-
1.
Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.
Schroor, MM, Joris, PJ, Plat, J, Mensink, RP
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2024;15(1):100130
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets, such as the 5:2 diet, time-restricted eating (TRE), and alternate-day fasting (ADF), are gaining popularity. According to previous research, IER protocols effectively manage obesity and may have many other health benefits, including improving metabolic health. This systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-eight parallel-design randomised controlled trials looked at the benefits of IER protocols, such as ADF, TRE, and the 5:2 diet, and the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that both the IER and CER are equally beneficial. However, IER protocols showed greater but clinically insignificant improvements in fat-free mass and waist circumference in healthy adults. IER and CER protocols were not different in improving the lipid profile, glucose and insulin levels and blood pressure. Different IER diets showed different positive effects on metabolic parameters. Future robust studies are required to assess the effects of these energy-restriction diets on metabolic and anthropometric parameters because of the high variability in the included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the potential clinical utility of various energy-restriction diets.
Abstract
The interest in intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets as a weight-loss approach is increasing. Different IER protocols exist, including time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and the 5:2 diet. This meta-analysis compared the effects of these IER diets with continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy adults. Twenty-eight trials were identified that studied TRE (k = 7), ADF (k = 10), or the 5:2 diet (k = 11) for 2-52 wk. Energy intakes between intervention groups within a study were comparable (17 trials), lower in IER (5 trials), or not reported (6 trials). Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. Changes in body weight [WMD: -0.42 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.96 to 0.13; P = 0.132] and fat mass (FM) (WMD: -0.31 kg; 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.36; P = 0.362) were comparable when results of the 3 IER diets were combined and compared with those of CER. All IER diets combined reduced fat-free mass (WMD: -0.20 kg; 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.01; P = 0.044) and waist circumference (WMD: -0.91 cm; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.06; P = 0.036) more than CER. Effects on body mass index [BMI (kg/m2)], glucose, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, and blood pressure did not differ. Further, TRE reduced body weight, FM, and fat-free mass more than CER, whereas ADF improved HOMA-IR more. BMI was reduced less in the 5:2 diet compared with CER. In conclusion, the 3 IER diets combined did not lead to superior improvements in anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers compared with CER diets. Slightly greater reductions were, however, observed in fat-free mass and waist circumference. To what extent differences in energy intakes between groups within studies may have influenced these outcomes should be addressed in future studies.
-
2.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body compositions of people with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective longitudinal observational study.
Sawada, M, Ohkuma, K, Aihara, M, Doi, S, Sekine, R, Kaneko, T, Iimuro, S, Ichi, I, Usami, S, Ohe, K, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2023;14(2):321-328
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted to evaluate the prognosis of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in people with diabetes mellitus have reported an approximately two- to three-fold higher risk of mortality from COVID-19 in people with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the state of emergency on the glycaemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. This study is a retrospective, longitudinal observational study in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 408 participants were included in this study, including 239 men (58.6%) and 169 women (41.4%). People with type 2 diabetes mellitus were predominant in this study (96.8%). Results show that: - there was a significant increase of the haemoglobin A1c level in people with diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic. - there was an increase in the changes in body weight and percent fat (increased) and skeletal muscle masses (decreased). Authors conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic caused a negative impact on the glycaemic control and body composition in people with diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the increase of body weight and fat mass and the decrease of the skeletal muscle mass during the pandemic were associated with poor glycaemic control, independent of the age and sex, in people with diabetes mellitus.
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus; to identify the determinants of worsening glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal observational study was performed in outpatients with diabetes mellitus who visited our hospital between April 2019 and March 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period) and continued for follow up from April 2020 to March 2021 (COVID-19 period). We compared the glycemic control, nutritional intakes, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus between the two periods. The changes in the HbA1c values (ΔHbA1c) and other study variables were compared between the two periods. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the increase of HbA1c levels. RESULTS A significant increase of HbA1c was observed during the COVID-19 period. The percent fat mass (FM) also increased, while the percent skeletal muscle mass (SMM) decreased during the COVID-19 period. After adjustments for age and sex, the ΔBMI (OR:2.33), ΔFM (OR:1.45), and ΔSMM (OR:0.51) were identified as being associated with elevated levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the glycemic control and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. The increased body weight and FM and decreased SMM observed during the pandemic were associated with poor glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.
-
3.
