-
1.
Non-Vitamin K Antagonists Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cardoso, R, Ternes, CMP, Justino, GB, Fernandes, A, Rocha, AV, Knijnik, L, d'Avila, A, Lopes, RD
The American journal of medicine. 2022;(2):228-234.e1
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves are at high risk for thromboembolic events. The pooled efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), as a class, relative to warfarin in this population is not well-known. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs relative to warfarin in patients with bioprosthetic valves or valve repair. METHODS We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves or valve repair. We pooled outcomes for stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding. RESULTS We included 4 trials with 1379 patients, of whom 723 (52.4%) received a NOAC. Mean follow-up ranged from 90 days to 2.8 years. In the pooled analysis, stroke or systemic embolism was significantly lower in patients treated with NOACs (1.9%) compared with warfarin (3.7%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.85; P = .02). Ischemic stroke (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.18-2.93), hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-1.05), cardiovascular death (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.38-1.62), and all-cause mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.55-1.62) were not significantly different among groups. Major bleeding was significantly lower in patients treated with NOAC (2.8%) compared with warfarin (4.7%) (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves or valve repair, NOACs are associated with a reduced incidence of thromboembolic events and major bleeding as compared with warfarin. Thus, NOACs may be considered a preferred option for this patient population.
-
2.
Network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for atrial fibrillation patients receiving PCI or with ACS.
Yang, SM, Huang, CJ, Chen, CH, Yu, WC, Sung, SH, Guo, CY, Chuang, SY, Cheng, HM, Chiang, CE
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA. 2022;(1):59-66
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), choosing the most appropriate antithrombotic treatment remains a dilemma. We aimed to compare the relative efficacy and safety outcomes of antithrombotic drugs in patients with AF after undergoing PCI or ACS. METHODS Randomized controlled trials were systematically searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Five studies (11,532 patients) were included in the network meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the reliability and conclusiveness of the meta-analysis comparing the dual antithrombotic therapy strategies with the triple antithrombotic therapy strategy. RESULTS Compared with vitamin K antagonist + dual antiplatelet therapy, novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) + P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with a significantly better trial-defined primary safety outcome (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90) and the lowest probability of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage using the cumulative ranking technique. In patients omitting aspirin, TSA demonstrated conclusive evidence with significant decreases in all safety outcomes and inconclusive evidence with a nonsignificant increase in in-stent thrombosis (risk ratio: 1.32; TSA-adjusted 95% CI, 0.54-3.24) and myocardial infarction (risk ratio: 1.19; TSA-adjusted 95% CI, 0.84-1.68). CONCLUSIONS In patients with AF receiving PCI or with ACS, NOAC + P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with the lowest bleeding risk but resulted in a statistically nonsignificant, numerically greater risk for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction, suggesting that triple antithrombotic therapy should still be an option for certain patients at a high risk of stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction.
-
3.
Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Caused by Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials).
Lv, M, Wu, T, Jiang, S, Chen, W, Zhang, J
The American journal of cardiology. 2022;:92-99
Abstract
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who take direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) face the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), which can be serious and even life threatening, but the risk of ICH of anticoagulants is still controversial. In this meta-analysis, we compared the risk of ICH between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and DOACs. Furthermore, we also compared the risk of ICH in different DOACs. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The outcome was ICH, shown as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). DOACs were ranked by calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We included a total of 82,404 patients with AF. DOACs reduced the ICH risk by nearly half compared with VKAs (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.54, p <0.001). VKAs were the least safe among all oral anticoagulants (SUCRA 1.7). Dabigatran 110 mg was the safest DOAC (SUCRA 87.3) for ICH risk, whereas rivaroxaban 20 mg was a relatively unsafe DOAC (SUCRA 27.5). Compared with rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 110 mg presented 53% (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.82) lower relative risk for ICH. In conclusion, DOACs present less ICH risk than VKAs in patients with AF. For patients with AF who are at high risk of ICH, dabigatran 110 mg may be the safest choice among the DOACs.
-
4.
