0
selected
-
1.
Blueberries Improve Abdominal Symptoms, Well-Being and Functioning in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.
Wilder-Smith, CH, Materna, A, Olesen, SS
Nutrients. 2023;15(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are the most common cause of recurring, chronic digestive upsets. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD), or persistent indigestion, are the most prevalent types of those disorders. Typical symptoms include pain or discomfort in the abdomen, changes in stool patterns or bloating and may also manifest in symptoms not directly relating to the digestive tract. It remains uncertain what the exact mechanisms of those disorders are. However, scientists identified various factors involved, including immune system activation, sensitisation of the nervous system, dysregulated permeability of the gut walls, and changes in the microbiota, their composition and metabolic activity. Polyphenols are natural compounds found abundantly in plants and are most known for their antioxidant qualities. One frequently studied and rich-source of phenols is Blueberries (Vaccinium spp). Blueberries have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties, and are known to reverse the permeability of the gut membrane. Hence their use in the management of FGID appeared promising. This double-blind, randomized, cross-over study assessed the benefit of blueberries in 43 people with IBS or FD, between 18–60 years of age. The candidates were given 30g freeze-dried blueberries, the equivalent of 180g of fresh blueberries, or a sugar-based placebo of similar calorific value for 6-weeks each. When receiving the blueberries, greater symptom relief was observed when compared to the placebo group. Blueberry intake also positively reflected in experienced improvement in quality of life. No notable differences were observed between groups in stool patterns and fructose digestion. Blueberries and their beneficial compounds such as polyphenols and fiber appear to have a wide range of benefits that can help manage some of the FGID-associated symptoms. Further studies are needed to understand why, despite some notable benefits, some of the other GI markers remained unaffected. As blueberries are generally well tolerated, they can be a simple and helpful food intervention to complement other FGID management strategies.
Abstract
Blueberries beneficially modulate physiologic mechanisms relevant to the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Forty-three patients with FGID received freeze-dried blueberries (equivalent to 180 g fresh blueberries) or sugar and energy-matched placebo in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. After 6 weeks of treatment, the differences in Gastrointestinal Clinical Rating Scale (GSRS) scores and abdominal symptom relief were compared as primary outcome measures. The quality of life and life functioning ratings (OQ45.2 questionnaire), Bristol stool scales, and fructose breath test results constituted secondary outcome measures. Blueberry treatment resulted in more patients with relevant abdominal symptom relief compared to placebo (53% vs. 30%, p = 0.03). Total and pain GSRS scores improved insignificantly (mean treatment differences [95% CI]: -3.4 [-7.4 to 0.6] (p = 0.09) and -1.0 [-2.2 to 0.1] (p = 0.08), respectively). OQ45.2 scores improved during blueberry treatment compared to placebo (treatment difference -3.2 [95% CI: -5.6 to -0], p = 0.01). Treatment effect differences for the further measures did not reach statistical significance. Blueberries relieved abdominal symptoms and improved general markers of well-being, quality of life, and life functioning more than placebo in patients with FGID. Consequently, the polyphenol and fiber components of blueberries exert broad beneficial effects separate from the sugars present in both treatments.
-
2.
Association of Major Food Sources of Fructose-Containing Sugars With Incident Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Semnani-Azad, Z, Khan, TA, Blanco Mejia, S, de Souza, RJ, Leiter, LA, Kendall, CWC, Hanley, AJ, Sievenpiper, JL
JAMA network open. 2020;3(7):e209993
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fructose is a type of sugar that has been implicated as a contributor to the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is a condition where large waist circumference, high blood pressure and elevated blood lipid levels may all coexist. However, it remains unclear as to the role of fructose containing foods in the development of MetS. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 prospective cohort studies aimed to determine the association of several fructose containing foods and drinks with MetS. The results showed that sugary drinks containing fructose increased the risk of MetS, whereas no associations were found with mixed fruit juice, 100% fruit juice, honey, ice cream or confectionary. Interestingly fruit and yoghurt containing fructose decreased the risk of developing MetS. It was concluded that fructose containing food and drinks are not all equal in their biological effects. Sugary drinks increased the risk of developing MetS but yoghurt and fruit had a protective effect against development. Reasons for this could be due to a generally unhealthier lifestyle in those who consume sugary drinks or may be due to the increased protective effects associated with the vitamins and minerals in fruit and yoghurt. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a diet eliminating sugary drinks and containing regular fruit and yoghurt intake.
