-
1.
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Results from PARADIGM-HF India sub-study.
Jain, AR, Aggarwal, RK, Rao, NS, Billa, G, Kumar, S
Indian heart journal. 2020;(6):535-540
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in Indian patients of PARADIGM-HF trial. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase III sub-study (NCT01035255) was conducted between April 2010 and May 2014. Patients with chronic heart failure (HF), aged >18 years with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were randomized (1:1) to receive either sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice-daily or enalapril 10 mg twice-daily. The primary endpoint was to compare efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan to enalapril in delaying time-to-first occurrence of the composite endpoint (cardiovascular [CV] death or HF hospitalization). RESULTS The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 27 months, because the boundary for benefit with sacubitril/valsartan had crossed. Among 637 Indian patients in PARADIGM-HF (sacubitril/valsartan, n = 322 and enalapril, n = 315), the primary outcome, CV death, and the first hospitalization for HF occurred in 21.81% and 24.76% (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.646-1.231), 17.45% and 20.63% (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.605-1.236), and 7.48% and 9.52% (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.461-1.350) patients in the sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril group, respectively. The all-cause mortality (19.0% vs. 21.9%) and adverse events (78.4% vs. 82.2%) were comparatively lower in the sacubitril/valsartan than enalapril group. No significant difference was seen between the benefits of treatment in Indian and the total PARADIGM-HF cohort (p value for interaction >0.05). CONCLUSION Results support the use of sacubitril/valsartan in Indian patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction with treatment benefits similar to global PARADIGM-HF cohort.
-
2.
Blood Pressure and Cholesterol-lowering Efficacy of a Fixed-dose Combination With Irbesartan and Atorvastatin in Patients With Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Factorial, Multicenter Phase III Study.
Kim, SH, Jo, SH, Lee, SC, Lee, SY, Yoon, MH, Lee, HL, Lee, NH, Ha, JW, Lee, NH, Kim, DW, et al
Clinical therapeutics. 2016;(10):2171-2184
Abstract
PURPOSE A fixed-dose combination of a stain and an antihypertensive drug may be useful for the treatment of patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. It may also improve patient drug compliance to help control risk factors of cardiovascular disease. This study was designed to evaluate the blood pressure-lowering and cholesterol-lowering effect of a fixed-dose combination of irbesartan-atorvastatin compared with monotherapy by either agent over an 8-week treatment period. METHODS Patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this randomized, double-blind, Phase III study. Eligible study patients were randomly assigned to test groups receiving a combination of irbesartan 300 mg and atorvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg (IRB300 + ATO40 and IRB300 + ATO80). Comparator groups comprised monotherapy groups with irbesartan 300 mg (IRB300) or atorvastatin 40 mg (ATO40) or atorvastatin 80 mg (ATO80), or placebo. Patients who were eligible at screening were subjected to a 4- to 6-week washout period before commencing 8 weeks of therapy per their assigned group. The primary efficacy end points were percent change in LDL-C and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline to end of therapy. Tolerability profiles of combination therapy were compared with other groups. FINDINGS A total of 733 patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this study; 230 eligible patients were randomized to treatment. The mean age of patients was 58.9 (8.5) years, and their mean body mass index was 25.8 (3.2) kg/m2. More than two thirds (70.9%) of the study patients were male. Mean LDL-C and sitting DBP levels at baseline were 149.54 (29.19) mg/dL and 92.32 (6.03) mm Hg, respectively. Percent reductions in LDL-C after 8 weeks were 46.74% (2.06%) in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 48.98% (2.12%) in the IRB300 + ATO80 group; these values were 47.13% (3.21%) and 48.30% (2.98%) in the ATO40 and ATO80 comparator groups. Similarly, a reduction in sitting DBP after 8 weeks was -8.50 (1.06) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 10.66 (1.08) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO80 group compared with 8.40 (1.65) mm Hg in the IRB300 group. The incidence rate for treatment-emergent adverse events was 22.27% and was similar between the monotherapy and combination groups. IMPLICATIONS A once-daily combination product of irbesartan and atorvastatin provided an effective, safe, and more compliable treatment for patients with coexisting hypertension and hyperlipidemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01442987.
