-
1.
Anti-interleukin-21 antibody and liraglutide for the preservation of β-cell function in adults with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
von Herrath, M, Bain, SC, Bode, B, Clausen, JO, Coppieters, K, Gaysina, L, Gumprecht, J, Hansen, TK, Mathieu, C, Morales, C, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2021;(4):212-224
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 1 diabetes is characterised by progressive loss of functional β-cell mass, necessitating insulin treatment. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that combining anti-interleukin (IL)-21 antibody (for low-grade and transient immunomodulation) with liraglutide (to improve β-cell function) could enable β-cell survival with a reduced risk of complications compared with traditional immunomodulation. METHODS This randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind, phase 2 trial was done at 94 sites (university hospitals and medical centres) in 17 countries. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-45 years with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes and residual β-cell function. Individuals with unstable type 1 diabetes (defined by an episode of severe diabetic ketoacidosis within 2 weeks of enrolment) or active or latent chronic infections were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with stratification by baseline stimulated peak C-peptide concentration (mixed-meal tolerance test [MMTT]), to the combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide, anti-IL-21 alone, liraglutide alone, or placebo, all as an adjunct to insulin. Investigators, participants, and funder personnel were masked throughout the treatment period. The primary outcome was the change in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration at week 54 (end of treatment) relative to baseline, measured via the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over a 4 h period for the full analysis set (intention-to-treat population consisting of all participants who were randomly assigned). After treatment cessation, participants were followed up for an additional 26-week off-treatment observation period. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02443155. FINDINGS Between Nov 10, 2015, and Feb 27, 2019, 553 adults were assessed for eligibility, of whom 308 were randomly assigned to receive either anti-IL-21 plus liraglutide, anti-IL-21, liraglutide, or placebo (77 assigned to each group). Compared with placebo (ratio to baseline 0·61, 39% decrease), the decrease in MMTT-stimulated C-peptide concentration from baseline to week 54 was significantly smaller with combination treatment (0·90, 10% decrease; estimated treatment ratio 1·48, 95% CI 1·16-1·89; p=0·0017), but not with anti-IL-21 alone (1·23, 0·97-1·57; p=0·093) or liraglutide alone (1·12, 0·87-1·42; p=0·38). Despite greater insulin use in the placebo group, the decrease in HbA1c (a key secondary outcome) at week 54 was greater with all active treatments (-0·50 percentage points) than with placebo (-0·10 percentage points), although the differences versus placebo were not significant. The effects diminished upon treatment cessation. Changes in immune cell subsets across groups were transient and mild (<10% change over time). The most frequently reported adverse events included gastrointestinal disorders, in keeping with the known side-effect profile of liraglutide. The rate of hypoglycaemic events did not differ significantly between active treatment groups and placebo, with an exception of a lower rate in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group during the treatment period. No events of diabetic ketoacidosis were observed. One participant died while on liraglutide (considered unlikely to be related to trial treatment) in connection with three reported adverse events (hypoglycaemic coma, pneumonia, and brain oedema). INTERPRETATION The combination of anti-IL-21 and liraglutide could preserve β-cell function in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The efficacy of this combination appears to be similar to that seen in trials of other disease-modifying interventions in type 1 diabetes, but with a seemingly better safety profile. Efficacy and safety should be further evaluated in a phase 3 trial programme. FUNDING Novo Nordisk.
-
2.
Safety and Clinical Activity of a New Anti-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or Combined with Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors: The PACT Phase Ia/Ib Trial.
