-
1.
Effects of Sodium Valproate Monotherapy on Blood Liver Enzyme Levels in Patients with Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis.
Fu, J, Tao, T, Li, Z, Chen, Y, Chen, X, Li, J, Peng, L
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2021;(7):425-434
Abstract
We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of sodium valproate (VPA) monotherapy on blood liver enzymes in patients with epilepsy. PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China national knowledge infrastructure databases were searched. Nine studies were included. Results showed: (1) The overall SMD for blood AST, ALT, and GGT levels of VPA monotherapy group versus control group were 0.70 (95% CI=0.31 to 1.09, Z=3.52, p=0.0004), 0.47 (95% CI=- 0.01 to 0.95, Z=1.91, p=0.06), 0.44 (95% CI=0.29 to 0.60, Z=5.55, p<0.00001), respectively. (2) In subgroup meta-analysis, increased blood AST and GGT levels were observed in epileptic minors (AST: total SMD=0.85, 95% CI=0.40 to 1.30, Z=3.69, p=0.0002; GGT: total SMD=0.46, 95% CI=0.29 to 0.63, Z=5.25, p<0.00001). Elevated blood ALT level was observed in Asian patients receiving VPA monotherapy (total SMD=0.70, 95% CI=0.51 to 0.90, Z=7.01, p<0.00001), and the early stage of VPA monotherapy (total SMD=0.93, 95% CI=0.57 to 1.29, Z=5.09, p<0.00001). Overall, our results indicated that blood AST and GGT were significantly increased in epileptic minors receiving VPA monotherapy. The elevation of blood ALT was observed in Asian patients and the early stage of VPA monotherapy. However, due to the small number of included studies, our results should be considered with caution.
-
2.
Medical treatment of SUNCT and SUNA: a prospective open-label study including single-arm meta-analysis.
Lambru, G, Stubberud, A, Rantell, K, Lagrata, S, Tronvik, E, Matharu, MS
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2021;(3):233-241
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA) remains challenging in view of the paucity of data and evidence-based treatment recommendations are missing. METHODS In this single-centre, non-randomised, prospective open-label study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of oral and parenteral treatments for SUNCT and SUNA in a real-world setting. Additionally, single-arm meta-analyses of the available reports of SUNCT and SUNA treatments were conducted. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 161 patients. Most patients responded to lamotrigine (56%), followed by oxcarbazepine (46%), duloxetine (30%), carbamazepine (26%), topiramate (25%), pregabalin and gabapentin (10%). Mexiletine and lacosamide were effective in a meaningful proportion of patients but poorly tolerated. Intravenous lidocaine given for 7-10 days led to improvement in 90% of patients, whereas only 27% of patients responded to a greater occipital nerve block. No statistically significant differences in responders were observed between SUNCT and SUNA. In the meta-analysis of the pooled data, topiramate was found to be significantly more effective in SUNCT than SUNA patients. However, a higher proportion of SUNA than SUNCT was considered refractory to medications at the time of the topiramate trial, possibly explaining this isolated difference. CONCLUSIONS We propose a treatment algorithm for SUNCT and SUNA for clinical practice. The response to sodium channel blockers indicates a therapeutic overlap with trigeminal neuralgia, suggesting that sodium channels dysfunction may be a key pathophysiological hallmark in these disorders. Furthermore, the therapeutic similarities between SUNCT and SUNA further support the hypothesis that these conditions are variants of the same disorder.
-
3.
Intravenous sodium valproate in status epilepticus: review and Meta-analysis.
Liampas, I, Siokas, V, Brotis, A, Zintzaras, E, Stefanidis, I, Dardiotis, E
The International journal of neuroscience. 2021;(1):70-84
Abstract
Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE.Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I2 < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability.Results:Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83-4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60-2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17-1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05-9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02-33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09-0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04-2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34-1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01-0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01-0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37-1.24)].Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.
-
4.
Levetiracetam as preventive treatment in adults with migraine: an up-to-date systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis.
