-
1.
OUTpatient intravenous LASix Trial in reducing hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (OUTLAST).
Hamo, CE, Abdelmoneim, SS, Han, SY, Chandy, E, Muntean, C, Khan, SA, Sunkesula, P, Meykler, M, Ramachandran, V, Rosenberg, E, et al
PloS one. 2021;(6):e0253014
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality. The current study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of outpatient furosemide intravenous (IV) infusion following hospitalization for ADHF. METHODS In a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 100 patients were randomized to receive standard of care (Group 1), IV placebo infusion (Group 2), or IV furosemide infusion (Group 3) over 3h, biweekly for a one-month period following ADHF hospitalization. Patients in Groups 2/3 also received a comprehensive HF-care protocol including bi-weekly clinic visits for dose-adjusted IV-diuretics, medication adjustment and education. Echocardiography, quality of life and depression questionnaires were performed at baseline and 30-day follow-up. The primary outcome was 30-day re-hospitalization for ADHF. RESULTS Overall, a total of 94 patients were included in the study (mean age 64 years, 56% males, 69% African American). There were a total of 14 (15%) hospitalizations for ADHF at 30 days, 6 (17.1%) in Group 1, 7 (22.6%) in Group 2, and 1 (3.7%) in Group 3 (overall p = 0.11; p = 0.037 comparing Groups 2 and 3). Patients receiving IV furosemide infusion experienced significantly greater urine output and weight loss compared to those receiving placebo without any significant increase creatinine and no significant between group differences in echocardiography parameters, KCCQ or depression scores. CONCLUSION The use of a standardized protocol of outpatient IV furosemide infusion for a one-month period following hospitalization for ADHF was found to be safe and efficacious in reducing 30-day re-hospitalization.
-
2.
Can We Predict the Outcome of Oral Dissolution Therapy for Radiolucent Renal Calculi? A Prospective Study.
Elsawy, AA, Elshal, AM, El-Nahas, AR, Elbaset, MA, Farag, H, Shokeir, AA
The Journal of urology. 2019;(2):350-357
Abstract
PURPOSE We prospectively assessed the efficacy and the predictors of the success of oral dissolution therapy by alkalization for lucent renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with radiolucent renal stones were counseled to undergo oral dissolution therapy, which entails oral potassium citrate 20 mEq 3 times daily, 3 L daily fluid intake and a dietary regimen. The study primary end point was the achievement of a 6-month stone-free rate with oral dissolution therapy. The other end point was a change in stone surface area as measured by noncontrast computerized tomography at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Between February 2015 and January 2016 only 182 of the 212 eligible patients who agreed to participate were compliant with oral dissolution therapy and included in the final analysis. Mean stone surface area at enrollment was 1.3 cm (range 0.16 to 11.84). At 3 months 97 (53.2%), 65 (35.7%) and 20 (11.1%) patients were oral dissolution therapy responders (stone-free), partial responders and nonresponders, respectively. Oral dissolution therapy achieved a 6-month stone-free rate of 83%, including 97 and 54 patients after 3 and 6 months of oral dissolution therapy, respectively. On regression analysis the initial 3-month response to oral dissolution therapy (p = 0.001), lower stone density (p = 0.03) and higher urine pH 12 weeks after treatment (p = 0.01) independently predicted the oral dissolution therapy response at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of stone size, oral dissolution therapy was an effective treatment approach for lucent renal stones. The initial response to oral dissolution therapy after 3 months was the key factor in determining the potential oral dissolution therapy response after 6 months. In addition, treatment compliance in achieving the targeted urine pH and low stone density has an independent role in the oral dissolution therapy response.
-
3.
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Mannitol with Furosemide for the Prevention of Renal Toxicity Induced by Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy with Short-term Low-volume Hydration in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The OLCSG1406 Study Protocol.
Makimoto, G, Ichihara, E, Hotta, K, Ninomiya, K, Oze, I, Minami, D, Ninomiya, T, Kubo, T, Ohashi, K, Tabata, M, et al
Acta medica Okayama. 2018;(3):319-323
Abstract
Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy shows a survival advantage compared to carboplatin for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer, high-volume hydration and a long infusion time are necessary to avoid nephrotoxicity, and cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been difficult to administer in outpatient settings. A low-volume hydration method using mannitol or furosemide as forced diuresis was recently introduced, but there are no clear conclusions regarding which agent should be used. We describe our ongoing randomized phase II trial (the OLCSG1406 Study) evaluating the efficacy of forced diuresis. This study will clarify whether mannitol or furosemide is more suitable in cisplatin-based chemotherapy with low-volume hydration.