Patnaik, A, Yap, TA, Chung, HC, de Miguel, MJ, Bang, YJ, Lin, CC, Su, WC, Italiano, A, Chow, KH, Szpurka, AM, et al
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2021;(5):1267-1277
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase Ia/Ib PACT study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of a new programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, LY3300054, as monotherapy or in combination with ramucirumab, abemaciclib, or merestinib (a type II MET kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors (NCT02791334). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled into cohorts of escalating LY3300054 dose (phase Ia) as monotherapy (N = 15) or combined with ramucirumab (N = 10), abemaciclib (N = 24), or merestinib (N = 12). The phase Ib dose expansion enrolled 8 patients with melanoma in the monotherapy arm and 12 patients with pancreatic cancer in the merestinib combination arm. Combination treatments were administered concurrently from day 1 of each cycle. A 14-day lead-in abemaciclib arm was also explored. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and safety. RESULTS Treatment-related adverse events included fatigue and nausea in the monotherapy arm (13% for each), hypothyroidism (30%) in the ramucirumab arm, diarrhea (54%) in the abemaciclib arm, and nausea (25%) in the merestinib arm. DLTs associated with hepatoxicity were observed in 3 of 4 patients in the abemaciclib lead-in cohorts. No DLTs or grade 3 or 4 hepatoxicity were reported in the concurrent abemaciclib arm. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were comparable with other PD-L1 inhibitors. One patient in each arm experienced a partial response per RECIST v1.1 lasting ≥7 months. CONCLUSIONS LY3300054 was well tolerated without unexpected safety concerns when administered alone or concurrently with ramucirumab, abemaciclib, or merestinib. Lead-in abemaciclib before combining with LY3300054 was not feasible due to hepatotoxicity. Durable clinical benefits were seen in all regimens.
-
3.
Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Facon, T, Kumar, SK, Plesner, T, Orlowski, RZ, Moreau, P, Bahlis, N, Basu, S, Nahi, H, Hulin, C, Quach, H, et al
The Lancet. Oncology. 2021;(11):1582-1596
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the primary analysis of the phase 3 MAIA trial (median follow-up 28·0 months), a significant improvement in progression-free survival was observed with daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in transplantation-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the updated efficacy and safety results from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival. METHODS MAIA is an ongoing, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients at 176 hospitals in 14 countries across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2, and were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation because of their age (≥65 years) or comorbidities. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using randomly permuted blocks (block size 4) by an interactive web response system to receive 28-day cycles of intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg, once per week during cycles 1-2, once every 2 weeks in cycles 3-6, and once every 4 weeks thereafter) plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21 of each cycle) and oral dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle; daratumumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Randomisation was stratified by International Staging System disease stage, geographical region, and age. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was centrally assessed, and a secondary endpoint was overall survival (both assessed in the intention-to-treat population). The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. The results presented here are from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival, for which the prespecified stopping boundary was p=0·0414. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02252172. FINDINGS Between March 18, 2015, and Jan 15, 2017, 952 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 737 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the daratumumab group (n=368) or the control group (n=369). At a median follow-up of 56·2 months (IQR 52·7-59·9), median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI 54·8-not reached) in the daratumumab group versus 34·4 months (29·6-39·2) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·43-0·66]; p<0·0001). Median overall survival was not reached in either group (daratumumab group, 95% CI not reached-not reached; control group, 95% CI 55·7-not reached; HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·53-0·86]; p=0·0013). The most common (>15%) grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (197 [54%] patients in the daratumumab group vs 135 [37%] patients in the control group), pneumonia (70 [19%] vs 39 [11%]), anaemia (61 [17%] vs 79 [22%]), and lymphopenia (60 [16%] vs 41 [11%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 281 (77%) patients in the daratumumab group and 257 (70%) patients in the control group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 13 (4%) patients in the daratumumab group and ten (3%) patients in the control group. INTERPRETATION Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone increased overall survival and progression-free survival in patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. There were no new safety concerns. Our results support the frontline use of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplantation. FUNDING Janssen Research & Development.
-
4.
