-
1.
End-of-Study Results for the Ladder Phase 2 Trial of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Khanani, AM, Callanan, D, Dreyer, R, Chen, S, Howard, JG, Hopkins, JJ, Lin, CY, Lorenz-Candlin, M, Makadia, S, Patel, S, et al
Ophthalmology. Retina. 2021;(8):775-787
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the end-of-study results from the Ladder clinical trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with nAMD with a documented response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment who received study treatment (N = 220). METHODS Patients were randomized 3:3:3:2 to treatment with the PDS filled with ranibizumab 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, and 100-mg/ml formulations or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES End-of-study results for the time to first meeting refill criteria (first refill), mean change from baseline for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT), and safety. RESULTS At study end, the mean time on study was 22.1 months (range, 10.8-37.6 months) for all PDS patients. Median time to first refill was 8.7 months, 13.0 months, and 15.8 months, and 28.9%, 56.0%, and 59.4% of patients went 12 months or longer without meeting refill criteria in the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, and 100-mg/ml treatment arms, respectively. At month 22, the observed mean BCVA change from baseline was ‒4.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, ‒2.3 ETDRS letters, +2.9 ETDRS letters, and +2.7 ETDRS letters in the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, 100-mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg treatment arms, respectively. At month 22, the observed mean CFT change from baseline was similar in the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg treatment arms. No new safety signals were detected during the additional follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Over a mean of 22 months on study, vision and anatomic outcomes were comparable between the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg arms, with a lower total number of ranibizumab treatments with the PDS. The Ladder end-of-study findings were consistent with the primary analysis, and the PDS generally was well tolerated throughout the entire study period. The PDS has the potential to reduce treatment burden in patients with nAMD while maintaining vision.
-
2.
Benefit of Targeting a LDL (Low-Density Lipoprotein) Cholesterol <70 mg/dL During 5 Years After Ischemic Stroke.
Amarenco, P, Kim, JS, Labreuche, J, Charles, H, Giroud, M, Lee, BC, Mahagne, MH, Nighoghossian, N, Gabriel Steg, P, Vicaut, É, et al
Stroke. 2020;(4):1231-1239
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Background and Purpose- The TST trial (Treat Stroke to Target) evaluated the benefit of targeting a LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol of <70 mg/dL to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in 2860 patients with ischemic stroke with atherosclerotic stenosis of cerebral vasculature or aortic arch plaque >4 mm, in a French and Korean population. The follow-up lasted a median of 5.3 years in French patients (similar to the median follow-up time in the SPARCL trial [Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Level]) and 2.0 years in Korean patients. Exposure duration to statin is a well-known driver for cardiovascular risk reduction. We report here the TST results in the French cohort. Methods- One thousand seventy-three French patients were assigned to <70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) and 1075 to 100±10 mg/dL (90-110 mg/dL, 2.3-2.8 mmol/L). To achieve these goals, investigators used the statin and dosage of their choice and added ezetimibe on top if needed. The primary outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, new symptoms requiring urgent coronary or carotid revascularization and vascular death. Results- After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the achieved LDL cholesterol was 66 (1.69 mmol/L) and 96 mg/dL (2.46 mmol/L) on average, respectively. The primary end point occurred in 9.6% and 12.9% of patients, respectively (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.94]; P=0.019). Cerebral infarction or urgent carotid revascularization following transient ischemic attack was reduced by 27% (P=0.046). Cerebral infarction or intracranial hemorrhage was reduced by 28% (P=0.023). The primary outcome or intracranial hemorrhage was reduced by 25% (P=0.021). Intracranial hemorrhages occurred in 13 and 11 patients, respectively (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.53-2.62]; P=0.70). Conclusions- After an ischemic stroke of documented atherosclerotic origin, targeting a LDL cholesterol of <70 mg/dL during 5.3 years avoided 1 subsequent major vascular event in 4 (number needed to treat of 30) and no increase in intracranial hemorrhage. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01252875.
-
3.
Patient and Physician Perspectives on Mode of Administration of the PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Alirocumab, an Injectable Medication to Lower LDL-C Levels.
