-
1.
The effect of synbiotics in improving Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pourmasoumi, M, Najafgholizadeh, A, Hadi, A, Mansour-Ghanaei, F, Joukar, F
Complementary therapies in medicine. 2019;:36-43
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori is a common human infection, presenting in half of the world's population. The failure of the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate necessitates the assessment of new options. The aim of the present meta-analysis was therefore to assess the role of synbiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge up to June 2018 to identify all randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of synbiotics on the treatment of Helicobacter pylori. A random-effects model was applied for pooling analysis to compensate for the heterogeneity of included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied to assess potential bias risks. RESULTS A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were found which assessed the effect of synbiotics on Helicobacter pylori eradication rate. The pooled effect size of the intention-to-treat showed that synbiotics can improve eradication rate (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15-1.43; I2 = 0%). Also, common adverse events resulting from antibiotics therapy were significantly reduced by adding synbiotics to conventional antibiotics treatments (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.90; I2 = 36%). However, no difference in eradication rate was observed from per-protocol treatment between intervention and control groups (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.69-1.16; I2 = 88%). CONCLUSION The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggested synbiotics might improve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates, and reduce adverse effects. However, these findings assessed a low number of studies, and further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
-
2.
Association Between Helicobacter pylori Exposure and Decreased Odds of Eosinophilic Esophagitis-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Shah, SC, Tepler, A, Peek, RM, Colombel, JF, Hirano, I, Narula, N
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2019;(11):2185-2198.e3
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Previous or current infection with Helicobacter pylori (exposure) has been reported to protect against eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), perhaps owing to H pylori-induced immunomodulation. However, findings vary. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies to define the association between H pylori exposure and EoE more clearly. METHODS We searched 4 large databases to identify comparative clinical studies that included sufficient detail to determine the odds or risk of EoE (primary outcome) or esophageal eosinophilia (secondary outcome) among individuals exposed to H pylori (exposed) vs individuals who were tested and found to be unexposed. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were planned a priori. Studies were evaluated for quality, risk of bias, publication bias, and heterogeneity. RESULTS We analyzed 11 observational studies comprising data on 377,795 individuals worldwide. H pylori exposure vs nonexposure was associated with a 37% reduction in odds of EoE (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78) and a 38% reduction in odds of esophageal eosinophilia (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76). Fewer prospective studies found a significant association between H pylori exposure and EoE (P = .06) than retrospective studies. Effect estimates were not affected by study location, whether the studies were performed in pediatric or adult populations, time period (before vs after 2007), or prevalence of H pylori in the study population. CONCLUSIONS In a comprehensive meta-analysis, we found evidence for a significant association between H pylori exposure and reduced odds of EoE. Studies are needed to determine the mechanisms of this association.
-
3.
Systematic review with meta-analysis: association between Helicobacter pylori CagA seropositivity and odds of inflammatory bowel disease.
Tepler, A, Narula, N, Peek, RM, Patel, A, Edelson, C, Colombel, JF, Shah, SC
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2019;(2):121-131
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accumulating data support a protective role of Helicobacter pylori against inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which might be mediated by strain-specific constituents, specifically cagA expression. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to more clearly define the association between CagA seropositivity and IBD. METHODS We identified comparative studies that included sufficient detail to determine the odds or risk of IBD, Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) amongst individuals with vs without evidence of cagA expression (eg CagA seropositivity). Estimates were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS Three clinical studies met inclusion criteria. cagA expression was represented by CagA seropositivity in all studies. Compared to CagA seronegativity overall, CagA seropositivity was associated with lower odds of IBD (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.44) and CD (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.17-0.38), and statistically nonsignificant lower odds for UC (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.35-1.32). Similarly, compared to H pylori non-exposed individuals, H pylori exposed, CagA seropositive individuals had lower odds of IBD (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.16-0.41) and CD (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.35), but not UC (OR 0.66, 0.34-1.27). However, there was no significant difference in the odds of IBD, CD or UC between H pylori exposed, CagA seronegative and H pylori non-exposed individuals. CONCLUSION We found evidence for a significant association between CagA seropositive H pylori exposure and reduced odds of IBD, particularly CD, but not for CagA seronegative H pylori exposure. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and define underlying mechanisms.
-
4.
High prevalence of clarithromycin resistance and effect on Helicobacter pylori eradication in a population from Santiago, Chile: cohort study and meta-analysis.
