-
1.
The Gut Microbiome in Early Life Stress: A Systematic Review.
Agusti, A, Lamers, F, Tamayo, M, Benito-Amat, C, Molina-Mendoza, GV, Penninx, BWJH, Sanz, Y
Nutrients. 2023;15(11)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children exposed to early life stress (ELS) show alterations in brain development and are at increased risk of developing mental illness. This study aims to clarify whether ELS influences the gut microbiome and whether this can be a predictor for the development of mental disorders. 13 articles were included in this systemic review. 4 looked at pre-natal stress and 9 at post-natal stress. Prenatal stress (via maternal stress) may be associated with an increase in Proteobacteria phylum and with a lower abundance of Bifidobacterium and lactic acid bacteria. In the postnatal group, greater microbiome diversity was related to lower depression and anxiety. In boys scores for adaptive skills were higher in those with good levels of Bifidobacterium. A positive association was found between EA (early adversity) experiences and gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety. This review demonstrates links between ELS and gut microbiome changes. Further research will be necessary to draw more robust conclusions.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This systematic review consolidated and discussed existing evidence on the link between early life stress (ELS) and changes to the human microbiome
- Exposure to ELS, prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, may impact mental and physical health.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A systematic review was conducted to consolidate clinical evidence examining the impact of early life stress (ELS) on the human intestinal microbiome.
Method
Thirteen observational studies were included in the review, sourced from Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS), with most studies scoring seven or eight out of nine stars.
Study designs varied, including prospective prenatal studies, postnatal longitudinal studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Four prenatal studies were prospective in design. The other nine postnatal studies included one longitudinal study, five case-control studies, and three cross-sectional studies. All 13 studies were published between 2015 and 2022. Because study designs and outcome assessments varied, the results were presented in a narrative form. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors.
Results
The primary findings from the review were as follows:
- Four longitudinal stress studies indicated that pregnant mothers experiencing psychological stress, increased cortisol levels, HIV, and lack of social support exhibited a lower abundance of beneficial Bifidobacterium and an increased abundance of Enterobacter genus.
- One postnatal stress longitudinal study (n=260) demonstrated lower depression and anxiety and improved internalising behaviour in patients with high microbiome diversity.
- . One postnatal stress case-control study (n=344) showed changes in the microbiome and an abundance of several bacterial taxa in stressed groups, including genera Prevotella, Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes), Coprococcus, Streptococcus, and Escherichia.
- One cross-sectional study of 128 adults without psychiatric conditions revealed that higher stress correlated with increased levels of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Rhodococcus, Methanobrevibacter, and Roseburia at the genus level, as well as lower Phascolarcto bacterium and Firmicutes at the phylum level.
- One large prospective study (n=446) found infants exposed to higher cumulative stress exhibited an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria groups and lower Bifidobacterium.
Conclusion:
Due to the inconsistency of study designs and their results this review failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both.
Clinical practice applications:
- Early life stress, and alterations in the gut microbiome, have been linked to mental health conditions
- Maternal prenatal stress may be linked to emotional, behavioural, and cognitive outcomes in infants.
Considerations for future research:
- Future research should standardise questionnaires, to ensure consistency and comparability across studies
- Additionally, future studies should consider using standard procedures and specific species and strain resolution shotgun metagenomics sequencing
- Consideration should be given to the influence of environmental variables (diet, physical activity, etc.) and sex in gut microbiome analysis.
Abstract
Exposure to early life stress (ELS), prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, can significantly impact mental and physical health. The role of the intestinal microbiome in human health, and particularly mental health, is becoming increasingly evident. This systematic review aims to summarize the clinical data evaluating the effect of ELS on the human intestinal microbiome. The systematic review (CRD42022351092) was performed following PRISMA guidelines, with ELS considered as exposure to psychological stressors prenatally and during early life (childhood and adolescence). Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria, and all studies reviewed found a link between ELS and the gut microbiome in both prenatal and postnatal periods. However, we failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both. The inconsistency of results is likely attributed to various factors such as different experimental designs, ages examined, questionnaires, timing of sample collection and analysis methods, small population sizes, and the type of stressors. Additional studies using similar stressors and validated stress measures, as well as higher-resolution microbiome analytical approaches, are needed to draw definitive conclusions about the links between stress and the human gut microbiome.
