-
1.
Fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem cells in people with diabetic retinopathy: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Bonora, BM, Albiero, M, Morieri, ML, Cappellari, R, Amendolagine, FI, Mazzucato, M, Zambon, A, Iori, E, Avogaro, A, Fadini, GP
Diabetologia. 2021;(10):2334-2344
Abstract
AIM/HYPOTHESIS In two large RCTs, fenofibrate reduced the progression of diabetic retinopathy. We investigated whether fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), which have vascular properties and have been shown to protect from retinopathy. METHODS We conducted a 12 week parallel-group RCT comparing fenofibrate vs placebo. Patients with diabetic retinopathy and without other conditions that would affect HSPCs were enrolled at a tertiary diabetes outpatient clinic and randomised to receive fenofibrate or placebo based on a computer-generated sequence. Patients and study staff assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in the levels of circulating HSPCs, defined by expression of the stem cell markers CD34 and/or CD133. Secondary endpoints were the changes in endothelial progenitor cells, lipids, soluble mediators and gene expression. We used historical data on the association between HSPCs and retinopathy outcomes to estimate the effect of fenofibrate on retinopathy progression. RESULTS Forty-two participants with diabetic retinopathy were randomised and 41 completed treatment and were analysed (20 in the placebo group and 21 in the fenofibrate group). Mean age was 57.4 years, diabetes duration was 18.2 years and baseline HbA1c was 60 mmol/mol (7.6%). When compared with placebo, fenofibrate significantly increased levels of HSPCs expressing CD34 and/or CD133. CD34+ HSPCs non-significantly declined in the placebo group (mean ± SD -44.2 ± 31.6 cells/106) and significantly increased in the fenofibrate group (53.8 ± 31.1 cells/106). The placebo-subtracted increase in CD34+ HSPCs from baseline was 30% (99.3 ± 43.3 cells/106; p = 0.027) which, projected onto the relationship between HSPC levels and retinopathy outcomes, yielded an OR of retinopathy progression of 0.67 for fenofibrate vs placebo. Endothelial differentiation of CD34+ cells, estimated by the %KDR (kinase insert domain receptor) expression, was significantly reduced by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate decreased serum triacylglycerols, but the change in triacylglycerols was unrelated to the change in HSPCs. No effect was observed for endothelial progenitor cells, cytokines/chemokines (stromal-cell derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Fenofibrate increased HSPC levels in participants with diabetic retinopathy and this mechanism may explain why fenofibrate reduced retinopathy progression in previous studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927315.
-
2.
Effects of Modified Low-Density Lipoproteins and Fenofibrate on an Outer Blood-Retina Barrier Model: Implications for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Fu, D, Yu, JY, Connell, AR, Hookham, MB, McLeese, RH, Lyons, TJ
Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2020;(10):754-764
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Purpose: There is a lack of treatment for early diabetic retinopathy (DR), including blood-retina barrier (BRB) breakdown. The robust clinical benefit of fenofibrate in DR provides an opportunity to explore disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets. We have previously found that modified lipoproteins contribute to DR and that fenofibrate protects the inner BRB. We now investigate (1) whether modified lipoproteins elicit outer BRB injury and (2) whether fenofibrate may alleviate such damage. Methods: Human retinal pigment epithelium ARPE-19 cells were cultured in semipermeable transwells to establish a monolayer barrier and then exposed to heavily oxidized, glycated low-density lipoprotein (HOG-LDL, 25-300 mg/L, up to 24 h) versus native (N)-LDL. Transepithelial electric resistance (TEER) and FITC-dextran permeability were measured. The effects of fenofibrate, its active metabolite fenofibric acid, and other peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) agonists (gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, and WY14643) were evaluated, with and without the PPARα antagonist GW6471 or the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) inhibitor Compound C. Results: HOG-LDL induced concentration- and time-dependent barrier impairment, decreasing TEER and increasing dextran leakage, effects that were amplified by high glucose. Fenofibric acid, but not fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, or WY14643, attenuated barrier impairment. This effect was reversed significantly by Compound C, but not by GW6471. Conclusions: Modified lipoproteins elicited outer BRB injury in an experimental model, which was reduced by fenofibric acid through a PPARα-independent, AMPK-mediated mechanism. These findings suggest a protective role of fenofibric acid on the outer BRB in diabetic retina.
-
3.
Alterations in plasma triglycerides and ceramides: links with cardiac function in humans with type 2 diabetes.
