-
1.
Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wadden, TA, Bailey, TS, Billings, LK, Davies, M, Frias, JP, Koroleva, A, Lingvay, I, O'Neil, PM, Rubino, DM, Skovgaard, D, et al
JAMA. 2021;(14):1403-1413
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Weight loss improves cardiometabolic risk factors in people with overweight or obesity. Intensive lifestyle intervention and pharmacotherapy are the most effective noninvasive weight loss approaches. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg vs placebo for weight management as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy with initial low-calorie diet in adults with overweight or obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 68-week, phase 3a study (STEP 3) conducted at 41 sites in the US from August 2018 to April 2020 in adults without diabetes (N = 611) and with either overweight (body mass index ≥27) plus at least 1 comorbidity or obesity (body mass index ≥30). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized (2:1) to semaglutide, 2.4 mg (n = 407) or placebo (n = 204), both combined with a low-calorie diet for the first 8 weeks and intensive behavioral therapy (ie, 30 counseling visits) during 68 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The co-primary end points were percentage change in body weight and the loss of 5% or more of baseline weight by week 68. Confirmatory secondary end points included losses of at least 10% or 15% of baseline weight. RESULTS Of 611 randomized participants (495 women [81.0%], mean age 46 years [SD, 13], body weight 105.8 kg [SD, 22.9], and body mass index 38.0 [SD, 6.7]), 567 (92.8%) completed the trial, and 505 (82.7%) were receiving treatment at trial end. At week 68, the estimated mean body weight change from baseline was -16.0% for semaglutide vs -5.7% for placebo (difference, -10.3 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -8.6]; P < .001). More participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo lost at least 5% of baseline body weight (86.6% vs 47.6%, respectively; P < .001). A higher proportion of participants in the semaglutide vs placebo group achieved weight losses of at least 10% or 15% (75.3% vs 27.0% and 55.8% vs 13.2%, respectively; P < .001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with semaglutide (82.8%) vs placebo (63.2%). Treatment was discontinued owing to these events in 3.4% of semaglutide participants vs 0% of placebo participants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with overweight or obesity, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide compared with placebo, used as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy and initial low-calorie diet, resulted in significantly greater weight loss during 68 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability of these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611582.
-
2.
Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rubino, D, Abrahamsson, N, Davies, M, Hesse, D, Greenway, FL, Jensen, C, Lingvay, I, Mosenzon, O, Rosenstock, J, Rubio, MA, et al
JAMA. 2021;(14):1414-1425
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effect of continuing vs withdrawing treatment with semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, on weight loss maintenance in people with overweight or obesity is unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare continued once-weekly treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, with switch to placebo for weight maintenance (both with lifestyle intervention) in adults with overweight or obesity after a 20-week run-in with subcutaneous semaglutide titrated to 2.4 mg weekly. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, 68-week phase 3a withdrawal study conducted at 73 sites in 10 countries from June 2018 to March 2020 in adults with body mass index of at least 30 (or ≥27 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity) and without diabetes. INTERVENTIONS A total of 902 participants received once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide during run-in. After 20 weeks (16 weeks of dose escalation; 4 weeks of maintenance dose), 803 participants (89.0%) who reached the 2.4-mg/wk semaglutide maintenance dose were randomized (2:1) to 48 weeks of continued subcutaneous semaglutide (n = 535) or switched to placebo (n = 268), plus lifestyle intervention in both groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was percent change in body weight from week 20 to week 68; confirmatory secondary end points were changes in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and physical functioning (assessed using the Short Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey, Acute Version [SF-36]). RESULTS Among 803 study participants who completed the 20-week run-in period (with a mean weight loss of 10.6%) and were randomized (mean age, 46 [SD, 12] years; 634 [79%] women; mean body weight, 107.2 kg [SD, 22.7 kg]), 787 participants (98.0%) completed the trial and 741 (92.3%) completed treatment. With continued semaglutide, mean body weight change from week 20 to week 68 was -7.9% vs +6.9% with the switch to placebo (difference, -14.8 [95% CI, -16.0 to -13.5] percentage points; P < .001). Waist circumference (-9.7 cm [95% CI, -10.9 to -8.5 cm]), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.8 to -2.0 mm Hg]), and SF-36 physical functioning score (2.5 [95% CI, 1.6-3.3]) also improved with continued subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo (all P < .001). Gastrointestinal events were reported in 49.1% of participants who continued subcutaneous semaglutide vs 26.1% with placebo; similar proportions discontinued treatment because of adverse events with continued semaglutide (2.4%) and placebo (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with overweight or obesity who completed a 20-week run-in period with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg once weekly, maintaining treatment with semaglutide compared with switching to placebo resulted in continued weight loss over the following 48 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548987.