Abstract
Importance: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, the role of other important food sources of fructose-containing sugars in the development of MetS remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association of major food sources of fructose-containing sugars with incident MetS. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to March 24, 2020, in addition to manual searches of reference lists from included studies using the following search terms: sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit drink, yogurt, metabolic syndrome, and prospective study. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria included prospective cohort studies of 1 year or longer that investigated the association of important food sources of fructose-containing sugars with incident MetS in participants free of MetS at the start of the study. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Extreme quantile risk estimates for each food source with MetS incidence were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). Dose-response analyses were performed using a 1-stage linear mixed-effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results were reported according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled risk ratio (RR) of incident MetS (pairwise and dose response). Results: Thirteen prospective cohort studies (49 591 participants [median age, 51 years; range, 6-90 years]; 14 205 with MetS) that assessed 8 fructose-containing foods and MetS were included. An adverse linear dose-response association for SSBs (RR for 355 mL/d, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23) and an L-shaped protective dose-response association for yogurt (RR for 85 g/d, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76) and fruit (RR for 80 g/d, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.86) was found. Fruit juices (mixed and 100%) had a U-shaped dose-response association with protection at moderate doses (mixed fruit juice: RR for 125 mL/d, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79; 100% fruit juice: RR for 125 mL/d, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97). Honey, ice cream, and confectionary had no association with MetS incidence. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for SSBs, yogurt, fruit, mixed fruit juice, and 100% fruit juice and very low for all other food sources. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the adverse association of SSBs with MetS does not extend to other food sources of fructose-containing sugars, with a protective association for yogurt and fruit throughout the dose range and for 100% fruit juice and mixed fruit juices at moderate doses. Therefore, current policies and guidelines on the need to limit sources of free sugars may need to be reexamined.
-
3.
Dietary Fructose and the Metabolic Syndrome.
Taskinen, MR, Packard, CJ, Borén, J
Nutrients. 2019;11(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructose is a naturally occurring sugar in carbohydrate foods and is often used as an ingredient in foods and sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) such as sport and energy drinks. The consumption of these drinks accounts for up to 15-17% of calorie intake in the modern western diet. Excessive sugar consumption is becoming a major public health issue with high sugar intake linked to Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Fructose is largely absorbed in the small intestines however the liver is considered the major organ for fructose metabolism. Too much fructose in the diet appears to stimulate the liver to produce more sugars and triglyceride fats which can raise cholesterol levels and promote insulin resistance. This partially explains the role of fructose in promoting a build-up of fat around the liver leading to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and central obesity. Too much fructose is also linked to unfavourable changes in gut bacteria which may contribute to obesity and MetS. Overall the study concludes that too much fructose contributes to an unhealthy lifestyle and is a risk factor for metabolic disturbances.
Abstract
Abstract: Consumption of fructose, the sweetest of all naturally occurring carbohydrates, has increased dramatically in the last 40 years and is today commonly used commercially in soft drinks, juice, and baked goods. These products comprise a large proportion of the modern diet, in particular in children, adolescents, and young adults. A large body of evidence associate consumption of fructose and other sugar-sweetened beverages with insulin resistance, intrahepatic lipid accumulation, and hypertriglyceridemia. In the long term, these risk factors may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Fructose is absorbed in the small intestine and metabolized in the liver where it stimulates fructolysis, glycolysis, lipogenesis, and glucose production. This may result in hypertriglyceridemia and fatty liver. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying intestinal and hepatic fructose metabolism is important. Here we review recent evidence linking excessive fructose consumption to health risk markers and development of components of the Metabolic Syndrome.
-
4.