Peterson, LR, Jiang, X, Chen, L, Goldberg, AC, Farmer, MS, Ory, DS, Schaffer, JE
Journal of lipid research. 2020;(7):1065-1074
Abstract
Cardiac dysfunction in T2D is associated with excessive FA uptake, oxidation, and generation of toxic lipid species by the heart. It is not known whether decreasing lipid delivery to the heart can effect improvement in cardiac function in humans with T2D. Thus, our objective was to test the hypothesis that lowering lipid delivery to the heart would result in evidence of decreased "lipotoxicity," improved cardiac function, and salutary effects on plasma biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. Thus, we performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled parallel design study of the effects of 12 weeks of fenofibrate-induced lipid lowering on cardiac function, inflammation, and oxidation biomarkers, and on the ratio of two plasma ceramides, Cer d18:1 (4E) (1OH, 3OH)/24:0 and Cer d18:1 (4E) (1OH, 3OH)/16:0 (i.e., "C24:0/C16:0"), which is associated with decreased risk of cardiac dysfunction and heart failure. Fenofibrate lowered plasma TG and cholesterol but did not improve heart systolic or diastolic function. Fenofibrate treatment lowered the plasma C24:0/C16:0 ceramide ratio and minimally altered oxidative stress markers but did not alter measures of inflammation. Overall, plasma TG lowering correlated with improvement of cardiac relaxation (diastolic function) as measured by tissue Doppler-derived parameter e'. Moreover, lowering the plasma C24:0/C16:0 ceramide ratio was correlated with worse diastolic function. These findings indicate that fenofibrate treatment per se is not sufficient to effect changes in cardiac function; however, decreases in plasma TG may be linked to improved diastolic function. In contrast, decreases in plasma C24:0/C16:0 are linked with worsening cardiac function.
-
4.
Design and rationale of a randomized control trial testing the effectiveness of combined therapy with STAtin plus FENOfibrate and statin alone in non-diabetic, combined dyslipidemia patients with non-intervened intermediate coronary artery disease - STAFENO study.
Kwon, TG, Jang, AY, Kim, SW, Hong, YJ, Bae, JH, Lee, SY, Kim, SH, Han, SH
Trials. 2020;(1):353
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the chronicled success of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)-lowering statin therapy, substantial residual cardiovascular (CV) disease risk remains a problem worldwide, highlighting the need to for combination therapies targeting non-LDLc factors, such as with fenofibrate. METHODS/DESIGN The STAFENO trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center trial to compare the effect of statin plus fenofibrate with statin alone on the reduction and stabilization of plaque in non-diabetic, combined dyslipidemia patients with non-intervened, intermediate coronary artery disease (CAD) using virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound at 12 months. A total of 106 eligible patients are planned to be randomized to receive either a combination therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg plus fenofibrate 160 mg/day) or monotherapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg/day) for 12 months. The primary endpoint of this study is the percentage change in the necrotic core volume. Secondary endpoints include changes in tissue characteristics and 1-year major CV events, including all-cause mortality, CV mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization of the intervened and non-intervened lesions. DISCUSSION The STAFENO trial will address whether combination treatment of statin and fenofibrate has an additive beneficial effect compared to statin alone on the reduction and stabilization of plaque and CV events in non-diabetic, combined dyslipidemia patients with non-intervened intermediate CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02232360. Registered 9 February 2014. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0004ULE&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00023SZ&ts=2&cx=juppd2.
-
5.
Efficacy and Tolerability of Pitavastatin Versus Pitavastatin/Fenofibrate in High-risk Korean Patients with Mixed Dyslipidemia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Parallel, Therapeutic Confirmatory Clinical Trial.
Ihm, SH, Chung, WB, Lee, JM, Hwang, BH, Yoo, KD, Her, SH, Song, WH, Chae, IH, Park, TH, Kim, JH, et al
Clinical therapeutics. 2020;(10):2021-2035.e3
Abstract
PURPOSE Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins are known to effectively reduce not only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level but also death and nonfatal myocardial infarction due to coronary heart disease. The risk for CVD from atherogenic dyslipidemia persists when elevated triglyceride (TG) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are not controlled with statin therapy. Therefore, statin/fenofibrate combination therapy is more effective in reducing CVD risk. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and a high risk for CVD. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, therapeutic-confirmatory clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combination therapy with pitavastatin/fenofibrate 2/160 mg in Korean patients with a high risk for CVD and a controlled LDL-C level (<100 mg/dL) and a TG level of 150-500 mg/dL after a run-in period with pitavastatin 2 mg alone. In the 8-week main study, 347 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive pitavastatin 2 mg with or without fenofibrate 160 mg after a run-in period. In the extension study, patients with controlled LDL-C and non-HDL-C (<130 mg/dL) levels were included after the completion of the main study. All participants in the extension study received the pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy for 16 weeks for the assessment of the tolerability of long-term treatment. FINDINGS The difference in the mean percentage change in non-HDL-C from baseline to week 8 between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups was -12.45% (95% CI, -17.18 to -7.72), and the combination therapy was associated with a greater reduction in non-HDL-C. The changes in lipid profile, including apolipoproteins, fibrinogen, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein from baseline to weeks 4 and 8 were statistically significant with combination therapy compared to monotherapy at all time points. Furthermore, the rates of achievement of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B targets at week 8 in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups were 88.30% versus 77.98% (P = 0.0110) and 78.94% versus 68.45% (P = 0.0021), respectively. The combination therapy was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of statin monotherapy. IMPLICATIONS In these Korean patients with mixed dyslipidemia and a high risk for CVD, combination therapy with pitavastatin/fenofibrate was associated with a greater reduction in non-HDL-C compared with that with pitavastatin monotherapy, and a significantly improvement in other lipid levels. Moreover, the combination therapy was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of statin monotherapy. Therefore, pitavastatin/fenofibrate combination therapy could be effective and well tolerated in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03618797.
