-
1.
Fecal microbiota composition is related to brown adipose tissue 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in young adults.
Ortiz-Alvarez, L, Acosta, FM, Xu, H, Sanchez-Delgado, G, Vilchez-Vargas, R, Link, A, Plaza-Díaz, J, Llamas, JM, Gil, A, Labayen, I, et al
Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2023;46(3):567-576
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a tissue that dissipates energy through the action of the uncoupling protein-1. Moreover, BAT takes up and oxidises glucose and lipids, as such working as a nutrient sink, and through its endocrine function may have cardiometabolic benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of fecal microbiota composition with BAT volume and activity in young adults. This study was a cross-sectional study of 92 young healthy adults (27 men and 65 women, age: 18–25 years old). Results showed that the relative abundance of: - specific genera (Akkermansia, Lachnospiraceae sp., and Ruminococcus) were negatively correlated with BAT volume and activity. - Bifdobacterium genus was positively correlated with BAT activity. Authors concluded faecal microbiota is involved in the regulation of glucose uptake by human BAT and other metabolic tissues including white adipose tissue and skeletal muscles in young adults.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Human brown adipose tissue (BAT) has gained considerable attention as a potential therapeutic target for obesity and its related cardiometabolic diseases; however, whether the gut microbiota might be an efficient stimulus to activate BAT metabolism remains to be ascertained. We aimed to investigate the association of fecal microbiota composition with BAT volume and activity and mean radiodensity in young adults. METHODS 82 young adults (58 women, 21.8 ± 2.2 years old) participated in this cross-sectional study. DNA was extracted from fecal samples and 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to analyse the fecal microbiota composition. BAT was determined via a static 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan (PET/CT) after a 2 h personalized cooling protocol. 18F-FDG uptake was also quantified in white adipose tissue (WAT) and skeletal muscles. RESULTS The relative abundance of Akkermansia, Lachnospiraceae sp. and Ruminococcus genera was negatively correlated with BAT volume, BAT SUVmean and BAT SUVpeak (all rho ≤ - 0.232, P ≤ 0.027), whereas the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium genus was positively correlated with BAT SUVmean and BAT SUVpeak (all rho ≥ 0.262, P ≤ 0.012). On the other hand, the relative abundance of Sutterellaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae families was positively correlated with 18F-FDG uptake by WAT and skeletal muscles (all rho ≥ 0.213, P ≤ 0.042). All the analyses were adjusted for the PET/CT scan date as a proxy of seasonality. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that fecal microbiota composition is involved in the regulation of BAT and glucose uptake by other tissues in young adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02365129 (registered 18 February 2015).
-
2.
Effects of Probiotics on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Parameters in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yefet, E, Bar, L, Izhaki, I, Iskander, R, Massalha, M, Younis, JS, Nachum, Z
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of gestational diabetes is increasing worldwide. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases obesity and future development of type 2 diabetes in mother and child. Previous research has looked at the beneficial effects of probiotics in reducing metabolic diseases, however, these specific benefits on women with GDM are not fully understood yet. This systematic review and meta-analysis of fourteen randomised controlled trials assessed the beneficial effects of probiotics on glycemic control and metabolic parameters in women with GDM. This study separately assessed probiotic bacterial strains such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus casei to understand their beneficial effects on metabolic parameters. This meta-analysis and systematic review suggest that probiotic supplementation could help improve glycemic control, insulin resistance and lipid levels in women diagnosed with GDM. All probiotic strains showed improvements in metabolic parameters when assessed separately. Further robust studies are required to assess the effect of probiotic supplementation on post- and pre-prandial glycemic control in women with GDM. Healthcare professionals can employ the results of this study to understand the therapeutic benefits of probiotics for improving GDM.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of probiotic supplements on glycemic control and metabolic parameters in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was glycemic control, i.e., serum glucose and insulin levels. Secondary outcomes were maternal weight gain, neonatal birth weight, and lipid parameters. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used. Cochrane's Q test of heterogeneity and I2 were used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS Of the 843 papers retrieved, 14 (n = 854 women) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. When compared with placebo, women receiving probiotic supplements had significantly lower mean fasting serum glucose, fasting serum insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, total cholesterol, and VLDL levels. Decreased neonatal birth weight was witnessed in supplements containing Lactobacillus acidophilus. CONCLUSION Probiotic supplements may improve glycemic control and lipid profile and reduce neonatal birth weight in women with GDM.
