0
selected
-
1.
The effect of gluten in adolescents and young adults with gastrointestinal symptoms: a blinded randomised cross-over trial.
Crawley, C, Savino, N, Halby, C, Sander, SD, Andersen, AN, Arumugam, M, Murray, J, Christensen, R, Husby, S
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2022;55(9):1116-1127
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gluten-free diet (GFD) has gained increasing popularity among healthy people without coeliac disease or wheat allergy. The main reasons for following a GFD are weight control, the perception that a GFD is healthier, and the presence of symptoms after gluten ingestion. The aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that adding gluten to the diet results in a self-reported worsening of gastrointestinal symptoms (primary outcome) and mental health (key secondary outcomes) in a well-characterised group of adolescents. This study was arranged in two phases; the first phase began with 2 weeks of a GFD, and if the participants responded to the GFD, they proceeded to phase 2. Phase 2 was a double-blinded randomised trial with cross-over and consisted of three periods, each lasting 7 days: (1) a challenge with gluten/placebo, (2) wash-out phase, and (3) the second challenge with placebo/gluten. Results show that it was not possible to detect a difference in symptoms between gluten and placebo at a group level. Furthermore, on an individual level, there was a comparable number of gluten responders and placebo responders, underscoring the insignificant difference between gluten and placebo. Authors conclude that adding gluten to the diet does not induce gastrointestinal symptoms or worsened mental health in adolescents.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The popularity of the gluten-free diet and sales of gluten-free products have increased immensely. AIMS To investigate whether gluten induces gastrointestinal symptoms, measured by self-reported questionnaires, as well as mental health symptoms in adolescents from a population-based cohort. METHODS The eligible participants (n = 273) were recruited from a population-based cohort of 1266 adolescents and had at least four different gastrointestinal symptoms. Phase one (n = 54) was a run-in phase where the participants lived gluten-free for 2 weeks. If they improved they continued to phase 2 (n = 33), a blinded randomised cross-over trial. Participants were blindly randomised either to start with 7 days of gluten, eating two granola bars containing 10 g of gluten or to 7 days on placebo, eating two granola bars without gluten, followed by the reverse and separated by a 7-day washout period. The effects of the intervention on gastrointestinal symptoms and mental health symptoms were assessed. RESULTS In total, 54/273 participants entered the run-in phase and 35 were eligible for randomization. A total of 33 were randomised and 32 completed the trial. The median age was 20.3 (IQR 19.2-20.9) and 32/33 participants were females. Compared with a placebo, gluten did not induce gastrointestinal symptoms. The difference in the average VAS was -0.01 (95% confidence interval -2.07 to 2.05). Nor did we find a difference in the outcomes measuring mental health. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, adding gluten to the diet did not induce gastrointestinal symptoms or worsened mental health in adolescents recruited from a population-based cohort. The trial registration number is NCT04639921.
-
2.
Gluten and FODMAPs Relationship with Mental Disorders: Systematic Review.
Aranburu, E, Matias, S, Simón, E, Larretxi, I, Martínez, O, Bustamante, MÁ, Fernández-Gil, MDP, Miranda, J
Nutrients. 2021;13(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is growing evidence that gluten and FODMAPs, such as fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols, can cause gastrointestinal symptoms, inflammation, and immune responses in patients with celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome. In addition, a high intake of gluten and FODMAPs may also be associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review to examine the relationship between gluten and FODMAP consumption and illnesses affecting the central nervous system. In addition, the studies examined the effects of potential dietary strategies that consider gluten and FODMAP intake on mental disorders, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism spectrum disorders. Several possible mechanisms identified in this systematic review could contribute to neurological and psychiatric disorders, including the release of proinflammatory cytokines, immune responses, gut dysbiosis, intestinal permeability, and interactions between the gut-brain axis. In patients with fibromyalgia, celiac disease, and irritable bowel syndrome, avoiding or limiting gluten may reduce depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. However, the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on the central nervous system are inconclusive. There is some evidence that gluten-free diets can improve cognition in schizophrenia patients. In addition, those with autism spectrum disorders may benefit from a gluten-free diet and a low-FODMAP diet. Further robust research is required to evaluate the beneficial effects of interventions that avoid or restrict the consumption of foods high in FODMAPs and gluten. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review to understand the potential benefits of therapeutic interventions that consider the intake of FODMAPs and gluten on illnesses affecting the central nervous system and their possible mechanisms of action.