Roth, EM, Bujas-Bobanovic, M, Louie, MJ, Cariou, B
Clinical therapeutics. 2015;(9):1945-1954.e6
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab, an every 2 week injectable monoclonal antibody, have shown significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol. However, many patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy are not experienced with self-injected medication. This study assessed patient and physician perceptions of 2 alirocumab delivery devices. METHODS 400 participants (200 physicians, 200 patients) were included from 6 countries. Physicians (99 primary care physicians [PCPs]; 101 specialists) had mean practice experience of 17.8 years and an average of 797 hypercholesterolemic patients. Participating patients had LDL-C levels above their goal and at least one of the following: familial hypercholesterolemia, statin intolerance, high cardiovascular risk, and/or diabetes. Mean patient age was 58.5 years, 51% were female, and 25.5% had injectable medication experience. Following device instruction and demonstration, participants tested either a pre-filled pen or pre-filled syringe, using both 75 and 150 mg doses of single-blinded placebo into a prosthetic pad. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaire. FINDINGS Participant acceptance of both devices was positive, with 83-100% agreeing with ease-of-use statements. After testing, physicians estimated that 66% (pen) and 58% (syringe) of their patients would be willing to self-inject using the device (relative increases from pre-testing of 22% and 16%, respectively; both P<0.05). Specialist estimates were higher than PCP estimates: for the pen, 60% versus 47% (pre-testing), respectively, and 72% versus 61% (post-testing); for the syringe, 57% versus 43% (pre-testing), 63% versus 54% (post-testing; all P<0.05, specialist vs PCP). After testing, 72% (pen) and 63% (syringe) of patient-participants were very willing to self-inject (relative increases from pre-testing of 26% [P<0.05] and 11%, respectively); 96% (pen) and 93% (syringe) were either very willing or somewhat willing to self-inject. The proportion of patients aged <60 years who were very willing to self-inject with either device was numerically (but not statistically) higher compared with those ≥60 years. Initially, patients with injectable medication experience were generally more willing to use the pen than injection-naive patients; after testing there was no difference between groups. No significant differences were observed in responses to the 2 different doses. IMPLICATIONS Responses from physicians and patients to pre-filled pen and syringe devices were positive. Devices were considered easy to operate, with most patients willing to use and accept self-injection. Patient willingness to self-inject increased after demonstration and testing. Results suggest that, in clinical practice, alirocumab administration by either pre-filled pen or syringe would not deter most physicians from prescribing or most patients from self-administering.
-
4.
Targets for parathyroid hormone in secondary hyperparathyroidism: is a "one-size-fits-all" approach appropriate? A prospective incident cohort study.
Laurain, E, Ayav, C, Erpelding, ML, Kessler, M, Briançon, S, Brunaud, L, Frimat, L
BMC nephrology. 2014;:132
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) consider that a "one-size-fits-all" target enables efficacy of care. In routine clinical practice, SHPT continues to pose diagnosis and treatment challenges. One hypothesis that could explain these difficulties is that dialysis population with SHPT is not homogeneous. METHODS EPHEYL is a prospective, multicenter, pharmacoepidemiological study including chronic dialysis patients (≥ 3 months) with newly SHPT diagnosis, i.e. parathyroid hormone (PTH) ≥ 500 ng/L for the first time, or initiation of cinacalcet, or parathyroidectomy. Multiple correspondence analysis and ascendant hierarchical clustering on clinico-biological (symptoms, PTH, plasma phosphorus and alkaline phosphatase) and treatment of SHPT (cinacalcet, vitamin D, calcium, or calcium-free calcic phosphate binder) were performed to identify distinct phenotypes. RESULTS 305 patients (261 with incident PTH ≥ 500 ng/L; 44 with cinacalcet initiation) were included. Their mean age was 67 ± 15 years, and 60% were men, 92% on hemodialysis and 8% on peritoneal dialysis. Four subgroups of SHPT patients were identified: 1/ "intermediate" phenotype with hyperphosphatemia without hypocalcemia (n = 113); 2/ younger patients with severe comorbidities, hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia, despite SHPT multiple medical treatments, suggesting poor adherence (n = 73); 3/ elderly patients with few cardiovascular comorbidities, controlled phospho-calcium balance, higher PTH, and few treatments (n = 75); 4/ patients who initiated cinacalcet (n = 43). The quality criterion of the model had a cut-off of 14 (>2), suggesting a relevant classification. CONCLUSION In real life, dialysis patients with newly diagnosed SHPT constitute a very heterogeneous population. A "one-size-fits-all" target approach is probably not appropriate. Therapeutic management needs to be adjusted to the 4 different phenotypes.
-
5.