Randomized Controlled Trial: Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Infliximab CT-P13 Maintenance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Schreiber, S, Ben-Horin, S, Leszczyszyn, J, Dudkowiak, R, Lahat, A, Gawdis-Wojnarska, B, Pukitis, A, Horynski, M, Farkas, K, Kierkus, J, et al
Gastroenterology. 2021;(7):2340-2353
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS This study compared pharmacokinetics, symptomatic and endoscopic efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a subcutaneous formulation of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 (CT-P13 SC) vs intravenous CT-P13 (CT-P13 IV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS This randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 1 study enrolled tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-naïve patients with active ulcerative colitis (total Mayo score 6-12 points with endoscopic subscore ≥2) or Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index 220-450 points) at 50 centers. After CT-P13 IV induction at Week (W) 0/W2, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC every 2 weeks (q2w) from W6 to W54 or CT-P13 IV every 8 weeks from W6 to W22. At W30, all patients receiving CT-P13 IV switched to CT-P13 SC q2w until W54. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of CT-P13 SC to CT-P13 IV for observed predose CT-P13 concentration at W22 (Ctrough,W22), concluded if the lower bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of geometric least-squares means exceeded 80%. RESULTS Overall, 66 and 65 patients were randomized to CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV, respectively. The primary endpoint of noninferiority was met with a geometric least-squares means ratio for Ctrough,W22 of 1154.17% (90% CI 786.37-1694.00; n = 59 [CT-P13 SC]; n = 57 [CT-P13 IV]). W30/W54 clinical remission rates were comparable between arms. Other efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were also broadly comparable between arms, including after switching. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetic noninferiority of CT-P13 SC to CT-P13 IV, and the comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles, support the potential suitability of CT-P13 SC treatment in IBD. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02883452.
-
5.
Efficacy of Every Four Monthly and Quarterly Dosing of Faricimab vs Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The STAIRWAY Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Khanani, AM, Patel, SS, Ferrone, PJ, Osborne, A, Sahni, J, Grzeschik, S, Basu, K, Ehrlich, JS, Haskova, Z, Dugel, PU
JAMA ophthalmology. 2020;(9):964-972
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Faricimab neutralizes angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A via both simultaneous and independent binding. OBJECTIVE To evaluate extended dosing with faricimab, the first bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a 52-week multicenter, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study. Study participants were enrolled in 25 sites in the US from January and March 2017 with treatment-naive choroidal neovascularization secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score of 73 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/40) to 24 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/320). Analysis began January 2017 and ended March 2018. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized 1:2:2 to receive intravitreal ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks or faricimab, 6.0 mg, every 12 or 16 weeks. Participants in the faricimab arms initially received 4 monthly injections of faricimab. No rescue injections were allowed. Participants randomized to dosing every 16 weeks were assessed for disease activity at week 24 using prespecified criteria. Those with no active disease continued dosing every 16 weeks through trial end; participants with disease activity continued received dosing every 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean change in BCVA from baseline at week 40. RESULTS Of 76 participants enrolled (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [8.5] years; age range, 56-94 years; 41 women [58%]; 69 white [97%]), 16 (21.0%) were randomized to ranibizumab every 4 weeks, 29 (38.2%) to faricimab every 12 weeks, and 31 (40.8%) to faricimab every 16 weeks. At week 24, 12 weeks after their last initiation injection, 65% (36 of 55) of all faricimab-treated participants had no disease activity. At week 40, adjusted mean BCVA gains from baseline (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) were +11.4 (80% CI, 7.8-15.0), +9.3 (80% CI, 6.4-12.3), and +12.5 (80% CI, 9.9-15.1) for the ranibizumab every 4 weeks, faricimab every 12 weeks, and faricimab every 16 weeks arms, respectively. Participants received a mean (SD) total of 12.9 (0.25), 6.7 (0.91), and 6.2 (0.93) injections, for the ranibizumab every 4 weeks, faricimab every 12 weeks, and faricimab every 16 weeks arms, respectively, through week 52. The secondary BCVA and anatomical imaging end points supported the primary end point and were comparable with ranibizumab every 4 weeks. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE At week 52, faricimab dosing every 16 weeks and every 12 weeks resulted in maintenance of initial vision and anatomic improvements comparable with monthly ranibizumab. These results suggest a role for simultaneous neutralization of angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A in providing sustained efficacy through extended durability, warranting further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03038880.
-
6.
Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses and Regimens of Faricimab vs Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The AVENUE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sahni, J, Dugel, PU, Patel, SS, Chittum, ME, Berger, B, Del Valle Rubido, M, Sadikhov, S, Szczesny, P, Schwab, D, Nogoceke, E, et al
JAMA ophthalmology. 2020;(9):955-963
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Faricimab, the first bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use, simultaneously and independently binds and neutralizes angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of different doses and regimens of faricimab vs ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS AVENUE was a 36-week, multiple-dose-regimen, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, phase 2 randomized clinical study performed at 58 sites in the United States. Eligible participants were anti-VEGF treatment naive with choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 73 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/320). Data were collected from August 11, 2015, to January 12, 2017, with the final patient visit completed September 26, 2017. Data were analyzed from August 11, 2015, to October 4, 2019. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized 3:2:2:2:3 to receive ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm A [n = 68]); faricimab, 1.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm B [n = 47]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm C [n = 42]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks until week 12, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (arm D [n = 47]); and ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks until week 8, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm E [n = 69]). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 36, proportion of participants gaining at least 15 letters, BCVA of 20/40 or better or 20/200 or worse, and ocular coherence tomographic outcomes in anti-VEGF treatment-naive participants (arms A, B, C, D) and from weeks 12 to 36 in those with incomplete response (participants in arms A and E with week 12 BCVA ETDRS letter score of ≤68 [Snellen equivalent, 20/50 or worse]). RESULTS A total of 263 participants were included in the analysis (172 [65.4%] female; 258 [98.1%] white; mean [SD] age, 78.3 [8.7] years). At week 36, adjusted mean change in BCVA vs ranibizumab was 1.6 (80% CI, -1.6 to 4.7) letters for arm B (P = .52), -1.6 (80% CI, -4.9 to 1.7) letters for arm C (P = .53), and -1.5 (80% CI, -4.6 to 1.6) letters for arm D (P = .53). For arm E, adjusted mean change from week 12 was -1.7 (80% CI, -3.8 to 0.4) letters (P = .30). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE AVENUE did not meet its primary end point of superiority of faricimab over ranibizumab in BCVA at week 36. Although not superior to monthly ranibizumab as given in this trial, overall visual and anatomical gains noted with faricimab support pursuing phase 3 trials for a potential alternative to monthly anti-VEGF therapy. Faricimab showed no new or unexpected safety signals. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02484690.
-
7.
Adjuvant 131I-metuximab for hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.
Li, J, Xing, J, Yang, Y, Liu, J, Wang, W, Xia, Y, Yan, Z, Wang, K, Wu, D, Wu, L, et al
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2020;(6):548-560
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective adjuvant treatment after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important area of research. Radioactive iodine (131I)-labelled metuximab is a radiolabelled monoclonal antibody against the CD147 (also known as basigin or HAb18G) antigen that is expressed in HCC. We aimed to examine the role of 131I-metuximab as an adjuvant therapy after HCC resection. METHODS This randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at five medical centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years who underwent curative-intent resection of histologically confirmed HCC expressing CD147 were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated random sequence, stratified by centre, to receive either adjuvant transarterial injection of one dose of 27·75 MBq/kg 131I-metuximab 4-6 weeks after the hepatectomy (treatment group) or no adjuvant treatment (control group). Patients and physicians were not masked to the study groups. The primary outcome was 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00819650. FINDINGS Between April 1, 2009, and Nov 30, 2012, 485 patients were screened for eligibility. 329 (68%) of these patients were excluded and 156 (32%) were randomly assigned to receive either 131I-metuximab (n=78) or no adjuvant treatment (n=78). The median follow-up was 55·9 months (IQR 18·6-79·4). In the intention-to-treat population, the 5-year RFS was 43·4% (95% CI 33·6-55·9) in the 131I-metuximab group and 21·7% (14·2-33·1) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·34-0·72]; Z=2·96, p=0·0031). 131I-metuximab-associated adverse events occurred within the first 4 weeks in 34 (45%) of 76 patients, seven (21%) of whom had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. These adverse events were all resolved with appropriate treatment within 2 weeks of being identified. INTERPRETATION Adjuvant 131I-metuximab treatment significantly improved the 5-year RFS of patients after hepatectomy for HCC tumours expressing CD147. This treatment was well tolerated by patients. FUNDING State Key Project on Infectious Diseases of China.