Tsaousi, G, Pourzitaki, C, Siafis, S, Kyrgidis, A, Grosomanidis, V, Kouvelas, D, Papazisis, G
European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2020;(2):161-174
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as migraine prophylaxis in adult patients suffering from migraine attacks. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and International Web of Science were searched (last search in August 2018) for studies investigating levetiracetam for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Both randomized and non-randomized trials were eligible. Efficacy was the primary outcome, but tolerability was also investigated. The study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42018088900. RESULTS Nine studies, enrolling 215 patients, were included. Levetiracetam decreased the frequency of attacks with headache in all studies, with a pooled mean difference of -3.02 (95% CI: -4.59 to -1.45; I2 = 0%), -4.65(-7 to -2.3; I2 = 0%), and -5.71 (-8.60 to -2.82; I2 = 0%) at 1, 3, and 6 months compared with baseline. Three randomized controlled trials were included, and levetiracetam was superior to placebo in two but was inferior to sodium valproate in reducing headache frequency. Similar results were found in the other indices of efficacy, and levetiracetam was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION Levetiracetam may be a relatively safe and efficacious treatment for the prophylaxis of migraine based on limited evidence, most from uncontrolled studies. Further evidence from randomized controlled trials is necessary.
-
5.
Therapeutic Options for Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus in Palliative Settings or with a Limitation of Life-Sustaining Therapies: A Systematic Review.
Willems, LM, Bauer, S, Jahnke, K, Voss, M, Rosenow, F, Strzelczyk, A
CNS drugs. 2020;(8):801-826
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) represents a serious medical condition requiring early and targeted therapy. Given the increasing number of elderly or multimorbid patients with a limitation of life-sustaining therapy (LOT) or within a palliative care setting (PCS), guidelines-oriented therapy escalation options for RSE have to be omitted frequently. OBJECTIVES This systematic review sought to summarize the evidence for fourth-line antiseizure drugs (ASDs) and other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options beyond guideline recommendations in patients with RSE to elaborate on possible treatment options for patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS. METHODS A systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on fourth-line ASDs or other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options was performed in February and June 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The search terminology was constructed using the name of the specific ASD or therapy option and the term 'status epilepticus' with the use of Boolean operators, e.g. "(brivaracetam) AND (status epilepticus)". The respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree terms were used, if available. RESULTS There is currently no level 1, grade A evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE. The best evidence was found for the use of lacosamide and topiramate (level 3, grade C), followed by brivaracetam, perampanel (each level 4, grade D) and stiripentol, oxcarbazepine and zonisamide (each level 5, grade D). Regarding non-medicinal options, there is little evidence for the use of the ketogenic diet (level 4, grade D) and magnesium sulfate (level 5, grade D) in RSE. The broad use of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment options in the absence of a presumed autoimmune etiology cannot be recommended; however, if an autoimmune etiology is assumed, steroid pulse, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange/plasmapheresis should be considered (level 4, grade D). Even if several studies suggested that the use of neurosteroids (level 5, grade D) is beneficial in RSE, the current data situation indicates that there is formal evidence against it. CONCLUSIONS RSE in patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS represents a challenge for modern clinicians and epileptologists. The evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE beyond that in current guidelines is low, but several effective and well-tolerated options are available that should be considered in this patient population. More so than in any other population, advance care planning, advance directives, and medical ethical aspects have to be considered carefully before and during therapy.
-
6.