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty and cobalt-chromium stents versus conventional angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of native coronary artery stenoses in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Ali, RM, Degenhardt, R, Zambahari, R, Tresukosol, D, Ahmad, WA, Kamar, Hb, Kui-Hian, S, Ong, TK, bin Ismail, O, bin Elis, S, et al
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;:K83-92
Abstract
AIMS: Coronary lesions in diabetics (DM) are associated with a high recurrence following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even after drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment. Encouraging clinical data of the drug-eluting balloon catheter (DEB) SeQuent Please warrant its investigation in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Eighty-four diabetic patients (60.8 ± 9.1 years, 76.2% male) were randomised to either the DEB SeQuent Please or the DES Taxus Liberté to compare the 9-month clinical and angiographic outcome of PCI in native coronary arteries. Comparing the DEB vs. the DES the 9-month results (follow-up DEB 39/45 [86.7%], DES 36/39 [92.3%]) are statistically not different at the 0.05 level for the primary endpoint of in-segment (0.37 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.63 mm) and in-stent (0.51 ± 0.61 mm vs. 0.53 ± 0.67 mm) late lumen loss, overall and cardiac deaths (2/45 [4.4%] and 3/45 [6.7%] vs. 0), target lesion revascularisation (3/45 [8.9%] vs. 4/39 [10.3%]), the total MACE rate (6/45 [13.3%] vs. 6/39 [15.4%]), and the event free survival after 10.2 ± 3.8 months (Kaplan-Meier analysis, p<0.80, log rank test). CONCLUSIONS The clinical and angiographic outcome of the combination of the drug-eluting balloon SeQuent Please with a cobalt chromium stent compared to the drug eluting Taxus stent are similar.
-
6.
Description of Pantera Lux paclitaxel-releasing balloon and preliminary quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) results at six months in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis.
Hehrlein, C, Richardt, G, Wiemer, M, Schneider, H, Naber, C, Hoffmann, E, Dietz, U
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;:K119-24
Abstract
AIMS: Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) have recently emerged as a valuable treatment option for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, little information exists on results of DEB therapy of in-stent restenosis from drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS The Pantera Lux balloon catheter, a novel DEB releasing paclitaxel with a BTHC matrix was studied in a prospective, multicentre first-in-man trial of patients with ISR either from bare metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES). Here we report on the clinical and angiographic follow-up of the first 45 Pantera Lux patients after six months. The mean age (± SD) of the studied ISR patients was 69 ± 9 years (82% males, 18% females). The distribution of BMS and DES in these patients was 53% and 47%, respectively. Success of deployment of the device was 100%. After six months, the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 7.7% including one post-procedural non-fatal myocardial infarction, one target lesion- and one target vessel- revascularisation (each clinically driven). Angiographic in-stent late lumen loss was 0.03 ± 0.35 mm (BMS: -0.08 ± 0.37 mm, DES: 0.15 ± 0.28 mm) as assessed by an independent angiographic core laboratory. CONCLUSION Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with the Pantera Lux paclitaxel-releasing balloon catheter shows very promising preliminary 6-month results, irrespective of whether the initially implanted stent was a bare metal- or a drug-eluting stent.
-
7.
Phase 2 safety trial targeting amyloid beta production with a gamma-secretase inhibitor in Alzheimer disease.
Fleisher, AS, Raman, R, Siemers, ER, Becerra, L, Clark, CM, Dean, RA, Farlow, MR, Galvin, JE, Peskind, ER, Quinn, JF, et al
Archives of neurology. 2008;(8):1031-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and amyloid beta (Abeta) response to the gamma-secretase inhibitor LY450139 in Alzheimer disease. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING Community-based clinical research centers. Patients Fifty-one individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease were randomized to receive placebo (n=15) or LY450139 (100 mg [n=22] or 140 mg [n=14]), with 43 completing the treatment phase. Intervention The LY450139 groups received 60 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 100 mg/d for 6 weeks, and then either 100 or 140 mg/d for 6 additional weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were adverse events, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta levels, vital signs, electrocardiographic data, and laboratory safety test results. Secondary outcome measures included the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Scale. RESULTS Group differences were seen in skin and subcutaneous tissue concerns (P=.05), including 3 possible drug rashes and 3 reports of hair color change in the treatment groups. There were 3 adverse event-related discontinuations, including 1 transient bowel obstruction. The plasma Abeta(40) concentration was reduced by 58.2% for the 100-mg group and 64.6% for the 140-mg group (P<.001). No significant reduction was seen in cerebrospinal fluid Abeta levels. No group differences were seen in cognitive or functional measures. CONCLUSIONS LY450139 was generally well tolerated at doses of up to 140 mg/d for 14 weeks, with several findings indicating the need for close clinical monitoring in future studies. Decreases in plasma Abeta concentrations were consistent with inhibition of gamma-secretase. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00244322.
-
8.
The Cobalt chromium STent with Antiproliferative for Restenosis II (COSTAR II) trial study design: advancing the active-control evaluation of second-generation drug-eluting stents.