-
3.
High-fiber diet ameliorates gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood in type 2 diabetes patients.
Chen, L, Liu, B, Ren, L, Du, H, Fei, C, Qian, C, Li, B, Zhang, R, Liu, H, Li, Z, et al
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2023;13:1069954
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Accumulating studies have demonstrated that there are strong correlations between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gut microbiota. A nutritious diet composed of an adequate level of dietary fibres could provide enough carbohydrates for the gut microbiota to ferment, and the microbial metabolites could provide energy supply and regulate the immune function of the host. The aim of this study was to analyse the changes in gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood of patients with T2DM after consumption of a high-fibre diet. This study was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial in T2DM patients with a 4-week treatment period. Seventeen patients clinically diagnosed with T2DM enrolled in the clinical trial and were randomly assigned into two groups: the control group (n = 8) or the intervention group (n = 9). Results showed that the high-fibre diet (compared to the control group): - improved glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism of participants with T2DM; - decreased serum levels of inflammatory chemokines in participants with T2DM; - alleviated depression and anxiety symptoms, particularly by the uptake of more diverse carbohydrates in the diet in participants with T2DM; - enhanced the diversity of gut microbiota in the treatment group. Authors conclude that the dietary source of fibre demonstrated protective impacts on the gut ecosystem, and the alteration of the gut microbiota composition improved the glucose homeostasis in patients with T2DM.
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often had the problems of fecal microbiota dysbiosis, and were usually accompanied with psychiatric comorbidities (such as depression and anxiety). Here, we conducted a randomized clinical study to analyze the changes in gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood of patients with T2DM after consumption of a high-fiber diet. The glucose homeostasis of participants with T2DM was improved by the high-fiber diet, and the serum metabolome, systemic inflammation and psychiatric comorbidities were also altered. The increased abundances of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Akkermansias revealed that the proportions of beneficial gut microbes were enriched by the high-fiber diet, while the abundances of Desulfovibrio, Klebsiella and other opportunistic pathogens were decreased. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that the intestinal microbiota alterations which were influenced by the high-fiber diet could improve the serum metabolism and emotional mood of patients with T2DM.
-
4.
Effects of galactooligosaccharides on maternal gut microbiota, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism and inflammation in pregnancy: A randomized controlled pilot study.
