-
1.
Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.
Schroor, MM, Joris, PJ, Plat, J, Mensink, RP
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2024;15(1):100130
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets, such as the 5:2 diet, time-restricted eating (TRE), and alternate-day fasting (ADF), are gaining popularity. According to previous research, IER protocols effectively manage obesity and may have many other health benefits, including improving metabolic health. This systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-eight parallel-design randomised controlled trials looked at the benefits of IER protocols, such as ADF, TRE, and the 5:2 diet, and the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that both the IER and CER are equally beneficial. However, IER protocols showed greater but clinically insignificant improvements in fat-free mass and waist circumference in healthy adults. IER and CER protocols were not different in improving the lipid profile, glucose and insulin levels and blood pressure. Different IER diets showed different positive effects on metabolic parameters. Future robust studies are required to assess the effects of these energy-restriction diets on metabolic and anthropometric parameters because of the high variability in the included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the potential clinical utility of various energy-restriction diets.
Abstract
The interest in intermittent energy restriction (IER) diets as a weight-loss approach is increasing. Different IER protocols exist, including time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and the 5:2 diet. This meta-analysis compared the effects of these IER diets with continuous energy restriction (CER) on anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy adults. Twenty-eight trials were identified that studied TRE (k = 7), ADF (k = 10), or the 5:2 diet (k = 11) for 2-52 wk. Energy intakes between intervention groups within a study were comparable (17 trials), lower in IER (5 trials), or not reported (6 trials). Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. Changes in body weight [WMD: -0.42 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.96 to 0.13; P = 0.132] and fat mass (FM) (WMD: -0.31 kg; 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.36; P = 0.362) were comparable when results of the 3 IER diets were combined and compared with those of CER. All IER diets combined reduced fat-free mass (WMD: -0.20 kg; 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.01; P = 0.044) and waist circumference (WMD: -0.91 cm; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.06; P = 0.036) more than CER. Effects on body mass index [BMI (kg/m2)], glucose, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, and blood pressure did not differ. Further, TRE reduced body weight, FM, and fat-free mass more than CER, whereas ADF improved HOMA-IR more. BMI was reduced less in the 5:2 diet compared with CER. In conclusion, the 3 IER diets combined did not lead to superior improvements in anthropometrics and cardiometabolic risk markers compared with CER diets. Slightly greater reductions were, however, observed in fat-free mass and waist circumference. To what extent differences in energy intakes between groups within studies may have influenced these outcomes should be addressed in future studies.
-
2.
Vitamin D supplementation and exercise for improving physical function, body composition and metabolic health in overweight or obese older adults with vitamin D deficiency: a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Mesinovic, J, Rodriguez, AJ, Cervo, MM, Gandham, A, Xu, CLH, Glavas, C, de Courten, B, Zengin, A, Ebeling, PR, Scott, D
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):951-964
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Overweight and obese older adults are at increased risk for vitamin D deficiency, which is associated with poor metabolic and musculoskeletal health, unfavourable body composition, and attenuated responses to exercise. The aim of this study was to determine whether, compared with placebo, vitamin D3 supplementation (4000 IU/day) taken prior to and during a 12-week exercise program improves physical function, body composition or metabolic health, in overweight or obese older adults with vitamin D deficiency. This study is a 24-week parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomised controlled trial. Fifty overweight or obese participants were enrolled for the study, and randomised to either 4000 IU/day of oral vitamin D3 or identical placebo. Results demonstrated that 4000 IU/day vitamin D3 supplementation: - did not affect gait speed when taken with or without exercise, - helped achieve optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and decreased waist circumference (compared with placebo) following multi-modal exercise. - taken alone without exercise reduced stair climb times. However, vitamin D3 supplementation did not have any beneficial effects on other biochemical, body composition or physical function parameters when taken alone or during exercise. Authors conclude that future studies should focus on populations with moderate or severe vitamin D deficiency as they are more likely to experience therapeutic benefits from vitamin D supplementation.
