-
1.
The effect of increasing dialysate magnesium on calciprotein particles, inflammation and bone markers: post hoc analysis from a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Bressendorff, I, Hansen, D, Pasch, A, Holt, SG, Schou, M, Brandi, L, Smith, ER
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2021;(4):713-721
Abstract
BACKGROUND The formation of calciprotein particles (CPPs) may be an important component of the humoral defences against ectopic calcification. Although magnesium (Mg) has been shown to delay the transition of amorphous calcium-/phosphate-containing primary CPP (CPP-1) to crystalline apatite-containing secondary CPP (CPP-2) ex vivo, effects on the endogenous CPP pool are unknown. METHODS We used post hoc analyses from a randomized double-blind parallel-group controlled clinical trial of 28 days treatment with high dialysate Mg of 2.0 mEq/L versus standard dialysate Mg of 1.0 mEq/L in 57 subjects undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. CPP load, markers of systemic inflammation and bone turnover were measured at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS After 28 days of treatment with high dialysate Mg, serum total CPP (-52%), CPP-1 (-42%) and CPP-2 (-68%) were lower in the high Mg group (all P < 0.001) but were unchanged in the standard dialysate Mg group. Tumour necrosis factor-α (-20%) and interleukin-6 (-22%) were also reduced with high dialysate Mg treatment (both P < 0.01). High dialysate Mg resulted in higher levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (a marker of bone formation) (+17%) but lower levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 b (a marker of bone resorption; -33%) (both P < 0.01). Inflammatory cytokines and bone turnover markers were unchanged in the standard dialysate Mg group over the same period. CONCLUSIONS In this exploratory analysis, increasing dialysate Mg was associated with reduced CPP load and systemic inflammation and divergent changes in markers of bone formation and resorption.
-
2.
High magnesium dialysate does not improve intradialytic hemodynamics or abrogate myocardial stunning.
Jefferies, HJ, Lemoine, S, McIntyre, CW
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2020;(4):506-515
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodialysis (HD) induces myocardial stunning and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Intradialytic hypotension is a modifiable determinant of myocardial stunning. Magnesium (Mg) is reported to be valuable in maintaining intradialytic blood pressure, which potentially would protect against demand myocardial ischemia. This study aimed to compare high vs. low dialysate Mg effects on intradialytic hemodynamics and HD-induced myocardial stunning. METHODS Twenty stable prevalent HD patients entered a randomized cross-over trial of low (0.5 mmol/L) vs. high (1.0 mmol/L) dialysate Mg. Patients were studied after 2 weeks of standard HD with each Mg concentration. Serial echocardiography assessed myocardial stunning, measured by left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs). Continuous intradialytic hemodynamics were measured noninvasively using thoracic bioimpedance. FINDINGS Median predialysis serum Mg was higher with high dialysate Mg (1.45[1.29-1.55] vs. 1.03[0.98-1.1] mmol/L, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in maximum intradialytic reduction in systolic BP. There was no significant difference in stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, and cardiac output. Overall ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) (as a sensitive marker of contractile function) was higher before dialysis in high Mg group, but there was no difference in GLS at peak stress. However, we showed a significant correlation between Mg changes and GLS changes, r = -0.47, P = 0.02. There was no difference in mean number of peak stress RWMAs per patient (4.0 ± 2.2 vs. 4.3 ± 2.9, P = 0.5). Ultrafiltration volume, a critical determinant of stunning, was not different between high and low dialysate Mg studies (1.35[0-3.3] vs. 1.5[0-2.8], P = 0.49). DISCUSSION Manipulation of magnesium by altering dialysate magnesium concentration does not influence intradialytic hemodynamic response or HD-induced myocardial stunning in the short term. However, decreasing Mg changes appears to decrease GLS changes.
-
3.
Short-Term Effects of Branched-Chain Amino Acids-Enriched Dialysis Fluid on Branched-Chain Amino Acids Plasma Level and Mass Balance: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.
