-
1.
Efficacy of combined transarterial radioembolization and sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Facciorusso, A, Paolillo, R, Tartaglia, N, Ramai, D, Mohan, BP, Cotsoglou, C, Chandan, S, Ambrosi, A, Bargellini, I, Renzulli, M, et al
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2022;(3):316-323
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant sorafenib may further enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS With a literature search through October 2020, we identified 9 studies (632 patients). Primary outcome was overall survival. Results were expressed as pooled median, odds ratio, or hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Pooled overall survival after radioembolization plus sorafenib was 10.79 months (95% confidence interval 9.19-12.39) and it was longer in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B (14.47 months, 9.07-19.86) as compared to BCLC C patients (10.22 months, 7.53-12.9). No difference between combined therapy versus radioembolization alone was observed in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07, 0.89-1.30). Pooled median progression-free survival was 6.32 months (5.68-6.98), with 1-year progression-free survival pooled rate of 38.5% (12.7%-44.2%). No difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.94, 0.79-1.12) between the two treatments was observed. Pooled rate of severe adverse events was 48.9% (26.7%-71.2%), again with no difference between the two treatment regimens (odds ratio 1.52, 0.15-15.02). CONCLUSIONS The association of sorafenib does not seem to prolong survival nor delay disease progression in patients treated with radioembolization.
-
2.
Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes.
Xie, Y, Tian, H, Xiang, B, Zhang, Y, Liu, J, Cai, Z, Xiang, H
Medicine. 2021;(33):e26958
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate-advanced HCC. METHODS A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate-advanced HCC. RESULTS Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified. We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.88, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median OS ranged from 7.0 to 22.0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.9 to 18.0 months with sorafenib. The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.65-0.82, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median time to progression ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.1 to 2.8 months with sorafenib. The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI 0.25-0.80, P = .0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI 0.37-1.33, P = .0006) than sorafenib group. Hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events. The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT. CONCLUSION Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC. Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.
-
3.
Meta-analysis of FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Chen, Z, Lv, Y, Li, H, Diao, R, Zhou, J, Yu, T
Medicine. 2021;(3):e24068
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Currently, the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is the standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. In recent years, FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has been gaining an increasing amount of attention, owing to its ability to reduce disease stage and transform LAPC to borderline resectable or even resectable pancreatic cancer. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of first-line FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with LAPC.We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the time of establishment till January 1, 2020 and included studies focusing on LAPC patients who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcomes were: resection rate and radical (R0) resection rate while the secondary outcomes were: objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, and rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse events. The meta package for R 3.6.2 was used for heterogeneity and publication bias testing.Twenty-one studies, including 653 patients with LAPC, were selected. After treatment with FOLFIRINOX, the resection rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20%-32%, I2 = 61%) and R0 resection rate was 88% (95% CI = 78%-95%, I2 = 62%). The response rate was 34% (95% CI = 25%-43%, I2 = 56%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival durations ranged from 10.0 to 32.7 months and 3.0 to 25.3 months, respectively. The observed grade 3 to 4 adverse events were neutropenia (20.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 14%-27%, I2 = 75%), febrile neutropenia (7.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 5%-9%, I2 = 42%), thrombocytopenia (6.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 5%-8%, I2 = 27%), nausea/vomiting (7.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 7%-12%, I2 = 76%), diarrhea (10.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 8%-12%, I2 = 38%), and fatigue (9.0 per 100 patients, 95% CI = 7%-11%, I2 = 43%).FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has the potential to improve the rates of resection, R0 resection, and median OS in LAPC. Our results require further validation in large, high-quality randomized controlled trials.
-
4.
Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic factor in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Bao, J, Zhu, ZY, Jin, MX
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2021;(18):5636-5652
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. In the past decade, numerous studies focus on the prognostic nutritional index (i.e., a measure of serum albumin and lymphocyte in peripheral circulation) as a possible biomarker to predict the survival outcomes in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Prognostic nutritional index can reliably predict the survivability outcomes by effectively quantifying the nutritional and immunological status of cancer patients. To date, only one review has attempted to evaluate the impact of the prognostic nutritional index on the survival outcomes in lung cancer patients with certain limitations. The goal of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to bridge the gap in the literature and evaluate the capacity of the prognostic nutritional index for predicting the survivability outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of prognostic nutritional index scoring on survival outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic academic literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines across Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of prognostic nutritional index scoring (i.e., high/low) on survival outcomes (i.e., progression-free survival, overall survival) in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. RESULTS From 963 studies, 16 eligible studies with 4250 lung cancer patients (62.32 ± 5.08 years) undergoing chemotherapy were included. Our meta-analysis revealed worse mortality outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (HR: 1.31) and overall survival (1.21) for the group with a low prognostic nutritional index score as compared to the group with a high prognostic nutritional index score in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Subsequent subgroup analyses further demonstrated markedly worse outcomes for progression-free survival (1.32) and overall survival (1.52) in non-small lung cancer patients with lower prognostic nutritional index scores. CONCLUSIONS We provide preliminary evidence suggesting that lower prognostic nutrition index scores are associated with worse survivability outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival) in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. We also show that lower prognostic nutrition index scores correlate with even worse survival outcomes in patients with non-small lung cancer histological subtype of lung cancer. These findings should help clinicians to stratify the risks associated with the chemotherapeutic management of lung cancer patients.