Abstract
PURPOSE Vitamin D supplementation may have non-skeletal health benefits and enhance exercise responsiveness, particularly in those with low vitamin D levels. We determined whether, compared with placebo, vitamin D supplementation taken prior to and during a 12-week exercise program improves physical function, body composition or metabolic health, in overweight and obese older adults with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS Fifty overweight or obese older adults (mean ± SD age: 60 ± 6 years; BMI 30.6 ± 5.7 kg/m2) with vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] < 50 nmol/L) were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either vitamin D3 (4000 IU/day) or matching placebo for 24 weeks. Between weeks 12 and 24, all participants completed multi-modal exercise three days per week while continuing with vitamin D/placebo. Mean changes in physical function (primary outcome: gait speed), body composition and biochemical parameters at weeks 12 and 24 were compared between groups. RESULTS Vitamin D supplementation, with or without exercise, had no effect on gait speed. From baseline to week 12, vitamin D supplementation increased serum 25(OH)D levels (placebo: 2.5 ± 14.7 nmol/L; treatment: 43.4 ± 18.4 nmol/L; P < 0.001) and reduced stair climb times (placebo: 0.3 ± 1.0 s; treatment: - 0.2 ± 1.0 s; P = 0.046). From 12 to 24 weeks, vitamin D supplementation combined with exercise decreased waist circumference (placebo: 1.3 ± 7.3 cm; treatment: - 3.0 ± 6.1 cm; P = 0.02) and waist-to-hip ratio (placebo: 0.01 ± 0.05; treatment: - 0.03 ± 0.05; P = 0.01) relative to placebo. Vitamin D supplementation, with or without exercise, had no effect on other physical function, body composition or metabolic health outcomes. CONCLUSION Vitamin D supplementation had no effect on most physical function, body composition or metabolic health parameters when taken alone, or during exercise, in overweight or obese older adults with vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D-related improvements in stair climb times and waist circumference suggest that future trials should explore the effects of vitamin D on muscle power, and its effects on body composition when combined with exercise, in populations with moderate or severe vitamin D deficiency.
-
3.
Nuts and seeds consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and their risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnesen, EK, Thorisdottir, B, Bärebring, L, Söderlund, F, Nwaru, BI, Spielau, U, Dierkes, J, Ramel, A, Lamberg-Allardt, C, Åkesson, A
Food & nutrition research. 2023;67
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nuts and seeds consumption is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nuts and seeds contain beneficial components to reduce the risk of CVD and CHD; hence dietary addition may benefit heart health. This systematic review and meta-analysis included sixty studies to analyse the effects of the consumption of nuts and seeds on the incidence of mortality from type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CVD and intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors. High nuts and seed consumption showed a 19% reduction in CVD risk and a 23% reduction in CVD mortality. In addition, high consumption lowered the risk of CHD by 25%. Increased nut consumption up to 30 g/day showed a dose-dependent relationship with reduced risk of CVD. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the association between nuts and seeds consumption and CHD, CVD and blood lipid levels. However, further robust studies are required to evaluate the effect of specific nuts and seeds on CHD and CVD risk reduction.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to systematically review studies and evaluate the strength of the evidence on nuts/seeds consumption and cardiometabolic diseases and their risk factors among adults. METHODS A protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270554). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus up to September 20, 2021 for prospective cohort studies and ≥12-week randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and type 2 diabetes (T2D), secondary total-/low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, blood pressure and glycaemic markers. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessments (using RoB 2.0 and RoB-NObS) were performed in duplicate. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and expressed as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI); heterogeneity quantified as I 2. One-stage dose-response analyses assessed the linear and non-linear associations with CVD, CHD, stroke and T2D. The strength of evidence was classified per the World Cancer Research Fund criteria. RESULTS After screening 23,244 references, we included 42 papers from cohort studies (28 unique cohorts, 1,890,573 participants) and 18 RCTs (2,266 participants). In the cohorts, mainly populations with low consumption, high versus low total nuts/seeds consumption was inversely associated with total CVD (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.75, 0.86; I 2 = 67%), CVD mortality (0.77; 0.72, 0.82; I 2 = 59.3%), CHD (0.82; 0.76, 0.89; I 2 = 64%), CHD mortality (0.75; 0.65, 0.87; I 2 = 66.9%) and non-fatal CHD (0.85; 0.75, 0.96; I 2 = 62.2%). According to the non-linear dose-response analyses, consumption of 30 g/day of total nuts/seeds was associated with RRs of similar magnitude. For stroke and T2D the summary RR for high versus low intake was 0.91 (95% CI 0.85, 0.97; I 2 = 24.8%) and 0.95 (0.75, 1.21; I 2 = 82.2%). Intake of nuts (median ~50 g/day) lowered total (-0.15 mmol/L; -0.22, -0.08; I 2 = 31.2%) and LDL-cholesterol (-0.13 mmol/L; -0.21, -0.05; I 2 = 68.6%), but not blood pressure. Findings on fasting glucose, HbA1c and insulin resistance were conflicting. The results were robust to sensitivity and subgroup analyses. We rated the associations between nuts/seeds and both CVD and CHD as probable. There was limited but suggestive evidence for no association with stroke. No conclusion could be made for T2D. CONCLUSION There is a probable relationship between consumption of nuts/seeds and lower risk of CVD, mostly driven by CHD, possibly in part through effects on blood lipids. More research on stroke and T2D may affect the conclusions. The evidence of specific nuts should be further investigated.
-
4.
Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Young, IE, Poobalan, A, Steinbeck, K, O'Connor, HT, Parker, HM
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023;24(3):e13537
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity increases an individual's risk of metabolic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis, and some cancers. “Chrononutrition” relates to the timing of meals and distribution of total energy intake across the day. Evidence is building chrononutrition as a potential target in both weight loss and metabolic disease interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss, and to evaluate the potential for utilizing altered energy distribution as a tool in weight loss interventions. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Total number of participants was 485 (earlier distributed total energy intakes: n = 244, later distributed total energy intakes; n = 241). Results show that energy intakes with a focus on earlier distribution resulted in significantly greater weight loss when compared with similarly energy-restricted diets with individuals consuming a larger proportion of their total energy intake later in the day and into the evening. Authors conclude that earlier energy intakes may be a promising tool to be used in conjunction with other weight loss strategies such as energy restriction to enhance weight loss. However, further research is required to elucidate the additional positive impacts that earlier distributed total energy intakes may have on weight and metabolic health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Implementing a dietary strategy where a higher proportion of energy is consumed earlier in the day may offer additional benefits to an energy restricted diet for weight loss, blood glucose, improve markers of insulin resistance, increase satiety and improve hunger management. Based on the findings, earlier distribution of energy intake may serve as an effective component of a weight loss protocol.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Chrononutrition refers to the timing and distribution of total daily energy intake across the day. It has been proposed that consuming a greater proportion of total daily energy intake earlier in the day as opposed to the evening may be beneficial for weight loss and metabolic health.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss.
Results
A total of 9 randomised controlled trials involving 485 participants were included in this analysis. The study durations ranged from 5-16 weeks. All of the studies included in this analysis applied energy-restricted diets to both intervention arms. The mean percentages of energy intake in 8 of the 9 studies per meal were:
- Earlier distributed intakes: breakfast: 34% ± 16%, lunch: 38% ± 7%, dinner: 20% ± 6%.
- Later distributed intakes: breakfast: 19% ± 6%, lunch: 30% ± 10%, dinner; 40% ± 11%.
One of the studies advised percentage of energy intakes as either:
- Earlier: 70% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 30% for afternoon tea and dinner
- Late: 55% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 45% for afternoon tea and dinner.
The earlier distributed energy intake groups demonstrated significantly greater weight loss when compared with later distributed energy intake groups ( Mean Difference (MD) −1.23 kg; 95% CI −2.40, −0.06, p = 0.04;
I2 = 98%).