-
2.
Effects of mental contrasting on sleep and associations with stress: A randomized controlled trial.
Schmidt, LI, Neubauer, AB, Stoffel, M, Ditzen, B, Schirmaier, J, Farrenkopf, C, Sieverding, M
Journal of health psychology. 2023;28(11):1057-1071
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Insufficient sleep is a widespread problem. For adults between 18 and 64 years, the National Sleep Foundation generally recommends a range of nightly sleep duration from 7 to 9 hours. The aim of this study was to test a self-regulatory intervention based on mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) against the effects of sleep hygiene information only. This study was a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with daily/nightly assessments in a baseline-week and analog daily/nightly assessments in a post-intervention week. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Results indicated an increase in sleep quality and subjective (but not objective) sleep duration from baseline to post-intervention period. Additionally, regarding subjective stress, associations with daily sleep parameters were largely confirmed. Authors conclude that future research should include booster sessions and evaluate MCII effects in the longer run. Furthermore, a better understanding of the causes regarding insufficient sleep among specific target groups and their degree of controllability is required to develop individually targeted interventions.
Abstract
Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) has been successfully applied to improve health-related behaviors (e.g. exercise). We explored its effectiveness to improve sleep outcomes beyond effects of sleep hygiene (SH) information, and investigated associations with stress. Eighty university employees (mean age: 29.6, SD = 4.5) were randomized to either a MCII + SH or a SH-only condition. During a baseline-week and a post-intervention week, sleep duration (Fitbit Alta and self-report), sleep quality, and stress were assessed daily and saliva was collected to assess the cortisol awakening response (CAR). In total, self-reported sleep quality and duration increased, but there was no meaningful condition*week interaction for sleep parameters or CAR. Higher average stress was associated with shorter sleep duration and lower sleep quality. Within-person, days with higher stress were followed by nights with lower sleep quality. Despite overall improvements, effects of MCII were not confirmed. MCII might be less effective to improve behaviors which are less controllable.
-
3.
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Reduces Perceived Psychological Stress in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Boehme, M, Rémond-Derbez, N, Lerond, C, Lavalle, L, Keddani, S, Steinmann, M, Rytz, A, Dalile, B, Verbeke, K, Van Oudenhove, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(14)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psychosocial stress is a common issue and one way in which nutrition may modulate the stress response is via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This 6-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress evaluated the effects of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 on psychological and physiological markers of stress and the response to an acute stress test. Outcome measures included cortisol awakening response, heart rate, heart rate variability and various questionnaires assessing stress, anxiety, depression, sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. Compared to placebo, probiotic intake led to a significant decrease in perceived stress and an improvement in subjective sleep after 6 weeks. There was no difference in cortisol awakening response. The subjects in both groups did not experience significant gastrointestinal symptoms and scored low on anxiety and depression at baseline. In response to the acute stress test, cortisol levels were higher in the probiotic than the placebo group, whilst no clear differences were seen in heart rate and heart rate variability. Subjects in the probiotic group had a lower pain experience during the stress test whilst subjects in the placebo group had an increase in positive mood following the test. The authors conclude that these results support their hypothesis that BL NCC3001 may alleviate stress and improve sleep in adults with moderate stress levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is mounting evidence to suggest that nutritional interventions can influence our stress responses. One of the routes by which nutrition can influence physiological and psychological stress responses involves the microbiota– gut–brain-axis.
- This exploratory trial suggests that supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 leads to a beneficial effect on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind exploratory clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters and acute stress in healthy adults who typically experience mild-to-moderate-levels of stress.
Method
47 Participants between the ages of 25-65 years old with mild-to-moderate psychological stress received 1x1010 CFU of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 daily or a placebo for 6 weeks.
Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-A and HADS-D), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Visual Analog Scales (VAS, which measures pain intensity) during the clinical study. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) questionnaire was also used to depict the progression of the participants through the study.
Faecal samples were taken at baseline and 6 weeks and awakening saliva samples were taken at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At the endpoint, 45/49 (91%) of the subjects completed the study. One participant reported an adverse event and the other withdrew without an explanation. Two participants were excluded from the full analysis.