-
5.
Statin use improves survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Tamburrino, D, Crippa, S, Partelli, S, Archibugi, L, Arcidiacono, PG, Falconi, M, Capurso, G
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2020;(4):392-399
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies on statins' effect on survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) report conflicting results. AIMS To evaluate the association between statin use and PDAC patients' survival. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including case-control, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials assessing the association between statin use and survival in PDAC patients. Pooled HRs with 95%CIs were calculated using random effects model; publication bias was assessed through Begg and Mazumdar test and heterogeneity by I2 value. RESULTS 14 studies with 33,137 PDAC patients, 40% under statins, were included. Statins use was associated to a reduced death risk (HR 0.871; 95%CI: 0.819; 0.927; p = 0.0001) suggesting a protective effect, homogeneous for different geographic areas. This effect was significant in surgically resected patients (HR 0.50; 95%CI: 0.32; 0.76; p = 0.001) but not in those with advanced disease (HR 0.78; 95%CI: 0.59; 1.02; p = 0.07). In studies providing information on statin type, only rosuvastatin resulted associated to a reduced risk of death (HR 0.88; 95%CI: 0.81; 0.96; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Statins use is significantly associated with a reduced risk of death in resected PDAC patients. This finding has to be considered with caution due to publication bias and the availability of only few studies for sensitivity analyses.
-
6.
Anti-Tumor Activity and Safety of Multikinase Inhibitors in Advanced and/or Metastatic Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Tsoli, M, Alexandraki, KI, Spei, ME, Kaltsas, GA, Daskalakis, K
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2020;(1):25-31
Abstract
Many trials have demonstrated prime antitumor activity of novel, small molecule multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) in advanced and/or metastatic thyroid cancer (TC). In this work, the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched. Quality/risk of bias were assessed using GRADE criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing two or more systemic therapies in patients with advanced and/or metastatic thyroid cancer were assessed. A total of 1347 articles and 548 clinical trials in clinicaltrials.gov were screened. We included seven relevant RCTs comprising 1934 unique patients assigned to different MKIs. Two separate network meta-analyses included four RCTs in radioiodine refractory well-differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-WDTC) and three RCTs in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), respectively; all with a low risk of bias. We identified three therapies for RR-WDTC: sorafenib [disease control rate (DCR) odds ratio (OR): 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.40); progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR): 1.99 (95% CI: 1.62-2.46)], vandetanib [DCR_OR:0.26 (95% CI: 0.06-1.24); PFS_HR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.82-1.20)] and lenvatinib [DCR_OR: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.05-1.33); PFS_HR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.81-1.22)]; and the following therapies for MTC: vandetanib 300 mg [objective response rate (ORR)_OR: 3.31 (95% CI: 0.68-16.22); vandetanib 150 mg ORR_OR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.16-2.33)]; and cabozantinib [ORR_OR: 85.32 (95% CI: 5.22-1395.15)]. Serious side effect (SE) analysis per organ/system demonstrated a varying MKI SE profile across both RR-WDTC and MTC diagnoses, more commonly involving metabolic/nutritional disorders [OR: 2.07 [95% CI: 0.82-5.18)] and gastrointestinal SE [OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.0-2.66)]. This network meta-analysis on advanced and/or metastatic TC points towards a higher efficacy of lenvatinib in RR-WDTC. The included MKIs exhibit a varying SE profile across different organs/systems favoring a patient-tailored approach with the anticipated toxicities guiding clinicians' decisions.
-
7.
Electrolyte disorders in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune check-point inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cantini, L, Merloni, F, Rinaldi, S, Lenci, E, Marcantognini, G, Meletani, T, Fiordoliva, I, Morgese, F, Torniai, M, Ricci, G, et al
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2020;:102974
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the relative risk (RR) of electrolyte disorders (EDs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS We searched for phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs (alone or combined with chemotherapy) with standard chemotherapy in aNSCLC. Summary incidence and RR were calculated. RESULTS Six RCTs with data on all-grade hyponatremia were identified (n = 3257). The incidence was 8.7 % in the study group and 4.9 % in the control group (RR 1.78, 95 %CI 1.12-2.80). Looking at all-grade hypokalemia, 7 RCTs were included (n = 4119). Incidence was 10.4 % in ICIs-treated patients and 5.9 % in the control arms (RR 1.62, 95 % CI 1.30-2.02). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with ICIs in aNSCLC is associated with a significant increased risk of hyponatremia and hypokalemia compared to chemotherapy. Monitoring of electrolyte levels should be emphasized in this setting.