-
6.
Pemafibrate Tends to have Better Efficacy in Treating Dyslipidemia than Fenofibrate.
Wang, H, Li, H, Zhou, Y, Liu, J, Wang, F, Zhao, Q
Current pharmaceutical design. 2019;(44):4725-4734
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the efficacy of pemafibrate (PF) and fenofibrate (FF) in treating dyslipidemia. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed on the public database to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared the effects of PF and FF treatment in lipid parameters among patients with dyslipidemia. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for continuous outcomes, whereas odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS Three RCTs were included with a total of 744 patients (PF=547 and FF=197). Compared with the FF group (100mg/day), PF group (0.05 to 0.4mg/day) had a better effect on reducing triglycerides (TGs) (MD, -8.66; 95%CI, -10.91 to -6.41), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C, MD, -12.19; 95%CI, -15.37 to - 9.01), remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (MD, -13.16; 95%CI, -17.62 to -8.69), apolipoprotein-B48 (ApoB48, MD, -12.74; 95%CI, -17.71 to -7.76) and ApoCIII (MD, -6.25; 95%CI, -11.85 to -0.64). Although a slightly LDL-Cincreasing effect was found in PF-treated group (MD, 3.10; 95%CI, -0.12 to 6.09), the levels of HDL-C (MD, 3.59; 95%CI, 1.65 to 5.53) and ApoAI (MD, 1.60; 95%CI, 0.38 to 2.82) were significantly increased in the PF group. However, no significant difference was found in the level of total cholesterol (MD, 0.01; 95%CI, -1.37 to - 1.39), non-HDL-C (MD, -0.06; 95%CI, -1.75 to 1.63), ApoB (MD, 0.39; 95%CI, -1.37 to 2.15) and ApoAII (MD, 3.31; 95%CI, -1.66 to 8.29) between the two groups. In addition, the incidence of total adverse events (OR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.53 to 0.86) and adverse drug reactions (OR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.24 to 0.54) was lower in the PF group than that in the FF group. CONCLUSIONS Pemafibrate tends to have better efficacy in treating dyslipidemia than fenofibrate.
-
7.
Fenofibrate monotherapy-induced rhabdomyolysis in a patient with hypothyroidism: A rare case report and literature review.
Wang, D, Wang, Y
Medicine. 2018;(14):e0318
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative indicated for use in hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia treatment among adults. Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome characterized by muscle necrosis and the release of intracellular muscle contents into the systemic circulation, which is the most serious and fatal side effect of fenofibrate. The objective of this paper is to discuss fatal side effect of fenofibrate and keep safe medication. PATIENT CONCERNS A patient with hypothyroidism who presented with rhabdomyolysis during fenofibrate monotherapy for hypertriglyceridemia was reported. DIAGNOSES Fenofibrate Monotherapy Induced Rhabdomyolysis. INTERVENTIONS Fenofibrate was stopped. Adequate fluid resuscitation, mannitol diuresis, myocardium protection, hepatoprotection and urine alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate were performed. OUTCOMES Blood tests were normal and the patient was good and discharged 2 weeks later. LESSONS 13 cases associated with fenofibrate monotherapy-induced rhabdomyolysis were reviewed, which had been published in the English literature. The severity of fenofibrate muscle toxicity may be the result of the combination of two rhabdomyolysis enhancers, such as hypothyroidism and female gender. To avoid it, strict clinical and laboratory monitoring should be maintained, particularly hypothyroidism. Patients should be informed of possible potentially irreversible effects after taking fibrates.
-
8.
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate in Patients with High Triglyceride and Low HDL Cholesterol Levels: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.