Nuts and seeds consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and their risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnesen, EK, Thorisdottir, B, Bärebring, L, Söderlund, F, Nwaru, BI, Spielau, U, Dierkes, J, Ramel, A, Lamberg-Allardt, C, Åkesson, A
Food & nutrition research. 2023;67
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nuts and seeds consumption is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nuts and seeds contain beneficial components to reduce the risk of CVD and CHD; hence dietary addition may benefit heart health. This systematic review and meta-analysis included sixty studies to analyse the effects of the consumption of nuts and seeds on the incidence of mortality from type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CVD and intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors. High nuts and seed consumption showed a 19% reduction in CVD risk and a 23% reduction in CVD mortality. In addition, high consumption lowered the risk of CHD by 25%. Increased nut consumption up to 30 g/day showed a dose-dependent relationship with reduced risk of CVD. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the association between nuts and seeds consumption and CHD, CVD and blood lipid levels. However, further robust studies are required to evaluate the effect of specific nuts and seeds on CHD and CVD risk reduction.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to systematically review studies and evaluate the strength of the evidence on nuts/seeds consumption and cardiometabolic diseases and their risk factors among adults. METHODS A protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270554). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus up to September 20, 2021 for prospective cohort studies and ≥12-week randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and type 2 diabetes (T2D), secondary total-/low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, blood pressure and glycaemic markers. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessments (using RoB 2.0 and RoB-NObS) were performed in duplicate. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and expressed as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI); heterogeneity quantified as I 2. One-stage dose-response analyses assessed the linear and non-linear associations with CVD, CHD, stroke and T2D. The strength of evidence was classified per the World Cancer Research Fund criteria. RESULTS After screening 23,244 references, we included 42 papers from cohort studies (28 unique cohorts, 1,890,573 participants) and 18 RCTs (2,266 participants). In the cohorts, mainly populations with low consumption, high versus low total nuts/seeds consumption was inversely associated with total CVD (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.75, 0.86; I 2 = 67%), CVD mortality (0.77; 0.72, 0.82; I 2 = 59.3%), CHD (0.82; 0.76, 0.89; I 2 = 64%), CHD mortality (0.75; 0.65, 0.87; I 2 = 66.9%) and non-fatal CHD (0.85; 0.75, 0.96; I 2 = 62.2%). According to the non-linear dose-response analyses, consumption of 30 g/day of total nuts/seeds was associated with RRs of similar magnitude. For stroke and T2D the summary RR for high versus low intake was 0.91 (95% CI 0.85, 0.97; I 2 = 24.8%) and 0.95 (0.75, 1.21; I 2 = 82.2%). Intake of nuts (median ~50 g/day) lowered total (-0.15 mmol/L; -0.22, -0.08; I 2 = 31.2%) and LDL-cholesterol (-0.13 mmol/L; -0.21, -0.05; I 2 = 68.6%), but not blood pressure. Findings on fasting glucose, HbA1c and insulin resistance were conflicting. The results were robust to sensitivity and subgroup analyses. We rated the associations between nuts/seeds and both CVD and CHD as probable. There was limited but suggestive evidence for no association with stroke. No conclusion could be made for T2D. CONCLUSION There is a probable relationship between consumption of nuts/seeds and lower risk of CVD, mostly driven by CHD, possibly in part through effects on blood lipids. More research on stroke and T2D may affect the conclusions. The evidence of specific nuts should be further investigated.
-
4.
Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Young, IE, Poobalan, A, Steinbeck, K, O'Connor, HT, Parker, HM
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023;24(3):e13537
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity increases an individual's risk of metabolic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis, and some cancers. “Chrononutrition” relates to the timing of meals and distribution of total energy intake across the day. Evidence is building chrononutrition as a potential target in both weight loss and metabolic disease interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss, and to evaluate the potential for utilizing altered energy distribution as a tool in weight loss interventions. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Total number of participants was 485 (earlier distributed total energy intakes: n = 244, later distributed total energy intakes; n = 241). Results show that energy intakes with a focus on earlier distribution resulted in significantly greater weight loss when compared with similarly energy-restricted diets with individuals consuming a larger proportion of their total energy intake later in the day and into the evening. Authors conclude that earlier energy intakes may be a promising tool to be used in conjunction with other weight loss strategies such as energy restriction to enhance weight loss. However, further research is required to elucidate the additional positive impacts that earlier distributed total energy intakes may have on weight and metabolic health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Implementing a dietary strategy where a higher proportion of energy is consumed earlier in the day may offer additional benefits to an energy restricted diet for weight loss, blood glucose, improve markers of insulin resistance, increase satiety and improve hunger management. Based on the findings, earlier distribution of energy intake may serve as an effective component of a weight loss protocol.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Chrononutrition refers to the timing and distribution of total daily energy intake across the day. It has been proposed that consuming a greater proportion of total daily energy intake earlier in the day as opposed to the evening may be beneficial for weight loss and metabolic health.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss.