-
8.
Anticancer Therapy-Related Increases in Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Parr, SK, Liang, J, Schadler, KL, Gilchrist, SC, Steele, CC, Ade, CJ
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;(14):e015598
Abstract
Background Cardio-oncology is a clinical discipline focused primarily on the early detection of anticancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy. However, there is growing evidence that the direct adverse consequences extend beyond the myocardium to affect the vasculature, but this evidence remains limited. In addition, there remains a paucity of clinically based strategies for monitoring vascular toxicity in these patients. Importantly, arterial stiffness is increasingly recognized as a surrogate end point for cardiovascular disease and may be an important vascular outcome to consider. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize evidence of increased arterial stiffening with anticancer therapy and evaluate the effect of treatment modifiers. Methods and Results A total of 19 longitudinal and cross-sectional studies that evaluated arterial stiffness both during and following anticancer therapy were identified using multiple databases. Two separate analyses were performed: baseline to follow-up (12 studies) and control versus patient groups (10 studies). Subgroup analysis evaluated whether stiffness differed as a function of treatment type and follow-up time. Standard mean differences and mean differences were calculated using random effect models. Significant increases in arterial stiffness were identified from baseline to follow-up (standard mean difference, 0.890; 95% CI, 0.448-1.332; P<0.0001; mean difference, 1.505; 95% CI, 0.789-2.221; P≤0.0001) and in patient versus control groups (standard mean difference, 0.860; 95% CI, 0.402-1.318; P=0.0002; mean difference, 1.437; 95% CI, 0.426-2.448; P=0.0052). Subgroup analysis indicated differences in arterial stiffness between anthracycline-based and non-anthracycline-based therapies (standard mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.001-0.41; P=0.048), but not follow-up time. Conclusions Significant arterial stiffening occurs following anticancer therapy. Our findings support the use of arterial stiffness as part of a targeted vascular imaging strategy for the identification of early cardiovascular injury during treatment and for the detection of long-term cardiovascular injury into survivorship.
-
9.
Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing Chinese herbal injections with chemotherapy for treating patients with esophageal cancer.
Zhang, D, Wu, J, Wang, H, Zhou, W, Ni, M, Liu, X, Zhang, X
The Journal of international medical research. 2020;(1):300060519898336
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in terms of clinical efficacy and safety for treating patients with esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CHIs combined with chemotherapy for treating EC published in English and Chinese databases were identified. The main outcomes were clinical efficacy, performance status, and adverse reactions. Random-effects models were fitted to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all pair-wise comparisons. RESULTS In total, 29 RCTs of eight CHIs were included in this study. The results of cluster analysis demonstrated that Compound Kushen injection plus chemotherapy was the optimal choice for improving the clinical efficacy rate. Shenfu injection was associated with a relatively high performance status. Compound Kushen injection and Shenfu injection were inferior to other CHIs in terms of preventing leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS The combination of Compound Kushen injection with chemotherapy could improve efficacy and reduce adverse drug reactions versus chemotherapy alone in patients with EC.
-
10.
Meta-analysis of oral cryotherapy in preventing oral mucositis associated with cancer therapy.
Park, SH, Lee, HS
International journal of nursing practice. 2019;(5):e12759
Abstract
AIMS: To review scientific evidence related to oral cryotherapy to prevent oral mucositis after cancer therapy. BACKGROUND Oral mucositis is a common complication of cancer therapy. In the most severe form of oral mucositis, patients cannot eat or drink at all and must receive nutrition and fluid replacement through parenteral support. Topical cooling of the oral mucosa may be an option for the prevention of oral mucositis. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES The literature search was performed using the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL Complete electronic databases for articles published up to 2017. The reference lists of all retrieved articles were manually reviewed to identify additional relevant studies. RESULTS Of 353 publications, 15 randomized controlled trials, involving 919 cancer patients, conducted between 1994 and 2017 were included in the present meta-analysis. Oral cryotherapy, applied during treatment of solid cancers, led to a statistically lower level (P < .05) of oral mucositis overall, and of the more severe grades (3-4 and 2-4). CONCLUSIONS Results of this study provide a scientific basis for oral cryotherapy as a viable nursing intervention that can significantly reduce the occurrence of severe oral mucositis.