-
3.
The Metabolic Syndrome: Emerging Novel Insights Regarding the Relationship between the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance and other Key Predictive Markers in Young Adults of Western Algeria.
Belhayara, MI, Mellouk, Z, Hamdaoui, MS, Bachaoui, M, Kheroua, O, Malaisse, WJ
Nutrients. 2020;(3)
Abstract
Several biological markers have been identified as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and are associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). This study provides a factual information on promising biomarkers that are associated with MetS and can aid in early detection and management of MetS in young adults of Western Algeria. We studied a total of one hundred subjects aged between thirty and forty years with MetS, in which anthropometric measurements, insulin resistance, C peptide and HbA1c, lipid profile, circulating adipokines and glucagon-like peptide-1 were measured by suitable methods, in comparison to two groups of control. MetS is closely linked to altered glucose homeostasis, the plasma insulin/glucose ratio; i.e., the insulinogenic index helps to estimate the level of insulin secretion and also for assessing β-cell function. The correlation between homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and HbA1c, body mass index or plasma triglycerides yielded positive and significant values. Biomarkers with a known and predictable association with MetS can provide a means to detect those at risk and intervene as needed. This could significantly decrease the burden complications impose on patients and the healthcare system.
-
4.
Effect of Additional Oral Semaglutide vs Sitagliptin on Glycated Hemoglobin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled With Metformin Alone or With Sulfonylurea: The PIONEER 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rosenstock, J, Allison, D, Birkenfeld, AL, Blicher, TM, Deenadayalan, S, Jacobsen, JB, Serusclat, P, Violante, R, Watada, H, Davies, M, et al
JAMA. 2019;(15):1466-1480
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Phase 3 trials have not compared oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, with other classes of glucose-lowering therapy. OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy and assess long-term adverse event profiles of once-daily oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin, 100 mg added on to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, in patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3a trial conducted at 206 sites in 14 countries over 78 weeks from February 2016 to March 2018. Of 2463 patients screened, 1864 adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea were randomized. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral semaglutide, 3 mg (n = 466), 7 mg (n = 466), or 14 mg (n = 465), or sitagliptin, 100 mg (n = 467). Semaglutide was initiated at 3 mg/d and escalated every 4 weeks, first to 7 mg/d then to 14 mg/d, until the randomized dosage was achieved. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the key secondary end point was change in body weight, both from baseline to week 26. Both were assessed at weeks 52 and 78 as additional secondary end points. End points were tested for noninferiority with respect to HbA1c (noninferiority margin, 0.3%) prior to testing for superiority of HbA1c and body weight. RESULTS Among 1864 patients randomized (mean age, 58 [SD, 10] years; mean baseline HbA1c, 8.3% [SD, 0.9%]; mean body mass index, 32.5 [SD, 6.4]; n=879 [47.2%] women), 1758 (94.3%) completed the trial and 298 prematurely discontinued treatment (16.7% for semaglutide, 3 mg/d; 15.0% for semaglutide, 7 mg/d; 19.1% for semaglutide, 14 mg/d; and 13.1% for sitagliptin). Semaglutide, 7 and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, significantly reduced HbA1c (differences, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%] and -0.5% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%], respectively; P < .001 for both) and body weight (differences, -1.6 kg [95% CI, -2.0 to -1.1 kg] and -2.5 kg [95% CI, -3.0 to -2.0 kg], respectively; P < .001 for both) from baseline to week 26. Noninferiority of semaglutide, 3 mg/d, with respect to HbA1c was not demonstrated. Week 78 reductions in both end points were statistically significantly greater with semaglutide, 14 mg/d, vs sitagliptin. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea, oral semaglutide, 7 mg/d and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c over 26 weeks, but there was no significant benefit with the 3-mg/d dosage. Further research is needed to assess effectiveness in a clinical setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607865.
-
5.
Interaction of GLP-1 and Ghrelin on Glucose Tolerance in Healthy Humans.