-
4.
Efficacy of standard and low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the recurrence prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis (NOSTONE trial): protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Dhayat, NA, Faller, N, Bonny, O, Mohebbi, N, Ritter, A, Pellegrini, L, Bedino, G, Schönholzer, C, Venzin, RM, Hüsler, C, et al
BMC nephrology. 2018;(1):349
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nephrolithiasis is a global healthcare problem with a current lifetime risk of 18.8% in men and 9.4% in women. Given the high cost of medical treatments and surgical interventions as well as the morbidity related to symptomatic stone disease, medical prophylaxis for stone recurrence is an attractive approach. Thiazide diuretics have been the cornerstone of pharmacologic metaphylaxis for more than 40 years. However, evidence for benefits and harms of thiazides in the prevention of calcium containing kidney stones in general remains unclear. In addition, the efficacy of the currently employed low dose thiazide regimens to prevent stone recurrence is not known. METHODS The NOSTONE trial is an investigator-initiated 3-year prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of standard and low dose hydrochlorothiazide treatment in the recurrence prevention of calcium containing kidney stones. We plan to include 416 adult (≥ 18 years) patients with recurrent (≥ 2 stone episodes in the last 10 years) calcium containing kidney stones (containing ≥50% of calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate or a mixture of both). Patients will be randomly allocated to 50 mg or 25 mg or 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide or placebo. The primary outcome will be incidence of stone recurrence (a composite of symptomatic or radiologic recurrence). Secondary outcomes will be individual components of the composite primary outcome, safety and tolerability of hydrochlorothiazide treatment, changes in urinary biochemistry elicited by hydrochlorothiazide treatment and impact of baseline disease severity, biochemical abnormalities and stone composition on treatment response. DISCUSSION The NOSTONE study will provide long-sought information on the efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide in the recurrence prevention of calcium containing kidney stones. Strengths of the study include the randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled design, the large amount of patients studied, the employment of high sensitivity and high specificity imaging and the exclusive public funding support. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057431 . Registered on February 20 2017.
-
5.
Effect of amiloride, or amiloride plus hydrochlorothiazide, versus hydrochlorothiazide on glucose tolerance and blood pressure (PATHWAY-3): a parallel-group, double-blind randomised phase 4 trial.
Brown, MJ, Williams, B, Morant, SV, Webb, DJ, Caulfield, MJ, Cruickshank, JK, Ford, I, McInnes, G, Sever, P, Salsbury, J, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2016;(2):136-47
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potassium depletion by thiazide diuretics is associated with a rise in blood glucose. We assessed whether addition or substitution of a potassium-sparing diuretic, amiloride, to treatment with a thiazide can prevent glucose intolerance and improve blood pressure control. METHODS We did a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind trial in 11 secondary and two primary care sites in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years; had clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher and home systolic blood pressure of 130 mmHg or higher on permitted background drugs of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or direct renin inhibitors (previously untreated patients were also eligible in specific circumstances); and had at least one component of the metabolic syndrome in addition to hypertension. Patients with known diabetes were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 24 weeks of daily oral treatment with starting doses of 10 mg amiloride, 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide, or 5 mg amiloride plus 12·5 mg hydrochlorothiazide; all doses were doubled after 12 weeks. Random assignment was done via a central computer system. Both participants and investigators were masked to assignment. Our hierarchical primary endpoints, assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis at 12 and 24 weeks, were the differences from baseline in blood glucose measured 2 h after a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), compared first between the hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride groups, and then between the hydrochlorothiazide and combination groups. A key secondary endpoint was change in home systolic blood pressure at 12 and 24 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00797862, and the MHRA, Eudract number 2009-010068-41, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between Nov 18, 2009, and Dec 15, 2014, 145 patients were randomly assigned to amiloride, 146 to hydrochlorothiazide, and 150 to the combination group. 