-
1.
Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Vargas-Alvarez, MA, Navas-Carretero, S, Palla, L, Martínez, JA, Almiron-Roig, E
Nutrients. 2021;(6)
Abstract
Portion control utensils and reduced size tableware amongst other tools, have the potential to guide portion size intake but their effectiveness remains controversial. This review evaluated the breadth and effectiveness of existing portion control tools on learning/awareness of appropriate portion sizes (PS), PS choice, and PS consumption. Additional outcomes were energy intake and weight loss. Published records between 2006-2020 (n = 1241) were identified from PubMed and WoS, and 36 publications comparing the impact of portion control tools on awareness (n = 7 studies), selection/choice (n = 14), intake plus related measures (n = 21) and weight status (n = 9) were analyzed. Non-tableware tools included cooking utensils, educational aids and computerized applications. Tableware included mostly reduced-size and portion control/calibrated crockery/cutlery. Overall, 55% of studies reported a significant impact of using a tool (typically smaller bowl, fork or glass; or calibrated plate). A meta-analysis of 28 articles confirmed an overall effect of tool on food intake (d = -0.22; 95%CI: -0.38, -0.06; 21 comparisons), mostly driven by combinations of reduced-size bowls and spoons decreasing serving sizes (d = -0.48; 95%CI: -0.72, -0.24; 8 comparisons) and consumed amounts/energy (d = -0.22; 95%CI: -0.39, -0.05, 9 comparisons), but not by reduced-size plates (d = -0.03; 95%CI: -0.12, 0.06, 7 comparisons). Portion control tools marginally induced weight loss (d = -0.20; 95%CI: -0.37, -0.03; 9 comparisons), especially driven by calibrated tableware. No impact was detected on PS awareness; however, few studies quantified this outcome. Specific portion control tools may be helpful as potentially effective instruments for inclusion as part of weight loss interventions. Reduced size plates per se may not be as effective as previously suggested.
-
2.
Gamification for the Improvement of Diet, Nutritional Habits, and Body Composition in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Suleiman-Martos, N, García-Lara, RA, Martos-Cabrera, MB, Albendín-García, L, Romero-Béjar, JL, Cañadas-De la Fuente, GA, Gómez-Urquiza, JL
Nutrients. 2021;(7)
Abstract
Currently, one of the main public health problems among children and adolescents is poor adherence to healthy habits, leading to increasingly high rates of obesity and the comorbidities that accompany obesity. Early interventions are necessary, and among them, the use of gamification can be an effective method. The objective was to analyse the effect of game-based interventions (gamification) for improving nutritional habits, knowledge, and changes in body composition. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, and Scopus databases, following the PRISMA recommendations. There was no restriction by year of publication or language. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Twenty-three articles were found. After the intervention, the consumption of fruit and vegetables increased, as well as the knowledge on healthy food groups. The means difference showed a higher nutritional knowledge score in the intervention group 95% CI 0.88 (0.05-1.75). No significant effect of gamification was found for body mass index z-score. Gamification could be an effective method to improve nutritional knowledge about healthier nutritional habits. Promoting the development of effective educational tools to support learning related to nutrition is necessary in order to avoid and prevent chronic diseases.
-
3.
Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Diets on Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Schönenberger, KA, Schüpfer, AC, Gloy, VL, Hasler, P, Stanga, Z, Kaegi-Braun, N, Reber, E
Nutrients. 2021;(12)
Abstract
Various nutritional therapies have been proposed in rheumatoid arthritis, particularly diets rich in ω-3 fatty acids, which may lead to eicosanoid reduction. Our aim was to investigate the effect of potentially anti-inflammatory diets (Mediterranean, vegetarian, vegan, ketogenic) on pain. The primary outcome was pain on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes were C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, health assessment questionnaire, disease activity score 28, tender/swollen joint counts, weight, and body mass index. We searched MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL for studies published from database inception to 12 November 2021. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted study data, and assessed the risk of bias. We performed a meta-analysis with all eligible randomized controlled trials using RevMan 5. We used mean differences or standardized mean differences and the inverse variance method of pooling using a random-effects model. The search retrieved 564 unique publications, of which we included 12 in the systematic review and 7 in the meta-analysis. All studies had a high risk of bias and the evidence was very low. The main conclusion is that anti-inflammatory diets resulted in significantly lower pain than ordinary diets (-9.22 mm; 95% CI -14.15 to -4.29; p = 0.0002; 7 RCTs, 326 participants).
-
4.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Different Intensity of Dietary Counselling on Cardiometabolic Health in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.
