-
1.
Efficacy and safety of setmelanotide, an MC4R agonist, in individuals with severe obesity due to LEPR or POMC deficiency: single-arm, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trials.
Clément, K, van den Akker, E, Argente, J, Bahm, A, Chung, WK, Connors, H, De Waele, K, Farooqi, IS, Gonneau-Lejeune, J, Gordon, G, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;(12):960-970
Abstract
BACKGROUND The melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R), a component of the leptin-melanocortin pathway, plays a part in bodyweight regulation. Severe early-onset obesity can be caused by biallelic variants in genes that affect the MC4R pathway. We report the results from trials of the MC4R agonist setmelanotide in individuals with severe obesity due to either pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) deficiency obesity or leptin receptor (LEPR) deficiency obesity. METHODS These single-arm, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trials were done in ten hospitals across Canada, the USA, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK. Participants aged 6 years or older with POMC or LEPR deficiency obesity received open-label setmelanotide for 12 weeks. Participants with at least 5 kg weight loss (or ≥5% if weighing <100 kg at baseline) entered an 8-week placebo-controlled withdrawal sequence (including 4 weeks each of blinded setmelanotide and placebo treatment) followed by 32 additional weeks of open-label treatment. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a baseline assessment (full analysis set), was the proportion of participants with at least 10% weight loss compared with baseline at approximately 1 year. A key secondary endpoint was mean percentage change in the most hunger score of the 11-point Likert-type scale at approximately 1 year on the therapeutic dose, which was assessed in a subset of participants aged 12 years or older in the full analysis set who demonstrated at least 5 kg weight loss (or ≥5% in paediatric participants if baseline bodyweight was <100 kg) over the 12-week open-label treatment phase and subsequently proceeded into the placebo-controlled withdrawal sequence, regardless of later disposition. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02896192 and NCT03287960. FINDINGS Between Feb 14, 2017, and Sept 7, 2018, ten participants were enrolled in the POMC trial and 11 participants were enrolled in the LEPR trial, and included in the full analysis and safety sets. Eight (80%) participants in the POMC trial and five (45%) participants in the LEPR trial achieved at least 10% weight loss at approximately 1 year. The mean percentage change in the most hunger score was -27·1% (n=7; 90% CI -40·6 to -15·0; p=0·0005) in the POMC trial and -43·7% (n=7; -54·8 to -29·1; p<0·0001) in the LEPR trial. The most common adverse events were injection site reaction and hyperpigmentation, which were reported in all ten participants in the POMC trial; nausea was reported in five participants and vomiting in three participants. In the LEPR trial, the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were injection site reaction in all 11 participants, skin disorders in five participants, and nausea in four participants. No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in both trials. INTERPRETATION Our results support setmelanotide for the treatment of obesity and hyperphagia caused by POMC or LEPR deficiency. FUNDING Rhythm Pharmaceuticals.
-
2.
Health-related quality of life in randomized controlled trials of lorcaserin for obesity management: what mediates improvement?
Kolotkin, RL, Crosby, RD, Wang, Z
Clinical obesity. 2017;(6):347-353
Abstract
Lorcaserin, plus diet and exercise, has demonstrated significant weight loss and improved cardiometabolic parameters vs. placebo in patients with overweight/obesity in three randomized, placebo-controlled trials. We examined whether lorcaserin is also associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and whether these improvements are wholly attributable to weight loss. Pooled data from Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin for Overweight and Obesity Management (BLOOM), Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin Second Study for Obesity Management (BLOSSOM) and BLOOM-Diabetes Mellitus (BLOOM-DM) trials were analysed (n = 5624). HRQOL was assessed at baseline and 52 weeks using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) questionnaire. Multiple mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the mechanisms underlying improved HRQOL. Greater HRQOL improvements were observed at 52 weeks in lorcaserin vs. placebo (P < 0.0001). A greater percentage of lorcaserin patients (54.1%) experienced meaningful improvements in IWQOL-Lite total score than placebo patients (48.2%) (P < 0.001). Body mass index (BMI) reduction was the primary driver of improved HRQOL (P < 0.0001), with depressive symptoms and total cholesterol also playing a role (P < 0.05). Improved HRQOL varied by gender, age, race and presence of diabetes and other comorbidities. Lorcaserin treatment significantly improves HRQOL compared with placebo. Although BMI reduction accounts for the majority of these improvements, improvement in depressive symptoms and total cholesterol are contributing factors.
