1.
HOMEFOOD randomised trial - Six-month nutrition therapy improves quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in older adults after hospital discharge.
Blondal, BS, Geirsdottir, OG, Halldorsson, TI, Beck, AM, Jonsson, PV, Ramel, A
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2022;48:74-81
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is well known that older people are at a higher risk for nutritional inadequacy which is accompanied by depression, impaired cognitive function, and poor overall health. In this secondary analysis of a randomised controlled assessor-blinded dietary intervention trial, the authors examined the effects of six months of nutritional therapy on quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in elderly patients aged 65 years and over. The participants in the intervention group received nutritional therapy (HOMEFOOD) education to overcome malnutrition, which included dietary recommendations to ensure an adequate nutritional intake of energy and protein through diet and additional supplemental protein and energy-rich foods. After six months of nutritional therapy, the intervention group showed improvement in cognitive function, self-rated health, depression score, and quality of life scores, as well as improvements in measures related to weight gain. Further studies need to be conducted in order to determine if nutritional therapy provides additional benefits to older people. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to better understand how nutritional therapy can improve the quality of life and health of older people in comparison to standard care, so they can better advise their patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Malnutrition is common among older adults and is related to quality of life, cognitive function, and depression. To what extent nutrition interventions can improve these outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nutrition therapy on health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in community dwelling older adults recently discharged from hospital. METHODS Participants (>65 years) were randomised into an intervention (n = 53) and a control group (n = 53). The intervention group received individualised nutrition therapy based on the nutrition care process including 5 home visits and 3 phone calls, in combination with freely delivered energy- and protein-rich foods and oral nutrition supplements for six months after hospital discharge. EQ-5D, self-rated health, Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE), and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression - IOWA (CES-D) scale were measured at baseline and at endpoint. RESULTS Two subjects dropped out, one from each arm. The control group experienced an increase in depressive symptoms and a decrease in self-rated health during the study period, while the intervention group experienced increases in cognitive function, self-rated health, and EQ-5D resulting in significant endpoint differences between the groups: EQ-5D (0.102, P = 0.001); self-rated health: 15.876 (P < 0.001); MMSE 1.701 (P < 0.001); depressive symptoms: - 3.072 (P < 0.001); all in favour of the intervention group. Improvements during the intervention in MMSE, self-rated health, and CES-D were significantly related to body weight gain in a linear way. CONCLUSION Cognitive function and mental well-being worsen or stagnate in older adults who receive standard care after hospital discharge. However, a six-month nutrition therapy improves these outcomes leading to statistically and clinically significant endpoint differences between the groups. As improvements were related to body weight gain after hospital discharge, we conclude that the increase in dietary intake, with focus on energy and protein density, and changes in body weight might have contributed to better cognitive function and mental well-being in older adults after the intervention.
2.
A Systematic Review of the Impact of the First Year of COVID-19 on Obesity Risk Factors: A Pandemic Fueling a Pandemic?
Daniels, NF, Burrin, C, Chan, T, Fusco, F
Current developments in nutrition. 2022;6(4):nzac011
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the most serious infectious disease outbreaks in recent history. Among the factors that can increase the risk of obesity, some seem to play a more prominent role than others such as depression, emotional eating, sedentary lifestyle and the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. This study is a systematic review of 87 studies with over 350,000 participants. Results show that: - overall, there was a general trend of weight gain during the pandemic. - there were differences in dietary changes, with some studies showing an improvement in diet. - some beneficial effects were observed in the dieting domain, such as higher consumption of home-cooked meals and healthy food (e.g., vegetables). However, there was an increasing trend in the overall food and alcohol consumption. - financial hardship and job loss were unavoidable consequences of the pandemic lockdown. However, although the impact of the countermeasures used to curb the COVID-19 pandemic was evident on obesity risk factors, none of the studies included in the research explored the direct impact of the risk factors on obesity itself. Authors conclude by pointing out the need for future research that aims at strengthening the link between stressful circumstances and a rise in risk factors for obesity and weight gain.
Abstract
Obesity is increasingly prevalent worldwide. Associated risk factors, including depression, socioeconomic stress, poor diet, and lack of physical activity, have all been impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This systematic review aims to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 to identify relevant studies pertaining to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (PROSPERO; CRD42020219433). All English-language studies on weight change and key obesity risk factors (psychosocial and socioeconomic health) during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for inclusion. Of 805 full-text articles that were reviewed, 87 were included for analysis. The included studies observed increased food and alcohol consumption, increased sedentary time, worsening depressive symptoms, and increased financial stress. Overall, these results suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the current risk factors for obesity and is likely to worsen obesity rates in the near future. Future studies, and policy makers, will need to carefully consider their interdependency to develop effective interventions able to mitigate the obesity pandemic.
