-
1.
Rifaximin or Saccharomyces boulardii in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from the randomized GutHeart trial.
Awoyemi, A, Mayerhofer, C, Felix, AS, Hov, JR, Moscavitch, SD, Lappegård, KT, Hovland, A, Halvorsen, S, Halvorsen, B, Gregersen, I, et al
EBioMedicine. 2021;:103511
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gut microbiota represents a potential treatment target in heart failure (HF) through microbial metabolites such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and systemic inflammation. Treatment with the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii have been suggested to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS In a multicentre, prospective randomized open label, blinded end-point trial, we randomized patients with LVEF <40% and New York Heart Association functional class II or III, despite optimal medical therapy, to treatment (1:1:1) with the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii, the antibiotic rifaximin, or standard of care (SoC) only. The primary endpoint, the baseline-adjusted LVEF at three months, was assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis. FINDINGS We enrolled a total of 151 patients. After three months' treatment, the LVEF did not differ significantly between the SoC arm and the rifaximin arm (mean difference was -1•2 percentage points; 95% CI -3•2 - 0•7; p=0•22) or between the SoC arm and the Saccharomyces boulardii arm (mean difference -0•2 percentage points; 95% CI -2•2 - 1•9; p=0•87). We observed no significant between-group differences in changes in microbiota diversity, TMAO, or C-reactive protein. INTERPRETATION Three months' treatment with Saccharomyces boulardii or rifaximin on top of SoC had no significant effect on LVEF, microbiota diversity, or the measured biomarkers in our population with HF. FUNDING The trial was funded by the Norwegian Association for Public Health, the Blix foundation, Stein Erik Hagen's Foundation for Clinical Heart Research, Ada og Hagbart Waages humanitære og veldedige stiftelse, Alfasigma, and Biocodex.
-
2.
Effect of 3 Days of Oral Azithromycin on Young Children With Acute Diarrhea in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
, , Ahmed, T, Chisti, MJ, Rahman, MW, Alam, T, Ahmed, D, Parvin, I, Kabir, MF, Sazawal, S, Dhingra, P, et al
JAMA network open. 2021;(12):e2136726
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines do not recommend routine antibiotic use for children with acute watery diarrhea. However, recent studies suggest that a significant proportion of such episodes have a bacterial cause and are associated with mortality and growth impairment, especially among children at high risk of diarrhea-associated mortality. Expanding antibiotic use among dehydrated or undernourished children may reduce diarrhea-associated mortality and improve growth. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the addition of azithromycin to standard case management of acute nonbloody watery diarrhea for children aged 2 to 23 months who are dehydrated or undernourished could reduce mortality and improve linear growth. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Antibiotics for Children with Diarrhea (ABCD) trial was a multicountry, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial among 8266 high-risk children aged 2 to 23 months presenting with acute nonbloody diarrhea. Participants were recruited between July 1, 2017, and July 10, 2019, from 36 outpatient hospital departments or community health centers in a mixture of urban and rural settings in Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Pakistan, and Tanzania. Each participant was followed up for 180 days. Primary analysis included all randomized participants by intention to treat. INTERVENTIONS Enrolled children were randomly assigned to receive either oral azithromycin, 10 mg/kg, or placebo once daily for 3 days in addition to standard WHO case management protocols for the management of acute watery diarrhea. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality up to 180 days after enrollment and linear growth faltering 90 days after enrollment. RESULTS A total of 8266 children (4463 boys [54.0%]; mean [SD] age, 11.6 [5.3] months) were randomized. A total of 20 of 4133 children in the azithromycin group (0.5%) and 28 of 4135 children in the placebo group (0.7%) died (relative risk, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27). The mean (SD) change in length-for-age z scores 90 days after enrollment was -0.16 (0.59) in the azithromycin group and -0.19 (0.60) in the placebo group (risk difference, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.06). Overall mortality was much lower than anticipated, and the trial was stopped for futility at the prespecified interim analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The study did not detect a survival benefit for children from the addition of azithromycin to standard WHO case management of acute watery diarrhea in low-resource settings. There was a small reduction in linear growth faltering in the azithromycin group, although the magnitude of this effect was not likely to be clinically significant. In low-resource settings, expansion of antibiotic use is not warranted. Adherence to current WHO case management protocols for watery diarrhea remains appropriate and should be encouraged. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03130114.
