1.
Exploratory effects of a strong CYP3A inhibitor (ketoconazole), a strong CYP3A inducer (rifampicin), and concomitant ethanol on piragliatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in type 2 diabetic patients.
Zhi, J, Zhai, S, Georgy, A, Liang, Z, Boldrin, M
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2016;(5):548-54
Abstract
Piragliatin is a CYP3A substrate; its inactive metabolite M4, formed through cytosolic reductase, is reversibly metabolized back to piragliatin through CYP3A. The impact of concomitant CYP3A modifiers thus cannot be predicted. Drinking alcohol under fasting conditions is associated with a recognized glucose-lowering effect, which might be synergistic with piragliatin's hypoglycemic effect. Two exploratory studies were conducted to examine these potential interactions in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients: 16 completed an open-label, sequential 2-way crossover, 2-arm (randomized to ketoconazole and rifampicin) CYP3A study; another 18 participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized 3-way crossover ethanol study. Administration of piragliatin (100-mg single dose) resulted in a 32% Cmax and 44% area under the curve (AUC∞ ) increase in piragliatin exposure without affecting glucose AUC0-6h following ketoconazole (400 mg QD × 5 days); 30% Cmax and 72% AUC∞ decrease in piragliatin exposure with a 13% increase in glucose AUC0-6h following rifampicin (600 mg QD × 5 days); and, unexpectedly, a 32% Cmax and 23% AUC0-6h decrease (no change in AUC∞ ) in piragliatin exposure with a 13% increase in glucose AUC0-6h following alcohol (40-g single dose). In conclusion, a strong CYP3A modifier or concomitant alcohol could lead to a change in exposure to piragliatin with a potential alteration in glucose-lowering effect.
2.
EUS-guided ethanol versus saline solution lavage for pancreatic cysts: a randomized, double-blind study.
DeWitt, J, McGreevy, K, Schmidt, CM, Brugge, WR
Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2009;(4):710-23
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for pancreatic cysts is associated with significant morbidity. A pilot study previously demonstrated the safety of EUS-guided ethanol lavage of pancreatic cysts. OBJECTIVE To determine whether EUS-guided ethanol lavage would decrease pancreatic cyst size more than saline solution lavage. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. SETTING Two tertiary referral hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS Patients referred for EUS with a 1- to 5-cm unilocular pancreatic cyst were randomized to blinded ethanol or saline solution lavage. Three months later, the cyst diameter was remeasured by EUS, and a second unblinded ethanol lavage was performed. INTERVENTIONS EUS-guided pancreatic cyst lavage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Cyst ablation based on size changes from follow-up EUS, CT, and histology of resected specimens. RESULTS Of 58 patients randomized, 16 were excluded and 42 underwent initial ethanol (n = 25) or saline solution (n = 17) lavage. Ethanol lavage resulted in a greater mean percentage of decrease in cyst surface area (-42.9; 95% CI, -58.4 to -27.4) compared with saline solution alone (-11.4; 95% CI, -25.0 to 2.2; P = .009). Nineteen (76.0%) of 25 and 14 (82.3%) of 17 patients randomized to ethanol and saline solution, respectively, underwent a second ethanol lavage. A follow-up CT scan demonstrated resolution in 12 (33.3%) of 36 cysts. Histology of 4 resected cysts demonstrated epithelial ablation ranging from 0% (saline solution alone) to 50% to 100% (1 or 2 ethanol lavages). Complication rates were similar in all groups. LIMITATION Short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS EUS-guided ethanol lavage results in a greater decrease in pancreatic cyst size compared with saline solution lavage with a similar safety profile. Overall CT-defined complete pancreatic cyst ablation was 33.3%.
3.
Inhaled ethanolic and aqueous solutions via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler are well-tolerated in asthma patients.
Patel, KR, Pavia, D, Lowe, L, Spiteri, M
Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2006;(4):434-40
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) is a new-generation inhaler offering improved lung deposition compared with other devices. Bronchodilators administered via Respimat SMI are preserved and stabilized with benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA); both have been reported to cause paradoxical bronchoconstriction if a threshold dose is exceeded. OBJECTIVE The aim of this randomized, double-blind, three-period, crossover study was to establish that the safety of inhaled ethanolic and aqueous placebo solutions (containing BAC and EDTA) is equivalent to that of inhaled normal saline solution when administered to asthma patients via Respimat SMI. METHODS Thirty-seven asthma patients with airway hyper-reactivity were randomized to receive four actuations of each of the following three treatments via Respimat SMI, one on each of 3 study days: ethanolic placebo (12 microl 96% ethanol + 0.13 mug EDTA/actuation), aqueous placebo (12 microl water + 5.5 microg EDTA + 1.1 mug BAC/actuation), and normal saline (12 microl 0.9% sodium chloride/actuation). Pulmonary function tests were performed at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after inhalation; the primary endpoint was the lowest FEV(1) recorded between 0 and 30 min. RESULTS The mean lowest FEV(1) recorded between 0 and 30 min after inhalation minus the study day baseline was -0.090 litres for ethanolic placebo, -0.121 litres for aqueous placebo and -0.094 litres for normal saline (SEM 0.034 litres for all). The mean treatment differences were: ethanolic placebo versus normal saline 0.004 litres (90% CI -0.075-0.083 litres, p = 0.002), and aqueous placebo versus normal saline -0.028 litres (90% CI -0.107-0.052 litres, p = 0.006). Since both 90% CIs fell within the pre-determined equivalence region of +/-0.15 litres, both treatments were considered equivalent to normal saline. CONCLUSION Ethanolic and aqueous solutions administered via Respimat SMI are safe with regard to paradoxical bronchoconstriction in asthma patients with airway hyper-reactivity.