Wan, J, An, L, Ren, Z, Wang, S, Yang, H, Ma, J
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1034266
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During pregnancy, a disordered gut microbiome and abnormal glucose metabolism may be possible mechanisms for pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Different from probiotics, galactooligosaccharides (GOS) is a prebiotic that is not digested and absorbed by the host, but can selectively promote the metabolism and proliferation of beneficial bacteria in the body, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of prebiotic intervention in healthy pregnant women, and conduct a preliminary exploration of the possible benefits for pregnant women. This study was a prospective double-blinded randomised clinical trial involving pregnant women. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group and the intervention group at a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that GOS intervention had no significant effect on reducing the incidence of GDM and improving glucose and lipid metabolism. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in glucose and lipid metabolism levels between GOS group and placebo group. Authors conclude that GOS can be considered as a dietary supplement during pregnancy. However, further clinical studies are needed to strengthen the findings of this study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gut microbiota of pregnant women change with the gestational week. On the one hand, they participate in the metabolic adaptation of pregnant women. On the other hand, the abnormal composition of gut microbiota of pregnant women is more likely to suffer from gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Therefore, gut microbiota targeted treatment through dietary supplements is particularly important for prevention or treatment. Prebiotic supplements containing galactooligosaccharides (GOS) may be an intervention method, but the effect is still unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of prebiotic intervention in healthy pregnant women during pregnancy, and to explore the possible effects of intervention on pregnant women and the influence on gut microbiota as preliminaries. METHODS After recruitment in first trimester, 52 pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive GOS intervention or placebo containing fructooligosaccharides. 16S rRNA sequencing technology was used to detect the composition, diversity and differential flora of gut microbiota. Lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism and inflammatory factors during pregnancy were also analyzed. RESULTS The adverse symptoms of GOS intervention are mild and relatively safe. For pregnant women, there was no significant difference in the GDM incidence rates and gestational weight gain (GWG) in the GOS group compared with placebo (P > 0.05). Compared with the placebo group, the levels of FPG, TG, TC, HDL-C LDL-C, and IL-6 had no significant difference in GOS group (P > 0.05). For newborns, there was no significant difference between GOS group and placebo group in the following variables including gestational week, birth weight, birth length, head circumference, chest circumference, sex, and delivery mode (P > 0.05). And compared with the placebo group, the GOS group had a higher abundance of Paraprevotella and Dorea, but lower abundance of LachnospiraceaeUCG_001. CONCLUSIONS GOS prebiotics appear to be safe and acceptable for the enrolled pregnancies. Although GOS intervention did not show the robust benefits on glucose and lipid metabolism. However, the intervention had a certain impact on the compostion of gut microbiota. GOS can be considered as a dietary supplement during pregnancy, and further clinical studies are needed to explore this in the future.
-
5.
Impact of dietary interventions on pre-diabetic oral and gut microbiome, metabolites and cytokines.
Shoer, S, Shilo, S, Godneva, A, Ben-Yacov, O, Rein, M, Wolf, BC, Lotan-Pompan, M, Bar, N, Weiss, EI, Houri-Haddad, Y, et al
Nature communications. 2023;14(1):5384
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Pre-diabetes, a condition characterized by elevated blood glucose levels but below diabetes thresholds, is a significant risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes, as well as other comorbidities including cardiovascular and kidney diseases. Diet plays a critical role in the development of hyperglycaemia and the onset of pre-diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a personalized postprandial glucose-targeting diet (PPT), as well as the standard of care Mediterranean diet (MED), on the oral and gut microbiome, metabolites and cytokines in 200 pre-diabetic individuals. This study was a biphasic, randomised, controlled, single-blind dietary intervention. Phase one included a six-month intervention that compared two diets targeting glycaemic control, while phase two included a six-month follow-up period. Participants (n = 225) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a PPT (n = 113) or a MED (n = 112). Results showed that participants assigned to the PPT diet had significant changes in 19 gut microbial species, 14 gut and one oral microbial pathway, 86 serum metabolites and four cytokines. Participants assigned to the MED diet showed significant changes in five gut and one oral microbial species, 18 gut microbial pathways, 27 serum metabolites and four cytokines. Authors conclude that dietary interventions can affect the microbiome, cardiometabolic profile and immune response of the host. Thus, diets such as the PPT used in this study, which takes into account microbiome features, could be designed to affect the microbiome and inflict desired metabolic outcomes.
Abstract
Diabetes and associated comorbidities are a global health threat on the rise. We conducted a six-month dietary intervention in pre-diabetic individuals (NCT03222791), to mitigate the hyperglycemia and enhance metabolic health. The current work explores early diabetes markers in the 200 individuals who completed the trial. We find 166 of 2,803 measured features, including oral and gut microbial species and pathways, serum metabolites and cytokines, show significant change in response to a personalized postprandial glucose-targeting diet or the standard of care Mediterranean diet. These changes include established markers of hyperglycemia as well as novel features that can now be investigated as potential therapeutic targets. Our results indicate the microbiome mediates the effect of diet on glycemic, metabolic and immune measurements, with gut microbiome compositional change explaining 12.25% of serum metabolites variance. Although the gut microbiome displays greater compositional changes compared to the oral microbiome, the oral microbiome demonstrates more changes at the genetic level, with trends dependent on environmental richness and species prevalence in the population. In conclusion, our study shows dietary interventions can affect the microbiome, cardiometabolic profile and immune response of the host, and that these factors are well associated with each other, and can be harnessed for new therapeutic modalities.