Low, JHM, Toh, DWK, Ng, MTT, Fam, J, Kua, EH, Kim, JE
Nutrients. 2021;(9)
Abstract
Dietary counselling has been identified as one of the nutritional strategies to alleviate cardiometabolic health conditions. Its effectiveness however may vary due to factors such as intensity level and provider while this has not been comprehensively studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of dietary counselling on the cardiometabolic health in middle-aged and older adults and the sub-group analyses with dietary counselling intensity and the provider were also assessed. Four databases including PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Cochrane Library and EMBASE were systematically searched. Data from 22 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were compiled and those from 9 RCTs were utilised for meta-analysis. Dietary counselling lowered total cholesterol (TC) and fasting blood sugar (FBS) but had no impact on triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Sub-group analysis revealed significant lowering effect of high intensity dietary counselling for TG (weighted mean difference (WMD): -0.24 mmol/L, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): -0.40 to -0.09), TC (WMD: -0.31 mmol/L, 95% CIs: -0.49 to -0.13), LDL (WMD: -0.39 mmol/L, 95% CIs: -0.61 to -0.16) and FBS (WMD: -0.69 mmol/L, 95% CIs: -0.99 to -0.40) while medium or low intensity dietary counselling did not show favouring effects. Counselling provider showed differential responses on cardiometabolic health between dietitian and all other groups. The findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that dietary counselling is a beneficial dietary strategy to improve cardiometabolic health in middle-aged and older adults with the emphasis on the counselling intensity.
-
5.
The Effect of Replacing Refined Grains with Whole Grains on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with GRADE Clinical Recommendation.
Marshall, S, Petocz, P, Duve, E, Abbott, K, Cassettari, T, Blumfield, M, Fayet-Moore, F
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2020;(11):1859-1883.e31
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational data have established a link between the consumption of whole grains and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, there is a need to review interventional research. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine whether interventions providing whole grain or whole pseudo-grain for dietary consumption improved CVD-related outcomes compared with refined grain or placebo in adults with or without chronic disease and/or associated risk factors. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared whole-grain vs refined-grain or placebo consumption by human adults was conducted. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for studies of 12 weeks (or 2 weeks for inflammatory outcomes) duration until 21 February 2020. Data were extracted for 14 types of CVD risk factors (40 outcomes in total). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method was used to determine confidence in the pooled effects and to inform a clinical recommendation. RESULTS Twenty-five randomized controlled trials were included and 22 were meta-analyzed. Interventions ranged from 2 to 16 weeks; most samples were healthy (n = 13 studies) and used mixed whole grains (n = 11 studies). Meta-analysis found that whole-grain oats improved total cholesterol (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.54, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.12) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.31), whole-grain rice improved triglycerides (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.01), and whole grains (all types) improved hemoglobin A1c (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.04) and C-reactive protein (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.00). CONCLUSIONS For adults with or without CVD risk factors, consuming whole grains as opposed to refined grains can improve total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, and C-reactive protein. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the whole grains as opposed to refined grains for the prevention and treatment of CVD. Further interventional research is needed to better understand the preventive and treatment potential of whole-grain and whole pseudo-grain dietary intake for cardiovascular disease, particularly among those with existing CVD risk factors.
-
6.
Healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns and the risk of chronic disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies.
Jayedi, A, Soltani, S, Abdolshahi, A, Shab-Bidar, S
The British journal of nutrition. 2020;(11):1133-1144
Abstract
We aimed to fully review the association of empirical dietary patterns with the risk of non-communicable chronic diseases and to rate the quality of the evidence. Published meta-analyses of observational studies investigating the association of empirically derived dietary patterns with the risk of chronic diseases were identified by searching PubMed and Scopus till September 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted the information and rated the quality of the evidence by NutriGrade score. For each meta-analysis, cross-sectional and case–control studies were excluded and then summary relative risk was recalculated by using a random-effects model. Sixteen meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies, reporting eighteen SRR for healthy dietary patterns and sixteen SRR for unhealthy patterns obtained from 116 primary prospective cohort studies with 4·8 million participants, were included. There was moderate quality of evidence for the inverse association of healthy dietary patterns with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), fracture and colorectal and breast cancers. There was also low-quality evidence for the inverse relation between healthy dietary patterns and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, depression, CHD and respiratory diseases. There was moderate quality of evidence for a positive association between unhealthy dietary patterns and the risk of T2D, fracture and the metabolic syndrome. Adopting a healthy dietary pattern may reduce the risk of T2D, CHD and premature death. More research is needed for outcomes for which the quality of the evidence was rated low, such as respiratory disease, mental illness and site-specific cancers.
-
7.
Meta-analysis of the relationship between Dietary Inflammatory Index and esophageal cancer risk.
Chen, QJ, Ou, L, Li, K, Ou, FR
Medicine. 2020;(49):e23539
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diet is closely related to the occurrence of esophageal cancer (EC). Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), as a novel index that describes the inflammatory potential of diet, was widely used in many diseases. OBJECTIVE To systematically analyze the relationship between DII and the risk of esophageal cancer. METHODS We mainly searched relative studies in PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and other literature database. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to detect the origin of heterogeneity. RESULTS We finally obtained 6 articles (8 studies). All studies were case-control studies which consisted of 1961 cases and 3577 controls. In this study, compared with the lowest DII category, the highest DII category had a higher risk of esophageal cancer, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) of the 8 studies were 2.54 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.90-3.40; I = 65.7%, P = .005). Furthermore, regardless of the differences in published year, DII components, geographic location, and study quality, there was still an increased risk of esophageal cancer in the highest DII category compared with the lowest DII category. CONCLUSIONS Our results inferred that DII was positively correlated with esophageal cancer risk and it could be used as a tool to predict the esophageal cancer risk and evaluate human health.
