0
selected
-
1.
Effects of acute caffeine consumption following sleep loss on cognitive, physical, occupational and driving performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Irwin, C, Khalesi, S, Desbrow, B, McCartney, D
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2020;:877-888
Abstract
Caffeine is widely used to counteract the effects of sleep loss. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of acute caffeine consumption on cognitive, physical, occupational and driving performance in sleep deprived/restricted individuals. 45 publications providing 327 effect estimates (EEs) were included in the review. Caffeine improved response time (44 EEs; g = 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.53-0.83) and accuracy (27 EEs; g = 0.68; 95 % CI: 0.48-0.88) on attention tests, improved executive function (38 EEs; g = 0.35; 95 % CI: 0.15-0.55), improved reaction time (12 EEs; g = 1.11; 95 % CI: 0.75-1.47), improved response time (20 EEs; g = 1.95; 95 % CI: 1.39-2.52) and accuracy (34 EEs; g = 0.43; 95 % CI: 0.30-0.55) on information processing tasks, and enhanced lateral (29 EEs; g = 1.67; 95 % CI: 1.32-2.02) and longitudinal (12 EEs; g = 1.60; 95 % CI: 1.16-2.03) measures of vehicular control on driving tests. Studies also typically indicated benefit of caffeine on memory (25 EEs), crystallized intelligence (11 EEs), physical (39 EEs) and occupational (36 EEs) performance. Ingestion of caffeine is an effective counter-measure to the cognitive and physical impairments associated with sleep loss.
-
2.
The effect of active hypohydration on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Goodman, SPJ, Moreland, AT, Marino, FE
Physiology & behavior. 2019;:297-308
Abstract
Hypohydration is generally considered to have a negative effect on cognitive function, despite several studies reporting comparable findings between hydration states. Recommendations to avoid moderate dehydration (≥ 2% loss in body mass) are commonly made to athletes, on the provision that this deficit may impair optimal cognitive performance. To determine whether cognitive function is impaired by hypohydration, and investigate the existence of the proposed critical water deficit of ≥2% loss in body mass purported to diminish cognitive performance, we conducted a systematic search of the literature and examined appropriate studies by meta-analysis. Overall, cognitive performance was not found to be impaired by hypohydration (g = -0.177; 95% CI = -0.532-0.179; P = .331). Nor were the underlying cognitive domains (complex attention, executive function, learning and memory) impaired (all P > .236), independent of the incurred fluid loss (less than or >2% loss in body mass), although results were not always homogenous (I2 ranging between 0% and 93%). Collectively, these results suggest that hypohydration may not compromise cognitive function, nor any of the investigated subdomains to a greater extent than if euhydration had been maintained. Furthermore, recommendations to avoid moderate hypohydration on the basis of maintaining optimal cognitive function are not substantiated by this meta-analysis.
-
3.
The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues.
van der Laan, LN, de Ridder, DT, Viergever, MA, Smeets, PA
NeuroImage. 2011;(1):296-303
Abstract
Food selection is primarily guided by the visual system. Multiple functional neuro-imaging studies have examined the brain responses to visual food stimuli. However, the results of these studies are heterogeneous and there still is uncertainty about the core brain regions involved in the neural processing of viewing food pictures. The aims of the present study were to determine the concurrence in the brain regions activated in response to viewing pictures of food and to assess the modulating effects of hunger state and the food's energy content. We performed three Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses on data from healthy normal weight subjects in which we examined: 1) the contrast between viewing food and nonfood pictures (17 studies, 189 foci), 2) the modulation by hunger state (five studies, 48 foci) and 3) the modulation by energy content (seven studies, 86 foci). The most concurrent brain regions activated in response to viewing food pictures, both in terms of ALE values and the number of contributing experiments, were the bilateral posterior fusiform gyrus, the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the left middle insula. Hunger modulated the response to food pictures in the right amygdala and left lateral OFC, and energy content modulated the response in the hypothalamus/ventral striatum. Overall, the concurrence between studies was moderate: at best 41% of the experiments contributed to the clusters for the contrast between food and nonfood. Therefore, future research should further elucidate the separate effects of methodological and physiological factors on between-study variations.
-
4.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behaviour.
Brooks, S, Prince, A, Stahl, D, Campbell, IC, Treasure, J
Clinical psychology review. 2011;(1):37-51
Abstract
AIM: Maladaptive cognitions about food, weight and shape bias attention, memory and judgment and may be linked to disordered eating behaviour. This paper reviews information processing of food stimuli (words, pictures) in people with eating disorders (ED). METHOD PubMed, Ovid, ScienceDirect, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched to December 2009. 63 studies measured attention, memory and judgment bias towards food stimuli in women with ED. RESULTS Stroop tasks had sufficient sample size for a meta-analyses and effects ranged from small to medium. Other studies of attention bias had variable effects (e.g. the Dot-Probe task, distracter tasks and Startle Eyeblink Modulation). A meta-analysis of memory bias studies in ED and RE yielded insignificant effect. Effect sizes for judgment bias ranged from negligible to large. CONCLUSIONS People with ED have greater attentional bias to food stimuli than healthy controls (HC). Evidence for a memory and judgment bias in ED is limited.