132 participants in the amiloride group, 134 in the hydrochlorothiazide group, and 133 in the combination group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 2 h glucose concentrations after OGTT, averaged at 12 and 24 weeks, were significantly lower in the amiloride group than in the hydrochlorothiazide group (mean difference -0·55 mmol/L [95% CI -0·96 to -0·14]; p=0·0093) and in the combination group than in the hydrochlorothiazide group (-0·42 mmol/L [-0·84 to -0·004]; p=0·048). The mean reduction in home systolic blood pressure during 24 weeks did not differ significantly between the amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide groups, but the fall in blood pressure in the combination group was significantly greater than that in the hydrochlorothiazide group (p=0·0068). Hyperkalaemia was reported in seven (4·8%) patients in the amiloride group and three (2·3%) patients in the combination group; the highest recorded potassium concentration was 5·8 mmol/L in a patient in the amiloride group. 13 serious adverse events occurred but the frequency did not differ significantly between groups. INTERPRETATION The combination of amiloride with hydrochlorothiazide, at doses equipotent on blood pressure, prevents glucose intolerance and improves control of blood pressure compared with montherapy with either drug. These findings, together with previous data about morbidity and mortality for the combination, support first-line use of amiloride plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients who need treatment with a diuretic. FUNDING British Heart Foundation and National Institute for Health Research.
-
6.
Adding Hydrochlorothiazide to Olmesartan/Amlodipine Increases Efficacy in Patients With Inadequate Blood Pressure Control on Dual-Combination Therapy.
Rump, LC, Ammentorp, B, Laeis, P, Scholze, J
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2016;(1):60-9
Abstract
This randomized, parallel-group study in patients inadequately controlled on olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine (OLM/AML) 40/10 mg assessed the effects of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and 25 mg, using seated blood pressure (SeBP) measurements and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Enrolled patients were screened and tapered off of therapy if required. All patients received OLM/AML 40/10 mg and those with mean seated BP (SeBP) ≥140/90 mm Hg after 8 weeks (n=808) were randomized (1:1:1) to continue with OLM/AML 40/10 mg or receive OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 or 40/10/25 mg for a further 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from the start to the end of the randomized treatment period. The addition of HCTZ 25 mg significantly reduced SeDBP (-2.8 mm Hg; P<.0001), lowered seated systolic BP (SeSBP) and ambulatory DBP and SBP, and improved BP goal rates. In patients uncontrolled on OLM/AML 40/10 mg, adding HCTZ led to further BP reductions, particularly in ambulatory BP.
-
7.
Diuretic response in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: characteristics and clinical outcome--an analysis from RELAX-AHF.
Voors, AA, Davison, BA, Teerlink, JR, Felker, GM, Cotter, G, Filippatos, G, Greenberg, BH, Pang, PS, Levin, B, Hua, TA, et al
European journal of heart failure. 2014;(11):1230-40
Abstract
AIMS: We studied the characteristics and clinical outcome related to diuretic response and the effects of serelaxin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS RELAX-AHF was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling 1161 patients admitted to hospital for AHF who were randomized to 48 h i.v infusions of placebo or serelaxin (30 µg/kg per day) within 16 h from presentation. Diuretic response was defined as Δ weight kg/[(total i.v. dose)/40 mg] + [(total oral dose)/80 mg)] furosemide (or equivalent loop diuretic dose) up to day 5. Median diuretic response was -0.42 (-1.00, -0.14) kg/40 mg. A poor diuretic response was independently associated with Western-like region (Western Europe, North America, Israel, and Poland), lower diastolic blood pressure, the absence of oedema, higher blood urea nitrogen, and lower levels of aspartate aminotransferase and potassium (all P < 0.01). Randomization to serelaxin was associated with lower doses of i.v. loop diuretics and slightly less weight loss, resulting in a neutral effect on diuretic response. Worse diuretic response was independently associated both with less relief of dyspnoea, measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at day 5 (primary endpoint; P = 0.0002), and with a higher risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure through day 60 (secondary endpoint, P < 0.0001), but not with increased 180-day cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.507). CONCLUSIONS In patients hospitalized for AHF, a poor diuretic response was associated with a poor in-hospital and early post-discharge clinical outcome. Serelaxin had a neutral effect on diuretic response. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00520806.