-
3.
Odanacatib treatment affects trabecular and cortical bone in the femur of postmenopausal women: results of a two-year placebo-controlled trial.
Engelke, K, Fuerst, T, Dardzinski, B, Kornak, J, Ather, S, Genant, HK, de Papp, A
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2015;(1):30-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Odanacatib, a selective cathepsin K inhibitor, increases areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine and hip of postmenopausal women. To gain additional insight into the effects on trabecular and cortical bone, we analyzed quantitative computed tomography (QCT) data of postmenopausal women treated with odanacatib using Medical Image Analysis Framework (MIAF; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany). This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3 trial enrolled 214 postmenopausal women (mean age 64 years) with low aBMD. Subjects were randomized to odanacatib 50 mg weekly (ODN) or placebo (PBO); all participants received calcium and vitamin D. Hip QCT scans at 24 months were available for 158 women (ODN: n = 78 women; PBO: n = 80 women). There were consistent and significant differential treatment effects (ODN-PBO) for total hip integral (5.4%), trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) (12.2%), and cortical vBMD (2.5%) at 24 months. There was no significant differential treatment effect on integral bone volume. Results for bone mineral content (BMC) closely matched those for vBMD for integral and trabecular compartments. However, with small but mostly significant differential increases in cortical volume (1.0% to 1.3%) and thickness (1.4% to 1.9%), the percentage cortical BMC increases were numerically larger than those of vBMD. With a total hip BMC differential treatment effect (ODN-PBO) of nearly 1000 mg, the proportions of BMC attributed to cortical gain were 45%, 44%, 52%, and 40% for the total, neck, trochanter, and intertrochanter subregions, respectively. In postmenopausal women treated for 2 years, odanacatib improved integral, trabecular, and cortical vBMD and BMC at all femur regions relative to placebo when assessed by MIAF. Cortical volume and thickness increased significantly in all regions except the femoral neck. The increase in cortical volume and BMC paralleled the increase in cortical vBMD, demonstrating a consistent effect of ODN on cortical bone. Approximately one-half of the absolute BMC gain occurred in cortical bone.
-
4.
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 Factorial Design, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension.
Lee, HY, Kim, YJ, Ahn, T, Youn, HJ, Chull Chae, S, Seog Seo, H, Kim, KS, Rhee, MY, Choi, DJ, Kim, JJ, et al
Clinical therapeutics. 2015;(11):2581-2596.e3
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fimasartan/amlodipine combination in patients with hypertension and to determine the optimal composition for a future single-pill combination formulation. METHODS This Phase II study was conducted by using a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 factorial design. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, eligible hypertensive patients (with a sitting diastolic blood pressure [SiDBP] between 90 and 114 mm Hg) were randomized to treatment. They received single or combined administration of fimasartan at 3 doses (0, 30, and 60 mg) and amlodipine at 3 doses (0, 5, and 10 mg) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in SiDBP from baseline and at week 8; secondary end points included the change in SiDBP from baseline and at week 4 and the changes in sitting systolic blood pressure from baseline and at weeks 4 and 8. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. FINDINGS 420 Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly allocated to the 9 groups. Mean (SD) SiDBP changes in each group after 8 weeks were as follows: placebo, -6.0 (8.5) mm Hg; amlodipine 5 mg, -10.6 (9.2) mm Hg; amlodipine 10 mg, -15.9 (7.2) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg, -10.1 (9.1) mm Hg; fimasartan 60 mg, -13.0 (10.0) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg/amlodipine 5 mg, -16.2 (8.5) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg/amlodipine 10 mg, -19.5 (7.5) mm Hg; fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 5 mg, -16.6 (6.9) mm Hg; and fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg, -21.5 (8.3) mm Hg. All treatment groups produced significantly greater reductions in blood pressure compared with the placebo group. In addition, all combination treatment groups had superior reductions in blood pressure compared with the monotherapy groups. In the combination treatment groups, doubling fimasartan dose in the given dose of amlodipine did not show further BP reduction, whereas doubling amlodipine dose showed significantly further BP reduction in the given dose of fimasartan. During the study period, 75 (17.9%) of 419 patients experienced 110 AEs. Ninety-five AEs were mild, 9 were moderate, and 6 were severe in intensity. Eight patients discontinued the study due to AEs. There was no significant difference in incidence of AEs among groups (P = 0.0884). The most common AE was headache (12 patients [2.9%]), followed by dizziness (11 patients [2.6%]) and elevated blood creatine phosphokinase levels (6 patients [1.4%]). IMPLICATIONS Fimasartan combined with amlodipine produced superior blood pressure reductions and low levels of AEs compared with either monotherapy. Therefore, a single-pill combination with fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg will be developed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01518998.