Results
The primary outcomes were:
- After 6-week of the probiotic intervention, there was a significant decrease in perceived stress in the probiotic group (21.4%) compared to the placebo group (-10.2%), p = 0.017.
- There was a significant improvement in subjective sleep in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.037).
- There was a significant decrease in the positive PANAS change score from the pre-stressor stage in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.01).
- There were lower pain values (VAS) scores from pre-stressor to post-stressor in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.05).
- There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS_D) scores.
Conclusion
Oral supplementation with BL NCC3001 may have beneficial effects on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Clinical practice applications:
- While the mechanism underlying the correlation between the microbiota and the gut-brain-axis is not fully understood, it is thought to play a critical role in the links between the microbiota, mood, stress, and brain health.
- This exploratory trial additionally supports the potential of specific probiotics being used to reduce perceived stress and improve subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, powered clinical trials are needed to provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the stress-relieving and sleep-improving effect of Bifidobacterium longum.
- Furthermore, the dosage and duration of the probiotics need further investigation in a larger healthy population.
- Comparative research is needed to help investigate the effect of different probiotic strains on stress relief and sleep quality.
Abstract
Emerging science shows that probiotic intake may impact stress and mental health. We investigated the effect of a 6-week intervention with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 (1 × 1010 CFU/daily) on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters in 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress using a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind design. The main results showed that supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the perceived stress and improved the subjective sleep quality score compared to placebo. Comparing the two groups, momentary subjective assessments concomitant to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test revealed a lower amount of pain experience in the probiotic group and a higher amount of relief at the end of the procedure in the placebo group, reflected by higher scores in the positive affect state. The awakening of the salivary cortisol response was not affected by the intervention, yet the reduction observed in the salivary cortisol stress response post-intervention was higher in the placebo group than the probiotic group. Multivariate analysis further indicated that a reduction in perceived stress correlated with a reduction in anxiety, in depression, and in the cortisol awakening response after the 6-week intervention. This exploratory trial provides promising insights into BL NCC3001 to reduce perceived stress in a healthy population and supports the potential of nutritional solutions including probiotics to improve mental health.
-
4.
Multispecies probiotic administration reduces emotional salience and improves mood in subjects with moderate depression: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Baião, R, Capitão, LP, Higgins, C, Browning, M, Harmer, CJ, Burnet, PWJ
Psychological medicine. 2023;53(8):3437-3447
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gut microbiota may be able to augment an individual’s mood, brain processing and cognition. Supplements containing live bacteria or a diet high in fibre which act as a substrate for beneficial gut bacteria may be of benefit to individuals with depression or mental illness. This 4-week randomised control trial aimed to determine the effect of a probiotic containing several different gut bacteria species on emotional processing and cognition in people with mild to moderate depression. The results showed that compared to placebo, probiotic intake increased empathy with others and improved some but not all aspects of cognition. Probiotic intake did not affect biological measures of stress but did improve feelings of depression. It was concluded that multispecies probiotics may change the emotional processing of people with depression. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the use of probiotics may be a good option to reduce the risk of people with mild to moderate depression developing a major depressive disorder.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential antidepressant properties of probiotics have been suggested, but their influence on the emotional processes that may underlie this effect is unclear. METHODS Depressed volunteers (n = 71) were recruited into a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study to explore the effects of a daily, 4-week intake of a multispecies probiotic or placebo on emotional processing and cognition. Mood, anxiety, positive and negative affect, sleep, salivary cortisol and serum C-reactive peptide (CRP) were assessed before and after supplementation. RESULTS Compared with placebo, probiotic intake increased accuracy at identifying faces expressing all emotions (+12%, p < 0.05, total n = 51) and vigilance to neutral faces (mean difference between groups = 12.28 ms ± 6.1, p < 0.05, total n = 51). Probiotic supplementation also reduced reward learning (-9%, p < 0.05, total n = 51), and interference word recall on the auditory verbal learning task (-18%, p < 0.05, total n = 50), but did not affect other aspects of cognitive performance. Although actigraphy revealed a significant group × night-time activity interaction, follow up analysis was not significant (p = 0.094). Supplementation did not alter salivary cortisol or circulating CRP concentrations. Probiotic intake significantly reduced (-50% from baseline, p < 0.05, n = 35) depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, but these did not correlate with the changes in emotional processing. CONCLUSIONS The impartiality to positive and negative emotional stimuli or reward after probiotic supplementation have not been observed with conventional antidepressant therapies. Further studies are required to elucidate the significance of these changes with regard to the mood-improving action of the current probiotic.
