-
1.
Association between COMT gene Val108/158Met and antidepressive treatment response: A meta-analysis.
Tang, Z, Zhang, S, Guo, D, Wang, H
Gene. 2020;:144333
Abstract
Multiple antidepressive treatment methods are widely used in the clinic, but different patients showed considerable differences in response to the same treatment. The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) rs4680 polymorphism is involved in the antidepressive treatment reaction; however, the results in different studies are inconsistent. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the association of the COMT rs4680 polymorphism with the treatment response in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. An online search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library up to December 2018. The odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and heterogeneity were calculated in four genetic models. Subgroup analysis and Galbraith plot were carried out to detect the potential source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed to identify the reliability of the results. A total of 11 studies involving 2845 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the subgroup analysis indicated that patients who carried the G allele had remission or a better response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in four genetic models. Excluding the studies that might lead to heterogeneity, overall ORs were recalculated, and no obvious association between rs4680 polymorphism and therapeutic reaction was detected in the allelic, recessive and additive models. In the dominant model, COMT rs4680 variants showed significant associations with antidepressive treatment, but the result was highly dependent on the individual study. In addition, the patients with the GG or AG + GG genotype in comparison to AA were associated with a better response to ECT treatment. However, due to the small number of studies using ECT treatment, we suggest that more research should be performed to verify this result.
-
2.
Value of peripheral neurotrophin levels for the diagnosis of depression and response to treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shi, Y, Luan, D, Song, R, Zhang, Z
European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;:40-51
Abstract
The neurotrophin hypothesis indicates that neurotrophic factors are important for the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), with alterations in peripheral neurotrophin levels having potential clinical application for MDD. The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic value for MDD of peripheral neurotrophin levels in cross-sectional studies and the association between peripheral neurotrophin levels and the response to antidepressant treatment in longitudinal studies. Published studies in the PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to February 2020. The search terms included depressive disorder, neurotrophic factor, serum/plasma and their synonyms. Human studies reporting on BDNF, GDNF, IGF-2, VEGF, NGF, FGF-2, and S100B levels in MDD patients were included. Data comparing MDD patients and healthy controls, and/or between responders and non-responders before and after antidepressant treatment were extracted. A random effects model was used to calculate standardized mean differences. A total of 177 original studies were identified, including 139 cross-sectional and 38 longitudinal studies. Significantly reduced BDNF and NGF levels and significantly elevated IGF-1, VEGF, and S100B levels were reported in MDD patients compared with healthy controls, while GDNF and FGF-2 levels were not significantly different. Furthermore, compared with non-responders, S100B levels at baseline and BDNF levels following treatment were significantly elevated in responders. In addition, there was a significantly elevated level of VEGF after treatment in responders only. In conclusions, alterations in peripheral neurotrophins levels were strongly associated with the biology and the treatment response of MDD. Further investigations are required to examine potential sources of heterogeneity.
-
3.
International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research Practice Guidelines for Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.
Guu, TW, Mischoulon, D, Sarris, J, Hibbeln, J, McNamara, RK, Hamazaki, K, Freeman, MP, Maes, M, Matsuoka, YJ, Belmaker, RH, et al
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 2019;(5):263-273
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex mental illness with unmet therapeutic needs. The antidepressant effects of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been widely reported. The subcommittee of the International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research organized an expert panel and conducted a literature review and a Delphi process to develop a consensus-based practice guideline for clinical use of n-3 PUFAs in MDD. The guideline focuses on 5 thematic areas: general concepts, acute treatment strategy, depression recurrence monitoring and prevention, use in special populations, and potential safety issues. The key practice guidelines contend that: (1) clinicians and other practitioners are advised to conduct a clinical interview to validate clinical diagnoses, physical conditions, and measurement-based psychopathological assessments in the therapeutic settings when recommending n-3 PUFAs in depression treatment; (2) with respect to formulation and dosage, both pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or an EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) combination of a ratio higher than 2 (EPA/DHA >2) are considered effective, and the recommended dosages should be 1-2 g of net EPA daily, from either pure EPA or an EPA/DHA (>2:1) formula; (3) the quality of n-3 PUFAs may affect therapeutic activity; and (4) potential adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal and dermatological conditions, should be monitored, as well as obtaining comprehensive metabolic panels. The expert consensus panel has agreed on using n-3 PUFAs in MDD treatment for pregnant women, children, and the elderly, and prevention in high-risk populations. Personalizing the clinical application of n-3 PUFAs in subgroups of MDD with a low Omega-3 Index or high levels of inflammatory markers might be regarded as areas that deserve future research.