-
3.
Effects of subacute ingestion of chlorogenic acids on sleep architecture and energy metabolism through activity of the autonomic nervous system: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded cross-over trial.
Park, I, Ochiai, R, Ogata, H, Kayaba, M, Hari, S, Hibi, M, Katsuragi, Y, Satoh, M, Tokuyama, K
The British journal of nutrition. 2017;(7):979-984
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Chlorogenic acids (CGA) are the most abundant polyphenols in coffee. Continuous consumption of CGA reduces body fat and body weight. Since energy metabolism and sleep are controlled by common regulatory factors, consumption of CGA might modulate sleep. Lack of sleep has been identified as a risk factor for obesity, hypertension and type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of ingesting CGA over 5 d on energy metabolism and sleep quality in humans. A total of nine healthy subjects (four male and five female) completed a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, cross-over intervention study. Subjects consumed a test beverage containing 0 or 600 mg of CGA for 5 d. On the fifth night, subjects stayed in a whole-room metabolic chamber to measure energy metabolism; sleep was evaluated using polysomnographic recording. It was found that CGA shortened sleep latency (9 (sem 2) v. 16 (sem 4) min, P<0·05) compared with the control, whereas no effect on sleep architecture, such as slow-wave sleep, rapid eye movement or waking after sleep onset, was observed. Indirect calorimetry revealed that consumption of CGA increased fat oxidation (510 (sem 84) kJ/8 h (122 (sem 20) kcal/8 h) v. 331 (sem 79) kJ/8 h (81 (sem 19) kcal/8 h), P<0·05) but did not affect energy expenditure during sleep. Consumption of CGA enhanced parasympathetic activity assessed from heart-rate variability during sleep (999 (sem 77) v. 919 (sem 54), P<0·05). A period of 5-d CGA consumption significantly increased fat oxidation during sleep, suggesting that beverages containing CGA may be beneficial to reduce body fat and prevent obesity. Consumption of CGA shortened sleep latency and did not adversely affect sleep quality.
-
4.
Efficacy and safety of beloranib for weight loss in obese adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Kim, DD, Krishnarajah, J, Lillioja, S, de Looze, F, Marjason, J, Proietto, J, Shakib, S, Stuckey, BGA, Vath, JE, Hughes, TE
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2015;(6):566-572
Abstract
AIM: To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of beloranib treatment for obesity. METHODS This phase II, double-blind, randomized study investigated the effects of beloranib suspension (0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 mg) or placebo, administered subcutaneously, for 12 weeks in 147 participants (primarily white women) with obesity. No diet or exercise advice was administered. RESULTS At week 12, beloranib resulted in dose-dependent progressive weight loss of -5.5 ± 0.5, -6.9 ± 0.6 and -10.9 ± 1.1 kg for the 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 mg beloranib doses, respectively, compared with -0.4 ± 0.4 kg with placebo (all p < 0.0001 vs placebo). Weight loss with beloranib was associated with corresponding reductions in waist circumference and body fat mass, as well as improvements in lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and blood pressure. Sleep disturbance and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with beloranib than with placebo; these were generally mild to moderate, transient and dose-related, and led to more early study withdrawals in participants in the group with the highest dose of beloranib. CONCLUSIONS In this 12-week phase II study, beloranib produced clinically and statistically significant weight loss and corresponding improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors. Beloranib appeared safe, and the 0.6 and 1.2 mg doses were generally well tolerated. The 2.4 mg dose was associated with increased sleep latency and mild to moderate gastrointestinal adverse events over the first month of treatment. These findings represent a novel mechanism for producing clinically meaningful weight loss.
-
5.
Safety and efficacy of lorcaserin: a combined analysis of the BLOOM and BLOSSOM trials.