Arenas, A, Serrano, C, Quiñones, L, Harris, P, Sandoval, M, Lavanderos, M, Sepúlveda, R, Maquilón, S, Echeverría, A, Ríos, C, et al
Scientific reports. 2019;(1):20070
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication using standard triple therapy (STT) with proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin (CLA) has been the standard in Latin America. However, CLA resistance is a rising problem affecting eradication rates. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19, a PPI metabolizer may also affect eradication. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of clarithromycin resistance on H. pylori eradication in a population from Santiago, and to establish the pooled clarithromycin resistance in Santiago, Chile. Symptomatic adult patients attending a tertiary hospital in Santiago were recruited for this study. CLA resistance and the polymorphisms of CYP2C19 were determined on DNA extracted from gastric biopsies, using PCR. The STT was indicated for 14 days and eradication was determined by a urea breath test 4-6 weeks after therapy. A meta-analysis of CLA resistance studies among adult residents in Santiago was performed. Seventy-three out of 121 consecutive patients had positive rapid urease test (RUT) and received STT. Sixty-nine patients (95%) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rate was 63% and the prevalence of CLA resistance was 26%. According to the CYP2C19 polymorphisms, 79.5% of the RUT-positive patients were extensive metabolizers. Multivariable analyses showed that only CLA resistance was significantly and inversely associated with failure of eradication (OR: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.04-0.49). A meta-analysis of two previous studies and our sample set (combined n = 194) yielded to a pooled prevalence of CLA resistance of 31.3% (95% CI 23.9-38.7). Our study shows that CLA resistance is associated with failure of H. pylori eradication. Given the high pooled prevalence of CLA resistance, consideration of CLA free therapies in Santiago is warranted. We could recommend bismuth quadruple therapy or high-dose dual therapy, according to bismuth availability. Further studies need to evaluate the best therapy.
-
5.
Efficacy and safety of Jianzhong decoction in treating peptic ulcers: a meta-analysis of 58 randomised controlled trials with 5192 patients.
Sun, Y, Zhang, J, Chen, Y
BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2017;(1):215
Abstract
BACKGROUND Jianzhong decoction is widely used to treat peptic ulcers; however, due to lack of systematic evaluations, its clinical efficacy remains controversial. We performed meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jianzhong decoction in treating peptic ulcers. METHODS Studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chongqing VIP, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), and references cited in related studies/reviews. Extracted data included the total effective rate, helicobacter pylori eradication rates, recurrence rate, and adverse reaction rate. Fifty-eight randomised controlled trials involving 5192 patients were included in the final analysis. RESULTS Results showed that Jianzhong decoction therapy was more effective than conventional Western medicine therapy (total effective rate, odds ratio [OR] = 4.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.51-5.23, P = 0.000; helicobacter pylori eradication rates, OR =2.10, 95% CI: 1.69-2.61, P = 0.000; recurrence rate, OR =0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.29, P = 0.000; and adverse reaction rate, OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.33, P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS Jianzhong decoction increased the total effective rate and helicobacter pylori eradication rate, and lowered the recurrence and adverse reaction rates. The results of this study can be used as a guide for clinical treatment of peptic ulcers.
-
6.
Meta-analysis of association between Helicobacter pylori infection and multiple sclerosis.
Yao, G, Wang, P, Luo, XD, Yu, TM, Harris, RA, Zhang, XM
Neuroscience letters. 2016;:1-7
Abstract
Despite recent research focus on the association between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and multiple sclerosis (MS) there is no consensus about the findings. To obtain a more comprehensive estimate of the association we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of H. pylori infection in MS patients and healthy controls. Pubmed and EMBASE were searched to identify eligible studies. Nine studies were selected for inclusion, involving 2806 cases (1553 patients with MS and 1253 controls). Overall, the prevalence of H. pylori infection in MS patients was lower than that in control groups (24.66% vs. 31.84%, OR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.83, P<0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the levels of H.pylori infection among MS patients were lower than for control subjects in Western countries (11.90% vs. 16.08%, OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91, P=0.01), but were not statistically significant in Eastern countries (39.39% vs. 43.82%, OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.55-1.14, P=0.20). Our data show that H. pylori infection and MS is negatively correlated, especially in Western countries. Whether H. pylori infection is a protective factor against MS risk should thus be addressed in large-scale and prospective studies.
-
7.
Prospective study of Helicobacter pylori antigens and gastric noncardia cancer risk in the nutrition intervention trial cohort.