-
5.
High doses of irbesartan offer long-term kidney protection in cases of established diabetic nephropathy.
Ros-Ruiz, S, Aranda-Lara, P, Fernández, JC, Martínez-Esteban, MD, Jironda, C, Hidalgo, P, Hernández-Marrero, D
Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia. 2012;(2):187-96
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypothetically, the greater the blockade of angiotensin AT1 receptors from ultra-high doses of angiotensin receptors blockers (ARB), the greater the expected renoprotection effects. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of ultra-high doses of irbesartan on proteinuria and renal function in diabetics with established or overt diabetic nephropathy (ODN). MATERIAL AND METHOD Ours was a prospective, non-randomised 3-year follow-up study, using a multifactorial therapeutic approach based on irbesartan 600mg daily. Demographic variables, anthropometric data, and biochemical parameters were comparatively analysed at the beginning and end of the study. Forty patients (75% with type 2 diabetes) were included, average age 57.1 +/- 10, 29 male (72.5%). RESULTS SBP (157.6 +/- 27mm Hg vs 130.1 +/- 14mm Hg) and DBP (88.8 +/- 10mm Hg vs 76.2 +/- 8mm Hg) decreased significantly at the end of follow-up (P<.001). Serum creatinine increased by only 0.17mg/dl, although this was a statistically significant difference (P<.05). Proteinuria markedly decreased from 2.64 +/- 1.99 to 0.98 +/- 1.18 (P<.0001), i.e. 59.2%. Twenty-five percent of patients had normal albuminuria at the end of the follow-up period. Lipid profiles significantly improved. No patients withdrew from the study due to side effects, and serum potassium did not change significantly over the course of the study. Except for BMI and HbA1c, all other therapeutic targets set out by ADA recommendations improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of ODN with ultra-high doses of irbesartan was highly effective and safe in reducing proteinuria and slowing the progressive course to ESRD.
-
6.
Effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker irbesartan on metabolic parameters in clinical practice: the DO-IT prospective observational study.
Parhofer, KG, Münzel, F, Krekler, M
Cardiovascular diabetology. 2007;:36
Abstract
AIMS: A number of intervention studies have shown that therapy with angiotensin receptor blockers, such as irbesartan, can improve metabolic parameters and reduce the incidence of diabetes mellitus. It is unknown whether this observation also holds true in routine clinical settings. METHODS We evaluated the effect of irbesartan (150 mg or 300 mg/d) together with or without hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg/d) in 3259 German patients. A total of 750 primary care physicians evaluated up to 5 subsequent patients with metabolic syndrome (58.9% diabetic), in whom irbesartan therapy was newly initiated (87%) or continued (13%). RESULTS Six months of irbesartan therapy decreased systolic blood pressure by 14% (157.4 +/- 14.7 vs. 135.0 +/- 10.7 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure by 13% (92.9 +/- 9.2 vs. 80.8 +/- 6.8 mmHg). This was associated with a decrease in body weight (-2.3%), fasting glucose (-9.5%), HbA1c (-4.6%), LDL-cholesterol (-11%), triglycerides (-16%) and gamma-GT (-12%) and an increase in HDL-cholesterol (+5%). These changes were somewhat more pronounced in male than in female patients and in obese than in lean patients. Changes in glucose concentration and HbA1c were much more prominent in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION Irbesartan therapy improves metabolic parameters in routine clinical settings. Thus, our study confirms previously published results from large intervention trials and extends the findings to routine clinical practice.