Deleaval, P, Luaire, B, Laffay, P, Jambut-Cadon, D, Stauss-Grabo, M, Canaud, B, Chazot, C
Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation. 2020;(1):61-68
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S): The hemodialysis (HD) session per se is a catabolic event contributing to protein-energy wasting via several mechanisms including nutrient losses. Amino acids (AAs) losses in the dialysate are estimated from 6 to 10 g per treatment. The HD patient plasma AA concentration is usually lower than in normal subjects. This is even more marked in patients with long dialysis vintage or malnutrition. METHODS The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect on mass balance of a branched-chain AA (BCAA)-enriched (valine, isoleucine, leucine) dialysis fluid in a group of 6 stable HD anuric patients, fasting since 12 hours. The specific choice of BCAA relied on their key role on protein and muscle anabolism and their usual decreased plasma concentration in HD patients. Each patient was prescribed in a cross-over design and random order, either receiving a standard high-flux HD or an HD treatment using a BCAA-enriched acid concentrate designed to achieve a physiological plasma concentration of BCAAs. HD prescription remained unchanged during the 2 phases of study. Dialysate electrolytes prescription was kept constant for each individual patient, as well as dialysate glucose concentration (5.5 mmol/L). Pre- and post-dialysis BCAAs concentrations were measured by Ion-Exchange Liquid Chromatography. Postdialysis concentrations were corrected for hemoconcentration, and net mass transfer was calculated. RESULTS Six stable prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients were studied. They consisted of 5 men and 1 woman, aged 69.9 years, with body mass index of 25.2 kg/m2. Treatment schedule consisted of treatment time 4 hours, high-flux polysulfone membrane (1.8 m2), blood flow 350 mL/minute, and dialysate/blood flow ratio at 1.5. The average BCAAs concentration in dialysate was targeted to physiological levels and assessed in 6 different samples, respectively for plasma valine, isoleucine, and leucine at 271, 78, and 145 μmol/L. With standard dialysate, plasma valine decreased from 204.5 to 130.8 (P = .0014). Plasma isoleucine and leucine changes were not significant, respectively from 65.7 to 59.3 μmol/L and 110.3 to 113.4 μmol/L. When using the BCAA-enriched dialysis fluid, plasma valine increased from 197.2 to 269.2 μmol/L (P = .0001), plasma isoleucine and leucine respectively from 63.2 to 84.7 (P = .0022) and from 107.2 to 161.6 μmoles/L (P = .0002). Dialysis dose estimated from KT/V did not differ between the sessions. The mass transfer with BCAA-enriched dialysate was +115, +16, and + 83 μmol per session for leucine, isoleucine, and valine, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): In conclusion, the addition of BCAAs at physiological concentration in the dialysis fluid contributes to restore physiological plasma concentrations for valine, isoleucine, and leucine at the end of a dialysis session. As BCAAs are essential to muscle balance, this could help to limit losses of BCAAs, restore physiological BCAAs concentrations, and decrease muscle catabolism observed during the HD treatment. Further outcome-based studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis on a larger scale and longer treatment time.
-
4.
Evaluation of intradialytic sodium shifts during sodium controlled hemodialysis.
Ponce, P, Pinto, B, Wojke, R, Maierhofer, AP, Gauly, A
The International journal of artificial organs. 2020;(9):620-624
Abstract
Plasma sodium shifts during hemodialysis treatments can be minimized by application of a sodium control algorithm. The present randomized cross-over trial was designed to apply this option on a large patient cohort and to observe the time course of plasma sodium over the treatment. In one study phase, patients received post-dilution online hemodiafiltration treatments with sodium control over the entire treatment. In the other study phase, patients received isolated ultrafiltration during the first 90 min followed by post-dilution online hemodiafiltration with sodium control for the remainder of the session, with the purpose to follow a possible initial equilibration process without the influence of a diffusive solute transfer. Each phase included six treatments and was delivered in randomized order. Eighty-one patients were enrolled, 77 patients could be analyzed as intention-to-treat population. The difference of the mean plasma sodium concentration between start and end of the treatment was -0.60 mmol/L (confidence interval -0.88 to -0.32) and -0.15 mmol/L (confidence interval -0.43 to 0.13), for sodium control and isolated ultrafiltration during the first 90 min followed by post-dilution online hemodiafiltration with sodium control, respectively. The functionality of the sodium control option could be confirmed and further reproduced in a bigger population of dialysis patients, providing the basis to investigate the clinical benefit of individually adjusting dialysate sodium in further clinical studies.
