0
selected
-
1.
Effects of probiotics and synbiotics on diarrhea in undernourished children: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Kambale, RM, Nancy, FI, Ngaboyeka, GA, Kasengi, JB, Bindels, LB, Van der Linden, D
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(5):3158-3169
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undernutrition predisposes children to a greater incidence and duration of diarrhea. No review and meta-analysis have yet been conducted to assess effectiveness of probiotics and synbiotics in undernourished children. AIMS To assess the effectiveness of probiotics and synbiotics on diarrhea in undernourished children. METHODS Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effects of probiotics and synbiotics on diarrhea in undernourished children were searched from 1990 to May 2020. Recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement were followed. RESULTS The systematic review identified 15 trials with 6986 patients. The meta-analysis revealed that treatment with probiotic or synbiotic reduced significantly both the duration of diarrhea [Weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.05 day, 95% CI (-1.98, -0.11)] and the hospital stay duration [Standard mean difference (SMD) = -2.87 days, 95% CI (-5.33, -0.42)], especially in specific patient subsets. In both groups, similar rates of vomiting and nutritional recovery were observed. No probiotics or synbiotics-related adverse effects were reported. Subgroup analyses showed that probiotic and synbiotic treatment were more effective in reducing risk of diarrhea in outpatients [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.86, 95%CI (0.75-0.98)]. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports the potential beneficial roles of probiotics and synbiotics on diarrhea in undernourished children.
-
2.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: The Effectiveness of Probiotics for Viral Gastroenteritis.
Ansari, F, Pashazadeh, F, Nourollahi, E, Hajebrahimi, S, Munn, Z, Pourjafar, H
Current pharmaceutical biotechnology. 2020;(11):1042-1051
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics can be used for the treatment of viral gastroenteritis. OBJECTIVE This systematic review is to evaluate the evidence regarding the effect of probiotics on human cases of viral gastroenteritis. METHODS The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics against placebo or standard treatment for viral gastroenteritis. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE via PubMed and Ovid databases, and unpublished studies (till 27 January 2018) was conducted followed by a process of study selection and critical appraisal by two independent reviewers. Randomized controlled trials assessing probiotic administration in human subjects infected with any species of gastroenteritis viruses were considered for inclusion. Only studies with a confirmed viral cause of infection were included. This study was developed using the JBI methodology for systematic reviews, which is in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Meta-analysis was conducted where feasible. Data were pooled using the inverse variance method with random effects models and expressed as Mean Differences (MDs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I2 statistic. We included 17 RCTs, containing 3,082 patients. RESULTS Probiotics can improve symptoms of viral gastroenteritis, including the duration of diarrhea (mean difference 0.7 days, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.09 days, n = 740, ten trials) and duration of hospitalization (mean difference 0.76 days, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92 days, n = 329, four trials). CONCLUSION The results of this review show that the administration of probiotics in patients with viral gastroenteritis should be considered.
-
3.
Use of Fecal Occult Blood Testing as a Diagnostic Tool for Clinical Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee, MW, Pourmorady, JS, Laine, L
The American journal of gastroenterology. 2020;(5):662-670
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are validated only for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but are commonly used as a diagnostic test in other clinical settings. We performed a systematic review to assess performance characteristics of FOBT as a diagnostic test for clinical indications. METHODS Bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies in adult patients with a specific gastrointestinal symptom or condition who underwent FOBT and a reference test and provided data on diagnoses. Our primary end point was sensitivity. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria: 12 in iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (5 fecal immunochemical (FIT) and 7 guaiac based), 8 in ulcerative colitis (FIT), and 2 in acute diarrhea (guaiac based). Only 2 studies had low risk of bias on all domains of the QUADAS-2. On meta-analysis, FOBT had a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.63) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.89) in predicting presumptive causes of IDA at endoscopy, with comparable results for guaiac-based tests and FIT. Sensitivity was higher for CRC (0.83) than non-CRC lesions (0.54). FIT had a sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.84) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.89) in predicting endoscopic activity in UC. Sensitivities of FOBT for positive stool culture in acute diarrhea were 0.38 and 0.87. DISCUSSION Sensitivity of FOBT is poor for IDA: 42% of patients with identifiable causes of IDA had false-negative FOBT. Our results did not show acceptable performance characteristics for FOBT to guide decisions regarding endoscopic evaluation and do not support its use in IDA.
-
4.
The significance of probiotics in preventing radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qiu, G, Yu, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, X
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2019;:61-69
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of radiotherapy-induced diarrhea (RID) in patients with cervical cancer. Previous studies failed to give a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of probiotics in this point. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science up to June 4, 2018. We also hand searched some studies included in previous reviews. Our primary outcome aims to compare the incidence of all Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grades of RID and adverse events (AEs) in both probiotics groups and placebo groups. Relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to compare the efficacy of probiotics in prevention of RID, and the pooled RRs were estimated using a fixed- or random-effect model; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q and Higgins I2 test. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. The analysis and bias for each of included studies were performed and assessed using Review Manager 5.2. RESULTS Nine randomized, placebo-controlled studies (N = 1508 participants) were included for assessing the efficacy of probiotics. Compared with placebo groups, participants in probiotic groups experienced much lower incidence of RID with RR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.0007). In addition, significant results were also observed in CTC grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 RID, with the pooled RRs of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.98; P = 0.02) and 0.32 (95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.02) respectively. Eight studies, included 1410 participants (726 consuming probiotics, 657 consuming placebo, 27 lost to follow-up), were used for the analysis of safety of probiotics. Of the 8 studies, 4 studies had no AEs caused by probiotics, while another 4 studies reported varying degrees of AEs during their treatment. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics may have a beneficial effect in prevention of RID generally, especially for Grade ≥2 or 3 diarrhea. Probiotics may be safe and rarely cause severe AEs during treatment.
