0
selected
-
1.
ERGO2: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Calorie-Restricted Ketogenic Diet and Fasting in Addition to Reirradiation for Malignant Glioma.
Voss, M, Wagner, M, von Mettenheim, N, Harter, PN, Wenger, KJ, Franz, K, Bojunga, J, Vetter, M, Gerlach, R, Glatzel, M, et al
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2020;(4):987-995
Abstract
PURPOSE ERGO2 is the first randomized clinical trial on a calorically restricted ketogenic diet (KD) and intermittent fasting (KD-IF) in addition to reirradiation for recurrent malignant gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty patients were randomized 1:1 to reirradiation combined with either a calorically unrestricted diet or KD-IF. The KD-IF schedule included 3 days of KD (21-23 kcal/kg/d), followed by 3 days of fasting and again 3 days of KD. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary endpoints were PFS, local PFS, overall survival (OS), frequency of epileptic seizures, rate of ketosis and quality of life. RESULTS Four patients quit the trial before treatment and 3 patients stopped KD-IF prematurely. Of the 20 patients who completed KD-IF, 17 patients developed ketosis at day 6 and glucose levels declined significantly. KD-IF was well-tolerated with a modest weight loss of -2.1 ± 1.8 kg. No severe adverse events attributable to the diet occurred. PFS6 was not significantly different between the 2 groups (KD-IF: 20%; calorically unrestricted diet: 16%). Similarly, no difference in PFS, local PFS6, or OS was observable. Explorative analysis revealed that patients in the KD-IF group who had a glucose level of less than the median (83.5 mg/dL) on day 6 had significantly longer PFS and OS compared with those above the median (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS KD-IF is feasible and effective in inducing ketosis in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent glioma. However, the short schedule reported here failed to increase the efficacy of reirradiation. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER NCT01754350.
-
2.
10 patients, 10 years - Long term follow-up of cardiovascular risk factors in Glut1 deficiency treated with ketogenic diet therapies: A prospective, multicenter case series.
Heussinger, N, Della Marina, A, Beyerlein, A, Leiendecker, B, Hermann-Alves, S, Dalla Pozza, R, Klepper, J
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2018;(6 Pt A):2246-2251
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Glut1 Deficiency (Glut1D) is caused by impaired glucose transport into brain. The resulting epileptic encephalopathy and movement disorders can be treated effectively by high-fat carbohydrate-restricted ketogenic diet therapies (KDT) mimicking fasting and providing ketones as an alternative cerebral fuel. Recently 6-24 months follow-ups of epileptic patients reported elevated blood lipids and intima thickening of the carotid artery raising concerns about potential cardiovascular risks by KDT. To clarify potential cardiovascular risks we performed a prospective 10 year follow up of 10 Glut1D patients. METHODS Between August 2001 and January 2016 we enrolled Glut1D patients on KDT at two hospitals in Germany in this prospective, multicenter case series. The minimal follow up was 10 years. Standard deviation scores (SDS) of body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol (TC), HDL-/LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (TG) before initiation of KDT were compared with respective values at 6 months, 2, 5 years, and 10 years after initiation. After 10 years on KDT cardiovascular risk, assessed by BMI, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurement, and blood pressure, was compared to a healthy reference population (n = 550). RESULTS Baseline and 10 year follow-up investigations were available for 10 individuals with Glut1D on KDT. After two years on KDT BMI increased significantly, while total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol decreased. Within 3-5 years on KDT these differences disappeared, and after 10 years blood lipid parameters reflected the situation at initiation of KDT. Prior to KDT one child had dyslipidaemia, but no child after 10 years on KDT. No significant differences were observed with respect to BMI SDS (p = 0.26), CIMT (p = 0.63) or systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SDS p = 0.11 and p = 0.37, respectively) in Glut1D children treated with KDT for at least 10 years compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previous short-term reports on adverse effects of KDT, 10-year follow-up did not identify cardiovascular risks of dietary treatment for Glut1D.
-
3.
Low-fat versus ketogenic diet in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Phillips, MCL, Murtagh, DKJ, Gilbertson, LJ, Asztely, FJS, Lynch, CDP
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2018;(8):1306-1314
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preliminary evidence suggests that diet manipulation may influence motor and nonmotor symptoms in PD, but conflict exists regarding the ideal fat to carbohydrate ratio. OBJECTIVES We designed a pilot randomized, controlled trial to compare the plausibility, safety, and efficacy of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet versus a ketogenic diet in a hospital clinic of PD patients. METHODS We developed a protocol to support PD patients in a diet study and randomly assigned patients to a low-fat or ketogenic diet. Primary outcomes were within- and between-group changes in MDS-UPDRS Parts 1 to 4 over 8 weeks. RESULTS We randomized 47 patients, of which 44 commenced the diets and 38 completed the study (86% completion rate for patients commencing the diets). The ketogenic diet group maintained physiological ketosis. Both groups significantly decreased their MDS-UPDRS scores, but the ketogenic group decreased more in Part 1 (-4.58 ± 2.17 points, representing a 41% improvement in baseline Part 1 scores) compared to the low-fat group (-0.99 ± 3.63 points, representing an 11% improvement) (P < 0.001), with the largest between-group decreases observed for urinary problems, pain and other sensations, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and cognitive impairment. There were no between-group differences in the magnitude of decrease for Parts 2 to 4. The most common adverse effects were excessive hunger in the low-fat group and intermittent exacerbation of the PD tremor and/or rigidity in the ketogenic group. CONCLUSIONS It is plausible and safe for PD patients to maintain a low-fat or ketogenic diet for 8 weeks. Both diet groups significantly improved in motor and nonmotor symptoms; however, the ketogenic group showed greater improvements in nonmotor symptoms. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
-
4.
Variants in KCNJ11 and BAD do not predict response to ketogenic dietary therapies for epilepsy.
Schoeler, NE, Leu, C, White, J, Plagnol, V, Ellard, S, Matarin, M, Yellen, G, Thiele, EA, Mackay, M, McMahon, JM, et al
Epilepsy research. 2015;:22-8
Abstract
In the absence of specific metabolic disorders, predictors of response to ketogenic dietary therapies (KDT) are unknown. We aimed to determine whether variants in established candidate genes KCNJ11 and BAD influence response to KDT. We sequenced KCNJ11 and BAD in individuals without previously-known glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome or other metabolic disorders, who received KDT for epilepsy. Hospital records were used to obtain demographic and clinical data. Two response phenotypes were used: ≥ 50% seizure reduction and seizure-freedom at 3-month follow-up. Case/control association tests were conducted with KCNJ11 and BAD variants with minor allele frequency (MAF)>0.01, using PLINK. Response to KDT in individuals with variants with MAF<0.01 was evaluated. 303 Individuals had KCNJ11 and 246 individuals had BAD sequencing data and diet response data. Six SNPs in KCNJ11 and two in BAD had MAF>0.01. Eight variants in KCNJ11 and seven in BAD (of which three were previously-unreported) had MAF<0.01. No significant results were obtained from association analyses, with either KDT response phenotype. P-values were similar when accounting for ethnicity using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. There did not seem to be a consistent effect of rare variants on response to KDT, although the cohort size was too small to assess significance. Common variants in KCNJ11 and BAD do not predict response to KDT for epilepsy. We can exclude, with 80% power, association from variants with a MAF of >0.05 and effect size >3. A larger sample size is needed to detect associations from rare variants or those with smaller effect sizes.