Plasma Cortisol and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Larsson, SC, Lee, WH, Burgess, S, Allara, E
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2021;(7):e2521-e2526
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
CONTEXT Atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac arrhythmias, and related risk factors are common in patients with Cushing's syndrome, or clinical chronic hypercortisolism. While hypercortisolism may be associated with AF, this association has not yet been ascertained causally. OBJECTIVE To determine whether plasma cortisol is causally associated with AF using a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design. METHODS Three genetic variants in the SERPINA1/SERPINA6 locus and functionally associated with plasma cortisol were identified in the CORtisol NETwork consortium (12 597 participants). Summary-level genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for the associations between the cortisol-associated variants and AF were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis of 6 studies (60 620 AF cases and 970 216 noncases) and the FinnGen consortium (17 325 AF cases and 97 214 noncases). The fixed-effects inverse-variance weighted approach accounting for genetic correlations between variants was used for analysis. Multivariable MR analyses were conducted to assess potential mediating effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and waist circumference (WC). Summary-level GWAS data for SBP and WC were obtained respectively from the International Consortium of Blood Pressure (757 601 participants) and the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium (232 101 participants). RESULTS One standard deviation increase in genetically predicted plasma cortisol was associated with greater risk of AF (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.35). The association attenuated when adjusting for genetically predicted SBP and WC (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.72-1.38). CONCLUSION Evidence derived from the MR study suggests a positive association between plasma cortisol and risk of AF, likely mediated through SBP and WC.
-
5.
Protective Effects of Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors on Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Li, D, Liu, Y, Hidru, TH, Yang, X, Wang, Y, Chen, C, Li, KHC, Tang, Y, Wei, Y, Tse, G, et al
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2021;:619586
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperglycemia is associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL). Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been reported to prevent AF/AFL in some studies, but not others. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether SGLT2i use is associated with lower risks of AF/AFL. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing SGLT2i and placebo. RESULTS A total of 33 trials involving 66,685 patients were included. The serious adverse events (SAEs) of AF/AFL occurrence were significantly lower in the SGLT2i group than the placebo group (0.96% vs. 1.19%; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.96; P = 0.01; I2 25.5%). Similarly, the SAEs of AF occurrence was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group (0.82% vs. 1.06%; RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.95; P = 0.01; I2 10.2%). The subgroup analysis showed that the reduction in AF/AFL was significant only for dapagliflozin (1.02% vs. 1.49%; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002; I2 0%), but not for canagliflozin (1.00% vs 1.08%; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.62-1.12; P = 0.23; I2 0%), empagliflozin (0.88% vs 0.70%; RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.76-1.90; P = 0.43; I2 0%), ertugliflozin (1.01% vs 0.96%; RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.66-1.75; P = 0.76; I2 0%), and sotagliflozin (0.16% vs 0.10%; RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.13-8.86; P = 0.93; I2 0%). CONCLUSIONS SGLT2i use is associated with a 19.33% lower SAEs of AF/AFL compared with the placebo. Dapagliflozin users had the lowest SAEs of AF/AFL incidence. Further studies are needed to determine whether canagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin similarly exert protective effects against AF/AFL development.
-
6.
Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available "Real-World" Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective.
Lorenzoni, V, Pirri, S, Turchetti, G
Clinical drug investigation. 2021;(3):255-267
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF. METHODS A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice.
-
7.
Association between the rs2106261 polymorphism in the zinc finger homeobox 3 gene and risk of atrial fibrillation: Evidence from a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Wei, Y, Wang, L, Lin, C, Xie, Y, Bao, Y, Luo, Q, Zhang, N
Medicine. 2021;(49):e27749
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous genome-wide studies have identified an association between the rs2106261 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the zinc finger homeobox 3 (ZFHX3) gene and an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this association remains controversial, since conflicting results have been reported in previous studies. We aimed to investigate the association between the ZFHX3 rs2106261 polymorphism and susceptibility to AF. METHODS A comprehensive literature search, of articles written in either English or Chinese, was conducted on various databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, Wan Fang, and CNKI, for studies performed up to August 1, 2020. Data were abstracted and pooled using Stata 14.0 software. A meta-analysis was performed on all selected studies based on ZFHX3 rs2106261 polymorphism genotypes. RESULTS Nine studies, including 10,107 cases and 58,663 controls, were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In the overall population, a significant association was found between AF and the T-allelic ZFHX 3 rs2106261 SNP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.46). In subgroup analysis, a significant association between the T-allele of rs7193343 and risk of AF in Caucasian (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37) and Asian subgroups (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.32-1.89) was observed. However, no statistically significant association was found in African populations (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.19). CONCLUSION The genetic variant rs2106261 SNP is associated with susceptibility to AF in Caucasian and Asian individuals, with Asian samples showing a stronger association. However, based on the current evidence, no association was found in African samples. Future studies, with larger sample sizes and multiple ethnicities, are still necessary.