Oxcarbazepine add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Bresnahan, R, Atim-Oluk, M, Marson, AG
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020;(3):CD012433
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder. In approximately 30% of epilepsy cases, seizures are uncontrolled by one antiepileptic drug (AED). These people require treatment with a combination of multiple AEDs and are described as having drug-resistant epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine is a keto-analogue of carbamazepine, an established AED, and can be used as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. SEARCH METHODS The following databases were searched on 24 September 2018: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Medline (Ovid) 1946 to 21 September 2018; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Originally, we also searched SCOPUS as a substitute for Embase, but this is no longer necessary, because randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in Embase are now included in CENTRAL. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials with parallel-group or cross-over design, recruiting people of any age with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We accepted any level of blinding and trials could be placebo- or active-controlled. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS In accordance with the methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration, two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility before extracting data and assessing risk of bias. We assessed the primary outcomes: median percentage seizure reduction per 28 days; 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; and adverse effects including ataxia, hyponatraemia, and somnolence. We assessed the secondary outcomes: seizure freedom; treatment withdrawal; cognitive effects; and quality of life. We used an intention-to-treat population for all primary analyses. We present results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with the exception of adverse effects which we present with 99% CI. MAIN RESULTS We identified six eligible studies, involving 1593 participants. We judged that three studies were at unclear risk of bias and three were at high risk of bias. Bias mainly arose from lack of methodological details and from high attrition rates. Participants were aged 1 month to 65 years, with a diagnosis of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. All studies were either placebo- or alternative-dose-controlled with parallel-group design. The treatment period varied from 9 days to 26 weeks. The median percentage seizure reduction per 28 days (3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) ranged from 26% to 83.3% for participants randomised to experimental oxcarbazepine compared to 7.6% to 28.7% for participants randomised to control treatment. Oxcarbazepine may increase the responder rate for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to control treatment (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.56; random-effects model; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence). For seizure freedom, the RR was 2.86 (95% CI 1.19 to 6.87; random-effects model; 5 studies; low-certainty evidence), suggesting an advantageous effectiveness of oxcarbazepine over control treatment. Treatment with oxcarbazepine was associated with an increased treatment withdrawal rate compared to control (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.13; fixed-effect model; 6 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). The largest oxcarbazepine dose used, 2400 mg/d, was associated with a higher treatment withdrawal rate (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.94; fixed-effect model; 2 studies) compared to control, than 1200 mg/d (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.95; fixed-effect model; 3 studies) or 600 mg/d oxcarbazepine (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.15; fixed-effect model; 1 study). Treatment with oxcarbazepine was associated with an increased incidence of multiple adverse effects including: ataxia (RR 2.54, 99% CI 0.86 to 7.54; random-effects model; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); and somnolence (RR 2.03, 99% CI 1.17 to 3.54; random-effects model; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence). Hyponatraemia occurred more frequently with oxcarbazepine treatment but not significantly so (RR 2.53, 99% CI 0.27 to 23.85; fixed-effect model; 6 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Oxcarbazepine might be effective at reducing seizure frequency when used as an add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The efficacy outcomes - 50% or greater seizure reduction and seizure freedom - were derived from low-certainty evidence. We are, therefore, uncertain whether the estimated effect size is representative of the true effect. In contrast, the evidence for median percentage seizure reduction and treatment withdrawal were of moderate certainty: thus, we are fairly certain of the effect estimates' reliability. Overall, we are unsure of the true efficacy of oxcarbazepine, but have concerns about its tolerability.
-
7.
Effects of valproic acid on bone mineral density and bone metabolism: A meta-analysis.
Fan, D, Miao, J, Fan, X, Wang, Q, Sun, M
Seizure. 2019;:56-63
Abstract
PURPOSE Numerous studies have shown that the risk of fracture is increased by long-term antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most commonly used AEDs. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of VPA on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to January 2019 for articles focusing on the effects of VPA on BMD and bone metabolism in adults or children. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. 3 software. RESULTS 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The BMD of lumber spine (MD= -0.06, 95%CI: -0.09 to -0.03, P < 0.0001) and femoral neck (MD= -0.05, 95% CI= -0.08 to -0.01, P = 0.02) was markedly decreased in the VPA group compared to healthy controls. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) level (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.30-1.40, P = 0.002) was notably increased in the VPA group compared to healthy groups. In the child group, the serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level was higher than in healthy groups (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.04, P = 0.02); besides, the serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) level was decreased (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.04, P = 0.02), while no significant alteration of these parameters was noted in the adult VPA group (P ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS VPA may reduce the BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with epilepsy while increasing the serum BALP level. Serum PTH level are increased and serum 25(OH)D3 level decreased in children with epilepsy treated with VPA. These parameters were unaltered in adults.
-
8.