-
3.
A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial on protective effects of pentoxifylline on gentamicin nephrotoxicity in infectious patients.
Mousavinasab, SR, Akhoundi-Meybodi, Z, Mahmoudi, L, Karimzadeh, I
Clinical and experimental nephrology. 2021;(8):844-853
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Renal toxicity has limited gentamicin use in clinical practice. The aim of the present clinical trial was to assess the possible nephroprotective effects of pentoxifylline (PTX) against gentamicin nephrotoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients who had the indication for systemic gentamicin for at least 7 days. Sixty people were selected and randomly assigned. For patients in the intervention and control groups, 400 mg PTX sustained release tablet and placebo were given orally three times daily, respectively. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic information of patients were recorded. malondialdehyde (MDA) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels in serum were measured on days 0 and 7. RESULTS The incidence of nephrotoxicity in the placebo group was 19.6 times higher than that in the PTX group (OR = 19.6, 95%CI = 3.08-114.32; P value = 0.001). The mean ± SD time onset of ATN was 4.00 ± 2.32 and 5.58 ± 1.59 days in PTX and placebo recipients, respectively (P value < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, potassium and magnesium wasting between the two groups. The mean ± SD levels of serum MDA and TNF-α at day 7 were significantly lower in the PTX compared to those in the placebo group (P value < 0.001 for both indexes). CONCLUSION The co-administration of 400 mg PTX orally three times daily along with gentamicin was both well-tolerated and effective in preventing the nephrotoxicity of gentamicin in patients with different infectious diseases.
-
4.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Povidone-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Suspension for Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis.
Ta, CN, Raizman, MB, Gross, RD, Joshi, S, Mallick, S, Wang, Y, Segal, B
American journal of ophthalmology. 2020;:56-65
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a topical ophthalmic suspension combination of povidone-iodine 0.6% (PVP-I) and dexamethasone 0.1% (DEX) for infectious and inflammatory components of bacterial conjunctivitis. DESIGN Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS Subjects of all ages (those <3 months had to be full-term) with a diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were randomized 3:1:3 to either PVP-I/DEX, PVP-I alone, or placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution in the study eye, and the key secondary efficacy endpoint was bacterial eradication, both at the day 5 visit. Adverse events (AEs) were documented at all visits. RESULTS Overall, 753 subjects were randomized (intent-to-treat [ITT] population; PVP-I/DEX [n = 324]; PVP-I [n = 108]; placebo [n = 321]); mean and standard deviation (SD) age was 44.3 (22.9) years, and most were female (61.2%) and white (78.1%). In all treatment groups, mean treatment compliance was >98%. The modified ITT population for the efficacy analysis comprised 526 subjects. In the study eye at the day 5 visit, clinical resolution was achieved by 50.5% (111/220) subjects in the PVP-I/DEX group vs 42.8% (95/222) in the placebo group (P = .127), and bacterial eradication was achieved by 43.3% (94/217) and 46.8% (102/218), respectively (P = .500). Treatment-emergent AEs were experienced by 32.8% (106/323), 39.8% (43/108), and 19.0% (61/321) of subjects in the safety population treated with PVP-I/DEX, PVP-I, and placebo, respectively (most mild in severity). CONCLUSION In this study, PVP-I/DEX did not demonstrate additional benefit in clinical efficacy compared with placebo in subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis.
-
5.
Intravenous versus oral antibiotics for eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis (TORPEDO-CF): a randomised controlled trial.