Results
A total of 9 randomised controlled trials involving 485 participants were included in this analysis. The study durations ranged from 5-16 weeks. All of the studies included in this analysis applied energy-restricted diets to both intervention arms. The mean percentages of energy intake in 8 of the 9 studies per meal were:
- Earlier distributed intakes: breakfast: 34% ± 16%, lunch: 38% ± 7%, dinner: 20% ± 6%.
- Later distributed intakes: breakfast: 19% ± 6%, lunch: 30% ± 10%, dinner; 40% ± 11%.
One of the studies advised percentage of energy intakes as either:
- Earlier: 70% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 30% for afternoon tea and dinner
- Late: 55% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 45% for afternoon tea and dinner.
The earlier distributed energy intake groups demonstrated significantly greater weight loss when compared with later distributed energy intake groups ( Mean Difference (MD) −1.23 kg; 95% CI −2.40, −0.06, p = 0.04;
I2 = 98%).
The earlier energy intake groups also displayed lower fasting and bedtime glucose levels (fasting: −0.83 vs. −0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.001; before sleep: −1.70 vs. −0.28 mmol/L, p = 0.009).
A random-effects model demonstrated that the earlier intake groups displayed greater reductions in LDL (MD: −0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, −0.07, p < 0.01), fasting glucose (MD: 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.23, −0.06, p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (MD: −0.38; 95% CI −0.64, −0.11, p = 0.005).
One study reported that earlier distribution energy intake also led to a greater reduction in medications following the intervention for type 2 diabetics (31% vs. 0%, P=0.002).
Two of the studies assessed both appetite and hunger and identified that earlier distribution of energy led to improvements in their urge to eat, preoccupation with food and cravings for sweets and fats.
Clinical practice applications:
Earlier distribution of energy intake may be beneficial for:
- Weight loss
- Improve fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose and HbA1c
- Reducing LDL
- Improving satiety and hunger management
- Supporting the reduction of medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes
- Improving regularity of sleep and waking times
Considerations for future research:
As the included studies only ranged from 5-16 weeks, longer duration studies would be useful to identify the effect of earlier distribution of energy intake on body weight, metabolic health and appetite over a longer period of time. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies and a lack of uniformity in the distributions of energy intake across the day. Further studies with more uniformity of energy distribution would be needed to identify the optimal distribution of energy across the day to improve body weight and metabolic health.
Abstract
Consuming a greater proportion of total energy intake earlier in the day rather than in the evening is proposed to positively influence weight loss and health, potentially due to greater synchronization of human body circadian rhythms. This systematic review provides an update on existing evidence regarding earlier distributed eating patterns in weight loss interventions. Using a robust search strategy in five electronic databases, nine randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of energy intake distribution on weight loss were identified. Following critical appraisal, a random-effects meta-analyses found that, in the context of an energy-reduced diet, distributing energy intake with a focus on earlier intake resulted in significantly greater weight loss (-1.23 kg; 95% CI 2.40, -0.06, p = 0.04). Improvements in HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, and LDL cholesterol were also seen. The current study provides a timely update on the evidence linking distribution of total daily energy intake and health, showing that a focus on earlier intakes can result in greater short-term weight loss compared with later intakes. Future studies are needed to elucidate the impact that earlier intakes may have on weight management and metabolic health.
-
5.
Treatment of obesity and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease with a diet or orlistat: A randomized controlled trial.
