-
1.
Meta-analysis of arbidol versus lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.
Yu, M, Wang, DC, Li, S, Lei, YH, Wei, J, Huang, LY
Journal of medical virology. 2022;(4):1513-1522
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using a meta-analysis method. METHODS The China Knowledge Network, VIP database, WanFang database PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane Library were searched for a collection of comparative studies on arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. RESULTS The results of the systematic review indicated that Arbidol had a higher positive-to-negative conversion rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid on Day 7 (p = 0.03), a higher positive-to-negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid on Day 14 (p = 0.006), a higher improvement rate of chest computed tomography on Day 14 (p = 0.02), a lower incidence of adverse reactions (p = 0.002) and lower rate of mortality (p = 0.007). There was no difference in the rate of cough disappearance on Day 14 (p = 0.24) or the rate of severe/critical illness (p = 0.07) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Arbidol may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. However, due to the small number of included studies and the number of patients, high-quality multicenter large-sample randomized double-blind controlled trials are still needed for verification.
-
2.
Interferon alpha therapy in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bewersdorf, JP, Giri, S, Wang, R, Podoltsev, N, Williams, RT, Tallman, MS, Rampal, RK, Zeidan, AM, Stahl, M
Leukemia. 2021;(6):1643-1660
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, COCHRANE registry of clinical trials, and Web of Science from inception through 03/2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-pegylated IFN (non-peg-IFN) in PV and ET patients. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of overall response rate (ORR) defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response (CHR) and partial hematologic response. Peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN were compared by meta-regression analyses. In total, 44 studies with 1359 patients (730 ET, 629 PV) were included. ORR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-84.1%, CHR: 59.0% [51.5%-66.1%]) and 76.7% (67.4-84.0%; CHR: 48.5% [37.8-59.4%]) for ET and PV patients, respectively. In meta-regression analyses results did not differ significantly for non-peg-IFN vs. peg-IFN. Annualized rates of thromboembolic complications and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were low at 1.2% and 8.8% for ET and 0.5% and 6.5% for PV patients, respectively. Both peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN can be effective and safe long-term treatments for ET and PV.
-
3.
Safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir combination in COVID-19: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.
Bhattacharyya, A, Kumar, S, Sarma, P, Kaur, H, Prajapat, M, Shekhar, N, Bansal, S, Avti, P, Hazarika, M, Sharma, S, et al
Indian journal of pharmacology. 2020;(4):313-323
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Being protease inhibitors and owing to their efficacy in SARS-CoV, lopinavir + ritonavir (L/R) combination is being used in the management of COVID-19. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we have evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of L/R combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Comparative, observational studies and controlled clinical trials comparing L/R combination to standard of care (SOC)/control or any other antiviral agent/combinations were included. A total of 10 databases were searched to identify 13 studies that fulfilled the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULTS No discernible beneficial effect was seen in the L/R group in comparison to SOC/control in terms of "progression to more severe state" (4 studies, odds ratio [OR]: 1.446 [0.722-2.895]), "mortality" (3 studies, OR: 1.208 [0.563-2.592]), and "virological cure on days 7-10" (3 studies, OR: 0.777 [0.371-1.630]), while the L/R combination arm performed better than the SOC/control arm in terms of "duration of hospital stay" (3 studies, mean difference (MD): -1.466 [-2.403 to - 0.529]) and "time to virological cure" (3 studies, MD: -3.272 [-6.090 to - 0.454]). No difference in efficacy was found between L/R versus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and L/R versus arbidol. However, in a single randomized controlled trail (open label), chloroquine (CQ) performed better than L/R. The combination L/R with arbidol may be beneficial (in terms of virological clearance and radiological improvement); however, we need more dedicated studies. Single studies report efficacy of L/R + interferon (IFN, either alpha or 1-beta) combination. We need more studies to delineate the proper effect size. Regarding adverse effects, except occurrence of diarrhea (higher in the L/R group), safety was comparable to SOC. CONCLUSION In our study, no difference was seen between the L/R combination and the SOC arm in terms of "progression to more severe state," "mortality," and virological cure on days 7-10;" however, some benefits in terms of "duration of hospital stay" and "time to virological cure" were seen. No significant difference in efficacy was seen when L/R was compared to arbidol and HCQ monotherapy. Except for the occurrence of diarrhea, which was higher in the L/R group, safety profile of L/R is comparable to SOC. Compared to L/R combination, CQ, L/R + arbidol, L/R + IFN-α, and L/R + IFN-1β showed better efficacy, but the external validity of these findings is limited by limited number of studies (1 study each).
-
4.
Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir among chronic hepatitis C patients.