Murphy, G, Freedman, ND, Michel, A, Fan, JH, Taylor, PR, Pawlita, M, Qiao, YL, Zhang, H, Yu, K, Abnet, CC, et al
International journal of cancer. 2015;(8):1938-46
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the strongest known risk factor for gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma (GNCA). We used multiplex serology to determine whether seropositivity to 15 H. pylori proteins is associated with the subsequent development of noncardia gastric cancer in Linxian, China. We included 448 GNCA cases and 1242 controls from two time points within the Linxian General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial, Linxian. H. pylori multiplex seropositivity was defined as positivity to ≥4 of the 15 included antigens. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted for major GNCA risk factors. In addition, we undertook a meta-analysis combining H. pylori multiplex serology data from both time points. H. pylori multiplex seropositivity was associated with a significant increase in risk of GNCA at one time point (1985; OR: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.91, 6.19) and this association remained significant following adjustment for H. pylori or CagA ELISA seropositivity (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.56, 5.47). Combining data from both time points in a meta-analysis H. pylori multiplex seropositivity was associated with an increased risk of GNCA, as were six individual antigens: GroEL, HP0305, CagA, VacA, HcpC and Omp. CagM was inversely associated with risk of GNCA. We identified six individual antigens that confer an increase in risk of GNCA within this population of high H. pylori seroprevalence, as well as a single antigen that may be inversely associated with GNCA risk. We further determined that the H. pylori multiplex assay provides additional information to the conventional ELISA methods on risk of GNCA.
-
8.
Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with glycemic control in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Horikawa, C, Kodama, S, Fujihara, K, Yachi, Y, Tanaka, S, Suzuki, A, Hanyu, O, Shimano, H, Sone, H
Journal of diabetes research. 2014;:250620
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. To assess the association between Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection and glycemic control in patients with diabetes through a meta-analytic approach. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS. Electronic literature searches were conducted for cross-sectional studies that examined the hemoglobin A1c (A1C) level by whether patients with diabetes were or were not carriers of HP. Mean differences in A1C between groups with and without HP infection were pooled with a random-effects model. RESULTS. Thirteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the HP carriers did not have significantly higher A1C levels compared with HP noncarriers (mean difference (95% CI), 0.19% (-0.18 to 0.46), P = 0.16). When the analysis was limited to studies targeting patients with type 1 diabetes, there was also no significant difference in A1C (0.69% (-0.31 to 1.68), P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS. There was insufficient evidence that HP infection worsened glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
-
9.
High risk of failing eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Horikawa, C, Kodama, S, Fujihara, K, Hirasawa, R, Yachi, Y, Suzuki, A, Hanyu, O, Shimano, H, Sone, H
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2014;(1):81-7
Abstract
AIMS: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (HP) is an effective approach to improve intestinal symptoms and prevent gastric cancer. However, there has been concern that the presence of diabetes reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effect of diabetes on the risk of failing eradication in patients with diabetes. METHODS An electronic literature search was conducted using Biosis, MEDLINE, Embase, PASCAL, and SciSearch through November 30, 2012. Selected studies had to provide data on the number of individuals who received treatment for HP infection and on the failure of HP eradication in groups with and without diabetes. Two authors independently extracted relevant data. RESULTS Data were obtained from 8 eligible studies (693 total participants including 273 participants with diabetes). Overall, the pooled risk ratio (RR) of failing HP eradication for diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic participants was 2.19 [95%CI, 1.65-2.90] (P<0.001). Excluding the 2 studies that used a non-standard protocol for HP eradication, individuals with diabetes had a higher risk of failure of eradication compared to those without diabetes (RR=2.31 [95%CI, 1.72-3.11]). CONCLUSIONS Current meta-analysis confirmed the higher risk of HP eradication failure in individuals with diabetes compared with those without diabetes, suggesting the necessity of prolonging treatment or developing a new regimen for HP eradication in patients with diabetes.
-
10.
Meta-analysis: the effects of Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation on Helicobacter pylori eradication rates and side effects during treatment.
Szajewska, H, Horvath, A, Piwowarczyk, A
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2010;(9):1069-79
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Problems with currently recommended Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies include unsatisfactory eradication rates and/or therapy-associated side effects. AIM: To investigate the effects of Saccharomyces boulardii as supplementation to standard triple therapy on H. pylori eradication rates and therapy-associated side effects. METHODS The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in July 2010, with no language restrictions, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs); additional references were obtained from reviewed articles. RESULTS Five RCTs involving a total of 1307 participants (among them only 90 children) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo or no intervention, S. boulardii given along with triple therapy significantly increased the eradication rate [four RCTs, n = 915, relative risk (RR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.21] and reduced the risk of overall H. pylori therapy-related adverse effects (five RCTs, n = 1305, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.7), particularly of diarrhoea (four RCTs, n = 1215, RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69). There were no significant differences between groups in the risk of other adverse effects. CONCLUSION In patients with H. pylori infection, there is evidence to recommend the use of S. boulardii along with standard triple therapy as an option for increasing the eradication rates and decreasing overall therapy-related side effects, particularly diarrhoea.