-
8.
Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: A Second Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Hoffmann, G, Schwingshackl, L
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2020;(12):1998-2031.e15
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal diet quality has a large impact on noncommunicable disease burden. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to update the body of evidence on the associations between diet quality, as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score, and health status. Moreover, results of the previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses were extended by evaluating the credibility of the evidence. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched to identify eligible studies published between May 15, 2017 and March 14, 2020. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% CI for highest vs lowest category of diet quality were estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic with 95% CI. Presence of publication bias was detected by using funnel plots and Egger's regression test. The NutriGrade tool was used to assess the credibility of evidence. RESULTS The current update identified 47 new reports, resulting in a total of 113 reports including data from 3,277,684 participants. Diets of the highest quality, as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension scores, were inversely associated with risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.82, I2 = 68%, n= 23), cardiovascular disease incidence or mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.82, I2 = 59%, n= 45), cancer incidence or mortality (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89, I2 = 73%, n= 45), incidence of type 2 diabetes (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85, I2 = 76%, n= 16), and incidence of neurodegenerative diseases (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.89, I2 = 71%, n= 12). In cancer survivors, the highest diet quality was linked with lower risk of all-cause (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88, I2 = 45%, n= 12) and cancer mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.89, I2 = 44%, n= 12). The credibility of evidence for identified associations between overall healthy dietary patterns and included health outcomes was moderate. CONCLUSION This updated systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that high diet quality (assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) is inversely associated with risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence or mortality, cancer incidence or mortality, type 2 diabetes, and neurodegenerative disease, as well as all-cause mortality and cancer mortality among cancer survivors. Moderate credibility of evidence for identified associations complements the recent 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report recommending healthy dietary patterns for disease prevention.
-
9.
What makes implementation intention interventions effective for promoting healthy eating behaviours? A meta-regression.
Carrero, I, Vilà, I, Redondo, R
Appetite. 2019;:239-247
Abstract
This study examines the efficacy of implementation intentions (II), a widely used self-regulatory strategy to help people achieve their goals. Although previous research has shown that the effect of II interventions is significantly higher in promoting healthy eating behaviours than in diminishing unhealthy eating behaviours, the factors that can moderate the effectiveness of these interventions remain unclear. In a meta-analysis of 70 interventions (N = 9689), we confirmed that II interventions for healthy eating behaviours yielded a medium significant effect size (d = 0.33) and a low significant effect size for unhealthy eating behaviors (d = 0.18). We show that the moderator variables of II interventions for healthy and unhealthy eating goals are very different. Regarding healthy eating, since moderator variables explain 53% of the variance in the heterogeneity of the effect sizes, the present study helps in gaining an understanding of the previous inconsistent results and offers suggestions for designing more efficient interventions. Effect size was negatively predicted by age, indicating that for younger people the effect size is higher, and II check, showing that if the instructor checks the plan it decreases its efficacy. Moreover, the effect of II interventions on students is significantly smaller than in non-student samples. In contrast, the effect size was positively predicted by initial training, off-line delivered interventions and, specific if-then and action plans versus complex plans. For unhealthy eating behaviours, our results show that there is less room to improve the intervention; there is only one moderator variable (plan formulation), and the heterogeneity found in the studies is lower for unhealthy eating behaviours (I2 = 46.70%) than for healthy eating behaviours (I2 = 73.25%), indicating that the intervention has low efficacy regardless of the design of the intervention.
-
10.
The effect of healthy Nordic diet on cardio-metabolic markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Ramezani-Jolfaie, N, Mohammadi, M, Salehi-Abargouei, A
European journal of nutrition. 2019;(6):2159-2174
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Nordic diet (ND), is supposed to be associated with a reduced cardiovascular risk; however, clinical trials have led to inconsistent results regarding the effect of this diet on cardio-metabolic markers. Using systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study aimed to investigate the effect of the ND on circulating levels of total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG), as well as blood pressure in human adults. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched up to February 2018 for relevant articles. Random effects model was used to estimate the overall effects. RESULTS Five RCTs consisting of 513 participants were included in the present review. The meta-analysis of five eligible studies showed that ND significantly reduces the total [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 0.38 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.76, - 0.01, P = 0.044] and LDL cholesterol (WMD = - 0.30 mmol/l, 95% CI - 0.54, - 0.06, P = 0.013) levels compared with the control groups; however, none was seen for HDL cholesterol and TG levels. The meta-analysis of four eligible RCTs revealed that the ND significantly reduces the systolic (WMD = - 3.97 mmHg, 95% CI - 6.40, - 1.54, P = 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD = - 2.08 mmHg, 95% CI - 3.43, - 0.72, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION The Nordic dietary pattern improves blood pressure and also some of blood lipid markers and it should be considered as a healthy dietary pattern.