Hewer, SCL, Smyth, AR, Brown, M, Jones, AP, Hickey, H, Kenna, D, Ashby, D, Thompson, A, Williamson, PR, ,
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2020;(10):975-986
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pulmonary infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis. If antibiotics are commenced promptly, infection can be eradicated. The aim of the trial was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous ceftazidime and tobramycin versus oral ciprofloxacin in the eradication of P aeruginosa. METHODS We did a multicentre, parallel group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in 72 cystic fibrosis centres (70 in the UK and two in Italy). Eligible participants were older than 28 days with an isolate of P aeruginosa (either the first ever isolate or a new isolate after at least 1 year free of infection). Participants were excluded if the P aeruginosa was resistant to, or they had a contraindication to, one or more of the trial antibiotics; if they were already receiving P aeruginosa suppressive therapy; if they had received any P aeruginosa eradication therapy within the previous 9 months; or if they were pregnant or breastfeeding. We used web-based randomisation to assign patients to 14 days intravenous ceftazidime and tobramycin or 12 weeks oral ciprofloxacin. Both were combined with 12 weeks inhaled colistimethate sodium. Randomisation lists were generated by a statistician, who had no involvement in the trial, using a computer-generated list. Randomisation was stratified by centre and because of the nature of the interventions, blinding was not possible. Our primary outcome was eradication of P aeruginosa at 3 months and remaining free of infection to 15 months. Primary analysis used intention to treat (powered for superiority). Safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. TORPEDO-CF was registered on the ISRCTN register, ISRCTN02734162, and EudraCT, 2009-012575-10. FINDINGS Between Oct 5, 2010, and Jan 27, 2017, 286 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 137 to intravenous antibiotics and 149 to oral antibiotics. 55 (44%) of 125 participants in the intravenous group and 68 (52%) of 130 participants in the oral group achieved the primary outcome. Participants randomly assigned to the intravenous group were less likely to achieve the primary outcome, although the difference between groups was not statistically significant (relative risk 0·84, 95% CI 0·65-1·09; p=0·18). 11 serious adverse events occurred in ten (8%) of 126 participants in the intravenous antibiotics group and 17 serious adverse events in 12 (8%) of 146 participants in the oral antibiotics group. INTERPRETATION Compared with oral therapy, intravenous antibiotics did not achieve sustained eradication of P aeruginosa in a greater proportion of patients with cystic fibrosis and was more expensive. Although there were fewer hospitalisations in the intravenous group than the oral group during follow-up, this confers no advantage over oral treatment because intravenous eradication frequently requires hospitalisation. These results do not support the use of intravenous antibiotics to eradicate P aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
-
6.
An open-label, multicentre, randomized comparative study of efficacy, safety and tolerability of the 5 plant - extract BNO 1012 in the Delayed Antibiotic Prescription Method in children, aged 6 to 11 years with acute viral and post-viral rhinosinusitis.
Popovych, VI, Beketova, HV, Koshel, IV, Tsodikova, OA, Kriuchko, TA, Abaturov, AE, Vakulenko, LI, Gavrylenko, IV
American journal of otolaryngology. 2020;(5):102564
Abstract
UNLABELLED Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) can be characterized as bacterial (ABRS) and require antibiotic therapy only in 0.5-5% of cases. In most cases, the disease is in a viral and post-viral form, which requires pathogenetic and symptomatic treatment. The study objective was to determine the efficacy of BNO 1012 extract in the technology of delayed antibiotic prescribing in children with acute rhinosinusitis. METHODS 292 children aged 6 to 11 years with ARS were randomized in the multicenter, comparative study. They received an extract of five medicinal plants in addition to standard symptomatic therapy or standard therapy only. EVALUATION CRITERIA reduction of the sinusitis severity according to a 4-point medical assessment scale (nasal congestion, severity of anterior and posterior rhinorrhea) at each visit, dynamics of self-scoring of rhinorrhea and headache (according to a 10-point visual analogue scale), "therapeutic benefit" in days, frequency of antibiotic prescriptions due to the use of an extract of five plants. RESULTS The use of the 5-plant extract BNO 1012 in addition to the standard symptomatic treatment of acute rhinosinusitis provides a clinically significant, adequate reduction in the severity of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and post-nasal drip, assessed by a physician at V2 (p < 0.005). Significant differences are noted in the patient's self-scoring of rhinorrhea on the second or third day in viral RS, and from the fourth to the eighth day in post-viral RS. Symptoms of similar intensity in control group were observed at V3. Thus, in the first week of treatment, the treatment group compared to the control one showed a "therapeutic benefit" of three days. The use of BNO 1012 in patients with acute rhinosinusitis can 1.81-fold reduce the prescription of antibacterial drugs. CONCLUSION The combination of five medicinal plants is effective for the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in children aged 6 to 11 years. Its use provides a significant "therapeutic benefit" when administered in addition to standard symptomatic therapy, reducing the need for antibiotic use.