Abstract
Nowadays, gluten and FODMAP food components (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) are increasingly studied due to their possible relation with extraintestinal-associated conditions. In recent years, gluten-free diets (GFD) and low-FODMAP diets (LFD) are becoming more popular not only in order to avoid the food components that cause intolerances or allergies in some people, but also due to the direct influence of marketing movements or diet trends on feeding habits. Likewise, neurological and psychiatric diseases are currently of increasing importance in developed countries. For this reason, a bibliographic systematic review has been carried out to analyse whether there is a pathophysiological relationship between the dietary intake of gluten or FODMAPs with mental disorders. This review collects 13 clinical and randomized controlled trials, based on the PRISMA statement, which have been published in the last ten years. Based on these results, limiting or ruling out gluten or FODMAPs in the diet might be beneficial for symptoms such as depression, anxiety (7 out of 7 articles found any positive effect), or cognition deficiency (improvements in several cognition test measurements in one trial), and to a lesser extent for schizophrenia and the autism spectrum. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to obtain completely reliable conclusions.
-
3.
Celiac Disease, Beyond the Bowel: A Review of Its Neurological Manifestations.
Patel, SC, Shreya, D, Zamora, DI, Patel, GS, Grossmann, I, Rodriguez, K, Soni, M, Joshi, PK, Sange, I
Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20112
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune condition in which genetically predisposed individuals develop an immunologic reaction to ingested gluten, a protein found in barley, wheat, and rye, destroying the intestinal villi. The aims of this review are to: (i) underline the pathogenic mechanism of the involvement of CD and its neurological manifestations; (ii) establish a clinical relationship between CD and its neurological manifestations; (iii) explore the existing screening and upcoming management guidelines of CD. This review shows that: - the most common neurological manifestations of CD include gluten ataxia, gluten neuropathy, and epilepsy. These conditions are strongly associated with a lower quality of life and a higher rate of hospitalisation. - neurological features of CD should be kept in mind in order to raise an adequate amount of clinical suspicion to perform screening for gluten sensitivity with the aim of reducing the time it takes for diagnosis, and thus patient suffering is kept to a minimum. Authors conclude that further thorough studies about neurological manifestations of CD are needed so that alternative treatment modalities are offered to provide a more holistic treatment approach to a patient with CD.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is a multi-systemic autoimmune condition that causes a hyperinflammatory response when gluten is ingested. There has been a shift in the clinical presentation of CD from a mere malabsorption disorder to an autoimmune condition that affects multiple organ systems, which could increase the rate of hospitalizations and a decreased quality of life. This article has compiled various studies that have explored the neurological manifestations of celiac disease, their epidemiology, possible pathogenic mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. The most common neurological conditions include gluten ataxia (GA), gluten neuropathy, gluten encephalopathy, and epilepsy which usually present as sporadic diseases which are difficult to diagnose in the absence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. The treatment for most of these conditions is a gluten-free diet (GFD) regardless of GI involvement.
-
4.
