1.
Referral to Slimming World in UK Stop Smoking Services (SWISSS) versus stop smoking support alone on body weight in quitters: results of a randomised controlled trial.
Lycett, D, Aveyard, P, Farmer, A, Lewis, A, Munafò, M
BMJ open. 2020;10(1):e032271
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Weight gain is a well-known consequence of smoking cessation. The aim of this study was to compare standard stop smoking behavioural support with an intervention that, in addition to providing standard stop smoking support, included personalised weight management support, provided by Slimming World. This study is a parallel group, individually randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomised (1:1) to usual care or Slimming World with usual care. Stop smoking advisors were unaware of the randomisation sequence. Results showed that referral to the Slimming World programme plus usual stop smoking support achieved significantly less weight gain than usual stop smoking support alone. Furthermore, percentage quit was no worse in the treatment than the control group. Authors conclude that referral to a behavioural weight loss programme may be a pragmatic option within stop smoking clinics.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most people who stop smoking gain weight. Dietary modification may seem an obvious solution, but food restriction may increase cigarette craving and smoking relapse. TRIAL DESIGN An unblinded parallel randomised controlled trial. METHODS Participants were adult smokers with a body mass index greater or equal to 23 kg/m2. Setting was National Health Service commissioned Stop Smoking Services, interventions were referral to a commercial weight management programme, plus stop smoking support (treatment group), compared with stop smoking support alone (control group). Objective was to compare weight change between interventions in smoking abstainers and not abstinent rates in all. Primary outcome was change in weight (kg) at 12 weeks. Randomisation sequence was computer generated and concealed until allocation. RESULTS Seventy-six participants were recruited, 37 were randomised to the treatment group and 39 to the control group. Change in weight was analysed in long-term abstainers (13 treatment, 14 control) only because the aim was to prevent weight gain associated with smoking cessation. Abstinence was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis (37 treatment, 39 control). At 12 weeks weight gain was less in the treatment than the control group with an adjusted mean difference of -2.3 kg 95% CI (-4.4 to -0.1). Craving scores were lower (Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale craving domain -1.6 (-2.7 to -0.5)) and quit rates were higher in the treatment than the control group (32% vs 21%), although the trial was not powered to superiority in cravings and quit rates. No adverse events or side effects were reported. CONCLUSION In people who are obese and want to quit smoking, these data provide modest encouragement that providing weight management at the time of quitting may be helpful. Those who are not obese, but who are informed about potential weight gain during their quit attempt, were uninterested in a weight management programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN65705512.
2.
The Role of Diet and Nutrition in Migraine Triggers and Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review.
Hindiyeh, NA, Zhang, N, Farrar, M, Banerjee, P, Lombard, L, Aurora, SK
Headache. 2020;60(7):1300-1316
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Migraine is a disabling primary headache disorder with 2 major subtypes: migraine without aura and migraine with aura. Certain foods, such as chocolate, caffeine, milk, cheese and alcoholic beverages, have been identified as common triggers of migraine attacks. The aim of this study was to qualitatively summarize data from randomized controlled trials or observational studies on the role of diet patterns, diet-related triggers, and dietary interventions in adults with migraine. This study is a systematic review of forty-three articles. Of the studies included in the review, 11 outlined the evidence on diet patterns, 20 outlined the evidence on diet-related triggers, and 12 outlined evidence on diet as interventions in people with migraine. Results show that evidence regarding the effect of general diet patterns in people with migraine varied in the studies identified. Furthermore, limited high-quality evidence was found. Authors conclude that certain dietary interventions may help to improve clinical outcomes in some people with migraine, but these findings still need to be supported with robust evidence before being recommended for use in clinical practice.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a disabling primary headache disorder often associated with triggers. Diet-related triggers are a common cause of migraine and certain diets have been reported to decrease the frequency of migraine attacks if dietary triggers or patterns are adjusted. OBJECTIVE The systematic literature review was conducted to qualitatively summarize evidence from the published literature regarding the role of diet patterns, diet-related triggers, and diet interventions in people with migraine. METHODS A literature search was carried out on diet patterns, diet-related triggers, and diet interventions used to treat and/or prevent migraine attacks, using an a priori protocol. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies assessing the effect of diet, food, and nutrition in people with migraine aged ≥18 years. Only primary literature sources (randomized controlled trials or observational studies) were included and searches were conducted from January 2000 to March 2019. The NICE checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of randomized controlled trials and the Downs and Black checklist was used for the assessment of observational studies. RESULTS A total of 43 studies were included in this review, of which 11 assessed diet patterns, 12 assessed diet interventions, and 20 assessed diet-related triggers. The overall quality of evidence was low, as most of the (68%) studies assessing diet patterns and diet-related triggers were cross-sectional studies or patient surveys. The studies regarding diet interventions assessed a variety of diets, such as ketogenic diet, elimination diets, and low-fat diets. Alcohol and caffeine uses were the most common diet patterns and diet-related triggers associated with increased frequency of migraine attacks. Most of the diet interventions, such as low-fat and elimination diets, were related to a decrease in the frequency of migraine attacks. CONCLUSIONS There is limited high-quality randomized controlled trial data on diet patterns or diet-related triggers. A few small randomized controlled trials have assessed diet interventions in preventing migraine attacks without strong results. Although many patients already reported avoiding personal diet-related triggers in their migraine management, high-quality research is needed to confirm the effect of diet in people with migraine.