3.
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pagliai, G, Dinu, M, Madarena, MP, Bonaccio, M, Iacoviello, L, Sofi, F
The British journal of nutrition. 2021;125(3):308-318
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Ultra-processed foods (UPF) are, according to the NOVA classification, “formulations of ingredients, mostly for industrial use only, derived from a series of industrial processes”. UPF represents an important and growing part of the world’s food supply. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between UPF consumption as defined by NOVA and health status. This study is systematic review with meta-analysis of all the cross-sectional and cohort studies published to-date. At the end of the selection process, twenty-three articles were included in the qualitative analysis and nineteen in the quantitative analysis. Results indicate the possible association between high UPF consumption, worse cardiometabolic risk profile (reported by an increased risk of overweight/obesity, elevated waist circumference, reduced high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and increased risk of the metabolic syndrome), and greater risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease and depression. Authors conclude that their findings have important public health implications, especially for food policymakers who should discourage the consumption of UPF and promote fresh and minimally processed foods to improve health status.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that high consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is associated with an increase in non-communicable diseases, overweight and obesity. The present study systematically reviewed all observational studies that investigated the association between UPF consumption and health status. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted, and reference lists of included articles were checked. Only cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies were included. At the end of the selection process, twenty-three studies (ten cross-sectional and thirteen prospective cohort studies) were included in the systematic review. As regards the cross-sectional studies, the highest UPF consumption was associated with a significant increase in the risk of overweight/obesity (+39 %), high waist circumference (+39 %), low HDL-cholesterol levels (+102 %) and the metabolic syndrome (+79 %), while no significant associations with hypertension, hyperglycaemia or hypertriacylglycerolaemia were observed. For prospective cohort studies evaluating a total population of 183 491 participants followed for a period ranging from 3·5 to 19 years, highest UPF consumption was found to be associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in five studies (risk ratio (RR) 1·25, 95 % CI 1·14, 1·37; P < 0·00001), increased risk of CVD in three studies (RR 1·29, 95 % CI 1·12, 1·48; P = 0·0003), cerebrovascular disease in two studies (RR 1·34, 95 % CI 1·07, 1·68; P = 0·01) and depression in two studies (RR 1·20, 95 % CI 1·03, 1·40; P = 0·02). In conclusion, increased UPF consumption was associated, although in a limited number of studies, with a worse cardiometabolic risk profile and a higher risk of CVD, cerebrovascular disease, depression and all-cause mortality.
4.
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.
Chen, X, Zhang, Z, Yang, H, Qiu, P, Wang, H, Wang, F, Zhao, Q, Fang, J, Nie, J
Nutrition journal. 2020;19(1):86
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Unhealthy diets are recognized as a major determinant of the occurrence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence for the association between ultra-processed food (UPFs) consumption and health outcomes. This study is a systemic review of 20 published epidemiological studies (12 cohort and 8 cross-sectional studies), with a total of 334,114 participants and 10 diseases. Results indicate a positive association between UPFs consumption and risk of all-cause mortality, overall cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, overweight and obesity, depression, irritable bowel syndrome, overall cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, gestational obesity, adolescent asthma and wheezing, and frailty. However, on the contrary, there was not an obvious association with cardiovascular disease mortality, prostate and colorectal cancer, gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational overweight. Authors conclude that their findings encouraged a decrease in UPFs consumption and an increase in the proportion of unprocessed or minimally processed foods, such as fruits and vegetables.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) plays a potential role in the development of obesity and other diet-related noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), but no studies have systematically focused on this. This study aimed to summarize the evidence for the association between UPFs consumption and health outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies. Epidemiological studies were included, and identified studies were evaluated for risk of bias.A narrative review of the synthesized findings was provided to assess the association between UPFs consumption and health outcomes. RESULTS 20 studies (12 cohort and 8 cross-sectional studies) were included in the analysis, with a total of 334,114 participants and 10 health outcomes. In a narrative review, high UPFs consumption was obviously associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, overall cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, overweight and obesity, depression, irritable bowel syndrome, overall cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, gestational obesity, adolescent asthma and wheezing, and frailty. It showed no significant association with cardiovascular disease mortality, prostate and colorectal cancers, gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational overweight. CONCLUSIONS This study indicated a positive association between UPFs consumption and risk of several health outcomes. Large-scale prospective designed studies are needed to confirm our findings.