-
5.
Inulin-type fructans and 2'fucosyllactose alter both microbial composition and appear to alleviate stress-induced mood state in a working population compared to placebo (maltodextrin): the EFFICAD Trial, a randomized, controlled trial.
Jackson, PP, Wijeyesekera, A, Williams, CM, Theis, S, van Harsselaar, J, Rastall, RA
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;118(5):938-955
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Anxiety and depression are the most common mental health disorders and a bidirectional relationship exists between the gut and the brain, the gut-brain axis, which may be mediated by metabolites of the gut microbiome, which include various neurotransmitters. Prebiotics, such as 2'fucosyllactose (2FS, a human milk oligosaccharide) and oligofructose (OF, an inulin-type fructan) can modulate the microbiome and may as such affect mood. The aim of this double-blind, randomised-controlled trial, including 96 healthy adults with mild/moderate levels of stress/anxiety, was to evaluate the effect of a 4-week course of 2FS and OF individually and combined versus maltodextrin (as a placebo) on the microbiome and mood. Significant positive changes in the microbiome were seen in the OF and the OF+2FS groups, compared to control. Improvements in mood (anxiety, depression, positive and negative affect and cortisol awakening response) were seen in all 3 intervention groups compared to control but generally stronger in the OF and the OF+2FS groups. The authors concluded that OF alone and in combination with 2FS has beneficial effects for mood and microbiome composition, whilst the effects on the microbiome of 2FS alone require further study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in the bidirectional relationship existing between the gut and brain and the effects of both oligofructose and 2'fucosyllactose to alter microbial composition and mood state. Yet, much remains unknown about the ability of oligofructose and 2'fucosyllactose to improve mood state via targeted manipulation of the gut microbiota. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the effects of oligofructose and 2'fucosyllactose alone and in combination against maltodextrin (comparator) on microbial composition and mood state in a working population. METHODS We conducted a 5-wk, 4-arm, parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 92 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate levels of anxiety and depression. Subjects were randomized to oligofructose 8 g/d (plus 2 g/d maltodextrin); maltodextrin 10 g/d; oligofructose 8 g/d plus 2'fucosyllactose (2 g/d) or 2'fucosyllactose 2 g/d (plus 8 g/d maltodextrin). Changes in microbial load (fluorescence in situ hybridization-flow cytometry) and composition (16S ribosomal RNA sequencing) were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal sensations, bowel habits, and mood state parameters. RESULTS There were significant increases in several bacterial taxa including Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Roseburia, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in both the oligofructose and oligofructose/2'fucosyllactose interventions (all P ≤ 0.05). Changes in bacterial taxa were highly heterogenous upon 2'fuscoyllactose supplementation. Significant improvements in Beck Depression Inventory, State Trait Anxiety Inventory Y1 and Y2, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule scores and cortisol awakening response were detected across oligofructose, 2'fucosyllactose, and oligofructose/2'fucosyllactose combination interventions (all P ≤ 0.05). Both sole oligofructose and oligofructose/2'fuscosyllactose combination interventions outperformed both sole 2'fucosyllactose and maltodextrin in improvements in several mood state parameters (all P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that oligofructose and combination of oligofructose/2'fucosyllactose can beneficially alter microbial composition along with improving mood state parameters. Future work is needed to understand key microbial differences separating individual responses to 2'fucosyllactose supplementation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05212545.
