0
selected
-
1.
Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis in a Patient Undergoing Collagen Corneal Cross-Linking 18 Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Surgery.
Grassmeyer, JJ, Goertz, JG, Baartman, BJ
Cornea. 2021;(7):917-920
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a case of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after corneal collagen cross-linking in an eye with a remote history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. METHODS This is a case report and literature review. RESULTS This report describes the development of unilateral stage IV DLK in a patient who underwent bilateral corneal cross-linking for corneal ectasia 18 years after LASIK surgery. The patient was treated with high-dose topical steroids that were tapered over 1 month and multiple flap lifts. The ultimate best-corrected visual outcome was 20/60. CONCLUSIONS DLK is a potential sight-threatening complication of refractive surgery that can occur at any time in the postoperative period, even years after the procedure. Undergoing a subsequent corneal procedure that may disrupt or promote inflammation within the surgical flap-stromal interface, such as corneal collagen cross-linking, is a recognized risk factor for the development of DLK. This case suggests that patients with any history of LASIK surgery undergoing corneal cross-linking or other lamellar corneal surgeries may benefit from closer follow-up (eg, daily) than patients with no history of LASIK.
-
2.
Bifunctional Non-Canonical Amino Acids: Combining Photo-Crosslinking with Click Chemistry.
Hoffmann, JE
Biomolecules. 2020;(4)
Abstract
Genetic code expansion is a powerful tool for the study of protein interactions, as it allows for the site-specific incorporation of a photoreactive group via non-canonical amino acids. Recently, several groups have published bifunctional amino acids that carry a handle for click chemistry in addition to the photo-crosslinker. This allows for the specific labeling of crosslinked proteins and therefore the pulldown of peptides for further analysis. This review describes the properties and advantages of different bifunctional amino acids, and gives an overview about current and future applications.
-
3.
Corneal crosslinking: Current protocols and clinical approach.
Beckman, KA, Gupta, PK, Farid, M, Berdahl, JP, Yeu, E, Ayres, B, Chan, CC, Gomes, JAP, Holland, EJ, Kim, T, et al
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2019;(11):1670-1679
Abstract
Members of the ASCRS Cornea Clinical Committee performed a review of the current literature on the corneal crosslinking (CXL) procedure for treating corneal ectasia. The members explored the data on the techniques currently in use and under investigation, including their advantages, safety profiles, risks, and cost analyses, compared with data on corneal transplantation. They concluded that CXL limits the progression of keratoconus, thus reducing the need for transplantation. They also found that compared with permitting the disease to progress naturally, CXL techniques carry significant and long-term cost and safety benefits, primarily by reducing the need for corneal transplantation. Studies of various CXL techniques (eg, epithelium-on treatment, changes in ultraviolet light parameters, riboflavin composition) continue with the ultimate goal of improving the procedure's safety and efficacy.
-
4.
Corneal Cross-Linking: The Science Beyond the Myths and Misconceptions.
Rubinfeld, RS, Caruso, C, Ostacolo, C
Cornea. 2019;(6):780-790
Abstract
PURPOSE There has been a recent explosion in the variety of techniques used to accomplish corneal cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of ectatic corneal diseases. To understand the success or failure of various techniques, we review the physicochemical basis of corneal CXL and re-evaluate the current principles and long-standing conventional wisdom in the light of recent, compelling, and sometimes contradictory research. METHODS Two clinicians and a medicinal chemist developed a list of current key topics, controversies, and questions in the field of corneal CXL based on information from current literature, medical conferences, and discussions with international practitioners of CXL. RESULTS Standard corneal CXL with removal of the corneal epithelium is a safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of corneal ectasias. However, the necessity of epithelium removal is painful for patients, involves risk and requires significant recovery time. Attempts to move to transepithelial corneal CXL have been hindered by the lack of a coherent understanding of the physicochemistry of corneal CXL. Misconceptions about the applicability of the Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity and the Lambert-Beer law in CXL hamper the ability to predict the effect of ultraviolet A energy during CXL. Improved understanding of CXL may also expand the treatment group for corneal ectasia to those with thinner corneas. Finally, it is essential to understand the role of oxygen in successful CXL. CONCLUSIONS Improved understanding of the complex interactions of riboflavin, ultraviolet A energy and oxygen in corneal CXL may provide a successful route to transepithelial corneal CXL.
-
5.
Collagen Cross-Linking in the Management of Microbial Keratitis.
Bonzano, C, Di Zazzo, A, Barabino, S, Coco, G, Traverso, CE
Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019;(3):507-512
Abstract
Increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents has contributed to an elevated risk of complications of infectious keratitis. Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has been widely adopted for the management of keratoconus and post-refractive surgery corneal ectasia. It has recently been introduced as an option for treating keratitis due to multidrug resistant organisms. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale, safety, and evidence for CXL in infectious keratitis and its possible effect on ocular surface inflammation. Published data show that CXL is effective and safe as an adjunct to antibiotic treatment in selected cases of bacterial keratitis. The benefit of CXL probably varies according to the etiology of the infection.
-
6.
Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratcoconus Review.
