-
1.
Bioactive peptides from foods: production, function, and application.
Jia, L, Wang, L, Liu, C, Liang, Y, Lin, Q
Food & function. 2021;(16):7108-7125
Abstract
Bioactive peptides are a class of peptides with special physiological functions and have potential applications in human health and disease prevention. Bioactive peptides have gained much research attention because they affect the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and nervous systems. Recent research has reported that bioactive peptides are of great value for physiological function regulation, including antioxidation, anti-hypertension, antithrombosis, antibacterial properties, anti-cancer, anti-inflammation, anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, cholesterol-lowering, immunoregulation, mineral binding and opioid activities. The production of food-derived bioactive peptides is mainly through the hydrolysis of digestive enzymes and proteolytic enzymes or microbial fermentation. The purpose of this review is to introduce the production, function, application, challenges, and prospects of food-derived bioactive peptides.
-
2.
[Geriatric medicine: update 2020].
Germann, D, Cochet, C, Apostolova, Y, Fratangelo, L, Gagliano, M, Nguyen, S, Büla, C
Revue medicale suisse. 2021;(720-1):33-37
Abstract
Several studies published in 2020 showed new data supporting the prescription of statins in some old and very old patients. Despite the enthusiasm about SGLT-2 inhibitors, caution must remain in frail and dependent older diabetic patients who are not well represented in most studies. Antihypertensive treatment appears more beneficial when taken at night rather than in the morning but beware of the prescribing cascade of a diuretic when a new prescription of a calcium channel blocker. Biomarkers, including plasmatic biomarkers, are becoming increasingly important in the diagnostic strategy of neurocognitive disorders. Finally, fall prevention studies showed heterogeneous results but multimodal interventions remain mainstream.
-
3.
Resistant Hypertension in People With CKD: A Review.
Fay, KS, Cohen, DL
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2021;(1):110-121
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is common in the chronic kidney disease population and conveys increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and the development of kidney failure. Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association published a revised scientific statement on the definition and management of resistant hypertension, which codified the long-debated differences between pseudoresistant hypertension and true resistant hypertension. We review this distinction and its importance to nephrologists, who frequently encounter patients for whom antihypertensive therapy fails due to difficulty adhering to complex multidrug regimens. Second, we discuss the evaluation of patients with resistant hypertension, including appropriate screening and diagnostic testing for causes of secondary hypertension. Third, we examine the management of established resistant hypertension, including medication optimization, recent clinical trials supporting lifestyle modifications, and the evidence behind the routine use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Special attention is given to the vital role of diuretics in the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease. We propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of these cases. Finally, we briefly discuss the current state of antihypertensive device therapies, including kidney denervation and baroreceptor-directed therapies.
-
4.
Arterial hypertension.
Brouwers, S, Sudano, I, Kokubo, Y, Sulaica, EM
Lancet (London, England). 2021;(10296):249-261
Abstract
Arterial hypertension is the most important contributor to the global burden of disease; however, disease control remains poor. Although the diagnosis of hypertension is still based on office blood pressure, confirmation with out-of-office blood pressure measurements (ie, ambulatory or home monitoring) is strongly recommended. The definition of hypertension differs throughout various guidelines, but the indications for antihypertensive therapy are relatively similar. Lifestyle adaptation is absolutely key in non-pharmacological treatment. Pharmacologically, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics are the first-line agents, with advice for the use of single-pill combination therapy by most guidelines. As a fourth-line agent, spironolactone should be considered. The rapidly evolving field of device-based therapy, especially renal denervation, will further broaden therapeutic options. Despite being a largely controllable condition, the actual rates of awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension are disappointingly low. Further improvements throughout the process of patient screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up need to be urgently addressed.
-
5.
Hypertension in Obesity: Novel Insights.
Natsis, M, Antza, C, Doundoulakis, I, Stabouli, S, Kotsis, V
Current hypertension reviews. 2020;(1):30-36
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between obesity and hypertension has been established in both adults and children. The combination of obesity, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors significantly increases the likelihood of adverse cardiovascular effects and raises concerns about aggressive treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE Despite the impressive elements which indicate an important role for excessive weight gain in increasing blood pressure, not all obese patients are hypertensive. A subgroup of obese people may not develop hypertension. Furthermore, masked hypertension occurs more common among obese patients, and body fat distribution has a major role in the development of hypertension. METHOD We conducted a research of the relevant literature regarding obesity-induced hypertension and possible treatment strategies. RESULTS Successful weight loss is correlated with blood pressure reduction and requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes personalized dietary interventions combined with regular exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy. CONCLUSION Pharmacological therapy may be considered as part of a comprehensive obesity management strategy. More research and new treatment therapies are required in this field.
-
6.
Influence of altitude on hypertension phenotypes and responses to antihypertensive therapy: Review of the literature and design of the INTERVENCION trial.
Medina-Lezama, J, Herrera-Enriquez, K, Narvaez-Guerra, O, Chirinos, JA
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2020;(10):1757-1762
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Systemic arterial hypertension constitutes the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and affects people living at different altitudes above sea level (AASL). AASL has a major impact on cardiovascular function and various biologic pathways that regulate blood pressure-related phenotypes, but whether it affects the clinical response to antihypertensive therapy is unknown. The hemodynamic adaptations observed among lowlanders acutely exposed to high altitude (HA) is distinct from those observed among HA dwellers. However, the phenotypic patterns of hypertension and the response to standard antihypertensive agents among adults chronically exposed to different AASL are poorly understood. The authors describe the protocol for the INTERVENCION trial, a randomized clinical trial designed to assess the effects of three first-line antihypertensive monotherapies (a thiazide diuretic, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a calcium channel blocker) on peripheral and central blood pressure, in-office blood pressure, and ambulatory blood pressure hemodynamics of hypertensive patients living at different AASL (low altitude, intermediate altitude, and high altitude). The primary end point is the reduction in 24-hour brachial systolic blood pressure. The INTERVENCION trial will provide the first clinical trial data regarding the influence of AASL on the response to antihypertensive monotherapy, as well as the hemodynamic characteristics of arterial hypertension at different AASL.