Aronne, L, Shanahan, W, Fain, R, Glicklich, A, Soliman, W, Li, Y, Smith, S
Postgraduate medicine. 2014;(6):7-18
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lorcaserin, a novel selective 5-HT2C receptor agonist, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for weight management in combination with lifestyle modification for adults with obesity and adults with overweight and ≥ 1 weight-related comorbid condition. The safety and effectiveness of lorcaserin in adult patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus was established based on 2 phase III clinical trials of similar design: Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin for Overweight and Obesity Management (BLOOM) and Behavioral Modification and Lorcaserin Second Study for Obesity Management (BLOSSOM). This report presents a prespecified analysis of pooled data from these trials. METHODS Co-primary end points in this analysis include the proportion of patients with a reduction in baseline body weight of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10%, and a change in weight from baseline. Key secondary end points include changes from baseline values in lipid parameters, quality-of-life measures, glycemic indicators, and vital signs. RESULTS At week 52, more than twice as many lorcaserin-treated patients achieved a weight loss of ≥ 5% compared with placebo (lorcaserin, 47.1%; placebo, 22.6%), and lorcaserin-treated patients lost significantly more body weight (lorcaserin, -5.8%; placebo, -2.5%). A significantly greater proportion of lorcaserin-treated patients achieved a weight loss of ≥ 10% (lorcaserin, 22.4%; placebo, 8.7%). There were statistically significant improvements in lipid parameters, glycemic indicators, quality-of-life measures, and vital signs in the lorcaserin group compared with placebo. The most common adverse events associated with lorcaserin treatment were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, and nasopharyngitis. Lorcaserin-treated patients had a rate of FDA-defined valvulopathy similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS This pooled analysis of the phase III BLOOM and BLOSSOM trials shows that lorcaserin 10 mg twice daily, in combination with diet and exercise, is safe and tolerable, and is associated with statistically significant weight loss and clinically relevant improvements in cardiometabolic parameters.
-
6.
Effects of low-dose, controlled-release, phentermine plus topiramate combination on weight and associated comorbidities in overweight and obese adults (CONQUER): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Gadde, KM, Allison, DB, Ryan, DH, Peterson, CA, Troupin, B, Schwiers, ML, Day, WW
Lancet (London, England). 2011;(9774):1341-52
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with a reduction in life expectancy and an increase in mortality from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and other causes. We therefore assessed the efficacy and safety of two doses of phentermine plus topiramate controlled-release combination as an adjunct to diet and lifestyle modification for weight loss and metabolic risk reduction in individuals who were overweight and obese, with two or more risk factors. METHODS In this 56-week phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned overweight or obese adults (aged 18-70 years), with a body-mass index of 27-45 kg/m(2) and two or more comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes or prediabetes, or abdominal obesity) to placebo, once-daily phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, or once-daily phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg in a 2:1:2 ratio in 93 centres in the USA. Drugs were administered orally. Patients were randomly assigned by use of a computer-generated algorithm that was implemented through an interactive voice response system, and were stratified by sex and diabetic status. Investigators, patients, and study sponsors were masked to treatment. Primary endpoints were the percentage change in bodyweight and the proportion of patients achieving at least 5% weight loss. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov, number NCT00553787. FINDINGS Of 2487 patients, 994 were assigned to placebo, 498 to phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, and 995 to phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg; 979, 488, and 981 patients, respectively, were analysed. At 56 weeks, change in bodyweight was -1·4 kg (least-squares mean -1·2%, 95% CI -1·8 to -0·7), -8·1 kg (-7·8%, -8·5 to -7·1; p<0·0001), and -10·2 kg (-9·8%, -10·4 to -9·3; p<0·0001) in the patients assigned to placebo, phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, and phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg, respectively. 204 (21%) patients achieved at least 5% weight loss with placebo, 303 (62%; odds ratio 6·3, 95% CI 4·9 to 8·0; p<0·0001) with phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, and 687 (70%; 9·0, 7·3 to 11·1; p<0·0001) with phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg; for ≥10% weight loss, the corresponding numbers were 72 (7%), 182 (37%; 7·6, 5·6 to 10·2; p<0·0001), and 467 (48%; 11·7, 8·9 to 15·4; p<0·0001). The most common adverse events were dry mouth (24 [2%], 67 [13%], and 207 [21%] in the groups assigned to placebo, phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, and phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg, respectively), paraesthesia (20 [2%], 68 [14%], and 204 [21%], respectively), constipation (59 [6%], 75 [15%], and 173 [17%], respectively), insomnia (47 [5%], 29 [6%], and 102 [10%], respectively), dizziness (31 [3%], 36 [7%], 99 [10%], respectively), and dysgeusia (11 [1%], 37 [7%], and 103 [10%], respectively). 38 (4%) patients assigned to placebo, 19 (4%) to phentermine 7·5 mg plus topiramate 46·0 mg, and 73 (7%) to phentermine 15·0 mg plus topiramate 92·0 mg had depression-related adverse events; and 28 (3%), 24 (5%), and 77 (8%), respectively, had anxiety-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION The combination of phentermine and topiramate, with office-based lifestyle interventions, might be a valuable treatment for obesity that can be provided by family doctors. FUNDING Vivus.