The Neuropathology of Gluten-Related Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Rouvroye, MD, Zis, P, Van Dam, AM, Rozemuller, AJM, Bouma, G, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2020;12(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder triggered by the ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. A wide range of extraintestinal manifestations has been attributed to CD, changing the classic perception of a disease limited to the intestine, to a multisystem disorder. The aim of this study was to analyse the published neuropathology of confirmed cases of gluten-related neurological dysfunction to aid our understanding of the pathogenesis. CD can therefore manifest with dental problems, consequences of malabsorption, skin and neurological disorders. This study is a systematic review of thirty-two neurological disorder focused studies. Results show that: - the neuropathological findings in gluten-related neurological disorders are widespread and not limited to the cerebellum. - the pathology is immune mediated and not related to vitamin or trace elements deficiencies. - the pathophysiology of neurological damage in the context of gluten sensitivity has an immune mediated basis. - more gluten-related neurological disorders affected men (57%), which was even higher in the ataxia group (76%). - transglutaminase 6 antibodies might be helpful in the diagnostic workup of gluten-related neurological disorders. Authors conclude that the current evidence is suggestive of both humoral and cell-mediated immunological responses. Further research is required to investigate the underlying neuropathological mechanism by characterisation of the inflammatory cell infiltrate and identification of target epitopes.
Abstract
Gluten-related neurological disorders (GRND) represent a spectrum of neurological manifestations that are triggered by gluten. In coeliac disease, a T-cell mediated enteropathy is triggered by gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. The underlying pathological mechanism of the neurological dysfunction is not yet clear. The aim of this review is to collate existing neuropathological findings in GRND as a means of aiding the understanding of the pathophysiology. A systematic search of the Pubmed Database yielded 188 articles, of which 32 were included, containing 98 eligible cases with a description of pathological findings in GRND. In gluten ataxia, loss of Purkinje cells, atrophy, gliosis and astrocytosis were apparent, as well as diffuse lymphocytic infiltration and perivascular cuffing with lymphocytes. In patients with large-fiber neuropathy, nerve biopsies revealed axonopathy, loss of myelinated fibers and focal and perivascular infiltration by inflammatory cells. Inflammatory infiltrate was also observed in muscle in myopathy and in cerebrum of patients with encephalopathy and patients with epilepsy. Such changes were not seen in skin biopsies from patients with small fiber neuropathies. The findings from this systematic review suggest an immune mediated pathogenesis for GRND. Future research should focus on the characterization of the inflammatory cell infiltrates and identifying target epitopes.
-
5.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
6.
Movement Disorders Related to Gluten Sensitivity: A Systematic Review.
Vinagre-Aragón, A, Zis, P, Grunewald, RA, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2018;10(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gluten related disorders (GRDs) is an umbrella term for diseases triggered by gluten, including coeliac disease and gluten sensitivity. People with GRDs may experience a wide range of symptoms including digestive and nervous system issues. Movement Disorders (MDs) refers to a group of nervous system conditions that cause abnormal movements, which may be voluntary or involuntary. This literature review looked at the current research on GRDs and MDs such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, restless leg syndrome and tremors. 48 papers were used for the review. Most papers looked at MDs in those diagnosed with coeliac disease, rather than other GRDs. The authors found many examples where the symptoms of MDs, including chorea, restless leg syndrome, stiff person syndrome and tics, improved on a gluten free diet. The authors concluded that gluten-related MDs may be more common than previously thought, and that following a gluten free diet can be beneficial in many cases. They recommended that gluten sensitivity and coeliac disease should be considered in patients with MDs of unknown cause.
Abstract
Gluten related disorders (GRD) represent a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations that are triggered by the ingestion of gluten. Coeliac disease (CD) or gluten sensitive enteropathy is the most widely recognised, but extra-intestinal manifestations have also been increasingly identified and reported. Such manifestations may exist in the absence of enteropathy. Gluten sensitivity (GS) is another term that has been used to include all GRD, including those where there is serological positivity for GS related antibodies in the absence of an enteropathy. Gluten ataxia (GA) is the commonest extraintestinal neurological manifestation and it has been the subject of many publications. Other movement disorders (MDs) have also been reported in the context of GS. The aim of this review was to assess the current available medical literature concerning MDs and GS with and without enteropathy. A systematic search was performed while using PubMed database. A total of 48 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present review. This review highlights that the phenomenology of gluten related MDs is broader than GA and demonstrates that gluten-free diet (GFD) is beneficial in a great percentage of such cases.