The earlier energy intake groups also displayed lower fasting and bedtime glucose levels (fasting: −0.83 vs. −0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.001; before sleep: −1.70 vs. −0.28 mmol/L, p = 0.009).
A random-effects model demonstrated that the earlier intake groups displayed greater reductions in LDL (MD: −0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, −0.07, p < 0.01), fasting glucose (MD: 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.23, −0.06, p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (MD: −0.38; 95% CI −0.64, −0.11, p = 0.005).
One study reported that earlier distribution energy intake also led to a greater reduction in medications following the intervention for type 2 diabetics (31% vs. 0%, P=0.002).
Two of the studies assessed both appetite and hunger and identified that earlier distribution of energy led to improvements in their urge to eat, preoccupation with food and cravings for sweets and fats.
Clinical practice applications:
Earlier distribution of energy intake may be beneficial for:
- Weight loss
- Improve fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose and HbA1c
- Reducing LDL
- Improving satiety and hunger management
- Supporting the reduction of medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes
- Improving regularity of sleep and waking times
Considerations for future research:
As the included studies only ranged from 5-16 weeks, longer duration studies would be useful to identify the effect of earlier distribution of energy intake on body weight, metabolic health and appetite over a longer period of time. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies and a lack of uniformity in the distributions of energy intake across the day. Further studies with more uniformity of energy distribution would be needed to identify the optimal distribution of energy across the day to improve body weight and metabolic health.
Abstract
Consuming a greater proportion of total energy intake earlier in the day rather than in the evening is proposed to positively influence weight loss and health, potentially due to greater synchronization of human body circadian rhythms. This systematic review provides an update on existing evidence regarding earlier distributed eating patterns in weight loss interventions. Using a robust search strategy in five electronic databases, nine randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of energy intake distribution on weight loss were identified. Following critical appraisal, a random-effects meta-analyses found that, in the context of an energy-reduced diet, distributing energy intake with a focus on earlier intake resulted in significantly greater weight loss (-1.23 kg; 95% CI 2.40, -0.06, p = 0.04). Improvements in HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, and LDL cholesterol were also seen. The current study provides a timely update on the evidence linking distribution of total daily energy intake and health, showing that a focus on earlier intakes can result in greater short-term weight loss compared with later intakes. Future studies are needed to elucidate the impact that earlier intakes may have on weight management and metabolic health.
-
5.
Body weight, diabetes incidence vascular events and survival 15 years after very low calorie diet in community medical clinics in the UK.
Paisey, R, Daniels, C, Howitt, W, Greatorex, D, Campbell, C, Paisey, C, Paisey, R, Frost, J, Bromige, R
BMJ nutrition, prevention & health. 2022;5(1):55-61
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of obesity and associated comorbidities such as Type 2 diabetes can be reduced by implementing population-wide weight loss dietary strategies. A very low-calorie diet (VLCD) has been considered a successful dietary strategy for people with Type 2 diabetes and obesity. A total of 325 people participated in this long-term observational study. Female participants consumed 450 kcal/day, and male participants consumed 650 kcal/day for at least three months. This 15-year follow-up retrospective study looked at the effects of VLCD in obese participants. In the 15-year follow-up, only 5.9% of participants maintained >10kg weight loss. However, 95% of participants gained weight after 15 years. Ten participants went into diabetes remission after three months of VLCD intervention. The results showed no positive effects of VLCD on diabetes remission after 15 years. However, there was a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease among participants who had considerable weight loss after the VLCD intervention. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the relationship between weight loss and the incidence of cardiovascular disease. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the short-term benefits of VLCD and the long-term impact of the obesogenic environment on the health of the general population.