Page, LC, Gastaldelli, A, Gray, SM, D'Alessio, DA, Tong, J
Diabetes. 2018;(10):1976-1985
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Emerging evidence supports the importance of ghrelin to defend against starvation-induced hypoglycemia. This effect may be mediated by inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion as well as reduced insulin sensitivity. However, administration of ghrelin during meal consumption also stimulates the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), an incretin important in nutrient disposition. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction between ghrelin and GLP-1 on parameters of glucose tolerance following a mixed-nutrient meal. Fifteen healthy men and women completed the study. Each consumed a standard meal on four separate occasions with a superimposed infusion of 1) saline, 2) ghrelin, 3) the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39) (Ex9), or 4) combined ghrelin and Ex9. Similar to previous studies, infusion of ghrelin caused glucose intolerance, whereas Ex9 had a minimal effect. However, combined ghrelin and Ex9 resulted in greater postprandial glycemia than either alone, and this effect was associated with impaired β-cell function and decreased glucose clearance. These findings suggest that in the fed state, stimulation of GLP-1 mitigates some of the effect of ghrelin on glucose tolerance. This novel interaction between gastrointestinal hormones suggests a system that balances insulin secretion and glucose disposal in the fed and fasting states.
-
6.
The effects of short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment on fasting glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
Huang, X, Li, S, Yang, M, Fu, X, Li, H, Yan, T, Liu, Y, Chen, L, Lan, L, Li, L, et al
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2018;:246-252
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early short-term intensive insulin therapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients shows benefit in glycemic control and β-cell function. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) plays an important role in glucose metabolism and development of type 2 diabetes. We did a study to observe the changes of GLP-1 and β-cell function after short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment. METHODS A total of 66 subjects were enrolled, including 30 normal glucose tolerance controls (NGT) and 36 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes between October 2015 and July 2016. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, and GLP-1 were measured in each subject. The patients underwent CSII treatment for 2 weeks, and then FBG, insulin, and GLP-1 were measured. HOMA-IR and HOMA-B were then calculated. RESULTS All patients achieved target glycemic control in two weeks. HOMA-IR and HOMA-B improved significantly after intensive interventions (p < 0.05). The GLP-1 concentration increased significantly in patients after treatment (p < 0.05). When grouped according to bodyweight and age in all patients, the HOMA-IR changed significantly in overweight and old age subgroups, the HOMA-B increased significantly in normal weight, overweight and middle age subgroups, and the GLP-1 concentration also increased significantly in overweight and middle age subgroups respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Short-term CSII treatment can obtain glycemic control target and recover β-cell function and GLP-1 secretion in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. The overweight and middle-aged patients may get more benefit from this treatment.
-
7.
GLP-1 and GLP-2 Levels are Correlated with Satiety Regulation After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Results of an Exploratory Prospective Study.
Cazzo, E, Pareja, JC, Chaim, EA, Geloneze, B, Barreto, MR, Magro, DO
Obesity surgery. 2017;(3):703-708
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in satiety regulation are known to play a pivotal role in the weight loss effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and the mechanisms by which these changes occur are not entirely known. There are previous reports of the influence of GLP-1 to cause enhancement of satiation, but in regard to GLP-2, it remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between the levels of GLP-1 and GLP-2 and satiety regulation following RYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS An exploratory prospective cohort study was made which enrolled 11 individuals who underwent RYGB and were followed-up for 12 months. GLP-1 and GLP-2 levels were determined before and after surgery and correlated with visual analogue scale scores for satiety. RESULTS GLP-2 AUC after standard meal tolerance test (MTT) was significantly higher following surgery (945.3 ± 449.1 versus 1787.9 ± 602.7; p = 0.0037). Postoperatively, GLP-1 AUC presented a significant negative correlation with the mean score obtained in the first question of the visual analogue scale ("how hungry do you feel?") (p = 0.008); GLP-2 AUC presented a significant positive correlation with the mean score of the third ("how full do you feel?") question, and a significant positive correlation with the mean score achieved in the fourth question ("how much do you think you can eat?"), (p = 0.005 and p = 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSION GLP-1 and GLP-2 were significantly correlated with satiety assessment within this sample. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings.
-
8.
Feedback suppression of meal-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion mediated through elevations in intact GLP-1 caused by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition: a randomized, prospective comparison of sitagliptin and vildagliptin treatment.