-
4.
Efficacy and Safety of Xiaoyao Formula as an Adjuvant Treatment for Post-Stroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis.
Jin, X, Jiang, M, Gong, D, Chen, Y, Fan, Y
Explore (New York, N.Y.). 2018;(3):224-229
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xiaoyao formula (XYF) as an adjuvant treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD) by conducting a meta-analysis. METHODS Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched up to May 2016. Randomized controlled trials investigating XYF plus antidepressants versus antidepressants alone for patients with PSD were considered. RESULTS A total of 607 PSD patients were identified from 7 trials. Adjuvant treatment with XYF had additional benefits in terms of improved total response rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.30), reduced Hamilton's depressive scale (weighted mean difference [WMD] -5.21; 95% CI: -7.48 to -2.95), and decreased Scandinavian Stroke Scale (WMD -6.35; 95% CI: -8.27 to -4.43). No serious adverse events were observed in any of the included trials. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant treatment with XYF appears to have additional benefits in the treatment of PSD, without increasing serious adverse events.
-
5.
D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.
Mataix-Cols, D, Fernández de la Cruz, L, Monzani, B, Rosenfield, D, Andersson, E, Pérez-Vigil, A, Frumento, P, de Kleine, RA, Difede, J, Dunlop, BW, et al
JAMA psychiatry. 2017;(5):501-510
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether and under which conditions D-cycloserine (DCS) augments the effects of exposure-based cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders is unclear. OBJECTIVE To clarify whether DCS is superior to placebo in augmenting the effects of cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders and to evaluate whether antidepressants interact with DCS and the effect of potential moderating variables. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to February 10, 2016. Reference lists of previous reviews and meta-analyses and reports of randomized clinical trials were also checked. STUDY SELECTION Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were (1) double-blind randomized clinical trials of DCS as an augmentation strategy for exposure-based cognitive behavior therapy and (2) conducted in humans diagnosed as having specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Raw data were obtained from the authors and quality controlled. Data were ranked to ensure a consistent metric across studies (score range, 0-100). We used a 3-level multilevel model nesting repeated measures of outcomes within participants, who were nested within studies. RESULTS Individual participant data were obtained for 21 of 22 eligible trials, representing 1047 of 1073 eligible participants. When controlling for antidepressant use, participants receiving DCS showed greater improvement from pretreatment to posttreatment (mean difference, -3.62; 95% CI, -0.81 to -6.43; P = .01; d = -0.25) but not from pretreatment to midtreatment (mean difference, -1.66; 95% CI, -4.92 to 1.60; P = .32; d = -0.14) or from pretreatment to follow-up (mean difference, -2.98, 95% CI, -5.99 to 0.03; P = .05; d = -0.19). Additional analyses showed that participants assigned to DCS were associated with lower symptom severity than those assigned to placebo at posttreatment and at follow-up. Antidepressants did not moderate the effects of DCS. None of the prespecified patient-level or study-level moderators was associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE D-cycloserine is associated with a small augmentation effect on exposure-based therapy. This effect is not moderated by the concurrent use of antidepressants. Further research is needed to identify patient and/or therapy characteristics associated with DCS response.
-
6.