Abstract
Objective: To assess weight loss maintenance, diabetes status, mortality and morbidity 15 years after a very low calorie diet programme (VLCD) in patients with obesity. Design: General practice data bases were interrogated for subjects coded for group therapy with VLCD in the 1990s. Causes of death, occurrence of vascular disease and remission or development of diabetes were ascertained from patient records and national stroke and cardiovascular disease data bases. Results: 325 subjects engaged in the programme and had sufficient data for analysis. Baseline characteristics were: age 47.8±12. 8 years; body mass index (BMI) 36.1±6.8 kg/m2; 79.1% female/20.9% male; 13.5% had type 2 diabetes. After 15±4 years weight had changed from 97.9±19 kg at baseline to 100±20.8 kg. 10 with diabetes at baseline were in remission at 3 months, but only two remained in remission at 5 years. 50 new cases of type 2 diabetes and 11 of impaired fasting glucose developed during follow-up. Only 5.9% who remained healthy at follow-up had maintained >10% body weight reduction. Neither diabetes incidence nor diabetes free survival were related to percentage body weight lost during VLCD. Only baseline BMI was related to development of new impaired fasting glucose or diabetes by 15 years (p=0.007). 37 subjects had a cardiovascular event. Age (p=0.000002) and degree of weight loss after VLCD (p=0.03) were significantly associated with subsequent vascular events. Conclusion: Long-term maintenance of weight loss after VLCD was rare in this single centre retrospective study 15 years later. Glucose intolerance developed in 21.4%. Lasting remission of type 2 diabetes or prevention of later glucose intolerance were not achieved. Vascular events were more frequent in those who lost most weight. Risk management during weight regain should be studied in future to assess potential for reduction in adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
-
6.
The Effect of Resveratrol on Blood Lipid Profile: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Cao, X, Liao, W, Xia, H, Wang, S, Sun, G
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is well known that cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death. Imbalances in the blood lipid levels, such as elevation of total cholesterol, Triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. It has been shown that resveratrol, a polyphenol found in grapes, blueberries, mulberries, raspberries, peanuts, and knotweeds, has protective effects against cardiovascular disease. In this meta-analysis, 17 randomised controlled trials were included, with varying durations of 4 to 48 weeks and intervention dosages ranging from 10 to 3000 mg/day. According to the results of this meta-analysis, Resveratrol supplementation significantly reduced total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, but not HDL cholesterol. In addition, the reduction in LDL cholesterol was more significant in type 2 diabetic patients when resveratrol was supplemented for 12 weeks or more. A crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of resveratrol supplementation is its dosage. High doses over 500 mg/day were found to have the opposite effect of increasing body mass index and body weight and suppressing the cardioprotective effect. The effects of different dosages and durations of resveratrol supplementation on cardiometabolic health require further robust research. Healthcare professionals may use the results of this study to understand the importance of careful consideration when supplementing resveratrol as a nutraceutical.
Abstract
(1) Background: The effects of resveratrol on blood lipids are controversial. Whether there is a dose-response of the lipid profile upon resveratrol supplementation is unknown. (2) Methods: This dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to explore the effects of resveratrol supplementation on lipid profile. A systematical and comprehensive search of several databases was conducted by 30 June 2022. (3) Results: The results indicated that the intake of resveratrol could significantly decrease the total cholesterol (TC) (mean difference = -10.28; 95%CI: -13.79, -6.76, p < 0.001), triglyceride (TG) (Mean difference = -856; 95%CI: -12.37, -4.75, p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (mean difference = -5.69; 95%CI: -11.07, -0.31, p = 0.038) level, but did not alter the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). In the non-linear dose-response analysis, we observed a significant effect of the supplementation dosage on the level of LDL-C (p-nonlinearity = 0.002). Results from the sub-group analysis showed that the reduction of LDL-C was more significant in the trials with a duration of ≥12 weeks and in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. (4) Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that resveratrol may be beneficial to reduce TC, TG, and LDL-C levels in the blood. The dosage of the resveratrol intervention is an essential factor that affects the level of LDL-C.
-
7.
Time-restricted eating and exercise training improve HbA1c and body composition in women with overweight/obesity: A randomized controlled trial.