Wang, TY, Hasselblad, V, Peterson, JL, Wijns, W, Parhizgar, A, Kereiakes, DJ, Krucoff, MW
American heart journal. 2007;(5):743-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DESs) compared with bare-metal stents in reducing the need for revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in low-risk patients with single-vessel lesions. Rapid DES uptake has necessitated shifting the paradigm to active DES-controlled noninferiority study models with most studies using surrogate angiographic measurements to attain adequate statistical power. No previous prospective trial has specifically compared a new DES with an active-control DES in a high-risk patient population using primary clinical end points. OBJECTIVE COSTAR II is designed to compare use of the investigational Costar stent (Conor MedSystems, Palo Alto, CA) with the Taxus (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) stent in single- and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point is the clinical composite of MACE at 8 months supported by consistent results in the evaluation of 8-month MACE rates in the single- and multivessel cohorts and of in-segment late loss in a small angiographic substudy at 9 months. METHODS A total of 1700 patients, 50% with single-vessel and 50% with multivessel disease, are randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive either Costar or Taxus stent(s) in this prospective, multicenter, noninferiority study design. Because no prior data were available to determine control multivessel MACE rates, an imputed placebo statistical analysis plan incorporating a variable delta based on actually observed control DES MACE rates will be implemented. The results of COSTAR II will provide information about a novel coronary stent device as well as unique data regarding both control and test DES use in more complex "real-world" patients.
-
9.
Effects of high-dose atorvastatin on cerebrovascular events in patients with stable coronary disease in the TNT (treating to new targets) study.
Waters, DD, LaRosa, JC, Barter, P, Fruchart, JC, Gotto, AM, Carter, R, Breazna, A, Kastelein, JJ, Grundy, SM
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;(9):1793-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the effects on cerebrovascular events of treating patients with stable coronary disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially below 100 mg/dl. BACKGROUND Lowering LDL-C with statins has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with stable coronary disease. In observational studies, naturally low cholesterol levels have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The cerebrovascular benefits of treating patients with stable coronary disease to LDL-C levels substantially below 100 mg/dl have not been previously investigated. METHODS We describe an analysis of cerebrovascular events in the Treating to New Targets study, a trial where 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day and followed for a median of 4.9 years. RESULTS Mean LDL-C levels were 101 mg/dl on 10 mg atorvastatin and 77 mg/dl on 80 mg. In addition to the reduction in major cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.89; p = 0.0002), the primary end point of the trial, patients in the 80-mg arm experienced a reduction in cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93; p = 0.007) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). Each 1-mg/dl reduction in LDL-C with treatment was associated with a 0.6% relative risk reduction in cerebrovascular events (p = 0.002) and a 0.5% relative risk reduction in stroke (p = 0.041). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was similar in the 80-mg and 10-mg groups, 16 and 18 respectively, and the hemorrhagic strokes were distributed evenly across quintiles of achieved LDL-C during treatment. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with established coronary disease, treating to an LDL-cholesterol substantially below 100 mg/dl with 80 mg/day atorvastatin reduces both stroke and cerebrovascular events by an additional 20% to 25% compared with the 10 mg/day dose. An increase in hemorrhagic stroke was not seen at low LDL-C levels. (Treating to New Targets; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00327691).
-
10.
In vivo evaluation of a novel pH- and time-based multiunit colonic drug delivery system.
Bott, C, Rudolph, MW, Schneider, AR, Schirrmacher, S, Skalsky, B, Petereit, HU, Langguth, P, Dressman, JB, Stein, J
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2004;(3):347-53
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted drug delivery to the colon is important for topical treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Established targeting systems predominantly focus on either pH- or time-dependent release, or bacterial degradation. AIM: To perform a three-phase, crossover design trial evaluating a novel combined pH- and time-based multiunit delivery system. METHODS Twelve healthy male volunteers each received 200 mg of caffeine as either uncoated immediate release tablets, coated pellets with pH-dependent rapid release (EUDRAGIT FS 30D), and pellets with pH- and time-based release (inner layer EUDRAGIT RL/RS 30D; outer layer EUDRAGIT FS 30D). Orocecal transit time was measured using lactose-[13C]ureide. Serum concentrations of caffeine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS In contrast to the uncoated tablet, both coated systems reached the ileocecal region almost at the same time (3.19 +/- 0.71 and 3.33 +/- 0.81 h). Serum caffeine profiles were significantly prolonged for the pH and time delivery system compared with the pH-only based system (median tmax 12.0 vs. 5.5 h; P < 0.001). This was further reflected by a lower Cmax value and a lower area under the curve within 24 h after application. CONCLUSION Compared with the conventional delivery systems, drug release from the new dosage form may offer a new dimension for the oral treatment of mid to distal ulcerative colitis.