Arai, H, Yamashita, S, Yokote, K, Araki, E, Suganami, H, Ishibashi, S, ,
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2018;(6):521-538
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: To verify the superiority of pemafibrate over placebo and the non-inferiority of pemafibrate to the maximum dose of fenofibrate for determining the percent change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels and to investigate safety by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS This phase III, placebo/active drug-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison study enrolled patients with high TG and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, or 0.4 mg/day; or fenofibrate 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day for 12 weeks. RESULTS Among 526 randomized patients, 489 completed the study, with drop-out rates of 0%, 6.7%, 5.5%, 5.9%, 8.2%, and 10.7% in the placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, and 0.4 mg/day; and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day groups. The study showed the non-inferiority of pemafibrate 0.4 mg/day and 0.2 mg/day to fenofibrate 200 mg/day as well the non-inferiority and superiority of all pemafibrate doses to fenofibrate 100 mg/day for reducing TG levels. No dose-dependent increase in the incidence of AEs or ADRs was observed among the pemafibrate dose groups. The incidence of AEs and ADRs for all pemafibrate doses was similar to that for placebo and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and significantly lower than that for fenofibrate 200 mg/day (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The favorable safety profile of pemafibrate, with fewer adverse effects on kidney/liver-related laboratory tests and fewer AEs/ADRs, including those leading to treatment discontinuation, over fenofibrate 200 mg/day may justify the use of this novel and potent treatment option for reducing TG levels in a broader range of patients.
-
9.
A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model of fenofibrate for explaining increased drug absorption after food consumption.
Back, HM, Song, B, Pradhan, S, Chae, JW, Han, N, Kang, W, Chang, MJ, Zheng, J, Kwon, KI, Karlsson, MO, et al
BMC pharmacology & toxicology. 2018;(1):4
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral administration of drugs is convenient and shows good compliance but it can be affected by many factors in the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Consumption of food is one of the major factors affecting the GI system and consequently the absorption of drugs. The aim of this study was to develop a mechanistic GI absorption model for explaining the effect of food on fenofibrate pharmacokinetics (PK), focusing on the food type and calorie content. METHODS Clinical data from a fenofibrate PK study involving three different conditions (fasting, standard meals and high-fat meals) were used. The model was developed by nonlinear mixed effect modeling method. Both linear and nonlinear effects were evaluated to explain the impact of food intake on drug absorption. Similarly, to explain changes in gastric emptying time for the drug due to food effects was evaluated. RESULTS The gastric emptying rate increased by 61.7% during the first 6.94 h after food consumption. Increased calories in the duodenum increased the absorption rate constant of the drug in fed conditions (standard meal = 16.5%, high-fat meal = 21.8%) compared with fasted condition. The final model displayed good prediction power and precision. CONCLUSIONS A mechanistic GI absorption model for quantitatively evaluating the effects of food on fenofibrate absorption was successfully developed, and acceptable parameters were obtained. The mechanism-based PK model of fenofibrate can quantify the effects of food on drug absorption by food type and calorie content.
-
10.
Predicting the Effect of Fenofibrate on Cardiovascular Risk for Individual Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Koopal, C, Visseren, FLJ, Westerink, J, van der Graaf, Y, Ginsberg, HN, Keech, AC
Diabetes care. 2018;(6):1244-1250
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In clinical trials, treatment with fenofibrate did not reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, treatment effects reported by trials comprise patients who respond poorly and patients who respond well to fenofibrate. Our aim was to use statistical modeling to estimate the expected treatment effect of fenofibrate for individual patients with T2DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS To estimate individual risk, the FIELD risk model, with 5-year MCVE as primary outcome, was externally validated in T2DM patients from ACCORD and the SMART observational cohort. Fenofibrate treatment effect was estimated in 17,142 T2DM patients from FIELD, ACCORD, and SMART. Individual treatment effect, expressed as absolute risk reduction (ARR), is the difference between treated and untreated MCVE risk. Results were stratified for patients with and without dyslipidemia (i.e., high triglycerides and low LDL cholesterol). RESULTS External validation of the FIELD risk model showed good calibration and moderate discrimination in ACCORD (C-statistic 0.67 [95% CI 0.65-0.69]) and SMART (C-statistic 0.66 [95% CI 0.63-0.69]). Median 5-year MCVE risk in all three studies combined was 6.7% (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-11.7) in patients without (N = 13,224) and 9.4% (IQR 5.4-16.1%) in patients with (N = 3,918) dyslipidemia. The median ARR was 2.15% (IQR 1.23-3.68) in patients with dyslipidemia, corresponding with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 47, and 0.22% (IQR 0.13-0.38) in patients without dyslipidemia (NNT 455). CONCLUSIONS In individual patients with T2DM, there is a wide range of absolute treatment effect of fenofibrate, and overall the fenofibrate treatment effect was larger in patients with dyslipidemia. The method of individualized treatment effect prediction of fenofibrate on MCVE risk reduction in T2DM can be used to guide clinical decision making.