-
8.
Efficacy and safety of burosumab in children aged 1-4 years with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.
Whyte, MP, Carpenter, TO, Gottesman, GS, Mao, M, Skrinar, A, San Martin, J, Imel, EA
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2019;(3):189-199
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with X-linked hypophosphataemia have high concentrations of circulating phosphatonin fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), which causes renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphataemia, rickets, skeletal deformities, and growth impairment. Burosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against FGF23, improves phosphate homoeostasis and rickets in children aged 5-12 years with X-linked hypophosphataemia. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of burosumab in younger children with X-linked hypophosphataemia. METHODS In this open-label, phase 2 trial at three hospitals in the USA, children (aged 1-4 years) with X-linked hypophosphataemia received burosumab (0·8 mg/kg) via subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for 64 weeks. The dose was increased to 1·2 mg/kg if two consecutive pre-dose serum phosphorus concentrations were below 1·03 mmol/L (3·2 mg/dL), serum phosphorus had increased by less than 0·16 mmol/L (<0·5 mg/dL) from baseline, and a dose of burosumab had not been missed. Participants could continue to receive burosumab for up to an additional 96 weeks during the extension period. Key inclusion criteria were age 1-4 years at the time of informed consent; fasting serum phosphorus concentration of less than 0·97 mmol/L (3·0 mg/dL); serum creatinine 8·8-35·4 μmol/L (0·1-0·4 mg/dL); radiographic evidence of rickets (at least five participants were required to have a Thacher Rickets Severity Score of ≥1·5 at the knee); and a confirmed PHEX mutation or a variant of unknown significance in the patient or direct relative also affected with X-linked hypophosphataemia. Conventional therapy was stopped upon enrolment. The coprimary endpoints were safety and change from baseline to week 40 in fasting serum phosphorus concentrations. Changes in rickets severity from baseline to weeks 40 and 64 (assessed radiographically using Thacher Rickets Severity Score and an adaptation of the Radiographic Global Impression of Change), and recumbent length or standing height, were key secondary outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02750618, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between May 16, 2016, and June 10, 2016, we enrolled 13 children with X-linked hypophosphataemia. All 13 children completed 64 weeks of treatment and were included in the efficacy and safety analysis; none exceeded 70 weeks of treatment at the time of analysis. Serum phosphorus least squares mean increase from baseline to week 40 of treatment was 0·31 mmol/L (SE 0·04; 95% CI 0·24-0·39; 0·96 mg/dL [SE 0·12]; p<0·0001). All patients had at least one adverse event. 14 treatment-related adverse events, mostly injection site reactions, occurred in five children. One serious adverse event considered unrelated to treatment (tooth abscess) occurred in a child with a history of tooth abscess. All other adverse events were mild to moderate, except a severe food allergy considered unrelated to treatment. No instances of nephrocalcinosis or noteworthy changes in the results of a standard safety chemistry panel emerged. Total Thacher Rickets Severity Score decreased by a least squares mean of -1·7 (SE 0·1; p<0·0001) from baseline to week 40 and by -2·0 (SE 0·1; p<0·0001) by week 64. The Radiographic Global Impression of Change score also indicated significant improvement, with a least squares mean score of +2·3 (SE 0·1) at week 40 and +2·2 (0·1) at week 64 (both p<0·0001). Mean length or standing height Z score was maintained from baseline to week 64. INTERPRETATION Burosumab had a favourable safety profile, increased serum phosphorus, and improved rickets and prevented early declines in growth in children aged 1-4 years with X-linked hypophosphataemia. These findings could substantially alter the treatment of young children with X-linked hypophosphataemia. FUNDING Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical and Kyowa Kirin International.
-
9.