-
5.
Impact of using two dialyzers in parallel on phosphate clearance in hemodialysis patients: a randomized trial.
Thompson, S, Manns, B, Lloyd, A, Hemmelgarn, B, MacRae, J, Klarenbach, S, Unsworth, L, Courtney, M, Tonelli, M
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;(5):855-861
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary restriction and phosphate binders are the main interventions used to manage hyperphosphatemia in people on hemodialysis, but have limited efficacy. Modifying conventional dialysis regimens to enhance phosphate clearance as an alternative approach remains relatively unstudied. METHODS This was a 10-week, 2-arm, randomized crossover study. Participants were prevalent dialysis patients ( n = 32) with consecutive serum phosphate levels >1.6 mmol/L and on stable doses of a phosphate binder. Following a 2-week run-in period, participants were randomized to initiate dialysis using two high flux dialyzers in parallel (blood flow ≥350 mL/min, dialysate flow 800 mL/min) or standard dialysis using one high flux dialyzer (blood flow ≥350 mL/min, dialysate flow of 800 mL/min). Each regimen was 3 weeks in duration. After a 2-week washout period, participants received the alternate regimen. The primary outcome was the mean difference in phosphate clearance by dialyzer strategy. Secondary outcomes were phosphate removal and pre-dialysis serum phosphate. RESULTS Phosphate clearance for the double dialyzer strategy did not differ significantly from the single dialyzer strategy [mean difference 7.5 mL/min (95% confidence interval, 95% CI, -6.1, 21.0), P = 0.28]. There was no difference in total phosphate removal and pre-dialysis phosphate between the double and single dialyzer strategies [total phosphate removal mean difference -0.2 mmol (95% CI -4.1, 3.7), P = 0.93; pre-dialysis mean difference 0.01 mmol/L (95% CI -0.18, 0.21), P = 0.88]. There was no difference in the proportion of participants who experienced at least one episode of intradialytic hypotension (32 versus 47%, P = 0.13). A limitation of the study was frequent protocol deviations in the dialysis prescription. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the use of two dialyzers in parallel did not increase phosphate clearance, phosphate removal or pre-dialysis serum phosphorus when compared with a standard dialysis treatment strategy. Future studies should continue to evaluate novel methods of phosphate removal using conventional hemodialysis.
-
6.
Dialysate bicarbonate variation in maintenance hemodiafiltration patients: Impact on serum bicarbonate, intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain.
Viegas, M, Cândido, C, Felgueiras, J, Clemente, J, Barros, S, Farbota, R, Vera, F, Matos, A, Sousa, F
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2017;(3):385-392
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The dialysate bicarbonate (DB) influences the acid-base balance in dialysis patients. Very low and high serum bicarbonate (SB) have been related with a higher mortality. Acid-base balance also has been associated with hemodynamic effects in these patients. The trial aim was to compare the effect of DB concentration variation on SB levels in maintenance hemodiafiltration (HDF) patients and the effect on intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain. METHODS A prospective study, with 9 months of follow-up, involving 93 patients, divided in two groups: group 1 and group 2 with a DB of 34 mmol/L and 30 mmol/L, respectively, with monitoring of pre and post HDF SB, intradialytic hypotension, and interdialytic weight gain. FINDINGS Pre dialysis SB was higher in group 1: median concentration of 22.7 mmol/L vs. 21.1 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Post dialysis SB levels were higher in group 1: median concentration of 28.0 mmol/L vs. 25.3 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Post dialysis SB in alkalotic range was only detected in group 1 (51.2% of the patients). No significant differences were detected in intradialytic hypotension rate [28.0 vs. 27.4 episodes per 1000 sessions in group 1 and 2, respectively, (P = 0.906)] or in average interdialytic weight gain [2.9% vs. 3.0% in group 1 and 2, respectively, (P = 0.710)]. DISCUSSION DB of 30 mmol/L appears to be associated with SB levels closer to physiological levels than 34 mmol/L. The bicarbonate dialysate, in the tested concentrations, did not appear to have a significant impact on intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain in maintenance HDF patients.