Haganes, KL, Silva, CP, Eyjólfsdóttir, SK, Steen, S, Grindberg, M, Lydersen, S, Hawley, JA, Moholdt, T
Cell metabolism. 2022;34(10):1457-1471.e4
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A healthy diet and regular physical activity are primary lifestyle strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity and its associated conditions. However, poor adherence rates to these strategies limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a popular dietary strategy that emphasises the timing of meals in alignment with diurnal circadian rhythms, permitting ad libitum energy intake during a restricted eating window (8–10 h between the first and last energy intake of the day). The aim of this study was to investigate the isolated and combined effects of TRE and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic health outcomes in women with overweight/obesity. This study is a 7-week randomised controlled trial with four parallel groups: TRE (energy intake limited to a %10-h eating window every day), HIIT (three supervised treadmill exercise sessions per week), a combination (TREHIIT), and a control group (CON, no intervention). Participants (n=131) were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. . Results show that 7 weeks of TRE, HIIT, or a combination failed to improve glycaemic control in reproductive-aged women with overweight/obesity. However, the combination of TRE and HIIT significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin levels compared with CON and induced greater losses in body weight, fat mass, and visceral fat area compared with either intervention alone. Isolated TRE resulted in lower nocturnal glucose concentrations compared with CON. Authors conclude that combining TRE with HIIT can rapidly induce several health benefits and decrease metabolic disease risk in women with overweight/obesity. In fact, the high rates of compliance and adherence shown in their findings, highlight the potential of these diet-exercise (TRE and HIIT) protocols to be implemented in clinical practice for treatment and primary prevention of overweight/ obesity.
Abstract
Diet modification and exercise training are primary lifestyle strategies for obesity management, but poor adherence rates limit their effectiveness. Time-restricted eating (TRE) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve cardiometabolic health in at-risk individuals, but whether these two interventions combined induce superior improvements in glycemic control than each individual intervention is not known. In this four-armed randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019860), we determined the isolated and combined effects of 7 weeks of TRE (≤10-h daily eating window, with ad libitum energy intake) and HIIT (three exercise sessions per week), compared with a non-intervention control group, on glycemic control and secondary cardiometabolic outcomes in 131 women (36.2 ± 6.2 years) with overweight/obesity. There were no statistically significant effects after isolated TRE, HIIT, or a combination (TREHIIT) on glucose area under the curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (the primary outcome) compared with the control group (TRE, -26.3 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -82.3 to 29.7, p = 0.36; HIIT, -53.8 mmol/L; 95% CI, -109.2 to 1.6, p = 0.057; TREHIIT, -41.3 mmol/L; 95% CI, -96.4 to 13.8, p = 0.14). However, TREHIIT improved HbA1c and induced superior reductions in total and visceral fat mass compared with TRE and HIIT alone. High participant adherence rates suggest that TRE, HIIT, and a combination thereof may be realistic diet-exercise strategies for improving markers of metabolic health in women at risk of cardiometabolic disease.
-
8.