-
8.
Efficacy and safety of a 14-day administration of tolvaptan in the treatment of patients with ascites in hepatic oedema.
Sakaida, I, Yamashita, S, Kobayashi, T, Komatsu, M, Sakai, T, Komorizono, Y, Okada, M, Okita, K, ,
The Journal of international medical research. 2013;(3):835-47
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of 14 days' orally administered tolvaptan as adjunctive treatment for hepatic oedema in Japanese liver cirrhosis patients with insufficient response to conventional diuretics, with the option to increase dose in those who did not respond initially. METHODS This multicentre, single-arm, phase 3 study allocated patients with liver cirrhosis and persistent ascites to 7-day treatment with 7.5 mg/day tolvaptan followed by an additional 7 days' treatment. Responders at day 7 (achieving ≥ 1 kg body-weight reduction) continued on 7.5 mg/day tolvaptan; nonresponders (<1 kg body-weight reduction) received 15 mg/day tolvaptan. Conventional diuretic treatment continued throughout. The primary endpoint was change in body weight from baseline, as a marker of ascites volume. RESULTS A total of 51 patients received 7.5 mg/day tolvaptan for 7 days, which caused a significant reduction in mean body weight (55% response rate). During the second 7-day treatment period, 30 patients received 7.5 mg/day tolvaptan and 13 patients received tolvaptan 15 mg/day: response rates were 43% and 23%, respectively. Two serious adverse events were observed. Serum sodium was within normal range. CONCLUSIONS Tolvaptan therapy for 14 days (with possible dose increase as necessary), in combination with conventional diuretics, effectively reduced body weight in patients with hepatic oedema.
-
9.
Assessing parenteral diuretic treatment of decompensated heart failure in the community.
Austin, J, Hockey, D, Williams, WR, Hutchison, S
British journal of community nursing. 2013;(11):528, 530-4
Abstract
Referrals of 46 patients with decompensated end-stage heart failure were reviewed by a community heart-failure specialist nurse as part of a pilot study to determine patient numbers suitable for parenteral diuretic treatment at home, and the appropriateness of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Carer's Stress Scales. Triage of patients resulted in the following care pathways: 14 (30%) received intravenous therapy, 11 (24%) received subcutaneous therapy, 9 (20%) required adjustment of medication, 8 (17%) could not be treated because of limited staffing resource, 4 (9%) met study exemption criteria. There were no adverse events following furosemide infusion. The majority of intravenous and subcutaneous treatments took 1-7 days (total 187 days). Parenteral diuretic therapy prevented admissions and reduced the severity heart failure symptoms in particular oedema. Patients and carers appreciated the service, which had a positive effect on carers stress. Of the nursing tools, the ESAS and the Carer's Stress Scales proved useful in the management of patients.
-
10.
Validation of a therapeutic scheme for the treatment of resistant hypertension.
Segura, J, Cerezo, C, Garcia-Donaire, JA, Schmieder, RE, Praga, M, de la Sierra, A, Ruilope, LM
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH. 2011;(6):498-504
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that a therapeutic strategy of substituting the diuretic (most commonly hydrochlorothiazide) with chlorthalidone (50 mg/day), and, if needed, the calcium channel blocker with the highest dose of the most commonly used calcium antagonist (amlodipine 10 mg), and adding on top a direct renin inhibitor (aliskiren 300 mg) is effective to treat resistant hypertensive patients not responding to spironolactone. The scheme was tested in a group of 76 patients who had true treatment resistant hypertension (24-hour mean blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg while receiving three or more drugs). An effective response to spironolactone was defined as 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) drop by more than 20 mm Hg, and was obtained with 25-50 mg in 60 patients (78.9%). In patients with inadequate response to spironolactone (n = 16), we administered the triple combination plus the remaining therapy, a mean decrease of 29 mm Hg (95% CI 11-48; P = .004) for SBP and 12 mm Hg (95% CI: 4-20 mm Hg) for diastolic BP were observed. In only 1 of 16 patients (6%), the response was considered as insufficient. These data indicate the need for further testing this scheme that looks really promising to treat resistant hypertensive patients not responding to spironolactone.