Feng, X, Lin, Y, Zhuo, S, Dong, Z, Shao, C, Ye, J, Zhong, B
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(4):691-700
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is characterised by excessive lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. Weight management by the treatment to target strategy through lifestyle intervention remains the primary approach for MAFLD treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a conventional energy-restricted diet (the control group), orlistat, and an experimental diet in the Asian population with obesity and MAFLD. This study was a prospective, open-label, monocentric randomised controlled study. Participants (n = 118) were randomly assigned to the control (n = 39), orlistat (n = 40), or experimental diet (n = 39) groups at a 1:1:1 allocation. Results showed that: - orlistat and the experimental diet were superior to lifestyle intervention in ameliorating liver steatosis [fatty liver]. - the experimental diet had an advantage over lifestyle intervention when patients adhered to the diet. - orlistat was superior to the experimental diet and lifestyle modifications in decreasing liver fat content. Authors conclude that more multicentre, large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify the long-term efficacy and safety of the experimental diet and orlistat treatment in subjects with MAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Losing weight by lifestyle interventions is the first-line treatment for metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) but is limited by low compliance. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the effects of orlistat or an experimental high-protein/lower-carbohydrate diet with a control diet in Asian patients with obesity and MAFLD. METHODS A total of 118 Asian patients with obesity and MAFLD confirmed with MRI-based proton density fat fraction with Dixon sequence were enrolled and allocated to the control group, the orlistat group, or the experimental diet group for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was the relative change in liver fat content (LFC) assessed by MRI-based proton density fat fraction. RESULTS A total of 118 subjects with obesity and MAFLD were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 39), the orlistat group (n = 40), or the experimental diet group (n = 39). All 3 groups demonstrated improvement in liver steatosis at wk 24. The absolute decrease in LFC in the orlistat group was 9.1% and 5.4% in the experimental diet group, both significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The relative reduction in LFC was 30.2% in the experimental diet group, which was significantly higher than the 12.2% observed in the control group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Orlistat and the experimental diet group reduced liver steatosis compared to the control group. This trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-1900027172). http://www.chictr.org.cn.
-
6.
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Patient Education Interventions in Obesity and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Correia, JC, Waqas, A, Huat, TS, Gariani, K, Jornayvaz, FR, Golay, A, Pataky, Z
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for the highest burden of non-communicable diseases. Obesity is also highly comorbid with type 2 DM with a prevalence of 8.5% among adults around the globe. The aims of this study were to present (a) a critical synthesis of the theoretical basis and development of therapeutic patient education (TPE) interventions for obesity and diabetes, and (b) quantitative evidence for the efficacy of these interventions across a range of biomedical, psychosocial and psychological outcomes. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifty-four randomised controlled trials. Results show that: - TPE interventions bring about significant improvements in biomedical outcomes among patients with DM and obesity. - there weren’t significant differences in the quality of life of participants undergoing TPE interventions (inconclusive as only data from two studies were considered). - interventions delivered through different media and delivery formats may be equally effective. Authors conclude that the use of electronic media such as short messaging services, website-based educational programs and animation media can be used to deliver TPE effectively.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity account for the highest burden of non-communicable diseases. There is increasing evidence showing therapeutic patient education (TPE) as a clinically and cost-effective solution to improve biomedical and psychosocial outcomes among people with DM and obesity. The present systematic review and meta-analysis present a critical synthesis of the development of TPE interventions for DM and obesity and the efficacy of these interventions across a range of biomedical, psychosocial and psychological outcomes. A total of 54 of these RCTs were identified among patients with obesity and diabetes and were thus qualitatively synthesized. Out of these, 47 were included in the quantitative synthesis. There was substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of these outcomes (I2 = 88.35%, Q = 317.64), with a significant improvement noted in serum HbA1c levels (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.118 to 0.525, n = 7360) and body weight (SMD = 0.526, 95% CI: 0.205 to 0.846, n = 1082) in the intervention group. The effect sizes were comparable across interventions delivered by different modes and delivery agents. These interventions can be delivered by allied health staff, doctors or electronically as self-help programs, with similar effectiveness (p < 0.001). These interventions should be implemented in healthcare and community settings to improve the health outcomes in patients suffering from obesity and DM.
-
7.
Time-restricted eating and exercise training improve HbA1c and body composition in women with overweight/obesity: A randomized controlled trial.
Haganes, KL, Silva, CP, Eyjólfsdóttir, SK, Steen, S, Grindberg, M, Lydersen, S, Hawley, JA, Moholdt, T
Cell metabolism. 2022;34(10):1457-1471.e4
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A healthy diet and regular physical activity are primary lifestyle strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity and its associated conditions. However, poor adherence rates to these strategies limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a popular dietary strategy that emphasises the timing of meals in alignment with diurnal circadian rhythms, permitting ad libitum energy intake during a restricted eating window (8–10 h between the first and last energy intake of the day). The aim of this study was to investigate the isolated and combined effects of TRE and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic health outcomes in women with overweight/obesity. This study is a 7-week randomised controlled trial with four parallel groups: TRE (energy intake limited to a %10-h eating window every day), HIIT (three supervised treadmill exercise sessions per week), a combination (TREHIIT), and a control group (CON, no intervention). Participants (n=131) were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. . Results show that 7 weeks of TRE, HIIT, or a combination failed to improve glycaemic control in reproductive-aged women with overweight/obesity. However, the combination of TRE and HIIT significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin levels compared with CON and induced greater losses in body weight, fat mass, and visceral fat area compared with either intervention alone. Isolated TRE resulted in lower nocturnal glucose concentrations compared with CON. Authors conclude that combining TRE with HIIT can rapidly induce several health benefits and decrease metabolic disease risk in women with overweight/obesity. In fact, the high rates of compliance and adherence shown in their findings, highlight the potential of these diet-exercise (TRE and HIIT) protocols to be implemented in clinical practice for treatment and primary prevention of overweight/ obesity.