-
7.
Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Greenway, FL, Fujioka, K, Plodkowski, RA, Mudaliar, S, Guttadauria, M, Erickson, J, Kim, DD, Dunayevich, E, ,
Lancet (London, England). 2010;(9741):595-605
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increasing public health concerns regarding obesity, few safe and effective drug treatments are available. Combination treatment with sustained-release naltrexone and bupropion was developed to produce complementary actions in CNS pathways regulating bodyweight. The Contrave Obesity Research I (COR-I) study assessed the effect of such treatment on bodyweight in overweight and obese participants. METHODS Men and women aged 18-65 years who had a body-mass index (BMI) of 30-45 kg/m(2) and uncomplicated obesity or BMI 27-45 kg/m(2) with dyslipidaemia or hypertension were eligible for enrolment in this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial undertaken at 34 sites in the USA. Participants were prescribed mild hypocaloric diet and exercise and were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive sustained-release naltrexone 32 mg per day plus sustained-release bupropion 360 mg per day combined in fixed-dose tablets (also known as NB32), sustained-release naltrexone 16 mg per day plus sustained-release bupropion 360 mg per day combined in fixed-dose tablets (also known as NB16), or matching placebo twice a day, given orally for 56 weeks. The trial included a 3-week dose escalation. Randomisation was done by use of a centralised, computer-generated, web-based system and was stratified by study centre. Co-primary efficacy endpoints at 56 weeks were percentage change in bodyweight and proportion of participants who achieved a decrease in bodyweight of 5% or more. The primary analysis included all randomised participants with a baseline weight measurement and a post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug (last observation carried forward). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00532779. FINDINGS 1742 participants were enrolled and randomised to double-blind treatment (naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion, n=583; naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion, n=578; placebo, n=581). 870 (50%) participants completed 56 weeks of treatment (n=296; n=284; n=290, respectively) and 1453 (83%) were included in the primary analysis (n=471; n=471; n=511). Mean change in bodyweight was -1.3% (SE 0.3) in the placebo group, -6.1% (0.3) in the naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion group (p<0.0001 vs placebo) and -5.0% (0.3) in the naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion group (p<0.0001 vs placebo). 84 (16%) participants assigned to placebo had a decrease in bodyweight of 5% or more compared with 226 (48%) assigned to naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion (p<0.0001 vs placebo) and 186 (39%) assigned to naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion (p<0.0001 vs placebo). The most frequent adverse event in participants assigned to combination treatment was nausea (naltrexone 32 mg plus bupropion, 171 participants [29.8%]; naltrexone 16 mg plus bupropion, 155 [27.2%]; placebo, 30 [5.3%]). Headache, constipation, dizziness, vomiting, and dry mouth were also more frequent in the naltrexone plus bupropion groups than in the placebo group. A transient increase of around 1.5 mm Hg in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was followed by a reduction of around 1 mm Hg below baseline in the naltrexone plus bupropion groups. Combination treatment was not associated with increased depression or suicidality events compared with placebo. INTERPRETATION A sustained-release combination of naltrexone plus bupropion could be a useful therapeutic option for treatment of obesity. FUNDING Orexigen Therapeutics.