Baranov, O, Kahle, M, Deacon, CF, Holst, JJ, Nauck, MA
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2016;(11):1100-1109
Abstract
AIM: To compare directly the clinical effects of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a special emphasis on incretin hormones and L-cell feedback inhibition induced by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibition. METHODS A total of 24 patients (12 on a diet/exercise regimen, 12 on metformin) were treated, in randomized order, for 7-9 days, with either vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily = 100 mg/d), sitagliptin (100 mg once daily in those on diet, 50 mg twice daily in those on metformin treatment = 100 mg/d) or placebo (twice daily). A mixed-meal test was performed. RESULTS Intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were doubled by both DPP-4 inhibitors. Meal-related total GLP-1 responses were reduced by vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment alike in the majority of patients (vildagliptin: p = 0.0005; sitagliptin: p = 0.019), but with substantial inter-individual variation. L-cell feedback appeared to be more pronounced in those whose intact GLP-1 relative to total GLP-1 increased more, and who had greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose after DPP-4 inhibition. K-cell feedback inhibition overall was not significant. There were no differences in any of the clinical variables (glycaemia, insulin and glucagon secretory responses) between vildagliptin and sitagliptin treatment. CONCLUSIONS Vildagliptin and sitagliptin affected incretin hormones, glucose concentrations, insulin and glucagon secretion in a similar manner. Inter-individual variations in L-cell feedback inhibition may indicate heterogeneity in the clinical response to DPP-4 inhibition.
-
9.
Improving Effect of the Acute Administration of Dietary Fiber-Enriched Cereals on Blood Glucose Levels and Gut Hormone Secretion.
Kim, EK, Oh, TJ, Kim, LK, Cho, YM
Journal of Korean medical science. 2016;(2):222-30
Abstract
Dietary fiber improves hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes through its physicochemical properties and possible modulation of gut hormone secretion, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). We assessed the effect of dietary fiber-enriched cereal flakes (DC) on postprandial hyperglycemia and gut hormone secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Thirteen participants ate isocaloric meals based on either DC or conventional cereal flakes (CC) in a crossover design. DC or CC was provided for dinner, night snack on day 1 and breakfast on day 2, followed by a high-fat lunch. On day 2, the levels of plasma glucose, GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and insulin were measured. Compared to CC, DC intake exhibited a lower post-breakfast 2-hours glucose level (198.5±12.8 vs. 245.9±15.2 mg/dL, P<0.05) and a lower incremental peak of glucose from baseline (101.8±9.1 vs. 140.3±14.3 mg/dL, P<0.001). The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of glucose after breakfast was lower with DC than with CC (P<0.001). However, there were no differences in the plasma insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP levels. In conclusion, acute administration of DC attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia without any significant change in the representative glucose-regulating hormones in patients with type 2 diabetes (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT 01997281).
-
10.
Minor Contribution of Endogenous GLP-1 and GLP-2 to Postprandial Lipemia in Obese Men.
Matikainen, N, Björnson, E, Söderlund, S, Borén, C, Eliasson, B, Pietiläinen, KH, Bogl, LH, Hakkarainen, A, Lundbom, N, Rivellese, A, et al
PloS one. 2016;(1):e0145890
Abstract
CONTEXT Glucose and lipids stimulate the gut-hormones glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, GLP-2 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) but the effect of these on human postprandial lipid metabolism is not fully clarified. OBJECTIVE To explore the responses of GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP after a fat-rich meal compared to the same responses after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to investigate possible relationships between incretin response and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) response to a fat-rich meal. DESIGN Glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP were measured after an OGTT and after a fat-rich meal in 65 healthy obese (BMI 26.5-40.2 kg/m(2)) male subjects. Triglycerides (TG), apoB48 and apoB100 in TG-rich lipoproteins (chylomicrons, VLDL1 and VLDL2) were measured after the fat-rich meal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postprandial responses (area under the curve, AUC) for glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GLP-2, GIP in plasma, and TG, apoB48 and apoB100 in plasma and TG-rich lipoproteins. RESULTS The GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP responses after the fat-rich meal and after the OGTT correlated strongly (r = 0.73, p<0.0001; r = 0.46, p<0.001 and r = 0.69, p<0.001, respectively). Glucose and insulin AUCs were lower, but the AUCs for GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP were significantly higher after the fat-rich meal than after the OGTT. The peak value for all hormones appeared at 120 minutes after the fat-rich meal, compared to 30 minutes after the OGTT. After the fat-rich meal, the AUCs for GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP correlated significantly with plasma TG- and apoB48 AUCs but the contribution was very modest. CONCLUSIONS In obese males, GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP responses to a fat-rich meal are greater than following an OGTT. However, the most important explanatory variable for postprandial TG excursion was fasting triglycerides. The contribution of endogenous GLP-1, GLP-2 and GIP to explaining the variance in postprandial TG excursion was minor.