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin, PY, Chang, CH, Chong, MF, Chen, H, Su, KP
Biological psychiatry. 2017;(8):560-569
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omega-3 (or n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are promising antidepressant treatments for perinatal depression (PND) because of supporting evidence from clinical trials, the advantage in safety, and their anti-inflammatory and neuroplastic effects. Although several observational studies have shown n-3 PUFA deficits in women with PND, the results of individual PUFAs from different studies were inconsistent. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the levels of PUFA indices, including eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, arachidonic acid, total n-3, total n-6, and the n-6/n-3 ratio between women with PND and healthy control subjects. The meta-analysis included 12 eligible studies available as of December 2016. The effect sizes were synthesized by using a random effects model. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis for the PUFA levels in patients with prenatal and postnatal depression, both of which were compared with healthy control subjects. RESULTS There were significantly lower levels of total n-3 PUFAs and docosahexaenoic acid and significantly increased n-6/n-3 ratios in PND patients. In the subgroup analyses, there were significantly lower levels of n-3 PUFAs, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid in women with prenatal depression. The n-6/n-3 ratio was significantly increased in both prenatal and postnatal depression subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis consolidates the important role of n-3 PUFAs in PND. Nutritional medicine is an important strategy to improve the effectiveness of treatment for depression, and our findings provide the strong rationale to conduct clinical trials to test the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of n-3 PUFAs in PND.
-
7.
Vortioxetine versus Duloxetine in the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Li, G, Wang, X, Ma, D
Clinical drug investigation. 2016;(7):509-17
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Vortioxetine and duloxetine are two new antidepressant drugs that have been used clinically in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The objectives of this meta-analysis were to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine compared with duloxetine in MDD. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed to compare vortioxetine with duloxetine in terms of efficacy and tolerability in patients with MDD. Results were expressed as the risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), and weighted mean difference (WMD). Pooled estimates were calculated by using a fixed-effects model or a randomized-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS A total of five RCTs involving 2287 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that duloxetine was associated with a higher response rate than vortioxetine, as well as showing a similar remission rate with vortioxetine. The changes from baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D24), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), CGI-Severity scale (CGI-S), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) scores were significantly greater in the duloxetine group than in the vortioxetine group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was significantly higher in the duloxetine group than in the vortioxetine group. CONCLUSION Duloxetine was more effective but less well-tolerated than vortioxetine in MDD. Considering the potential limitations of this meta-analysis, more large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
-
8.
Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials.
Solmi, M, Veronese, N, Zaninotto, L, van der Loos, ML, Gao, K, Schaffer, A, Reis, C, Normann, C, Anghelescu, IG, Correll, CU
CNS spectrums. 2016;(5):403-418
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To meta-analytically summarize lamotrigine's effectiveness and safety in unipolar and bipolar depression. METHODS We conducted systematic PubMed and SCOPUS reviews (last search =10/01/2015) of randomized controlled trials comparing lamotrigine to placebo or other agents with antidepressant activity in unipolar or bipolar depression. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of depression ratings, response, remission, and adverse effects calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Eighteen studies (n=2152, duration=9.83 weeks) in patients with unipolar depression (studies=4, n=187; monotherapy vs lithium=1, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=3) or bipolar depression (studies=14, n=1965; monotherapy vs placebo=5, monotherapy vs lithium or olanzapine+fluoxetine=2, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=1, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs placebo=3, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs trancylpromine, citalopram, or inositol=3) were meta-analyzed. Lamotrigine's efficacy for depressive symptoms did not differ significantly in monotherapy vs augmentation studies (vs. placebo: p=0.98, I2=0%; vs active agents: p=0.48, I2=0%) or in unipolar vs bipolar patients (vs placebo: p=0.60, I2=0%), allowing pooling of each placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. Lamotrigine outperformed placebo regarding depressive symptoms (studies=11, n=713 vs n=696; SMD=-0.15, 95% CI=-0.27, -0.02, p=0.02, heterogeneity: p=0.24) and response (after removing one extreme outlier; RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.13-1.78; p=0.003, heterogeneity: p=0.08). Conversely, lamotrigine did not differ regarding efficacy on depressive symptoms, response, or remission from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol (studies=6, n=306 vs n=318, p-values=0.85-0.92). Adverse effects and all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation were similar across all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS Lamotrigine was superior to placebo in improving unipolar and bipolar depressive symptoms, without causing more frequent adverse effects/discontinuations. Lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol.