-
6.
Differential Responders to a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Risk Factors and Gut Microbiota-Data from the MEDGI-Carb Randomized Controlled Trial.
Skantze, V, Hjorth, T, Wallman, M, Brunius, C, Dicksved, J, Pelve, EA, Esberg, A, Vitale, M, Giacco, R, Costabile, G, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(20)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a growing worldwide health problem. Increased blood sugars and a corresponding increase in the production of the hormone insulin, which functions to lower blood sugar are risk factors for T2D development. However, it has been shown that everyone has an individual response to the food and the production of differing levels of blood sugar and insulin when eating the same meals has been shown. This secondary analysis of a 12-week randomised control trial of 155 individuals aimed to determine relationships between gut microbiota composition and the glucose response to high and low glycaemic index Mediterranean diets. The results identified two distinct types of response amongst the participants. Cluster A individuals had a lower but more rapid glucose response following food and were deemed to have a better glucose control than cluster B individuals. The clusters also differed in the gut microbiota composition. Cluster A had a higher proportion of Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and a lower proportion of Blautia, than cluster B. It was concluded that the glucose response to a standardised meal can differ between individuals and are associated with differing gut microbiota and risk for T2D. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that diet recommendations are not one size fits all and that the recommendation of certain diets may have differing success. Understanding and differentiating individuals and tailor making recommendations may be of benefit, however further understanding is required on different glucose responses following a meal.
Abstract
The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has surged in recent decades, and the identification of differential glycemic responders can aid tailored treatment for the prevention of prediabetes and T2DM. A mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) based on regular foods offers the potential to uncover differential responders in dynamical postprandial events. We aimed to fit a simple mathematical model on dynamic postprandial glucose data from repeated MMTTs among participants with elevated T2DM risk to identify response clusters and investigate their association with T2DM risk factors and gut microbiota. Data were used from a 12-week multi-center dietary intervention trial involving high-risk T2DM adults, comparing high- versus low-glycemic index foods within a Mediterranean diet context (MEDGICarb). Model-based analysis of MMTTs from 155 participants (81 females and 74 males) revealed two distinct plasma glucose response clusters that were associated with baseline gut microbiota. Cluster A, inversely associated with HbA1c and waist circumference and directly with insulin sensitivity, exhibited a contrasting profile to cluster B. Findings imply that a standardized breakfast MMTT using regular foods could effectively distinguish non-diabetic individuals at varying risk levels for T2DM using a simple mechanistic model.
-
7.
Randomized controlled trial demonstrates response to a probiotic intervention for metabolic syndrome that may correspond to diet.
Wastyk, HC, Perelman, D, Topf, M, Fragiadakis, GK, Robinson, JL, Sonnenburg, JL, Gardner, CD, Sonnenburg, ED
Gut microbes. 2023;15(1):2178794
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Rates of metabolic syndrome are high throughout developed countries. Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions that occur together and increase your risk for heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. Studies in animals and humans have shown that the composition of the gut microbiome may be linked to metabolic syndrome and that it is affected by diet. This randomised control trial of 39 individuals showed that the supplementation of a probiotic containing three different probiotic strains did not have a population wide effect but did influence a subset of individuals. These individuals had a different microbiome by the end of the trial and a decrease in blood pressure and blood lipids. Interestingly these individuals also had a higher dietary intake of sugar, yet a lower blood sugar level. It was concluded that the response to probiotic supplements may be dependent upon an individual’s diet. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that diet may influence the success of probiotics, however more research is warranted before firm conclusions are made on the optimal diet during supplementation.