-
6.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 decreases subjective academic stress in healthy adults: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Wauters, L, Van Oudenhove, L, Accarie, A, Geboers, K, Geysen, H, Toth, J, Luypaerts, A, Verbeke, K, Smokvina, T, Raes, J, et al
Gut microbes. 2022;14(1):2031695
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous research has shown a bidirectional relationship between the gut and psychological stress, which could be mediated by intestinal permeability followed by an immune and inflammatory response. However, the exact mechanisms of this relationship are yet to be elucidated. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress markers during a public speech in healthy students. Participants consumed either milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 or acidified milk twice daily for four weeks to assess subjective and objective stress markers and markers of intestinal permeability. Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 reduced the stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol and subjective stress markers (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/ STAI). A subgroup of healthy students with stress-induced cortisol >P90 of baseline showed a reduction in perceived stress score following Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 intervention. To evaluate the additional effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on stress and gut health, further robust studies are needed. Healthcare professionals can use the findings of this study to understand the anxiolytic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690.
Abstract
Psychological stress negatively affects the intestinal barrier function in animals and humans. We aimed to study the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress-markers during public speech. Healthy students were randomized to L. rhamnosus-containing (test) or acidified (placebo) milk consumed twice daily for 4 weeks, with 46 subjects per treatment group. Small intestinal permeability was quantified by a 2 h urinary lactulose-mannitol ratio (LMR, primary outcome), fractional excretion of lactulose (FEL) and mannitol (FEM). Salivary cortisol, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress scores (PSS) were collected. No between-treatment differences were found for LMR (p = .71), FEL or FEM. Within-treatment analyses showed similar LMR and FEL but a stress-induced increase of FEM with the placebo (p < .05) but not test product. Despite a similar increase in salivary cortisol, the stress-induced increase in STAI was significantly lower with the test product vs. placebo (p = .01). Moreover, a stress-preventative effect of the probiotic was found for PSS and more pronounced in subjects with high stress-induced cortisol (p = .01). While increased FEM was mediated by salivary cortisol levels, the effect of the test product on subjective stress was not mediated by changes in FEM. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, we demonstrated that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 prevented stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol. Subjective but not objective stress-markers were reduced with L. rhamnosus vs. placebo, suggesting anxiolytic effects, which were independent of barrier stabilization and attractive for the reduction of stress in both health and disease. Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03408691.
-
7.
Effect of Combined Ingestion of L-Theanine and L-Arginine for Short-Term Psychological Stress in Young Adults: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.
Furushima, D, Sugiyama, I, Nomura, Y, Unno, K, Yamada, H
Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology. 2022;68(6):540-546
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The beneficial effects of green tea and its components are well known. The ingredient L-Theanine is the most abundant water soluble non-proteinous amino acid component in green tea. The second most abundant ingredient is L-Arginine. It also exhibits a high stress-reducing effect. The hypothesis of this study was that the combined ingestion of L-arginine and L-theanine could have beneficial clinical effects for psychological stress compared with ingestion of theanine alone. This study was a randomised placebo-controlled, single-blinded study in healthy young adults. Participants (n=120) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (1:1:1); L-theanine alone, L-theanine and L-arginine or placebo. Results show that combined ingestion of L-theanine and L-arginine tended to have greater stress reducing effects than ingestion of L-theanine alone. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Authors conclude that their findings are suggestive of synergistic effects of L-theanine and L-arginine against stress in young adults.
Abstract
l-Theanine, the most abundant amino acid component in green tea, has anti-stress effects and refreshes the mental state. A recent study demonstrated that l-arginine, the second most abundant amino acid in green tea, might enhance the anti-stress effects of l-theanine. The aim of this study was to evaluated the effects of combined ingestion of l-theanine and l-arginine on psychological stress in humans. A randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted including 120 healthy young adults (mean age 22.4 y, 63.3% female). Subjects were randomly assigned to theanine (200 mg l-theanine), combined theanine/arginine (200 mg l-theanine, 50 mg l-arginine), or placebo groups. After consuming a test beverage, we administered a stress-loading test (Uchida-Kraepelin performance test) and performed salivary alpha-amylase activity (sAA) measurements to assess the physiological stress response at 0 min (immediately after), 5 min, and 15 min. The changes in sAA at 15 min after the stress-loading test were -2.75 (11.2) kIU/L in the theanine/arginine group, -0.40 (11.5) kIU/L in the theanine group, and 6.95 (18.6) kIU/L in the placebo group. The values in the theanine/arginine (p=0.007) and theanine (p=0.02) groups differed significantly from those in the placebo group. However, the difference between theanine/arginine and theanine groups, was not statistically significant (p=0.74). From this study, no clear conclusion could be drawn regarding the potentiating effect of theanine and arginine combined ingestion on anti-stress effects in human.