-
7.
Gender differences in the renal response to renin-angiotensin system blockade.
Miller, JA, Cherney, DZ, Duncan, JA, Lai, V, Burns, KD, Kennedy, CR, Zimpelmann, J, Gao, W, Cattran, DC, Scholey, JW
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2006;(9):2554-60
Abstract
Evidence suggests that gender differences exist in renin-angiotensin system (RAS) function. It was hypothesized that women may differ also in their response to RAS blockade. The renal and peripheral hemodynamic responses to incremental dosages of an angiotensin receptor blocker and the degree of angiotensin II (AngII) insensitivity achieved during 8 wk were examined in men and women. Participants were 30 young healthy men (n = 15; mean age 27 +/- 2) and women (n = 15; mean age 28 +/- 2) who were on a controlled sodium and protein diet for 1 wk before each study. The humoral, renal, and systemic response to incremental dosages of irbesartan (75 mg for 4 wk, then 150 mg for 4 wk) was assessed, as was the pressor response to AngII (3 ng/kg per min), at 2-wk intervals. AngII type 1 receptor expression in skin biopsies was assessed at baseline and after 8 wk by a real-time PCR protocol. Men and women both exhibited significant declines in BP. Women achieved significantly reduced AngII sensitivity compared with men at lower dosages, showing no pressor response at 4 wk of 75 mg/d irbesartan, whereas men continued to exhibit a pressor response at 4 wk of 150 mg/d. Receptor expression at baseline did not differ between men and women but by 8 wk was significantly decreased in women and unchanged in men. Our findings indicate that men may require larger dosages of angiotensin receptor blocker than do women and that the BP response cannot be used as a surrogate marker for adequate RAS blockade of the renal microvasculature.
-
8.
Effects of irbesartan on intracellular antioxidant enzyme expression and activity in adolescents and young adults with early diabetic angiopathy.
Chiarelli, F, Di Marzio, D, Santilli, F, Mohn, A, Blasetti, A, Cipollone, F, Mezzetti, A, Verrotti, A
Diabetes care. 2005;(7):1690-7
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Defective intracellular antioxidant enzyme production (IAP) has been demonstrated in adults with diabetic nephropathy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on IAP in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and early signs of retinopathy and nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This prospective, matched case-control study was conducted between November 2001 and December 2002 among 14 type 1 diabetic patients with early signs of angiopathy (ages 14-21 years), 11 type 1 diabetic patients without angiopathy (ages 12-22 years), and 10 healthy volunteers (ages 16-22 years). Skin fibroblasts were obtained by skin biopsies from the anterior part of the forearm and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The activity and mRNA expression of CuZn superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD), Mn superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) were measured before and after 6 months of treatment with irbesartan (150 mg/day); on both occasions, antioxidant enzyme activity was evaluated at different glucose concentrations (5 and 22 mmol/l). RESULTS At a normal glucose concentration (5 mmol/l), the activity and mRNA expression of CuZnSOD (0.50 +/- 0.21 units/mg protein, 4.4 +/- 1.5 mRNA/glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), MnSOD (0.26 +/- 0.04 units/mg protein, 0.08 +/- 0.07 mRNA), CAT (0.32 +/- 0.08 units/mg protein, 4.8 +/- 1.3 mRNA), and GPX (0.53 +/- 0.09 units/mg protein, 2.2 +/- 0.9 mRNA) were not different among the three groups (only values of diabetic subjects with angiopathy are shown). At high glucose concentrations, the activity and mRNA expression of CuZnSOD increased similarly in all groups (diabetic subjects with angiopathy: 0.93 +/- 0.26 units/mg protein, 9.4 +/- 2.1 mRNA); that of CAT and GPX increased in only control subjects and diabetic subjects without angiopathy (diabetic subjects with angiopathy: 0.33 +/- 0.09 units/mg protein and 5.0 +/- 1.4 mRNA; 0.54 +/- 0.10 units/mg protein and 2.3 +/- 1.0 mRNA, respectively). MnSOD did not change in any group. Treatment with irbesartan in adolescents with diabetic angiopathy was able to restore CAT and GPX activity and mRNA expression after exposure to high glucose concentrations. Markers of oxidative stress (serum malondialdehyde, fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and 8-isoprostanes prostaglandin F(2alpha)) were significantly reduced after treatment with irbesartan. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents and young adults with early signs of diabetic angiopathy have defective intracellular antioxidant enzyme production and activity. Treatment with irbesartan can substantially improve the activity and production of these enzymes in skin fibroblasts.