Abstract
Diet modification and exercise training are primary lifestyle strategies for obesity management, but poor adherence rates limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve cardiometabolic health in at-risk individuals, but whether these two interventions combined induce superior improvements in glycemic control than each individual intervention is not known. In this four-armed randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019860), we determined the isolated and combined effects of 7 weeks of TRE (≤10-h daily eating window, with ad libitum energy intake) and HIIT (three exercise sessions per week), compared with a non-intervention control group, on glycemic control and secondary cardiometabolic outcomes in 131 women (36.2 ± 6.2 years) with overweight/obesity. There were no statistically significant effects after isolated TRE, HIIT, or a combination (TREHIIT) on glucose area under the curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (the primary outcome) compared with the control group (TRE, -26.3 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -82.3 to 29.7, p = 0.36; HIIT, -53.8 mmol/L; 95% CI, -109.2 to 1.6, p = 0.057; TREHIIT, -41.3 mmol/L; 95% CI, -96.4 to 13.8, p = 0.14). However, TREHIIT improved HbA1c and induced superior reductions in total and visceral fat mass compared with TRE and HIIT alone. High participant adherence rates suggest that TRE, HIIT, and a combination thereof may be realistic diet-exercise strategies for improving markers of metabolic health in women at risk of cardiometabolic disease.
-
8.
Acute Beetroot Juice Supplementation Enhances Intermittent Running Performance but Does Not Reduce Oxygen Cost of Exercise among Recreational Adults.
Esen, O, Domínguez, R, Karayigit, R
Nutrients. 2022;14(14)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The ergogenic effect of dietary nitrate (NO3 −) supplementation is attributed to its reduction of NO3 − to nitrite and, subsequently, nitric oxide. The aim of this study was to assess if acute NO3 − supplementation would elicit performance benefits in recreationally active individuals during the Yo–Yo intermittent recovery level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) test, with its potential benefit on oxygen (O2) consumption (VO2). This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Participants were to consume either a NO3 −-rich or a NO3 −-depleted concentrated beetroot juice. Results showed that acute high-dose supplementation of NO3 − enhanced the Yo–Yo IR1 test performance in recreational young adults. However, NO3 − supplementation had no effect on VO2 responses during the intermittent running, suggesting that the observed performance enhancement is likely related to other potential physiological influence of NO3 −, but not to its potential effect on O2 cost. Authors conclude that acute supplementation with NO3 −-rich beetroot juice may be a nutritional ergogenic aid during intermittent running in recreational adults, and that further mechanistic research is required.
Abstract
Nitrate (NO3-) supplementation has been reported to enhance intermittent exercise performance; however, its impact on oxygen (O2) cost during intermittent running exercise is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess if acute NO3- supplementation would elicit performance benefits in recreationally active individuals during the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) test, with its potential benefit on O2 consumption (VO2), in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 12 recreational males consumed NO3--rich (NIT; ~12.8 mmol), and NO3--depleted (PLA; 0.04 mmol) concentrated beetroot juice 3 h before completing the Yo-Yo IR1 test. VO2 was measured at 160, 280 and 440 m (sub-maximal) and when the test was terminated (peak). Performance in the Yo-Yo IR1 was greater with NIT (990 ± 442.25 m) compared to PLA (870 ± 357.4 m, p = 0.007). The VO2 was not significantly different at 160 m (1.92 ± 0.99 vs. 2.1 ± 0.88 L·min-1), 280 m (2.62 ± 0.94 vs. 2.83 ± 0.94 L·min-1), 440 m (3.26 ± 1.04 vs. 3.46 ± 0.98 L·min-1) and peak (4.71 ± 1.01 vs. 4.92 ± 1.17 L·min-1) between NIT and PLA trials (all p > 0.05). The present study has indicated that acute supplementation of NO3- enhanced intermittent running performance but had no effect on VO2 during the Yo-Yo IR1 test in recreational young adults.