-
8.
Probiotic Mixture Containing Lactobacillus helveticus, Bifidobacterium longum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Affects Brain Responses to an Arithmetic Stress Task in Healthy Subjects: A Randomised Clinical Trial and Proof-of-Concept Study.
Edebol Carlman, HMT, Rode, J, König, J, Repsilber, D, Hutchinson, AN, Thunberg, P, Persson, J, Kiselev, A, Pruessner, JC, Brummer, RJ
Nutrients. 2022;14(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Physiological and psychological stress can affect gut function and its interaction with the brain (gut-brain axis). Different types of stress and different phases of stress regulation can affect the brain in different ways. Manipulation of the gut microbiota using probiotic bacteria has been shown to improve cognition and stress response. However, probiotic interventions are likely to have different effects depending on the strains used. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a probiotic intervention on brain activity and stress response. This study is a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover study with 22 healthy subjects. Subjects were randomised to two study groups receiving the intervention in different orders (probiotics or placebo first). Results demonstrate that the probiotic intervention: - altered activity in specific brain regions known to regulate emotion and stress response. - significantly altered functional connectivity between the upper limbic and medioventral regions. - did not affect the activation of other limbic or subcortical areas. Authors conclude that their findings could further lead to possible clinical implications for improving stress resilience and potential roles in the treatment of affective and gut-brain axis disorders.
Abstract
Probiotics are suggested to impact physiological and psychological stress responses by acting on the gut-brain axis. We investigated if a probiotic product containing Bifidobacterium longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum R1012 affected stress processing in a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover proof-of-concept study (NCT03615651). Twenty-two healthy subjects (24.2 ± 3.4 years, 6 men/16 women) underwent a probiotic and placebo intervention for 4 weeks each, separated by a 4-week washout period. Subjects were examined by functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) as well as an autonomic nervous system function assessment during the Stroop task. Reduced activation in regions of the lateral orbital and ventral cingulate gyri was observed after probiotic intervention compared to placebo. Significantly increased functional connectivity was found between the upper limbic region and medioventral area. Interestingly, probiotic intervention seemed to predominantly affect the initial stress response. Salivary cortisol secretion during the task was not altered. Probiotic intervention did not affect cognitive performance and autonomic nervous system function during Stroop. The probiotic intervention was able to subtly alter brain activity and functional connectivity in regions known to regulate emotion and stress responses. These findings support the potential of probiotics as a non-pharmaceutical treatment modality for stress-related disorders.
-
9.
A combination of green tea, rhodiola, magnesium and B vitamins modulates brain activity and protects against the effects of induced social stress in healthy volunteers.
Boyle, NB, Billington, J, Lawton, C, Quadt, F, Dye, L
Nutritional neuroscience. 2022;25(9):1845-1859
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Stress is a leading cause of work-related time off. Low magnesium intake has been shown to be associated with anxiety and supplementation has been shown to relieve anxiety-related-symptoms, especially when combined with B vitamins. Green tea and rhodiola have also been used to alleviate stress, anxiety, and fatigue, the latter after just 3 days of intake. This randomised control trial of 100 moderately stressed adults aimed to determine the effects of combining magnesium, B vitamins, green tea, and rhodiola after induced social stress. The results showed that supplementation with a combination of magnesium, B vitamins, green tea, and rhodiola induced a relaxed, alert state and lowered stress, anxiety, and mood disturbances. However, it did not affect stress hormones, heart rate or blood pressure in response to stress. It was concluded that combination treatment is a promising therapy for stress. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend the combination of magnesium, B vitamins, green tea, and rhodiola to individuals with social anxiety before they enter a socially stressful situation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnesium (Mg), green tea and rhodiola extracts have, in isolation, been shown to possess stress and anxiety relieving effects. Green tea and rhodiola have been shown to modulate EEG oscillatory brain activity associated with relaxation and stress perception. The combined capacity of these ingredients to confer protective effects under conditions of acute stress has yet to be examined. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of Mg (with B vitamins) + green tea + rhodiola would acutely moderate the effects of stress exposure. METHODS A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group design was employed (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03262376; 25/0817). One hundred moderately stressed adults received oral supplementation of either (i) Mg + B vitamins + green tea + rhodiola; (ii) Mg + B vitamins + rhodiola; (iii) Mg + B vitamins + green tea; or (iv) placebo. After supplementation participants were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test. The effects of the study treatments on electroencephalogram (EEG) resting state alpha and theta, subjective state/mood, blood pressure, heart rate variability and salivary cortisol responses after acute stress exposure were assessed. RESULTS The combined treatment significantly increased EEG resting state theta (p < .02) - considered indicative of a relaxed, alert state, attenuated subjective stress, anxiety and mood disturbance, and heightened subjective and autonomic arousal (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Mg, B vitamins, rhodiola and green tea extracts are a promising combination of ingredients that may enhance coping capacity and offer protection from the negative effects of stress exposure.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03262376.