Perez-Straziota, C, Gaster, RN, Rabinowitz, YS
Cornea. 2018;(6):802-809
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To comprehensively review the available published literature for cross-linking in the pediatric population. METHODS Review of the literature published in English in PubMed. RESULTS Two hundred ten publications were considered. One hundred fifteen were considered relevant to this review. CONCLUSIONS Studies of cross-linking in pediatric patients are sparse, with relatively short follow-up times, and mostly on small groups of patients. Treatment with cross-linking halts progression of keratoconus in the pediatric population, and early treatment seems to be cost-effective compared with later penetrating keratoplasty. Long-term effects and regression rates remain unclear, and further studies are needed in this population.
-
7.
Corneal Scarring and Hyperopic Shift After Corneal Cross-linking for Corneal Ectasia After SMILE.
Voulgari, N, Mikropoulos, D, Kontadakis, GA, Safi, A, Tabibian, D, Kymionis, GD
Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995). 2018;(11):779-782
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a case of severe corneal scarring and hyperopic shift after corneal cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of ectasia following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS Case report and literature review. RESULTS A 35-year-old man was referred with severe unilateral corneal haze that developed after CXL. The patient had undergone SMILE 4 years earlier in both eyes. Nineteen months postoperatively, the patient presented with bilateral decrease in vision and corneal topography revealed corneal ectasia in the right eye. CXL was performed in the right eye and a deep stromal haze was observed 1 year later. Comparative maps showed progressive corneal thinning with corresponding flattening that induced hypermetropization and astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS CXL after SMILE in this original case resulted in severe deep corneal haze and corneal flattening with hyperopic shift. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):779-782.].
-
8.
[Complications and postoperative therapeutic strategies in cross-linking].
Kohlhaas, M
Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 2017;(8):693-696
Abstract
CLINICAL ISSUE The reduced corneal mechanical stability in keratoconus and similar collagen diseases can lead to a progressive and irregular corneal shape and decrease of visual acuity. DIAGNOSTICS A progression of keratectatic diseases can be shown with corneal topography. TREATMENT Keratoconus can be treated by photo-oxidative cross-linking of the corneal collagen. In order to achieve a high absorption of irradiation energy in the cornea, riboflavin at a concentration of 0.1% and UVA light at a wavelength of 370 nm corresponding to the relative maximum absorption of riboflavin (vitamin B2) are used. Evidence for corneal cross-linking are the increase of biomechanical stiffness, the increased resistance against enzymatic degradation, a higher shrinkage temperature, a lower swelling rate and an increased diameter of collagen fibers. The currently available data demonstrate that the therapeutic cross-linking procedure is safe when respecting the important theoretical and clinical parameters and that a progression of the keratoconus can be avoided. In 80% of cases an average levelling of the curvature of approximately 2 dpt can be achieved, which leads not only to stabilization but also to an increase in visual acuity of approximately 1.2 lines. ASSESSMENT In a Cochrane review from 2015 publications about complications and results were reviewed. Complication rates ranged from 1-10% depending on the initial situation, comorbidities and stage of the keratoconus. The most important complications are early epithelial wound healing problems as well as extremely rare perforations. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Corneal cross-linking is a well-established and safe procedure but is not free of complications.
-
9.
Combined application of prophylactic corneal cross-linking and laser in-situ keratomileusis - a review of literature.
Chan, TCY, Ng, ALK, Chan, KKW, Cheng, GPM, Wong, IYH, Jhanji, V
Acta ophthalmologica. 2017;(7):660-664
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is safe and effective laser refractive procedures in treating refractive errors. However, regression of treatment and iatrogenic keratectasia remain to be a major concern, especially in treating thin cornea with high ametropia. Collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method in stopping keratoconus progression through increasing the biomechanical strength of the cornea. Adjuvant cross-linking to refractive procedures can theoretically help prevent regression and reduce the risk of keratectasia development by increasing the mechanical stability of cornea. During the procedure, riboflavin is directly applied to the corneal stroma, thereby reducing the need of de-epithelialization as in the conventional protocol for keratoconus. Currently, there is still no consensus regarding the indication of CXL during refractive procedure, nor any standardized treatment protocol. This article aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the use of adjuvant CXL in LASIK.
-
10.
Accelerated versus conventional corneal crosslinking for refractive instability: an update.
Kymionis, GD, Kontadakis, GA, Hashemi, KK
Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2017;(4):343-347
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is a relatively new treatment modality offering refractive stability in patients with ectatic disorders. The procedure as initially described (Dresden protocol) is time consuming; accelerated protocols have been lately developed. The purpose of this review is to present the recent findings regarding the comparison of accelerated CXL with the conventional Dresden protocol. RECENT FINDINGS A variety of accelerated protocols are described in the literature. Safety and efficacy of the procedures with regard to stability seem to be equivalent in initial studies but indirect measures of efficacy, such as demarcation line depth and laboratory measurements, do not always confirm equivalence of accelerated protocols in comparison to conventional one. Modified accelerated protocols must be developed in order to overcome this. SUMMARY Accelerated CXL protocols seem to be a valid alternative to the conventional protocol; however, more comparative long term studies are needed to confirm the validity and to elucidate which accelerated protocol is ideal in each case.