-
9.
Consuming a Protein and Fiber-Based Supplement Preload Promotes Weight Loss and Alters Metabolic Markers in Overweight Adults in a 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Glynn, EL, Fleming, SA, Edwards, CG, Wilson, MJ, Evans, M, Leidy, HJ
The Journal of nutrition. 2022;152(6):1415-1425
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
One of the challenges of reduced-calorie diets is the inability to control appetite. Reductions in food intake can lead to the activation of neurological pathways that increase hunger and food cravings. Adjusting nutrient intake has the potential to serve as an effective strategy for increasing feelings of satiety, which can lead to improved appetite control. The aim of this study was to determine if greater weight loss and greater changes in body composition and metabolic outcomes could be achieved following a 12-wk energy-restricted diet that included twice-daily consumption of a protein and fibre-based multi-ingredient nutritional supplement shake (HPF) compared with an isocaloric low-protein/lower-fibre placebo (LPF) in adults with overweight and obesity. This study is a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study. Two hundred and six healthy adults were recruited and randomly assigned to intervention groups in a 1:1 ratio. Results show that the habitual consumption of an HPF preload 30 min before breakfast and lunch resulted in greater weight loss compared with an isocaloric LPF preload in overweight/obese adults. In addition, improved metabolic outcomes were observed in the HPF group throughout the 84-d randomized controlled trial. Authors conclude that diet composition rather than energy reduction alone may influence the success of a weight-loss regimen, potentially including protein and fibre content.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher protein and fiber diets promote weight management and metabolic health. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine if greater weight loss and positive changes in metabolic outcomes could be achieved with twice-daily consumption of a high-protein and fiber-based multi-ingredient nutritional shake (HPF) compared with an isocaloric low-protein, lower fiber-based placebo (LPF). METHODS Study procedures were conducted by an independent research organization under clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT03057873. Healthy overweight and obese adults [n = 206; BMI (kg/m2): 27-35; 70% female] were randomly assigned to HPF or LPF. All participants were prescribed an energy-restricted diet (500 kcal/d less than energy needs) and consumed a HPF (17 g protein, 6 g fiber) or LPF (1 g protein, 3 g fiber) shake 30 min before breakfast and lunch for 12 wk. Primary outcomes included body weight and total body fat percentage. Blood samples were collected at days (D) 0, 28, 56, and 84 for secondary analyses related to metabolic markers of health. RESULTS Although weight loss occurred in both groups, HPF had greater weight loss at D84 compared with LPF (-3.3 kg vs. -1.8 kg, P < 0.05). Percentage body fat decreased in both groups (HPF: -1.33%, LPF: -1.09%; P < 0.001) with no differences between groups. Serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and oxidized LDL decreased between -5.1% to -8.3%, whereas adiponectin increased over time in both groups; these changes occurred to a greater extent in HPF compared with LPF (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A multi-ingredient HPF nutritional supplement shake consumed as a preload before breakfast and lunch positively influenced weight management and metabolic outcomes in overweight adults compared with an LPF placebo. These findings suggest that specific nutrient factors (i.e., potentially including protein, fiber, and bioactive content) other than calorie reduction alone influence the success of a weight-loss regimen. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03057873.
-
10.
Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss?
Zhang, Q, Zhang, C, Wang, H, Ma, Z, Liu, D, Guan, X, Liu, Y, Fu, Y, Cui, M, Dong, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity increases the risk of developing metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and associated comorbidities. Intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) are fasting regimens known to reduce weight, which is at the heart of strategy in reducing obesity. IF and CCR restricts energy intake; however, CCR is harder to follow than IF. IF focuses more on time-restricted eating. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of IF and CCR on body mass index (BMI), body weight, and metabolism in overweight and obese participants. This research showed that IF is significantly superior to CCR in weight loss in obese people. However, there was no difference in BMI between both regimens. There was a significant difference between IF and CCR for total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and waist circumference. Further larger long-term robust studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of different fasting regimens due to the high heterogeneity in this research. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to distinguish the weight loss effects between different fasting regimens.
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and pilot trial studies to compare the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) in overweight and obese people. The parameters included body mass index (BMI), body weight, and other metabolism-related indicators. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the effectiveness. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. The stability of the results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. The significance of body weight change (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI (-0.40, -0.02) p = 0.028) was more significant after IF than CCR. There was no significant difference in BMI (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.16, 0.20) p = 0.848) between IF and CCR. These findings suggest that IF may be superior to CCR for weight loss in some respects.