3.
A Randomized Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial of very Low-Calorie Diet in Overweight Migraine Patients: A Possible Role for Ketones?
Di Lorenzo, C, Pinto, A, Ienca, R, Coppola, G, Sirianni, G, Di Lorenzo, G, Parisi, V, Serrao, M, Spagnoli, A, Vestri, A, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The ketogenic diet (KD) constitutes high-fat, adequate protein, and low-carbohydrate, and has been proven to be efficacious for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Recently, KD showed promising results for treating other neurological conditions. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of very low-calorie ketogenic diets (VLCKDs) in overweight episodic migraine patients during a weight-loss intervention. This study is a double-blind cross-over design randomised trial (of five phases). Participants eligible for trial participation were overweight/obese adults, aged 18 to 65 years, who had at least 12 months’ history of migraines with or without aura. Subjects alternated randomly between a very low-calorie ketogenic diet and a very low-calorie non-ketogenic diet (VLCnKD) each for one month. Results indicate that a 4-week period VLCKD, despite inducing similar weight loss and glycaemic profile, was significantly more effective than VLCnKD in preventing migraine attacks, as evidenced by a decrease in the frequency of migraine days and attacks, and a greater than 50% response rate. Authors conclude that VLCKD is effective for rapid, short-term improvement of migraines in overweight patients, while VLCnKD is not.
Abstract
Here we aimed at determining the therapeutic effect of a very low-calorie diet in overweight episodic migraine patients during a weight-loss intervention in which subjects alternated randomly between a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) and a very low-calorie non-ketogenic diet (VLCnKD) each for one month. In a nutritional program, 35 overweight obese migraine sufferers were allocated blindly to 1-month successive VLCKD or VLCnKD in random order (VLCKD-VLCnKD or VLCnKD-VLCD). The primary outcome measure was the reduction of migraine days each month compared to a 1-month pre-diet baseline. Secondary outcome measures were 50% responder rate for migraine days, reduction of monthly migraine attacks, abortive drug intake and body mass index (BMI) change. Only data from the intention-to-treat cohort (n = 35) will be presented. Patients who dropped out (n = 6) were considered as treatment failures. Regarding the primary outcome, during the VLCKD patients experienced -3.73 (95% CI: -5.31, -2.15) migraine days respect to VLCnKD (p < 0.0001). The 50% responder rate for migraine days was 74.28% (26/35 patients) during the VLCKD period, but only 8.57% (3/35 patients) during VLCnKD. Migraine attacks decreased by -3.02 (95% CI: -4.15, -1.88) during VLCKD respect to VLCnKD (p < 0.00001). There were no differences in the change of acute anti-migraine drug consumption (p = 0.112) and BMI (p = 0.354) between the 2 diets. A VLCKD has a preventive effect in overweight episodic migraine patients that appears within 1 month, suggesting that ketogenesis may be a useful therapeutic strategy for migraines.
4.
Changes in Eating Behaviors of Children with Obesity in Response to Carbohydrate-Modified and Portion-Controlled Diets.
Kirk, S, Woo, JG, Brehm, B, Daniels, SR, Saelens, BE
Childhood obesity (Print). 2017;13(5):377-383
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Paediatric obesity has been shown to be managed most effectively when interventions with multiple components, such as dietary changes, physical activity, supportive parental involvement, and behavioural strategies are included. The aim to the study was to evaluate whether baseline or changes in psychological dimensions of eating behaviours could account for variability in weight status outcomes. For this study, children aged between 7 – 12 years with a fasting blood glucose level of ≤100mg/dl and with a BMI z-score of 1.60 – 2.65 were recruited. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three diet groups (low carbohydrate, reduced glycaemic load or portion-controlled diet). The study results show that eating behaviours improved significantly with all diets, and increased cognitive restraint and decreased hunger were sustained at 12 months. Disinhibition also remained significantly lower at 12 months for the reduced glycaemic load group. Authors conclude that targeting diets to youth with obesity who have specific characteristics such as sex, race, and/or lower baseline hunger or higher baseline cognitive restraint scores may lead to better outcomes.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study's objective was to determine whether two distinct carbohydrate (CHO)-modified diets and a standard portion-controlled (PC) diet differentially impacted children's eating behaviors and whether eating behavior scores predicted lower BMI among children with obesity. METHODS Children (n = 102) aged 7-12 years with obesity were randomly assigned to a 12-month intervention of a low-carbohydrate (LC), reduced glycemic load (RGL), or standard PC diet. The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was completed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months by parents to characterize their child's hunger (H), disinhibition (D), and cognitive restraint (CR). Baseline and follow-up TFEQ scores by diet were evaluated relative to BMI status over time. RESULTS All diet groups showed increased CR and decreased H and D from baseline to 3 months, with differences from baseline remaining at 12 months for CR and H. Lower BMI status during study follow-up was associated with different TFEQ scores by diet group (LC and RGL: higher CR; PC: lower H), adjusting for sex, age, and race. Higher CR at follow-up was predicted by race and higher baseline CR; only lower H at baseline predicted lower H at follow-up. CONCLUSION Eating behaviors improved significantly with all diets during the initial 3 months; higher CR and lower H were sustained at treatment's end. BMI outcomes were associated with different eating behaviors in CHO-modified diet groups compared with PC diets. Targeting diets of children with obesity with specific baseline characteristics may lead to improved outcomes.