Weight Loss and Exercise Differentially Affect Insulin Sensitivity, Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Muscle Strength in Older Adults With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Brennan, AM, Standley, RA, Anthony, SJ, Grench, KE, Helbling, NL, DeLany, JP, Cornnell, HH, Yi, F, Stefanovic-Racic, M, Toledo, FGS, et al
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2022;77(5):1088-1097
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Aging is marked by increased risk for type 2 diabetes, reduced muscle mass and strength (ie, sarcopenia), decreased physical function and cardiorespiratory fitness, ectopic fat deposition, and insulin resistance all of which increase the risk for physical disability, morbidity, and mortality. These adverse health consequences associated with advanced age are exacerbated with obesity and physical inactivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of weight loss with or without exercise on skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity, exclusively in obese older adults. This study is a 2-site, 6-month randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design. Eighty-six older (60–80 years of age), physically inactive men and women with obesity were randomised into one of the 3 treatments (1:1:1 allocation ratio): control (health education), calorie restriction-induced weight loss, and weight loss with exercise. Results suggest that weight loss via calorie restriction alone is insufficient to significantly improve skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity and requires the addition of exercise to incur benefit, which was also true for clinical measures of insulin resistance including haemoglobin A1C [a blood test that measures the average blood sugar levels over a period of 3 months] and fasting insulin. Authors conclude that regular exercise should be considered as a useful and manageable adjunct to traditional weight loss therapies for older adults with obesity to mitigate risk for chronic disease and maintain functional independence and quality of life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging-related disease risk is exacerbated by obesity and physical inactivity. It is unclear how weight loss and increased activity improve risk in older adults. We aimed to determine the effects of diet-induced weight loss with and without exercise on insulin sensitivity, VO2peak, body composition, and physical function in older obese adults. METHODS Physically inactive older (68.6 ± 4.5 years) obese (body mass index 37.4 ± 4.9 kg/m2) adults were randomized to health education control (HEC; n = 25); diet-induced weight loss (WL; n = 31); or weight loss and exercise (WLEX; n = 28) for 6 months. Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI, strength by isokinetic dynamometry, and VO2peak by graded exercise test. RESULTS WLEX improved (p < .05) peripheral insulin sensitivity (+75 ± 103%) versus HEC (+12 ± 67%); WL (+36 ± 47%) versus HEC did not reach statistical significance. WLEX increased VO2peak (+7 ± 12%) versus WL (-2 ± 24%) and prevented reductions in strength and lean mass induced by WL (p < .05). WLEX decreased abdominal adipose tissue (-16 ± 9%) versus HEC (-3 ± 8%) and intermuscular adipose tissue (-15 ± 13%) versus both HEC (+9 ± 15%) and WL (+2 ± 11%; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Exercise with weight loss improved insulin sensitivity and VO2peak, decreased ectopic fat, and preserved lean mass and strength. Weight loss alone decreased lean mass and strength. Older adults intending to lose weight should perform regular exercise to promote cardiometabolic and functional benefits, which may not occur with calorie restriction-induced weight loss alone.
-
9.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fasting and Lifestyle Modification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: Effects on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Jeitler, M, Lauche, R, Hohmann, C, Choi, KA, Schneider, N, Steckhan, N, Rathjens, F, Anheyer, D, Paul, A, von Scheidt, C, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(17)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition characterized by the presence of at least three cardiovascular risk factors, such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidaemia. The aim of this study was to assess effects of fasting followed by the Mind-Body Medicine in Integrative and Complementary Medicine (MICOM) lifestyle modification intervention in patients with MetS on patient-reported outcomes, compared to a lifestyle modification intervention only. This study is a single-blind, bicentre, randomized controlled study. Patients (n=145) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into one of the 2 groups: fasting and lifestyle modification or the lifestyle modification. They started with 2 vegan days (max. 1200 kcal/day), followed by 5 days of fasting (max. 350 kcal/day), and a stepwise reintroduction of food. Then they participated in the 10-week MICOM comprehensive multimodal lifestyle modification intervention with weekly 6-h sessions. Results show that after the multimodal lifestyle modification intervention, there were improvements for all outcome measures, namely quality of life, anxiety, depression, stress, mood as well as self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion, which persisted at the follow-up after 24 weeks. Authors conclude that their findings show beneficial and clinically relevant effects of fasting and intensified lifestyle modification on quality of life and psychological parameters.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For clients with Metabolic syndrome a 5-day fast consisting of max. 350 kcal/day, in conjunction with therapies that focus on improved emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and behavioural factors may directly affect health and support improved mood.
Therapies include mindfulness and specific group training rooted in psycho-neuroendocrinology, and the use of formal meditation and gentle yoga exercises. As well as nutritional education included lectures, cooking workshops, as well as group support.
Bottom line: The use of complimentary therapies such as mindfulness, yoga and medication in conjunction with nutritional advice and may be effective to support improved mood in clients with Metabolic syndrome.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition characterised by the presence of at least three cardiovascular risk factors such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.