-
8.
The effects of ezetimibe and/or orlistat on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism in obese hypercholesterolemic patients.
Nakou, ES, Filippatos, TD, Agouridis, AP, Kostara, C, Bairaktari, ET, Elisaf, MS
Lipids. 2010;(5):445-50
Abstract
We investigated the factors influencing triglycerides (TG) reduction during ezetimibe, alone or combined with orlistat, administration. Eighty-six obese hypercholesterolemic subjects were prescribed a low-fat diet and were randomized to ezetimibe (E group), orlistat (O group), or both (OE group) for 6 months. Plasma TG and apolipoprotein (apo) C-III reduction was significantly greater in the combination group compared with monotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that in E group apoC-III reduction and baseline TG levels were independently positively correlated, whereas baseline apoC-II levels were negatively correlated, with TG lowering. In OE group apoC-III reduction was the only independent contributor to TG reduction.
-
9.
Use of a prescribed ephedrine/caffeine combination and the risk of serious cardiovascular events: a registry-based case-crossover study.
Hallas, J, Bjerrum, L, Støvring, H, Andersen, M
American journal of epidemiology. 2008;(8):966-73
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Ephedrine and herbal ephedra preparations have been shown to induce a small-to-moderate weight loss. Owing to reports on serious cardiovascular events, they were banned from the US market in 2004. There have been no large controlled studies on the possible association between prescribed ephedrine/caffeine and cardiovascular events in general. The authors linked data from four different sources within Statistics Denmark, using data on 257,364 users of prescribed ephedrine/caffeine for the period 1995-2002. The data were analyzed using a case-crossover technique with a composite endpoint: death outside of a hospital, myocardial infarction, or stroke. To account for effects of chronic exposure and effects in naïve users, the authors performed a secondary case-control study nested within the cohort of ephedrine/caffeine ever users. Among 2,316 case subjects, 282 (12.2%) were current users of ephedrine/caffeine. The case-crossover analysis yielded an odds ratio of 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 1.00); after adjustment for trends in ephedrine/caffeine use, it was 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.79, 1.16). Subgroup analyses revealed no strata with significantly elevated risk. In the case-control substudy, there was no increased risk among naïve users or users with large cumulative doses. Prescribed ephedrine/caffeine was not associated with a substantially increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this study.
-
10.
Telephone-based diet and exercise coaching and a weight-loss supplement result in weight and fat loss in 120 men and women.
Tucker, LA, Cook, AJ, Nokes, NR, Adams, TB
American journal of health promotion : AJHP. 2008;(2):121-9
Abstract
PURPOSE Determine the effects of telephone-based coaching and a weight-loss supplement on the weight and body fat (BF) of overweight adults. DESIGN Randomized, placebo-controlled experiment with assessments at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months. SETTING Community. SUBJECTS Sixty overweight or obese men and 60 overweight or obese women, 25 to 60 years INTERVENTION Eleven 30-minute telephone coaching sessions were spaced throughout the study; the initial conversation lasted 60 to 90 minutes. Supplement or placebo capsules were taken daily over the 17 weeks. MEASURES Weight was measured using an electronic scale, and BF was assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS Subjects taking the placebo lost 1.8 +/- 3.3 kg of weight and 0.7 +/- 2.2 kg of BF, whereas supplement users lost more: 3.1 +/- 3.7 kg of weight (F = 4.1, P = .045) and 1.7 +/- 2.6 kg of BF (F = 4.4, p = .039). Participants receiving no coaching lost 1.8 +/- 3.3 kg of weight and 0.7 +/- 2.2 kg of BF, whereas adults receiving coaching lost more: 3.2 +/- 3.6 kg of weight (F = 4.8, p = .032) and 1.6 +/- 2.5 kg of BF (F = 4.2, p = .044). Adults receiving both the supplement and coaching had the greatest losses of weight and BF, suggesting an additive effect (F = 3.2, p = .026; F = 2.9, p = .039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Both treatments, coaching and the supplement, viewed separately and in combination, worked to help subjects lose weight and BF. Adults can be educated and motivated via telephone to change behaviors leading to weight loss, and a weight-loss supplement can be included to increase success.