-
10.
Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Daily Heart Rate Variability Assessment for Classifying Meaningful Change in Testosterone-to-Cortisol Ratio: A Preliminary Study.
DeBlauw, JA, Crawford, DA, Kurtz, BK, Drake, NB, Heinrich, KM
International journal of exercise science. 2021;14(3):260-273
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise-induced hormonal responses are controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis, a key regulator of homeostasis, which responds to stress by triggering a series of endocrine changes resulting in the release of testosterone (T) and cortisol (C). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between daily resting heart rate variability (HRV) and pre-exercise T:C ratio and evaluate the clinical utility (i.e., diagnostic validity and reliability) of daily HRV assessment in classifying atypical T:C ratio changes throughout a nine-week high-intensity functional training (HIFT) intervention. This study is a secondary analysis of a subset of participants from a larger study. Eight recreationally active men and women ages 18-35 were recruited for participation. Following 14 days of baseline HRV assessments, participants were randomized to either the treatment or control condition. Results show a statistically significant negative relationship between HRVdaily and the T:C ratio throughout 9-weeks of HIFT. Additionally, there was no significant relationship found between C and HRVdaily and neither sex nor group were significant factors. Authors conclude that their findings emphasize the potential of HRV for the guidance of training, however, as hormonal responses to training are highly individual, the creation of individual autonomic nervous systems and hormonal profiles would increase the accuracy of training stress modulation.
Abstract
The study purpose was to determine the relationship of resting heart rate variability (HRV) and testosterone to cortisol (T:C) ratio, along with the diagnostic ability of HRV to assess changes in T:C ratio during a 9-week high-intensity functional training intervention. Eight recreationally-active men (n = 4, age 24.25 ± 1.75 yrs, height 181.25 ± 3.86 cm, weight 79.68 ± 11.66 kg) and women (n = 4, age 26 ± 3.6 yrs, height 164.25 ± 3.3, weight 73.4 ± 8.42) completed daily HRV measurements (HRVdaily) using photoplethysmography via a commercially-available smartphone application along with weekly saliva samples. Saliva samples were analyzed for concentrations of testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Upon study completion 72 data points were available, due to participant compliance and inadequate saliva sample, 67 matched pairs of HRV and T:C ratio were analyzed. A statistically significant negative relationship (n = 67, r = -.315, p < 0.05) was found between HRVdaily and saliva T:C ratio concentrations within aggregate data. Individual participant relationships showed considerable variability (r = -0.101 - 0.665, p = 0.103 to 0.829 The model which best explained the data resulted in AIC = 130.247 with factors HRVdaily (β = -0.218, 95%CI = -0.391, -0.044, t = -2.46, p < 0.05), Sex (β = 0.450, 95%CI = -0.214, 1.114, t = 1.113, p = 0.242), and Group (β = -0.394, 95%CI = -1.089, 0.302, t = -1.11, p = 0.311). Diagnostically, HRVdaily demonstrates excellent sensitivity (95%), but poor specificity (5%) for detecting meaningful changes in T:C ratio. Assessment of HRVdaily may be a clinically valid proxy measure for monitoring hormonal changes throughout a training intervention.