0
selected
-
1.
Timely and individualized heart failure management: need for implementation into the new guidelines.
Abdin, A, Bauersachs, J, Frey, N, Kindermann, I, Link, A, Marx, N, Lainscak, M, Slawik, J, Werner, C, Wintrich, J, et al
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society. 2021;(8):1150-1158
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Due to remarkable improvements in heart failure (HF) management over the last 30 years, a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization rates in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been observed. Currently, the optimization of guideline-directed chronic HF therapy remains the mainstay to further improve outcomes for patients with HFrEF to reduce mortality and HF hospitalization. This includes established device therapies, such as implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapies, which improved patients' symptoms and prognosis. Over the last 10 years, new HF drugs have merged targeting various pathways, such as those that simultaneously suppress the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the breakdown of endogenous natriuretic peptides (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan), and those that inhibit the If channel and, thus, reduce heart rate (e.g., ivabradine). Furthermore, the treatment of patient comorbidities (e.g., iron deficiency) has shown to improve functional capacity and to reduce hospitalization rates, when added to standard therapy. More recently, other potential treatment mechanisms have been explored, such as the sodium/glucose co-transporter inhibitors, the guanylate cyclase stimulators and the cardiac myosin activators. In this review, we summarize the novel developments in HFrEF pharmacological and device therapy and discuss their implementation strategies into practice to further improve outcomes.
-
2.
Contemporary Management of Electrical Storm.
Geraghty, L, Santangeli, P, Tedrow, UB, Shivkumar, K, Kumar, S
Heart, lung & circulation. 2019;(1):123-133
Abstract
Cardiac electrical storm (ES) is characterised by three or more discrete episodes of ventricular arrhythmia within 24hours, or incessant ventricular arrhythmia for more than 12hours. ES is a distinct medical emergency that portends a significant increase in mortality risk and often presages progressive heart failure. ES is also associated with psychological morbidity from multiple implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and exponential health resource utilisation. Up to 30% of ICD recipients may experience storm in follow-up, with the risk higher in patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication. Storm recurs in a high proportion of patients after an initial episode, and multiple storm clusters may occur in follow-up. The mechanism of storm remains elusive but is likely influenced by a complex interplay of inciting triggers (e.g., ischaemia, electrolyte disturbances), with autonomic perturbations acting on a vulnerable structural and electrophysiologic substrate. Triggers can be identified only in a minority of patients. An emergent treatment approach is warranted, if possible with emergent transfer to a high-volume centre for ventricular arrhythmia management with a multi-modality approach including ICD reprogramming, sympathetic blockade (sedation, intubation, ventilation, beta blockers), and anti-arrhythmic drugs, and adjunctive intervention techniques, such as catheter ablation and neuraxial modulation (e.g., thoracic epidural anaesthesia, stellate ganglion block). Outcomes of catheter ablation of ES are excellent with resolution of storm in over 90% of patients at 1year with a low complication rate (∼2%). ES may occur in the absence of structural heart disease in the context of channelopathies, Brugada syndrome, early repolarisation and premature ventricular contraction-induced ventricular fibrillation. There are unique treatment approaches to these conditions that must be recognised. This state-of-the-art review will summarise the incidence, mechanism, and multi-modality treatment of ES in the contemporary era.
-
3.
Innovative Strategies in Heart Failure: Present and Future.
Rodríguez-Mañero, M, Grigorian-Shamagian, L, Rábago, G, Abou-Jokh, C, Álvarez, B, Brion, M, González-Juanatey, JR
Archives of medical research. 2018;(8):558-567
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a progressively debilitating disease that considerably decreases the life expectancy and quality of life. It has become an important area of focus since it remains one of the most common reasons for admission in patients over the age of 65. Importantly, the incidence of HF has not declined within the past 20 years, but the survival after onset has increased in younger patients and men. This has been in part due to the growing interest in therapies that may decrease morbidity, mortality, along with the substantial health care expenditures associated with the disease. It can be said that over the past 50 years, there have been three distinct eras relating to HF management; a) the non-pharmacologic era, focused its treatments on fluid restriction; b) the pharmacologic era, marked by the increased use of inotropes and diuretics and the discovery of vasodilators, and the posterior discovery of medications relating to neurohormonal pathways; c) the device era, with the discovery, acceptance, and increased use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) among others. A new forth era could be about to arrive, with the advent of regenerative therapies. In this review article will discuss new therapeutic discoveries as well as provide insight into future therapies.
-
4.
[Electrophysiologic procedure complications in the elderly].