-
7.
A noninferiority trial comparing a heparin-grafted membrane plus citrate-containing dialysate versus regional citrate anticoagulation: results of the CiTED study.
Meijers, B, Metalidis, C, Vanhove, T, Poesen, R, Kuypers, D, Evenepoel, P
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;(4):707-714
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anticoagulation is a prerequisite for successful haemodialysis. Heparin and low-molecular weight heparins are routinely used despite increased bleeding risk. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is efficacious, but is laborious and may induce metabolic disturbances. Heparin-grafted membranes are less efficacious. It is not known whether combining citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid anticoagulation strategy. METHODS We performed a randomized crossover noninferiority trial, with a prespecified noninferiority threshold of 10% in maintenance dialysis patients ( n = 25). We compared the combination of citrate-containing dialysate plus a heparin-grafted membrane [CiTrate and EvoDial (CiTED) protocol] with RCA. The primary endpoint was completion of dialysis without significant clotting. Secondary endpoints included time to clotting, achieved Kt / V urea , loss of total cell volume, venous air chamber clotting score and systemic-ionized calcium concentration. RESULTS In total, 1284 sessions were performed according to study protocol, 636 in the CiTED arm and 648 in the RCA arm. The primary outcome of preterm interruption due to clotting occurred in 36 (5.7%) of sessions in the CiTED arm, and in 40 (6.2%) sessions in the RCA arm, thereby meeting noninferiority criteria (P < 0.0001). Most of the clotting events occurred in the fourth hour of dialysis. Repetitive clotting occurred in four patients in the CiTED arm and one patient in the RCA arm. Time to preterm interruption due to clotting and achieved Kt / V urea was not significantly different. Systemic-ionized calcium levels during treatment were significantly lower in the RCA arm and clinically relevant hypocalcaemia was noted only in the RCA arm. CONCLUSION The combination of citrate-containing dialysate and a heparin-grafted membrane is a valid alternative to RCA.
-
8.
Effect of a sustained difference in hemodialytic clearance on the plasma levels of p-cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate.
Camacho, O, Rosales, MC, Shafi, T, Fullman, J, Plummer, NS, Meyer, TW, Sirich, TL
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2016;(8):1335-41
Abstract
BACKGROUND The protein-bound solutes p-cresol sulfate (PCS) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) accumulate to high plasma levels in renal failure and have been associated with adverse events. The clearance of these bound solutes can be altered independently of the urea clearance by changing the dialysate flow and dialyzer size. This study tested whether a sustained difference in clearance would change the plasma levels of PCS and IS. METHODS Fourteen patients on thrice-weekly nocturnal hemodialysis completed a crossover study of two periods designed to achieve widely different bound solute clearances. We compared the changes in pre-dialysis plasma PCS and IS levels from baseline over the course of the two periods. RESULTS The high-clearance period provided much higher PCS and IS clearances than the low-clearance period (PCS: 23 ± 4 mL/min versus 12 ± 3 mL/min, P < 0.001; IS: 30 ± 5 mL/min versus 17 ± 4 mL/min, P < 0.001). Despite the large difference in clearance, the high-clearance period did not have a different effect on PCS levels than the low-clearance period [from baseline, high: +11% (-5, +37) versus low: -8% (-18, +32), (median, 25th, 75th percentile), P = 0.50]. In contrast, the high-clearance period significantly lowered IS levels compared with the low-clearance period [from baseline, high: -4% (-17, +1) versus low: +22% (+14, +31), P < 0.001). The amount of PCS removed in the dialysate was significantly greater at the end of the high-clearance period [269 (206, 312) versus 199 (111, 232) mg per treatment, P < 0.001], while the amount of IS removed was not different [140 (87, 196) versus 116 (89, 170) mg per treatment, P = 0.15]. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that an increase in PCS generation prevents plasma levels from falling when the dialytic clearance is increased. Suppression of solute generation may be required to reduce plasma PCS levels in dialysis patients.