-
7.
Stroke Prevention in Older Adults: Recent Advances.
Spence, JD, Azarpazhooh, MR, Larsson, SC, Bogiatzi, C, Hankey, GJ
Stroke. 2020;(12):3770-3777
Abstract
The risks of stroke and dementia increase steeply with age, and both are preventable. At present, the best way to preserve cognitive function is to prevent stroke. Therapeutic nihilism based on age is common and unwarranted. We address recent advances in stroke prevention that could contribute greatly to prevention of stroke and dementia at a time when the aging of the population threatens to markedly increase the incidence of both. Issues discussed: (1) old patients benefit even more from lipid-lowering therapy than do younger patients; (2) patients with stiff arteries are at risk from a target systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg; (3) the interaction of the intestinal microbiome, age, and renal function has important dietary implications for older adults; (4) anticoagulation with direct-acting oral anticoagulants should be prescribed more to old patients with atrial fibrillation; (5) B vitamins to lower homocysteine prevent stroke; and (6) most old patients in whom intervention is warranted for carotid stenosis would benefit more from endarterectomy than from stenting. An 80-year-old person has much to lose from a stroke and should not have effective therapy withheld on account of age. Lipid-lowering therapy, a more plant-based diet, appropriate anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, appropriate blood pressure control, B vitamins to lower homocysteine, and judicious intervention for carotid stenosis could do much to reduce the growing burden of stroke and dementia.
-
8.
Antihypertensive Drugs and Risk of Cancer: Between Scylla and Charybdis.
Sanidas, E, Velliou, M, Papadopoulos, D, Fotsali, A, Iliopoulos, D, Mantzourani, M, Toutouzas, K, Barbetseas, J
American journal of hypertension. 2020;(12):1049-1058
Abstract
Antihypertensive drugs namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, and diuretics are among the most clearly documented regimens worldwide with an overall cardioprotective benefit. Given that malignancy is the second leading cause of mortality, numerous observational studies aimed to investigate the carcinogenic potential of these agents with conflicting results. The purpose of this review was to summarize current data in an effort to explore rare side effects and new mechanisms linking antihypertensive drugs with the risk of developing cancer.
-
9.
Effects of Olive Oil on Blood Pressure: Epidemiological, Clinical, and Mechanistic Evidence.
Massaro, M, Scoditti, E, Carluccio, MA, Calabriso, N, Santarpino, G, Verri, T, De Caterina, R
Nutrients. 2020;(6)
Abstract
The increasing access to antihypertensive medications has improved longevity and quality of life in hypertensive patients. Nevertheless, hypertension still remains a major risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction, suggesting the need to implement management of pre- and hypertensive patients. In addition to antihypertensive medications, lifestyle changes, including healthier dietary patterns, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and the Mediterranean diet, have been shown to favorably affect blood pressure and are now recommended as integrative tools in hypertension management. An analysis of the effects of nutritional components of the Mediterranean diet(s) on blood pressure has therefore become mandatory. After a literature review of the impact of Mediterranean diet(s) on cardiovascular risk factors, we here analyze the effects of olive oil and its major components on blood pressure in healthy and cardiovascular disease individuals and examine underlying mechanisms of action. Both experimental and human studies agree in showing anti-hypertensive effects of olive oil. We conclude that due to its high oleic acid and antioxidant polyphenol content, the consumption of olive oil may be advised as the optimal fat choice in the management protocols for hypertension in both healthy and cardiovascular disease patients.
-
10.
Hypertension in aortic stenosis: a focused review and recommendations for clinical practice.
Saeed, S, Scalise, F, Chambers, JB, Mancia, G
Journal of hypertension. 2020;(7):1211-1219
Abstract
: In patients with aortic stenosis, the presence of hypertension negatively affects the hemodynamic severity of the stenosis, and worsens adverse left ventricular remodeling. It accelerates the progression of the stenosis and is associated with worse prognosis. Proper management of hypertension is thus crucial but there are concerns about the safety and efficacy of antihypertensive medications as well as uncertainty about optimal blood pressure (BP) targets and their impact on left ventricular mass regression and survival benefits. In the present review, we discuss these issues based on the evidence available in the current literature. Focus is first directed on the consequences of a persistently elevated BP before and after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter valve implantation, and the clinical significance of an abnormal BP response during exercise in patients with significant aortic stenosis. Available data on use of antihypertensive drugs are then critically addressed, the conclusion being that calcium channel blockers may be associated with lower survival, and that diuretics may have disadvantages in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and smaller left ventricular cavity dimensions, β-blockers may be well tolerated and a better choice for patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and arrhythmias. Renin--angiotensin system blockers improve survival given either before or after valve intervention. Emphasis is placed on the fact that evidence is not derived from randomized trials but only from observational studies. Finally, we discuss the optimal SBP level to reach in patients with aortic stenosis. Again, randomized trials are not available but observational evidence suggests that values between 130 and 139 mmHg systolic and 70-90 mmHg diastolic might represent the best option, and lower BP targets should probably be avoided.