-
5.
Probiotics in preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced diarrhea: a meta-analysis.
Lu, D, Yan, J, Liu, F, Ding, P, Chen, B, Lu, Y, Sun, Z
Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2019;(4):701-710
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To systematically assess the safety and effectiveness of probiotics in preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID), so as to provide the evidence-based evidence for clinical practice. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN Electronic databases, including EMbase, Cochrane Library, pubMed, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang databases, were retrieved to search for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CIDs among patients with malignant tumors treated with probiotics as of March 2019. Later, the Rev Man 5.3 statistical software was employed to extract data and assess the quality of the identified literature for metaanalysis. RESULTS Finally, 13 RCTs involving a total of 1024 patients were included into the current metaanalysis. Results of this meta-analysis showed that the addition of probiotics to conventional symptomatic treatment could evidently reduce the total diarrhea rate in patients with cancer [RR=0.47, 95% CI (0.35, 0.63), p<0.00001] and grade III-IV diarrhea [RR=0.16, 95% CI (0.05, 0.42), p=0.0008], increase the total effective rate [OR=4.26, 95% CI (2.55, 7.12), p<0.00001], and shorten the duration of diarrhea [MD=-1.92, 95% CI (-1.96, - 1.88), p<0.00001]; meanwhile, the difference was statistically significant. But in patients with grade I-II diarrhea [RR=0.81, 95% CI (0.53, 1.24), p=0.34], the difference was not statistically significant. Besides, none of the enrolled study had reported adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS The application of probiotics before or during chemotherapy can effectively prevent the occurrence of CID among cancer patients. Moreover, the combination of probiotics in treating CID can also improve the therapeutic effect on CID, with less adverse events.
-
6.
No direct correlation between rotavirus diarrhea and breast feeding: A meta-analysis.
Shen, J, Zhang, BM, Zhu, SG, Chen, JJ
Pediatrics and neonatology. 2018;(2):129-135
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some studies indicated that children with exclusive breast feeding had a reduction in the prevalence of rotavirus diarrhea, while some others held the opposite views. In this study, we aimed to systematically find the associations between rotavirus diarrhea and breast feeding. METHODS A literature search up to June 2016 in electronic literature databases, including PubMed and Embase, was performed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to conduct the quality assessment of all the selected studies. Statistical analyses were performed using the R package version 3.12 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Beijing1, China, meta package), and odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. The heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q-statistic and I2 test, and the sensitivity analysis was performed by trimming one study at a time. RESULTS A total of 17 articles, which included 10,841 participants, were investigated in the present meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the case group and control group (OR, 0.59 95% CI 0.33-1.07) in the meta-analysis of exclusive breast feeding, and no significant difference was found between the case group and the control group (OR, 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.16) in the meta-analysis of breast feeding. No significant difference was found between the case group and control group (OR, 0.78 95% CI 0.59-1.04) for all quantitative data. CONCLUSIONS There may be no direct correlation between rotavirus diarrhea and breast feeding.
-
7.
Racecadotril for acute diarrhoea in children: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Gordon, M, Akobeng, A
Archives of disease in childhood. 2016;(3):234-40
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Racecadotril is an antisecretory agent that can prevent fluid/electrolyte depletion from the bowel as a result of acute diarrhoea without affecting intestinal motility. An up-to-date systematic review is indicated to summarise the evidence on racecadotril for the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children. DESIGN A Cochrane format systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. PATIENTS Children with acute diarrhoea, as defined by the primary studies. INTERVENTIONS RCTs comparing racecadotril with placebo or other interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURS Duration of illness, stool output/volume and adverse events. RESULTS Seven RCTs were included, five comparing racecadotril with placebo or no intervention, one with pectin/kaolin and one with loperamide. Moderate to high risk of bias was present in all studies. There was no significant difference in efficacy or adverse events between racecadotril and loperamide. A meta-analysis of three studies with 642 participants showed significantly shorter duration of symptoms with racecadotril compared with placebo (mean difference -53.48 h, 95% CI -65.64 to -41.33). A meta-analysis of five studies with 949 participants showed no significant difference in adverse events between racecadotril and placebo (risk ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence that racecadotril is more effective than placebo or no intervention in reducing the duration of illness and stool output in children with acute diarrhoea. However, the overall quality of the evidence is limited due to sparse data, heterogeneity and risk of bias. Racecadotril appears to be safe and well tolerated.
-
8.
Vitamin A supplementation and childhood morbidity from diarrhea and respiratory infections: a meta-analysis.
Grotto, I, Mimouni, M, Gdalevich, M, Mimouni, D
The Journal of pediatrics. 2003;(3):297-304
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform an updated meta-analysis of the effect of vitamin A supplementation on childhood morbidity from respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. Study design A comprehensive search of the 1966 to 2000 MEDLINE database and review of the reference lists of relevant articles identified 9 randomized controlled trials dealing with morbidity from respiratory infections and diarrhea in children 6 months to 7 years of age and provided "intention-to-treat" data. RESULTS The combined results indicated that vitamin A supplementation has no consistent overall protective effect on the incidence of diarrhea (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.07) and that it slightly increases the incidence of respiratory tract infections (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11). CONCLUSIONS High-dose vitamin A supplements are not recommended on a routine basis for all preschool children and should be offered only to individuals or populations with vitamin A deficiency.