-
9.
Adjunctive Nutraceuticals for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Sarris, J, Murphy, J, Mischoulon, D, Papakostas, GI, Fava, M, Berk, M, Ng, CH
The American journal of psychiatry. 2016;(6):575-87
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is burgeoning interest in augmentation strategies for improving inadequate response to antidepressants. The adjunctive use of standardized pharmaceutical-grade nutrients, known as nutraceuticals, has the potential to modulate several neurochemical pathways implicated in depression. While many studies have been conducted in this area, to date no specialized systematic review (or meta-analysis) has been conducted. METHOD A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to December 2015 for clinical trials using adjunctive nutrients for depression. Where sufficient data were available, a random-effects model analyzed the standard mean difference between treatment and placebo in the change from baseline to endpoint, combining the effect size data. Funnel plot and heterogeneity analyses were also performed. RESULTS Primarily positive results were found for replicated studies testing S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), methylfolate, omega-3 (primarily EPA or ethyl-EPA), and vitamin D, with positive isolated studies for creatine, folinic acid, and an amino acid combination. Mixed results were found for zinc, folic acid, vitamin C, and tryptophan, with nonsignificant results for inositol. No major adverse effects were noted in the studies (aside from minor digestive disturbance). A meta-analysis of adjunctive omega-3 versus placebo revealed a significant and moderate to strong effect in favor of omega-3. Conversely, a meta-analysis of folic acid revealed a nonsignificant difference from placebo. Marked study heterogeneity was found in a Higgins test for both omega-3 and folic acid studies; funnel plots also revealed asymmetry (reflecting potential study bias). CONCLUSIONS Current evidence supports adjunctive use of SAMe, methylfolate, omega-3, and vitamin D with antidepressants to reduce depressive symptoms.
-
10.
Meta-analysis and meta-regression of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for major depressive disorder.
Mocking, RJ, Harmsen, I, Assies, J, Koeter, MW, Ruhé, HG, Schene, AH
Translational psychiatry. 2016;(3):e756
Abstract
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation has been proposed as (adjuvant) treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). In the present meta-analysis, we pooled randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the effects of omega-3 PUFA supplementation on depressive symptoms in MDD. Moreover, we performed meta-regression to test whether supplementation effects depended on eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid dose, their ratio, study duration, participants' age, percentage antidepressant users, baseline MDD symptom severity, publication year and study quality. To limit heterogeneity, we only included studies in adult patients with MDD assessed using standardized clinical interviews, and excluded studies that specifically studied perinatal/perimenopausal or comorbid MDD. Our PubMED/EMBASE search resulted in 1955 articles, from which we included 13 studies providing 1233 participants. After taking potential publication bias into account, meta-analysis showed an overall beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs on depressive symptoms in MDD (standardized mean difference=0.398 (0.114-0.682), P=0.006, random-effects model). As an explanation for significant heterogeneity (I(2)=73.36, P<0.001), meta-regression showed that higher EPA dose (β=0.00037 (0.00009-0.00065), P=0.009), higher percentage antidepressant users (β=0.0058 (0.00017-0.01144), P=0.044) and earlier publication year (β=-0.0735 (-0.143 to 0.004), P=0.04) were significantly associated with better outcome for PUFA supplementation. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed. In conclusion, present meta-analysis suggested a beneficial overall effect of omega-3 PUFA supplementation in MDD patients, especially for higher doses of EPA and in participants taking antidepressants. Future precision medicine trials should establish whether possible interactions between EPA and antidepressants could provide targets to improve antidepressant response and its prediction. Furthermore, potential long-term biochemical side effects of high-dosed add-on EPA supplementation should be carefully monitored.