-
7.
Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics or honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a study protocol of an open randomised clinical trial in primary care.
Cots, JM, Moragas, A, García-Sangenís, A, Morros, R, Gomez-Lumbreras, A, Ouchi, D, Monfà, R, Pera, H, Pujol, J, Bayona, C, et al
BMJ open. 2019;(5):e028159
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the frequent use of therapies in acute bronchitis, the evidence of their benefit is lacking, since only a few clinical trials have been published, with low sample sizes, poor methodological quality and mainly in children. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three symptomatic therapies (dextromethorphan, ipratropium or honey) associated with usual care and the usual care in adults with acute bronchitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This will be a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, open randomised trial. Patients aged 18 or over with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough for less than 3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough on a 7-point Likert scale, will be randomised to one of the following four groups: usual care, dextromethorphan 30 mg three times a day, ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg two puffs three times a day or honey 30 mg (a spoonful) three times a day, all taken for up to 14 days. The exclusion criteria will be pneumonia, criteria for hospital admission, pregnancy or lactation, concomitant pulmonary disease, associated significant comorbidity, allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs or admitted to a long-term residence. SAMPLE 668 patients. The primary outcome will be the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. All patients will be given a paper-based symptom diary to be self-administered. A second visit will be scheduled at day 2 or 3 for assessing evolution, with two more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance and complications. Patients still with symptoms at day 29 will be called 6 weeks after the baseline visit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Ethical Board of IDIAP Jordi Gol (reference number: AC18/002). The findings of this trial will be disseminated through research conferences and peer-review journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03738917; Pre-results.
-
8.
Vigilance on use of drugs, herbal products, and food supplements during pregnancy: focus on fosfomycin.
Mannucci, C, Dante, G, Miroddi, M, Facchinetti, F, D'Anna, R, Santamaria, A, Lenti, MC, Vannacci, A, Calapai, F, Perone, M, et al
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2019;(1):125-128
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE Urinary tract infection (UTI) is defined as a common bacterial infection that can lead to significant morbidity such as stricture, fistula, abscess formation, bacteremia, sepsis, pyelonephritis, and kidney dysfunction with a mortality rates reported of 1% in men and 3% in women because of development of pyelonephritis. UTIs are more common in women and the 33% of them require antimicrobials treatment for at least one episode by the age of 24 years. UTIs are the most common infections observed during pregnancy and up to 30% of mothers with not treated asymptomatic bacteriuria may develop acute pyelonephritis which consequently can be associated to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. All bacteriuria in pregnancy should be treated with antimicrobial treatments being safe for both the mother and the fetus. Approximately one every four women receives prescription of antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, nearly 80% of all the prescription medications during gestation. The use of fosfomycin to treat cystitis in pregnancy generally considered safe and effective. Even though use on antibiotics for urinary tract infections is considered generally safe for the fetus and mothers, this opinion is not based on specific studies monitoring the relationship of among urinary infections, consumption of antibiotics, and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS On this basis we decided to analyze data from the database of our multicenter study PHYTOVIGGEST, reporting data from 5362 pregnancies, focusing on use of fosfomycin. Principal outcomes of pregnancy in women treated with fosfomycin were taken into consideration. RESULTS Women who have been treated with urinary antibiotics during the pregnancy were 183. With respect to the total number of pregnancies of our sample, these women represented the percentage of 3.49% (187/5362). Analysis of different outcomes of pregnancy such as gestational age, neonatal weight, and neonatal Apgar index did not show any significant difference. At the same time, analysis of data of pregnancy complicancies (such as urgent cesarean delivery, use of general anesthesia, need to induce labor) did not show any difference in women taking fosfomycin during pregnancy and those not taking it. CONCLUSIONS Our data, based on a large number of pregnancies, confirm the safety use of fosfomycin use in pregnancy.