Abstract
An individual's immune and metabolic status is coupled to their microbiome. Probiotics offer a promising, safe route to influence host health, possibly via the microbiome. Here, we report an 18-week, randomized prospective study that explores the effects of a probiotic vs. placebo supplement on 39 adults with elevated parameters of metabolic syndrome. We performed longitudinal sampling of stool and blood to profile the human microbiome and immune system. While we did not see changes in metabolic syndrome markers in response to the probiotic across the entire cohort, there were significant improvements in triglycerides and diastolic blood pressure in a subset of probiotic arm participants. Conversely, the non-responders had increased blood glucose and insulin levels over time. The responders had a distinct microbiome profile at the end of the intervention relative to the non-responders and placebo arm. Importantly, diet was a key differentiating factor between responders and non-responders. Our results show participant-specific effects of a probiotic supplement on improving parameters of metabolic syndrome and suggest that dietary factors may enhance stability and efficacy of the supplement.
-
8.
White common bean extract remodels the gut microbiota and ameliorates type 2 diabetes and its complications: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.
Feng, Y, Zhu, J, Wang, Q, Cao, H, He, F, Guan, Y, Li, D, Yan, J, Yang, J, Xia, Y, et al
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022;13:999715
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of macrovascular complications. Intensive glycaemic control reduces microvascular complications and exerts a modest improved effect on macrovascular outcomes. The main aim of this study was to explore the effects of white common bean extract (WCBE) on glucose metabolism and diabetic complications in patients with T2D. This study was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial which enrolled ninety-six patients with T2D aged between 35 and 75 years. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to the control group and WCBE group. Results showed that WCBE alleviated glucose metabolism dysbiosis and diabetic complication indices. In fact, after 2 months of an intense intervention with a WCBE treatment and in the following two-month maintenance period, the improvements to glycaemic metabolism were preserved. Furthermore, there was notable improvement of the structure of the gut microbiota, especially the enrichment of short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria and inhibition of opportunistic pathogens. Authors conclude that WCBE may be considered as a novel prebiotic antidiabetic agent for the regulation of glucose metabolism and gut microbiota homeostasis and may slightly ameliorate diabetic complications in patients with T2D.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Excessive carbohydrate intake is a high risk factor for increased morbidity of type 2 diabetes (T2D). A novel regimen for the dietary care of diabetes that consists of a highly active α-amylase inhibitor derived from white common bean extract (WCBE) and sufficient carbohydrates intake was applied to attenuate T2D and its complications. Furthermore, the role of gut microbiota in this remission was also investigated. METHODS We conducted a 4-month randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. During the intense intervention period, ninety subjects were randomly assigned to the control group (Group C) and WCBE group (Group W). Subjects in Group C were supplemented with 1.5 g of maltodextrin as a placebo. Subjects in Group W took 1.5 g of WCBE half an hour before a meal. Fifty-five participants continued the maintenance intervention receiving the previous dietary intervention whereas less frequent follow-up. The variation in biochemical, vasculopathy and neuropathy indicators and the structure of the fecal microbiota during the intervention was analyzed. RESULT Glucose metabolism and diabetic complications showed superior remission in Group W with a 0.721 ± 0.742% decline of glycosylated hemoglobin after 4 months. The proportion of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (Toronto Clinical Scoring System, TCSS ≥ 6) was significantly lower in Group W than in Group C. Both the left and right sural sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV-left sural and SNCV-right sural) slightly decreased in Group C and slightly increased in Group W. Additionally, the abundances of Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium and Anaerostipes were higher in Group W, and the abundances of Weissella, Klebsiella, Cronobacter and Enterobacteriaceae_unclassified were lower than those in Group C at month 2. At the end of month 4, Bifidobacterium remained more abundant in Group W. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first report of improvement to diabetes complications by using a dietary supplement in such a short-term period. The enrichment of SCFA-producing bacteria might be responsible for the attenuation of T2D and its complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=23309&htm=4, identifier ChiCTR-IOR-17013656.