Valproate decreases vitamin D levels in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Xu, Z, Jing, X, Li, G, Sun, J, Guo, H, Hu, Y, Sun, F, Wen, X, Chen, F, Wang, T, et al
Seizure. 2019;:60-65
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare Vitamin D (Vit D) levels in children with epilepsy on valproate monotherapy with healthy controls. METHODS A meta-analysis performed on articles identified from PubMed and Web of Science online databases evaluated using National Institute of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools. Subgroup analyses and publication bias assessments were also performed. RESULTS Eleven publications were eligible based on inclusion/exclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Results noted a decrease in the mean Vit D level in children with epilepsy on valproate monotherapy compared with healthy children with a Standard Mean Difference = -0.313 [-0.457, -0.169]. Cumulative meta-analysis showed progressive negative effect of valproate therapy on Vit D levels across time. Other antiepileptic medications caused a similar effect on Vit D status. There was no evidence of publication bias in the analyses. Type of study design and country of origin introduced heterogeneities into the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis provides evidence that long-term therapy with valproate causes a decrease in Vit D levels in children. Therefore, in children with a seizure disorder on long-term valproate therapy, 25-OH-Vit D levels should be monitored and appropriate supplementation implemented if levels are deficient.
-
9.
Effects of Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs Compared to First-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs on Bone Metabolism in Patients with Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis.
Fu, J, Peng, L, Li, J, Tao, T, Chen, Y
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2019;(8):511-521
Abstract
We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate effects of second-generation anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs; levetiracetam, lamotrigine) compared to first-generation AEDs (valproic acid, carbamazepine) on bone metabolism in epilepsy patients. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinical trials.gov, Wanfang, and China national knowledge infrastructure databases were searched. Ten trials were included. Results showed: (1) The overall SMD for changes of serum calcium, phosphorus, ALP, and PTH levels from baseline of LEV versus first-generation AEDs were 1.00 (95% CI=0.23-1.77, Z=2.56, p=0.01), 0.98 (95% CI=- 0.05 to 2.01, Z=1.86, p=0.06), - 1.17 (95% CI=- 2.08 to - 0.25, Z=2.50, p=0.01), 0.07 (95% CI=- 0.14 to 0.27, Z=0.63, p=0.53), respectively. (2) The overall SMD for changes of serum calcium, phosphorus, ALP, and PTH levels from baseline of LTG versus first-generation AEDs were -0.16 (95% CI=- 0.47 to 0.16, Z=0.99, p=0.32), -0.05 (95% CI=- 0.55 to 0.44, Z=0.22, p=0.83), 0.10 (95% CI=- 0.53 to 0.73, Z=0.31, p=0.75), -0.05 (95% CI=- 0.52 to 0.42, Z=0.22, p=0.83), respectively. Overall, our results indicate that compared to first-generation AEDs, LEV has less adverse effects on blood bone metabolism markers in epilepsy patients, while LTG does not. However, due to small number of included studies, our results warrant additional research.
-
10.
Comparison of the relapse rates in seizure-free patients in whom antiepileptic therapy was discontinued and those in whom the therapy was continued: A meta-analysis.
Wang, J, Huang, P, Song, Z
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 2019;(Pt A):106577
Abstract
About 70% of patients with epilepsy can be seizure-free with an appropriate treatment. When the seizures are under control, discontinuation of the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can help avoid their side effects; however, it may increase the risk of relapse. Some studies have compared the relapse rates between patients in whom AEDs have been continued and those in whom AEDs have been discontinued. However, it is not clear whether AED discontinuation causes a higher seizure recurrence rate. This meta-analysis aimed mainly to determine whether the seizure recurrence rate was different between seizure-free patients in whom AEDs were continued and those in whom AEDs were discontinued. The I2 value was used for assessing the heterogeneity; the Mantel-Haenszel test was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The study quality evaluation was performed respectively using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad scale. A total of 1253 patients were included. The relapse rate was higher in patients in whom AEDs were discontinued than in those in whom the AED treatment was continued. Furthermore, we also compared the epilepsy recurrence rates after AED discontinuation between seizure-free patients who were on monotherapy with different AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, sodium valproate, and phenobarbitone/primidone). Four studies and 625 patients were included in this analysis. The epilepsy recurrence rates did not significantly differ between the patients on different AED treatment.