within days of administration. In vitro, Lactobacillus-secreted soluble factors contributed to probiotics-induced microbiome inhibition. Collectively, potential post-antibiotic probiotic benefits may be offset by a compromised gut mucosal recovery, highlighting a need of developing aFMT or personalized probiotic approaches achieving mucosal protection without compromising microbiome recolonization in the antibiotics-perturbed host.
3.
Personalized Gut Mucosal Colonization Resistance to Empiric Probiotics Is Associated with Unique Host and Microbiome Features.
Zmora, N, Zilberman-Schapira, G, Suez, J, Mor, U, Dori-Bachash, M, Bashiardes, S, Kotler, E, Zur, M, Regev-Lehavi, D, Brik, RB, et al
Cell. 2018;174(6):1388-1405.e21
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Evidence regarding the efficacy of probiotics in colonising the gut mucosa are sparse. The authors investigated whether probiotics colonise the gut mucosa in mice and humans, using both gut mucosa and stool samples. They found that, in both mice and humans, results from stool samples only partially correlate with colonisation of the gut mucosa as determined through gut mucosa samples. Whilst results were fairly uniform in mice, in humans a person-specific resistance to colonisation of the gut mucosa by probiotics was observed. Inter-person variation could be predicted by the composition of the pre-probiotic microbiome and host immune features.
Abstract
Empiric probiotics are commonly consumed by healthy individuals as means of life quality improvement and disease prevention. However, evidence of probiotic gut mucosal colonization efficacy remains sparse and controversial. We metagenomically characterized the murine and human mucosal-associated gastrointestinal microbiome and found it to only partially correlate with stool microbiome. A sequential invasive multi-omics measurement at baseline and during consumption of an 11-strain probiotic combination or placebo demonstrated that probiotics remain viable upon gastrointestinal passage. In colonized, but not germ-free mice, probiotics encountered a marked mucosal colonization resistance. In contrast, humans featured person-, region- and strain-specific mucosal colonization patterns, hallmarked by predictive baseline host and microbiome features, but indistinguishable by probiotics presence in stool. Consequently, probiotics induced a transient, individualized impact on mucosal community structure and gut transcriptome. Collectively, empiric probiotics supplementation may be limited in universally and persistently impacting the gut mucosa, meriting development of new personalized probiotic approaches.