-
9.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for 1 day versus 3 days in liver cancer surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Takayama, T, Aramaki, O, Shibata, T, Oka, M, Itamoto, T, Shimada, M, Isaji, S, Kanematsu, T, Kubo, S, Kusunoki, M, et al
Surgery today. 2019;(10):859-869
Abstract
PURPOSES This study compared the effectiveness of 1-day vs 3-days antibiotic regimen to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in open liver resection. METHOD We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in 480 patients at 39 hospitals across Japan (registered as UMIN000002852). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma scheduled to undergo resection were randomly assigned to receive either a 1-day regimen for antimicrobial prophylaxis, or a 3-day regimen. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI. RESULTS Among 480 randomized patients, 232 assigned to the 1-day regimen and 235 to the 3-day regimen were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. SSI was diagnosed in 22 patients (9.5%) in the 1-day group vs 23 patients (9.8%) in the 3-day group (difference, - 0.30; 90% CI - 4.80 to 4.19% [95% CI - 5.66% to 5.05%]; one-sided P = 0.001 for non-inferiority), meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. In both groups, remote site infection (16 [6.9%] vs 22 [9.4%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) and drain-related infection (5 [2.2%] vs 4 [1.7%], P ˂ 0.001 for non-inferiority) were comparable. CONCLUSION To prevent SSI in liver cancer surgery, a 1-day regimen of flomoxef sodium is recommended for antimicrobial prophylaxis because of confirming the non-inferiority to longer usage.
-
10.
Azithromycin and metronidazole versus metronidazole-based therapy for the induction of remission in mild to moderate paediatric Crohn's disease : a randomised controlled trial.
Levine, A, Kori, M, Kierkus, J, Sigall Boneh, R, Sladek, M, Escher, JC, Wine, E, Yerushalmi, B, Amil Dias, J, Shaoul, R, et al
Gut. 2019;(2):239-247
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Crohn's disease (CD) pathogenesis associated with dysbiosis and presence of pathobionts in the lumen, intracellular compartments and epithelial biofilms. Azithromycin is active in all three compartments. Our goal was to evaluate if azithromycin-based therapy can improve response and induce remission compared with metronidazole alone in paediatric CD.
DESIGN This blinded randomised controlled trial allocated children 5-18 years with 10
12.5 or remission using intention to treat analysis. RESULTS 73 patients (mean age 13.8±3.1 years) were enrolled, 35 to group 1 and 38 to group 2. Response and remission rates at week 8 were identical 23/35 (66%) in group 1 and 17/38 (45%) and 15/38 (39%) in group 2 (P=0.07 and P=0.025, respectively). The needed to treat for remission was 3.7. Faecal calprotectin declined significantly in group 1 (P=0.003) but not in group 2 (p=0.33), and was lower at week 8 (P=0.052). Additional therapy was required in 6/35(17%) from group 1 versus 16/38(42%) in group 2 (P=0.027) by week 8. Among 12 failures in group 2, open-label azithromycin led to remission in 10/12 (83%). CONCLUSIONS The combination of azithromycin and metronidazole failed to improve response but was superior for induction of remission and reduction in calprotectin. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01596894.