The authors refer to epidemiological studies that have identified the role of psychological risk factors such as psychosocial stress, depression and anxiety in patients with MetS and cardiovascular disease.
This single-blind, bi-centre RCT assessed the effects of fasting followed by a comprehensive lifestyle modification program MICOM (Mind-Body Medicine in Integrative and Complementary Medicine) in 145 participants with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) (62.8% women; 59.7 ± 9.3 years) randomised to:
1. 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (F + LM; modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73) or
2. 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (LM; n = 72)
The study duration was 24 weeks occurring from April 2014 to December 2014, with the last follow-up assessment in December 2015. 73 Participants were randomised into an F + LM group and 72 participants into an LM group between the ages of 59 and 60.
Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 12, and 24, for quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-36), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, CPSS), mood (Profile of Mood States, POMS), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale, SCS).
At week 1, POMS depression and fatigue scores were significantly lower in F + LM compared to LM. At week 12, most self-report outcomes improved in both groups—only POMS vigour was significantly higher in F + LM than in LM. Most of the beneficial effects within the groups persisted at week 24.
Clinical practice applications:
This randomised controlled trial highlights fasting-induced mood-modulating effects in the short term (<24 months).
LM induced several positive effects on quality of life and psychological parameters in participants with MetS.
The compliance rate for this study was good and there were no adverse effects reported suggesting a potentially effective lifestyle modification intervention for adults with metabolic syndrome.
The authors did note the extent to which participants adhered to the program by using stress reduction techniques at home was not assessed.
Considerations for future research:
MBM lifestyle modification intervention led to an improvement of self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion.
Further studies to explore explanatory models for the effects of MBM are needed.
Mediating variables on mindfulness, self-efficacy, and compassion, and the effects on physical and psychological parameters, need to be examined more closely.
Future studies could use condition-specific questionnaires in addition to generic ones, which have previously been used to facilitate the comparison of the study results with those in the population.
Abstract
Lifestyle interventions can have a positive impact on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). In this randomized controlled trial, 145 participants with MetS (62.8% women; 59.7 ± 9.3 years) were randomized to (1) 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (F + LM; modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73) or (2) 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (LM; n = 72). Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 12, and 24, and included quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-36), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, CPSS), mood (Profile of Mood States, POMS), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale, SCS). At week 1, POMS depression and fatigue scores were significantly lower in F + LM compared to LM. At week 12, most self-report outcomes improved in both groups-only POMS vigor was significantly higher in F + LM than in LM. Most of the beneficial effects within the groups persisted at week 24. Fasting can induce mood-modulating effects in the short term. LM induced several positive effects on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with MetS.
-
10.
Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss?
Zhang, Q, Zhang, C, Wang, H, Ma, Z, Liu, D, Guan, X, Liu, Y, Fu, Y, Cui, M, Dong, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity increases the risk of developing metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and associated comorbidities. Intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) are fasting regimens known to reduce weight, which is at the heart of strategy in reducing obesity. IF and CCR restricts energy intake; however, CCR is harder to follow than IF. IF focuses more on time-restricted eating. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of IF and CCR on body mass index (BMI), body weight, and metabolism in overweight and obese participants. This research showed that IF is significantly superior to CCR in weight loss in obese people. However, there was no difference in BMI between both regimens. There was a significant difference between IF and CCR for total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and waist circumference. Further larger long-term robust studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of different fasting regimens due to the high heterogeneity in this research. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to distinguish the weight loss effects between different fasting regimens.
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and pilot trial studies to compare the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (IF) and continuous calorie restriction (CCR) in overweight and obese people. The parameters included body mass index (BMI), body weight, and other metabolism-related indicators. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to measure the effectiveness. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. The stability of the results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. The significance of body weight change (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI (-0.40, -0.02) p = 0.028) was more significant after IF than CCR. There was no significant difference in BMI (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.16, 0.20) p = 0.848) between IF and CCR. These findings suggest that IF may be superior to CCR for weight loss in some respects.