Singh, AD, Maitra, S, Singh, N, Tyagi, P, Ashraf, A, Kumar, R, Shalimar,
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2020;(5):490-504
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) among chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients receiving the second generation, pan-genotypic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) regimen is unclear. AIM: To assess the effect of RAS on the SVR12 in CHC patients treated with G/P regimen. METHODS The EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases were searched for relevant studies published before 1 March 2019. The principal outcome was to compare the SVR12 in CHC patients with and without baseline RAS, particularly in genotype-1, genotype-3 and direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) failure patients. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools for randomised and nonrandomised interventional studies. RESULTS After initially identifying 410 studies, 3302 patients from 17 studies were included. Among 50 cases of virologic failures, 48% had genotype-3 infection, 44% genotype-1 infection and 36% DAA-failure patients. Baseline RAS were present in 44(88%) patients. The most common NS5a and NS3 mutations were Y93H and A166S respectively. The odds of SVR12 were significantly reduced in patients with any baseline RAS (NS3 and/or NS5a) (OR 0.32, 95%C I[0.15, 0.65], I2 = 0%) and NS5a substitutions (OR 0.36, 95%CI [0.18,0.73]). The impact of RAS on SVR12 was significant among genotype-3 patients, but not among genotype-1 or DAA-failure cases. The presence of Y93H and A30K mutations significantly impacted SVR12 rates in genotype-3 patients. CONCLUSION Baseline NS3 or NS5a RAS, especially the NS5a substitutions-A30K, Y93H, decrease the odds of achieving SVR12 in genotype-3 CHC patients.
-
5.
Comparative efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, MB, Wang, H, Zheng, QH, Zheng, XW, Fan, JN, Ding, YL, Niu, JL
PloS one. 2019;(11):e0224773
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. METHODS The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) since the date of database inception to July 2019. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the obtained studies and extracted the outcome indexes. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS Early on, tenofovir had a greater ability to inhibit the hepatitis B virus, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.03, 1.13), P<0.01] (96 weeks). Entecavir can normalize the ALT levels earlier, I2 = 0% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.77, 0.98), P = 0.02] (48 weeks). However, there was no statistically significant difference between TDF and ETV at 144 weeks. Tenofovir was as effective as entecavir in terms of HBeAg clearance and HBeAg seroconversion, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.68, 1.62), P = 0.82]; I2 = 69% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.61), P = 0.80]. The difference in the incidence of elevated creatine kinase levels was not statistically significant I2 = 0% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.27, 1.60), P = 0.35]. CONCLUSIONS Tenofovir and entecavir were equally effective in the treatment of patients with nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. In addition, TDF has an advantage in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional RCTs and a large-sample prospective cohort study should be performed.
-
6.
Universal prophylaxis or preemptive strategy for cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mumtaz, K, Faisal, N, Husain, S, Morillo, A, Renner, EL, Shah, PS
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2015;(2):472-81
Abstract
We systematically reviewed and meta-analyze the efficacy of universal prophylaxis (UP) and preemptive (PE) strategies (using ganciclovir or valganciclovir) in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (CMD) among liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database till December 2013. Studies that assessed UP or PE for preventing CMD in LTRs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was CMD, secondary outcomes being acute cellular rejection (ACR), graft loss (GL) and mortality. Due to the heterogeneity of comparative studies, an indirect comparison was performed. Pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence interval (CI) are calculated for each outcome using a random-effects model. Thirty-two studies involving 2456 LTRs were included. The majority of the studies were of low risk of bias. Irrespective of donor/recipient CMV sero-status, CMD was 10% with UP (95% CI: 6-14; I(2) = 87%; 16 studies, n = 1581) and 7% with PE (95% CI: 3-10; I(2) = 84%; 16 studies, n = 875) (mean difference 2.6; 95% CI: -3.25 to 8.45, p = 0.34). Likewise, ACR and mortality were similar with the two strategies. However, GL was significantly lower in the UP group, regardless of donor/recipient sero-status. In indirect comparison, the incidence of CMD, ACR and mortality in LTRs were similar with two strategies. Trials comparing the two strategies directly are needed.
-
7.
Interferon-associated retinopathy risk in patients with diabetes and hypertensive hepatitis C.
Xue, JH, Zhu, HH, Wang, J, Chen, Z
World journal of gastroenterology. 2014;(23):7505-13
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the association of hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) with interferon-associated retinopathy (IAR) risk in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). METHODS Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Embase for eligible articles published prior to December 2013; additional studies were identified by reviewing the bibliographies. Only case-control or cohort studies that evaluated the association between hypertension and/or DM and IAR incidence in CHC patients were included. IAR was characterized by the presence of cotton-wool spots and/or retinal hemorrhage, and was defined as the primary efficacy measure. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using data extracted from papers based on random-effects models. RESULTS Eight eligible studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The outcomes showed that patients with CHC and hypertension were at higher risk of IAR (48/189 vs 96/455, RR = 1.90; 95%CI: 1.15-3.15, P < 0.05). Patients with DM receiving interferon (IFN)-based therapy for CHC infection may be at higher risk for IAR (18/72 vs 60/256, RR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.11-2.20, P < 0.05); however, the outcome was not stable. There was no significant difference in IAR risk between genotype-1-infected patients and non-genotype-1-infected patients (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.64-1.87, P > 0.05). Comparable incidences of IAR were also found between patients treated with pegylated interferon (PIFN) α-2a and those treated with PIFN α-2b (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.56-1.24, P > 0.05) and between patients treated with IFN α and those treated with PIFN α (RR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.72-1.50, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with hypertension have a higher risk of retinopathy when receiving IFN-based therapy for CHC.