Pfeiffer, D, Neef, M, Jurisch, D, Hagendorff, A
Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie. 2017;(1):3-8
Abstract
Published registries give limited information on age-dependent complication rates. There are several reasons for this, including limited numbers of patients in subgroups (e.g., contractility management), experience-dependent procedures (e.g., catheter ablation), or in changing indications (e.g., resynchronization). Finally, severely ill and very old patients with limited prognosis are often excluded from electrophysiologic procedures. Therefore, published data are difficult to interpret. Meta-analyses of randomized trials give more precise information on included patient cohorts, but do not necessarily reflect daily practice because elderly patients are often excluded from trials. Therefore, the individual risk of elderly patients has to be estimated on an individual case basis. In summary, the age of patients is not relevant regarding possible complications; thus, there is no age limit for electrophysiologic interventions. Therefore, there is no alternative to the individual estimation of procedural risks of interventions of an informed patient by an experienced cardiologist.
-
5.
Does any therapy really work for neurocardiogenic syncope?
Hawkins, NM, Krahn, AD
Cardiology journal. 2014;(6):616-24
Abstract
Effectiveness of a treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope can be defined in terms of symptom response, quality-of-life, healthcare utilization, treatment side effects and cost-effectiveness. Most trials have focused on syncope recurrence or burden, without assessing quality-of-life formally. Drug and device interventions are characterized by a dearth of randomized controlled trials, with those few of robust design demonstrating little impact on recurrence of syncope. General advice includes hydration, trigger recognition and counter pressure maneuvers to attenuate episodes. Lifestyle recommendations have limited comparative effectiveness evidence, but are favored due to lack of side effects and low cost. The frequency of syncope improves in many patients regardless of the intervention, although ultimate recurrence of syncope remains high. In the minority of patients seeking treatment due to recurrence, midodrine has reasonable supporting evidence for effectiveness with some evidence for beta-blockers in older age patients. Emerging evidence favors pacing in patients with asystole during spontaneous (as opposed to provoked) syncope. Combining long-term implantable cardiac monitoring, tilt and adenosine triphosphate testing may yet accurately define the optimal minority who benefit from pacing. In the remaining majority, pharmacologic and device interventions should be used sparingly until clear benefits are established. Better understanding of patient fears, beliefs and behaviors may help develop cognitive therapies and improve quality-of-life alongside the focus on physical symptoms.
-
6.
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in heart failure.
Shantsila, E, Lip, GY
Heart failure clinics. 2013;(4):427-35, viii
Abstract
Heart failure and atrial fibrillation are major problems of modern cardiology with important clinical, prognostic, and socioeconomic implications. The risks are high morbidity, impaired quality of life, poor outcome, and increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists or novel licensed medicines should be considered unless contraindicated. Possible benefits of sinus rhythm maintenance are not entirely clear and need to be explored further. Relatively scarce data are available on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; this requires further research.
-
7.
Therapeutic approach for patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: state of the art and future developments.
van der Werf, C, Zwinderman, AH, Wilde, AA
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2012;(2):175-83
Abstract
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome characterized by bidirectional or polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias under conditions of increased sympathetic activity in young patients with structurally normal hearts. Patients with CPVT are at high risk of developing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias when untreated. A wide variety of arrhythmic event rates on conventional therapy, with β-blockers as the cornerstone, has been reported. Here, we systematically review all available studies describing the efficacy of β-blocker therapy for prevention of arrhythmic events in CPVT. Because of heterogeneity between the studies, a random-effects meta-analysis model was used to assess the efficacy of β-blocker therapy in preventing any arrhythmic event [syncope, aborted cardiac arrest (ACA), and sudden cardiac death (SCD)], near-fatal arrhythmic events (ACA and SCD), and fatal arrhythmic events. Eleven studies including 403 patients, of whom 354 (88%) had a β-blocker prescribed, were identified. Mean follow-up ranged from 20 months to 8 years. Estimated 8-year arrhythmic, near-fatal, and fatal event rates were 37.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.6-57.7], 15.3% (95% CI: 7.4-23.3), and 6.4% (95% CI: 3.2-9.6), respectively. In addition, we review the recent developments in alternate chronic treatment options for CPVT patients, including calcium channel blockers, flecainide, left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. A new treatment strategy is proposed, including a stepwise addition of the alternate treatment options to β-blockers in patients who do not respond sufficiently to this first-line therapy. Finally, future developments in chronic treatment options and acute treatment options of ventricular arrhythmias are discussed.