-
7.
Headache Associated with Coeliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zis, P, Julian, T, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2018;10(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is the best-recognised gluten-related disorder (GRD), and it is characterized by a small bowel enteropathy occurring in genetically susceptible individuals whilst exposed to the protein gliadin. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current literature in order to establish the relationship between headache and CD. This study is a systematic review of 40 articles, studying a total of 42,388 individuals with either headache or GRD. Results show that: - There is an increased prevalence of headache amongst patients with CD. - There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst patients with idiopathic headache. - Headaches associated with CD are mainly migraines. - Gluten-free diet is a very effective treatment for headaches associated with CD. Authors conclude that further studies on the prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with idiopathic headache are needed, including further research on the pathogenetic mechanisms.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to explore the relationship between coeliac disease (CD) and headache. The objectives were to establish the prevalence of each entity amongst the other, to explore the role of gluten free diet (GFD), and to describe the imaging findings in those affected by headaches associated with CD. METHODOLOGY A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on the PubMed database. Information regarding study type, population size, the age group included, prevalence of CD amongst those with headache and vice versa, imaging results, the nature of headache, and response to GFD. RESULTS In total, 40 articles published between 1987 and 2017 qualified for inclusion in this review. The mean pooled prevalence of headache amongst those with CD was 26% (95% CI 19.5⁻33.9%) in adult populations and 18.3% (95% CI 10.4⁻30.2%) in paediatric populations. The headaches are most often migraine-like. In children with idiopathic headache, the prevalence of CD is 2.4% (95% CI 1.5⁻3.7%), whereas data for adult populations is presently unavailable. Brain imaging can be normal, although, cerebral calcifications on CT, white matter abnormalities on MRI and deranged regional cerebral blood flow on SPECT can be present. GFD appears to be an effective management for headache in the context of CD, leading to total resolution of headaches in up to 75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is an increased prevalence of CD amongst idiopathic headache and vice versa. Therefore, patients with headache of unknown origin should be screened for CD, as such patients may symptomatically benefit from a GFD.
-
8.
Mood Disorders and Gluten: It's Not All in Your Mind! A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Busby, E, Bold, J, Fellows, L, Rostami, K
Nutrients. 2018;10(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gluten is a protein found in grains such as wheat, barley and rye. For some people, gluten can cause serious health issues such as coeliac disease (CD). A growing body of research suggests that mood symptoms are associated with gluten-related disorders. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish whether a relationship exists between mood and gluten consumption. 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A gluten-free diet (GFD) significantly reduced depressive symptoms in 953 participants overall. Subgroup analyses revealed no difference in effect on mood between those with and without diagnosed CD or between those with a genetic predisposition to CD. In patients diagnosed with classical CD, a GFD resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mood symptoms, whereas the effect for silent CD patients was not significant. The authors concluded that gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. Future studies should focus on gluten and mood in participants without a gut-related disorder, for example, in a population sample with depression. Finally, the level of support available to help a patient in maintaining a GFD diet over time should be carefully considered when recommending a GFD in practice.
Abstract
Gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. However, the directionality of the relationship remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of prospective studies for effects of gluten on mood symptoms in patients with or without gluten-related disorders. Six electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were searched, from inception to 8 August 2018, for prospective studies published in English. Meta-analyses with random-effects were performed. Three randomised-controlled trials and 10 longitudinal studies comprising 1139 participants fit the inclusion criteria. A gluten-free diet (GFD) significantly improved pooled depressive symptom scores in GFD-treated patients (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.55 to -0.20; p < 0.0001), with no difference in mean scores between patients and healthy controls after one year (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.20, p = 0.94). There was a tendency towards worsening symptoms for non-coeliac gluten sensitive patients during a blinded gluten challenge vs. placebo (SMD 0.21, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.15; p = 0.25). Our review supports the association between mood disorders and gluten intake in susceptible individuals. The effects of a GFD on mood in subjects without gluten-related disorders should be considered in future research.