-
9.
Comparative analysis of the efficacies of probiotic supplementation and glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang, T, Xie, X, Wu, L, Li, L, Yang, L, Gao, H, Deng, Z, Zhang, X, Chen, X, Zhang, J, et al
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:825897
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a serious medical condition often requiring antidiabetic drug management. Although commonly used antidiabetic drugs effectively control glucose levels, their tolerability profiles differ, causing various side effects. Probiotics can be used as single or multi strains to reduce glycaemic and lipid indicators and avoid the negative effects of antidiabetic medications. The study included twenty-five randomised controlled trials, of which fourteen studies assessed the effectiveness of probiotics (single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements), and eleven studies included different antidiabetic drugs such as Thiazolidinedione (TZD), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-4i), and Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of probiotic and antidiabetic drugs on glycaemia, lipid profile and blood pressure in T2D patients. Probiotics were less effective than specific antidiabetic drugs in reducing fasting blood sugar levels (FBS), HbA1c levels, and triglycerides. Different probiotic formulations were effective in reducing the HOMA-IR index, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and systolic and diastolic pressure (SBP and DBP). A subgroup analysis showed a greater reduction in FBS, HbA1c, TC, TG, and SBP in obese and elderly participants, those who participated for a longer duration, and those from Eastern origins. Considering the high heterogeneity in baseline study characteristics among the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, further studies are required to evaluate the effects of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs. However, healthcare professionals can use the study to understand the effect of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs in reducing glycaemic, lipid and hypertension profiles.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Glucose-lowering drugs, except for DPP-4i, reduced FBS and HbA1c more than probiotics; and SGLT-2i induced the greatest decrease in HbA1c
- A BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 showed a significant decrease in FBS and the HOMA-IR index compared with those with lower BMI
- Weight loss induced by glucose-lowering drugs and probiotic supplementation plays an important role in glycaemic control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis compared the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) on various outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library between January 2015 - April 2021.
Results
25 randomised controlled trials (RCT) were included (2843 participants). 14 RCTs (842 participants) involved the administration of single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements, and 11 RCTs (2001 participants) involved TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP-4i. Participants in 7 of the studies had T2D, aged ≤ 55 years old. 8 RCTs included participants with a mean BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, and 11 RCTs participants had a mean BMI < 30 kg/m2.
Effects of probiotics:
- Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS): A reduction (−1.42, −0.32 mg/dL, p=0.000)
- Glycated hemaglobin (HbA1c): No reduction (p = 0.000)
- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR): A decrease (−0.64, −0.31; p = 0.780), regardless of probiotic strain or with a co-supplement
- Insulin: Not significant (p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis: no reduction
- Total Cholesterol (TC): No difference (p = 0.941). Subgroup analysis: reduction from multi-species probiotics (−0.36, −0.01 mg/dL, p = 0.871)
- Triglycerides: Difference (−0.25 mg/dL, p = 0.958)
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.189)
- HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.014)
- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): A decrease (−6.44, −0.08 mmHg, p = 0.044)
- Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): A reduction (−4.53, −0.80 mmHg, p = 0.206).
Effects of glucose-lowering drugs:
- FBS: A decrease (−4.22 mg/dL, −1.24 mg/dL, p = 0.000)
- HbA1c: A decrease (−2.51%, −0.52%, p = 0.000) with TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP- 4i; a reduction with SGLT-2i (p = 0.003)
- TC: No difference (p = 0.000). Subgroup: no decrease with single species probiotics and probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i)
- TG: No difference (p = 0.000)
- . HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.000). Subgroup: a decrease with TZDs (−2.37, −0.72 mg/dL). No difference with probiotic strains, or probiotics with co-supplements, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.000), Subgroups: no difference with probiotic strains, probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i).
Limitations
Limited number of studies for TZD and SGLT-2i, making results potentially unreliable.