Burosumab versus conventional therapy in children with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Imel, EA, Glorieux, FH, Whyte, MP, Munns, CF, Ward, LM, Nilsson, O, Simmons, JH, Padidela, R, Namba, N, Cheong, HI, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2019;(10189):2416-2427
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND X-linked hypophosphataemia in children is characterised by elevated serum concentrations of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), hypophosphataemia, rickets, lower extremity bowing, and growth impairment. We compared the efficacy and safety of continuing conventional therapy, consisting of oral phosphate and active vitamin D, versus switching to burosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against FGF23, in paediatric X-linked hypophosphataemia. METHODS In this randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial at 16 clinical sites, we enrolled children with X-linked hypophosphataemia aged 1-12 years. Key eligibility criteria were a total Thacher rickets severity score of at least 2·0, fasting serum phosphorus lower than 0·97 mmol/L (3·0 mg/dL), confirmed PHEX (phosphate-regulating endopeptidase homolog, X-linked) mutation or variant of unknown significance in the patient or a family member with appropriate X-linked dominant inheritance, and receipt of conventional therapy for at least 6 consecutive months for children younger than 3 years or at least 12 consecutive months for children older than 3 years. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either subcutaneous burosumab starting at 0·8 mg/kg every 2 weeks (burosumab group) or conventional therapy prescribed by investigators (conventional therapy group). Both interventions lasted 64 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in rickets severity at week 40, assessed by the Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score. All patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the primary and safety analyses. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02915705. FINDINGS Recruitment took place between Aug 3, 2016, and May 8, 2017. Of 122 patients assessed, 61 were enrolled. Of these, 32 (18 girls, 14 boys) were randomly assigned to continue receiving conventional therapy and 29 (16 girls, 13 boys) to receive burosumab. For the primary endpoint at week 40, patients in the burosumab group had significantly greater improvement in Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score than did patients in the conventional therapy group (least squares mean +1·9 [SE 0·1] with burosumab vs +0·8 [0·1] with conventional therapy; difference 1·1, 95% CI 0·8-1·5; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment by the investigator occurred more frequently with burosumab (17 [59%] of 29 patients in the burosumab group vs seven [22%] of 32 patients in the conventional therapy group). Three serious adverse events occurred in each group, all considered unrelated to treatment and resolved. INTERPRETATION Significantly greater clinical improvements were shown in rickets severity, growth, and biochemistries among children with X-linked hypophosphataemia treated with burosumab compared with those continuing conventional therapy. FUNDING Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical and Kyowa Kirin International.
-
10.
Long-term safety and efficacy of alirocumab in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: An open-label extension of the ODYSSEY program.
Farnier, M, Hovingh, GK, Langslet, G, Dufour, R, Baccara-Dinet, MT, Din-Bell, C, Manvelian, G, Guyton, JR
Atherosclerosis. 2018;:307-314
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS ODYSSEY OLE (open-label extension; NCT01954394) included patients diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), receiving maximally tolerated statins, who had completed one of four Phase 3 double-blind parent studies (all 18 months' duration), with the aim to assess longer-term safety and efficacy of alirocumab. METHODS Patients received starting dose alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W; patients from FH I, FH II, and LONG TERM) or alirocumab 150 mg Q2W (patients from HIGH FH). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were blinded to the patient and physician until Week 8; from Week 8, LDL-C levels were communicated to physicians. From Week 12, dose adjustment from 75 to 150 mg Q2W, or vice versa, was possible per physician's clinical judgment according to patient's LDL-C levels. RESULTS Patients who had received alirocumab (n = 655) compared with placebo (n = 330) in the parent studies exhibited similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 87.3% vs. 83.9%) during OLE (2.5 years median alirocumab exposure). Overall, 33 patients (3.4%) experienced TEAEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation. At Week 8, alirocumab reduced mean LDL-C by 44.2% (reduction from 151.9 mg/dL at parent study baseline to 84.9 mg/dL); reduction in LDL-C was consistent to Week 96 of OLE. Reductions in lipid parameters were similar regardless of treatment allocation in the parent study. CONCLUSIONS In patients with HeFH, no unexpected long-term safety concerns were observed with alirocumab compared with previously published data; durability of LDL-C-lowering over 3 years (including 1.5 years of parent trials) was demonstrated.