-
8.
Relationship of vitamin D status with advanced liver fibrosis and response to hepatitis C virus therapy: a meta-analysis.
García-Álvarez, M, Pineda-Tenor, D, Jiménez-Sousa, MA, Fernández-Rodríguez, A, Guzmán-Fulgencio, M, Resino, S
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2014;(5):1541-50
Abstract
UNLABELLED There is growing evidence that vitamin D is related to chronic hepatitis C (CHC) pathogenicity. We analyzed the relationship of vitamin D status with advanced liver fibrosis (ALF) in CHC treatment-naïve patients and sustained virologic response (SVR) in CHC patients on pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin (pegIFNα/ribavirin) therapy. We performed a meta-analysis of all eligible studies published to date (April, 2014) in PubMed, SCOPUS, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library, assessing plasma/serum vitamin D levels related to ALF and/or SVR. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by either fixed or random effects models. Fourteen studies were selected from the literature search, seven for ALF (1,083 patients) and 11 for SVR (2,672 patients). For liver fibrosis, low vitamin D status was related to a diagnosis of ALF, with the cutoffs of 10 ng/mL (OR=2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.20, 4.72) and 30 ng/mL (OR=2.22, 95% CI=1.24, 3.97) being significant, and a near-significance for 20 ng/mL (OR=1.44, 95% CI=0.99, 2.12). Regarding SVR, a significant heterogeneity among studies was found (P<0.001), and we only found a significant association with SVR for a vitamin D cutoff of 20 ng/mL (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.31, 0.91). When meta-analysis was performed excluding the outliers, significant pooled ORs were found for all patients (10 ng/mL [OR=0.48, 95% CI=0.34, 0.67] and 20 ng/mL [OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.45, 0.76]) and GT1/4 patients (10 ng/mL [OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.34, 0.81] and 20 ng/mL [OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.39, 0.74]). CONCLUSION Low vitamin D status in CHC patients is associated with a higher likelihood of having ALF and lower odds of achieving SVR following pegIFNα/ribavirin therapy.
-
9.
Treatment of children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
El Sherbini, A, Omar, A
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2014;(12):1103-10
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective management of children with chronic hepatitis B is still an unresolved issue. AIM: To assess the outcome of different therapeutic regimens among children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. METHODS Electronic database searches identified clinical trials that completed specific periods of treatment and follow-up. Sustained response rates were defined by the loss of HBV DNA and HBeAg, and by the normalization of liver enzymes. The loss of HBsAg and seroconversion to anti-HBs were also listed. RESULTS Our searches found 20 eligible articles (1112 enrolled patients, 2-18 years old). Interferon-alpha therapy showed significantly higher sustained response rate and loss of HBsAg than no therapy (Odd's ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.6-5.4; and 2.3, 1.1-11.3, respectively). The sustained response rate was not significantly different between interferon and interferon plus lamivudine, or plus prednisone, or plus hepatitis B vaccine; this rate was significantly higher for interferon compared with combined interferon plus levamisole or vitamin E. CONCLUSION Interferon-alpha is still the most effective treatment option for children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Randomized trials are warranted for further comparing interferon to newer antiviral agents in terms of efficacy, safety, emergence of mutant variants, and cost/benefit ratio.
-
10.
Patients eligible for treatment with simeprevir in a French center.
Morel, V, Duverlie, G, Brochot, E
Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2014;(1):149-51
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simeprevir (Olysio(®)), a second-wave protease inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, is not indicated in patients with genotype 1a strain harboring the Q80K protease mutation. Phase 2 and 3 studies on this molecule mainly focused on North American patients and the prevalence of Q80K is particularly high in the USA (around 50%). The prevalence of this mutation in other parts of the world is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of our study was to perform a detection of this mutation in a single PCR technique and to study the prevalence of this Q80K mutation in a non U.S. population. We can thus estimate the proportion of HCV positive patients who can be treated with simeprevir. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a meta-analysis of response rates in the presence or absence of this mutation in randomized trials and then describe a simple and reliable method to detect this mutation. We also examined bilirubin levels in our cohort of 95 HCV genotype 1a patients. RESULTS Ten patients (10.5%) had a Q80K mutation and 12 patients exhibited bilirubin levels above the upper limit of normal at baseline. In our cohort, 21 patients (22%) were therefore ineligible for treatment with simeprevir. The prevalence of this mutation seems to be much lower in European patients. CONCLUSION In conclusion, before considering treatment with simeprevir, physicians must be able to screen for the Q80K mutation.