-
8.
Statin use and mortality in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 100,287 patients.
Pastori, D, Baratta, F, Di Rocco, A, Farcomeni, A, Del Ben, M, Angelico, F, Violi, F, Pignatelli, P, Lip, GYH
Pharmacological research. 2021;:105418
Abstract
Statins are effective for reducing cardiovascular disease in patients at risk or with cardiovascular disease. The benefit of statin therapy on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is not clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies retrieved from MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane (CENTRAL) database of studies investigating the efficacy of statins in AF patients. The principal endpoint was all-cause mortality. Other endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, composite endpoints and any bleeding. We included 14 studies (2 post-hoc analysis of randomized clinical trials, 8 prospective and 4 retrospective) with 100,287 AF patients, of whom 23,228 were on statins. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 0.59 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.54-0.65). This association was consistent by aging, sex and prevalent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. and the beneficial effect was evident already after 12 months of therapy. The absolute risk reduction for all-cause mortality in patients treated with statins was 10 % (95 % CI 9-10). The pooled HR for statins against cardiovascular mortality was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.58-0.96). No association was found with other secondary endpoints. Regarding bleeding events, the pooled HR for statin use was 0.60 (95 % CI 0.48-0.76). Our meta-analysis shows that in AF patients, statin therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality are reduced by 41 % and 25 %, respectively. Randomized clinical trials in AF patients are necessary, as well as clarity on AF-specific LDL cholesterol targets.
-
9.
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
Zhu, W, Ye, Z, Chen, S, Wu, D, He, J, Dong, Y, Lip, GYH, Liu, C
Stroke. 2021;(4):1225-1233
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies. METHODS We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model. RESULTS A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.
-
10.
Redefining β-blocker response in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: a machine learning cluster analysis.
Karwath, A, Bunting, KV, Gill, SK, Tica, O, Pendleton, S, Aziz, F, Barsky, AD, Chernbumroong, S, Duan, J, Mobley, AR, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2021;(10309):1427-1435
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality remains unacceptably high in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) despite advances in therapeutics. We hypothesised that a novel artificial intelligence approach could better assess multiple and higher-dimension interactions of comorbidities, and define clusters of β-blocker efficacy in patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. METHODS Neural network-based variational autoencoders and hierarchical clustering were applied to pooled individual patient data from nine double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of β blockers. All-cause mortality during median 1·3 years of follow-up was assessed by intention to treat, stratified by electrocardiographic heart rhythm. The number of clusters and dimensions was determined objectively, with results validated using a leave-one-trial-out approach. This study was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00832442) and the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews (CRD42014010012). FINDINGS 15 659 patients with heart failure and LVEF of less than 50% were included, with median age 65 years (IQR 56-72) and LVEF 27% (IQR 21-33). 3708 (24%) patients were women. In sinus rhythm (n=12 822), most clusters demonstrated a consistent overall mortality benefit from β blockers, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0·54 to 0·74. One cluster in sinus rhythm of older patients with less severe symptoms showed no significant efficacy (OR 0·86, 95% CI 0·67-1·10; p=0·22). In atrial fibrillation (n=2837), four of five clusters were consistent with the overall neutral effect of β blockers versus placebo (OR 0·92, 0·77-1·10; p=0·37). One cluster of younger atrial fibrillation patients at lower mortality risk but similar LVEF to average had a statistically significant reduction in mortality with β blockers (OR 0·57, 0·35-0·93; p=0·023). The robustness and consistency of clustering was confirmed for all models (p<0·0001 vs random), and cluster membership was externally validated across the nine independent trials. INTERPRETATION An artificial intelligence-based clustering approach was able to distinguish prognostic response from β blockers in patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF. This included patients in sinus rhythm with suboptimal efficacy, as well as a cluster of patients with atrial fibrillation where β blockers did reduce mortality. FUNDING Medical Research Council, UK, and EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative BigData@Heart.