-
9.
Effects of citrate dialysate in chronic dialysis: a multicentre randomized crossover study.
Schmitz, M, Loke, O, Fach, B, Kalb, K, Heering, PJ, Meinke, D, Rawer, P, Galle, J, Kozik-Jaromin, J
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2016;(8):1327-34
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although citrate dialysate (CiDi) is regarded to be safe, dialysis modalities using higher dialysate volumes, like haemodiafiltration (HDF), may expose patients to higher citrate load and thus increase the risk of complications. We investigated the residual risk of CiDi compared with standard dialysate (StDi) in patients on different dialysis modalities and its effect on dialysis dose. METHODS In a multicentre randomized crossover study, 92 dialysis patients (HDF post-dilution: n = 44, HDF pre-dilution: n = 26, haemodialysis: n = 25) were treated for 4 weeks with each dialysate (StDi and CiDi). Hypocalcaemia (ionized calcium ≤0.9 mmol/L), alkalosis (pH ≥7.55), post-treatment bicarbonate ≥32 mmol/L, pre-treatment bicarbonate ≥27 mmol/L, intra-dialytic events (IEs) and adverse events (AEs) between dialysis sessions were investigated as primary end points. The secondary objective was dialysis efficacy, i.e. dose and removal ratios of urea, creatinine, phosphate and β-2-microglobulin. RESULTS Post-dialysis overcorrection of bicarbonate (>32 mmol/L) was less frequent with CiDi (P = 0.008). Other predefined calcium and acid-base disturbances did not vary. There was no significant difference in IE. However, more patients developed AEs such as fatigue, muscle spasms or pain using CiDi (StDi: 41 versus CiDi: 55 patients, P = 0.02), particularly in the first 2 weeks of exposure. Dialysis efficacy was comparable with both dialysates. CONCLUSIONS It can be confirmed that CiDi is not associated with the development of severe calcium and acid-base disorders, even when dialysis modalities with higher citrate loads are used. However, a refinement of the CiDi composition to minimize AEs is necessary.
-
10.
Citrate vs. acetate dialysate on intradialytic heparin dose: A double blind randomized crossover study.
Leung, KC, Tai, DJ, Ravani, P, Quinn, RR, Scott-Douglas, N, MacRae, JM
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2016;(4):537-547
Abstract
Introduction Citrate containing dialysate has a calcium-binding anticoagulant effect compared to standard acetic acid containing dialysate. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in maintenance HD patients to determine if citrate dialysate ("citrate") safely allows for a lower cumulative heparin dose ("heparin dose"). Methods Intradialytic heparin was adjusted to the minimum during a 2-week run-in phase. Patients remaining on heparin at the end of the run-in phase were then randomized to two weeks of HD with acetate dialysate ("acetate") followed by two weeks of citrate (sequence 1) or two weeks of citrate followed by two weeks of acetate (sequence 2). We estimated a minimum of 14 patients are required to show a 30% reduction in heparin dose per HD session with citrate compared with acetate. Twenty-five patients entered the run-in phase, 20 were randomized, and 19 completed the study. Findings The mean heparin dose was reduced by 19% (656 units, 95% CI -174 to -1139 units, P = 0.011) in the acetate group, and 30% (1046 units 95% CI -498 to 1594 units, P < 0.001) in the citrate group. There was no difference in the mean heparin dose reduction between the two dialysates (P > 0.05). The intradialytic ionized calcium in the citrate group was lowered by 0.10 mmol/L (95% CI 0.07 to 0.14 mmol/L, P < 0.001), and remained unchanged in the acetate group. Discussion Although citrate is a safe alternative to acetate, it does not result in additional heparin dose reduction.