-
9.
Effect of irbesartan monotherapy compared with ACE inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers on patient compliance in essential hypertension patients: a multicenter, open-labeled, three-armed study.
Koylan, N, Acarturk, E, Canberk, A, Caglar, N, Caglar, S, Erdine, S, Guneri, S, Ilerigelen, B, Kabakci, G, Onder, R, et al
Blood pressure. Supplement. 2005;:23-31
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This multicenter, three-armed, open-labeled study investigated patient compliance of patients receiving irbesartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers (CCB) for essential hypertension for a 6-month period. Patients were either newly diagnosed or switched from existing antihypertensive medication due to lack of efficacy or side-effects. METHODS Patients were started monotherapy with irbesartan (n=377), ACE inhibitors (n=298) or CCB (n=308) and were reevaluated on 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the treatment. The primary endpoint was patient compliance, assessed by proportion of patients who had taken their study medication every day. Efficacy was recorded as mean reductions in blood pressure and the proportion of patients whose blood pressure normalized. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events. RESULTS Significantly more patients receiving irbesartan had complied with study medication after 3 and 6 months of treatment than ACE inhibitors or CCB. Significantly fewer patients receiving irbesartan needed to change their antihypertensive medication. All three study treatments exhibited similar efficacy profiles, but irbesartan had significantly less adverse events. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that patient compliance to irbesartan was significantly superior to other study treatments. Irbesartan is therefore a suitable first-line therapy for essential hypertension in everyday clinical practice.
-
10.
Irbesartan and lipoic acid improve endothelial function and reduce markers of inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: results of the Irbesartan and Lipoic Acid in Endothelial Dysfunction (ISLAND) study.
Sola, S, Mir, MQ, Cheema, FA, Khan-Merchant, N, Menon, RG, Parthasarathy, S, Khan, BV
Circulation. 2005;(3):343-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND The metabolic syndrome is associated with increased angiotensin II activity, induction of a proinflammatory and oxidative state, and endothelial dysfunction. We evaluated the ability of irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and lipoic acid, an antioxidant, to affect endothelial function and inflammation in patients with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS We randomized 58 subjects with the metabolic syndrome in a double-blinded manner to irbesartan 150 mg/d (n=14), lipoic acid 300 mg/d (n=15), both irbesartan and lipoic acid (n=15), or matching placebo (n=14) for 4 weeks. Endothelium-dependent and -independent flow-mediated vasodilation was determined under standard conditions. Plasma levels of interleukin-6, plasminogen activator-1, and 8-isoprostane were measured. After 4 weeks of therapy, endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery was increased by 67%, 44%, and 75% in the irbesartan, lipoic acid, and irbesartan plus lipoic acid groups, respectively, compared with the placebo group. Treatment with irbesartan and/or lipoic acid was associated with statistically significant reductions in plasma levels of interleukin-6 and plasminogen activator-1. In addition, treatment with irbesartan or irbesartan plus lipoic acid decreased 8-isoprostane levels. No significant changes in blood pressure were noted in any of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS Administration of irbesartan and/or lipoic acid to patients with the metabolic syndrome improves endothelial function and reduces proinflammatory markers, factors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.