Conclusions
Multi species probiotics are worth considering as an adjunct to glucose-lowering drugs, and for improving lipid profiles and hypertension.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic supplementation reduced the HOMA-IR index
- Multi-species probiotics were associated with reduction in TC and TG levels
- DPP-4i only decreased TG levels
- TZD was associated with decrease in HDL-C, whereas probiotic supplementation was associated with higher decrease in SBP and DBP and that GLP-1 RA increases the risk of hypoglycaemia.
Considerations for future research:
- Semaglutide was associated with an increased risk for hypoglycaemia compared with a placebo, indicating that the safety of semaglutide needs further study
- Dietary and physical activity should be considered in future studies
- Heterogeneity in some indicators may be due to differences in study baseline characteristics,Larger trials needed to support the results of this meta-analysis.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs (thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) in patients with type 2 diabetes from randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on the treatment effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs on glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure metabolism published between Jan 2015 and April 2021. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 25 RCTs (2,843 participants). Overall, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and TZD significantly reduce fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas GLP-1 RA increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. Multispecies probiotics decrease FBS, total cholesterol (TC), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Moreover, subgroup analyses indicated that participants aged >55 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, longer duration of intervention, and subjects from Eastern countries, showed significantly higher reduction in FBS and HbA1c, TC, TG and SBP. This meta-analysis revealed that including multiple probiotic rather than glucose-lowering drugs might be more beneficial regarding T2D prevention who suffering from simultaneously hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.
-
10.
Dietary macronutrients and the gut microbiome: a precision nutrition approach to improve cardiometabolic health.
Jardon, KM, Canfora, EE, Goossens, GH, Blaak, EE
Gut. 2022;71(6):1214-1226
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The global rise in the prevalence of obesity is strongly associated with an increase in the incidence and prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases, including insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In recent years, advancements have been made in understanding the involvement of the gut microbiome in obesity and related cardiometabolic complications as regulator of host energy and substrate metabolism. This study is a review that discusses the latest research describing interactions between dietary composition, the gut microbiome and host metabolism. Results show that current evidence for developing optimal dietary interventions targeting bodyweight control and IR via the gut microbiota is still in its infancy and does not capture the complexity of the integration of a whole-diet approach, the microbial and the host’s metabolic phenotype. Furthermore, implementation of targeted, precision nutrition intervention strategies or dietary guidelines for individuals or subgroups in public health requires further insight in the mechanisms involved in (non-)response to dietary intervention. Authors conclude that future studies are needed and these should focus on assessing detailed individual phenotyping and gaining insight into the balance between carbohydrate and protein fermentation by the gut microbiota as well as the site of fermentation in the colon.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiome is an important regulator of body weight, glucose and lipid metabolism, and inflammatory processes, and may thereby play a key role in the aetiology of obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Interindividual responsiveness to specific dietary interventions may be partially determined by differences in baseline gut microbiota composition and functionality between individuals with distinct metabolic phenotypes. However, the relationship between an individual's diet, gut microbiome and host metabolic phenotype is multidirectional and complex, yielding a challenge for practical implementation of targeted dietary guidelines. In this review, we discuss the latest research describing interactions between dietary composition, the gut microbiome and host metabolism. Furthermore, we describe how this knowledge can be integrated to develop precision-based nutritional strategies to improve bodyweight control and metabolic health in humans. Specifically, we will address that (1) insight in the role of the baseline gut microbial and metabolic phenotype in dietary intervention response may provide leads for precision-based nutritional strategies; that (2) the balance between carbohydrate and protein fermentation by the gut microbiota, as well as the site of fermentation in the colon, seems important determinants of host metabolism; and that (3) 'big data', including multiple omics and advanced modelling, are of undeniable importance in predicting (non-)response to dietary interventions. Clearly, detailed metabolic and microbial phenotyping in humans is necessary to better understand the link between diet, the gut microbiome and host metabolism, which is required to develop targeted dietary strategies and guidelines for different subgroups of the population.