0
selected
-
1.
The efficacy and safety of low dialysate sodium levels for patients with maintenance haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, X, Song, Y, Hou, B, Ma, Y, Wang, Y
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2020;:332-339
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM: Fluid overload and hypertension frequently results in cardiovascular disease, which is one of the leading causes of death in dialysis patients. It is plausible that low dialysate [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension, and ultimately reducing cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a low (<138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science up to August 22, 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (<138 mM) versus neutral (138-140 mM) or high (>140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included. Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were estimated to compare the outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2. RESULTS 12 Randomised controlled trials with 390 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, three studies were parallel group, and the remaining nine were crossover. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] reduced dialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) with a pooled MD of -3.38 mmHg (95% CI -4.57 to -2.19; P < 0.00001), reduced interdialytic weight gain with a pooled MD of -0.35 kg (95% CI -0.51 to -0.18; P < 0.0001), reduced predialysis serum [Na+] with a pooled MD of -2.62 mM (95% CI -3.59 to -1.66; P < 0.00001). In contrast, low dialysate [Na+] increased intradialytic hypotension events with a pooled RR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.05; P = 0.003), increased the incidence of intradialytic cramps with a pooled RR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.73; P = 0.01). However, no difference was found between lower and higher dialysate [Na+] in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Though our pooled result indicated that low dialysate [Na+] reduced MAP, interdialytic weight gain and predialysis serum [Na+] significantly, it also indicated that low dialysate [Na+] could increase the incidence of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic cramps events. Considering the contradiction in efficacy and safety of low dialysate [Na+] in our analysis, future larger and up-to-date definitive studies are needed to evaluate the medium to long-term effects of low sodium levels in dialysis fluid, and better inform clinical practice.
-
2.
Long-term effects of low calcium dialysates on the serum calcium levels during maintenance hemodialysis treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yoshikawa, M, Takase, O, Tsujimura, T, Sano, E, Hayashi, M, Takato, T, Hishikawa, K
Scientific reports. 2018;(1):5310
Abstract
Hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) can cause the progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and mineral bone disorders (MBD). The KDIGO recommends the dialysates with a calcium (Ca) concentration of 1.25-1.5 mmol/L for MHD treatments, but the optimal concentration remains controversial. Here, we conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials examining a total of 622 patients to investigate the optimal concentration for MHD for 6 months or longer. The dialysates with a low Ca concentration (1.125 or 1.25 mmol/L) significantly lowered the serum Ca and raised the intact parathyroid hormone levels by 0.52 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85) and 39.59 pg/mL (14.80-64.38), respectively, compared with a high Ca concentration (1.50 or 1.75 mmol/L). Three studies showed that a low concentration was preferred for lowering arterial calcifications or atherosclerosis in different arteries, but one study showed that coronary arterial calcifications increased with a low concentration. Two studies showed contradictory outcomes in terms of MBD. Our meta-analysis showed that a dialysate with a low Ca concentration lowered the serum Ca levels in patients receiving long-term MHD, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal Ca concentration in terms of CVD and MBD.
-
3.
Effect of lanthanum carbonate versus calcium-based phosphate binders in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhai, CJ, Yu, XS, Sun, QL, Li, L, Zhang, LT, Zhou, AY, Wang, R
Clinical nephrology. 2014;(6):372-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of lanthanum carbonate (LC) vs. calciumbased phosphate binders in dialysis patients have been a matter of debate. METHODS We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and CBM for all randomized controlled trials comparing LC with calcium-based phosphate binders in adult dialysis patients. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Metaanalysis was conducted by RevMan 5.2. RESULTS Nine studies were eligible for our meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.25 - 2.83) and cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.55 - 1.29) between LC and calcium-based phosphate binders. LC was associated with similar proportions of phosphate-controlled patients (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.27 - 1.44) and lower incidence of hypercalcemia (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.35) in comparison to calcium-based phosphate binders. Compared with calcium salts, LC was associated with significantly lower serum calcium, similar serum Ca x P product and higher serum iPTH. CONCLUSION Despite the trends observed, we found no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events between LC and calcium-based phosphate binders in dialysis patients. The conclusion was limited by lack of large sample and long-term trials. LC could reduce the incidence of hypercalcemia while comparable with calcium-based phosphate binders in reducing serum phosphorus level.
-
4.
Comparison of icodextrin and glucose solutions for long dwell exchange in peritoneal dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Qi, H, Xu, C, Yan, H, Ma, J
Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2011;(2):179-88
Abstract
BACKGROUND Icodextrin is widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, the safety and efficacy of icodextrin are unclear. In the present study, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared icodextrin and glucose for the once-daily long dwell in PD. METHODS Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to select all eligible studies. Eligible studies, as determined by consensus using predefined criteria, were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard form. RESULTS In the 9 RCTs that were identified, patients using icodextrin were found to have much greater net ultrafiltration (UF) and a lower incidence of negative net UF compared to patients using 1.5%, 2.5%, and 4.25% glucose solutions. Additionally, icodextrin has a markedly increased UF efficiency ratio and peritoneal clearance of creatinine and urea nitrogen, but residual renal function was not different from patients using glucose solutions for PD. No significant differences were observed between icodextrin and glucose groups with respect to risk of mortality, peritonitis, and total adverse events. Although rashes occurred significantly more often in icodextrin groups, few differences were noted between icodextrin and glucose groups when withdrawal rates secondary to adverse events were compared. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that icodextrin provides patients with greater fluid removal and small solute clearance and does not cause any damage to residual renal function. Icodextrin is particularly appropriate for use in patients with high peritoneal transport status.