Relation of Total Sugars, Sucrose, Fructose, and Added Sugars With the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Khan, TA, Tayyiba, M, Agarwal, A, Mejia, SB, de Souza, RJ, Wolever, TMS, Leiter, LA, Kendall, CWC, Jenkins, DJA, Sievenpiper, JL
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019;94(12):2399-2414
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sugar-sweetened beverages have been associated with a risk for poor health outcomes, however risk for poor health outcomes with the fructose sugar they contain remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies aimed to determine the role of total added fructose in the development of heart disease. Total sugars, sucrose and fructose were not associated with the incidence of heart disease, however total sugars and fructose increased the risk of death due to heart disease, the extent of which was dependent upon the amount consumed. Interestingly sucrose had a protective effect against death due to heart disease. It was concluded that consumption of fructose, total sugars and added sugars is associated with death due to heart disease, whereas sucrose is not. Although not all food stuffs containing fructose and added sugars were analysed, it is still indicative that healthcare professionals could recommend a low sugar and fructose diet to lower the risk of death due to heart disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the association of total and added fructose-containing sugars on cardiovascular (CVD) incidence and mortality. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2018. Prospective cohort studies assessing the association of reported intakes of total, sucrose, fructose and added sugars with CVD incidence and mortality in individuals free from disease at baseline were included. Risk estimates were pooled using the inverse variance method, and dose-response analysis was modeled. RESULTS Eligibility criteria were met by 24 prospective cohort comparisons (624,128 unique individuals; 11,856 CVD incidence cases and 12,224 CVD mortality cases). Total sugars, sucrose, and fructose were not associated with CVD incidence. Total sugars (risk ratio, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.17]) and fructose (1.08 [1.01 to 1.15]) showed a harmful association for CVD mortality, there was no association for added sugars and a beneficial association for sucrose (0.94 [0.89 to 0.99]). Dose-response analyses showed a beneficial linear dose-response gradient for sucrose and nonlinear dose-response thresholds for harm for total sugars (133 grams, 26% energy), fructose (58 grams, 11% energy) and added sugars (65 grams, 13% energy) in relation to CVD mortality (P<.05). The certainty of the evidence using GRADE was very low for CVD incidence and low for CVD mortality for all sugar types. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports a threshold of harm for intakes of total sugars, added sugars, and fructose at higher exposures and lack of harm for sucrose independent of food form for CVD mortality. Further research of different food sources of sugars is needed to define better the relationship between sugars and CVD. REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01608620.
-
5.
Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chung, M, Ma, J, Patel, K, Berger, S, Lau, J, Lichtenstein, AH
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2014;100(3):833-49
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
There have been increasing concerns on the relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fructose or high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effect of dietary fructose in different forms on NAFLD and various biomarkers of liver health. This review included 21 published intervention studies and found a diet supplemented with fructose or glucose increases liver fat and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations when compared with a maintenance diet in healthy adults. Based on the available research, the authors point out the relationship between liver health markers and fructose, but also recognise this association may be confounded by excess energy intake. Due to the lack of robust findings, they conclude there is insufficient evidence on HFCS and NAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised about the concurrent temporal trend between simple sugar intakes, especially of fructose or high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), and rates of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the United States. OBJECTIVE We examined the effect of different amounts and forms of dietary fructose on the incidence or prevalence of NAFLD and indexes of liver health in humans. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of English-language, human studies of any design in children and adults with low to no alcohol intake and that reported at least one predetermined measure of liver health. The strength of the evidence was evaluated by considering risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision. RESULTS Six observational studies and 21 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall strength of evidence for observational studies was rated insufficient because of high risk of biases and inconsistent study findings. Of 21 intervention studies, 19 studies were in adults without NAFLD (predominantly healthy, young men) and 1 study each in adults or children with NAFLD. We found a low level of evidence that a hypercaloric fructose diet (supplemented by pure fructose) increases liver fat and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations in healthy men compared with the consumption of a weight-maintenance diet. In addition, there was a low level of evidence that hypercaloric fructose and glucose diets have similar effects on liver fat and liver enzymes in healthy adults. There was insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion for effects of HFCS or sucrose on NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of indirect comparisons across study findings, the apparent association between indexes of liver health (ie, liver fat, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, alanine aminotransferase, AST, and γ-glutamyl transpeptase) and fructose or sucrose intake appear to be confounded by excessive energy intake. Overall, the available evidence is not sufficiently robust to draw conclusions regarding effects of fructose, HFCS, or sucrose consumption on NAFLD.